‘Christ’ ad is Huckabee’s cross to bear

Mike Huckabee’s new TV ad features the Republican presidential hopeful telling voters that “what really matters” during the holiday season “is the celebration of the birth of Christ,” apparently a first for a presidential candidate in a TV commercial. The same ad features Huckabee speaking in front of what appears to be a floating cross over his right shoulder.

Yesterday, the ad drew criticism from none other than Catholic League president Bill Donahue, best known as a right-wing culture warrior, professional whiner, an ardent proponent of infusing more of American culture and politics with Christianity. (via Shakesville)

Donahue … an ardent defender of Christmas in what he believes is a secular “war” against the holiday, told hosts of the Fox and Friends morning program that the ad had gone too far.

“The whole idea is to give the appearance of a cross,” he said, “and this is just injecting religion into politics even too far for guys like me.” Asked if the ad was “too much,” Donahue said it was.

“Because there’s a pattern here,” he added. “Every other word out of [Huckabee’s] mouth is that ‘I’m Christian.’ He’s calling into question Romney’s Mormonism…let people talk about there faith, but don’t sell it on your sleeve.”

Added Donahue, “Yeah, I believe in freedom of speech and freedom of religion, but don’t become a salesman. Don’t hawk it like that on the street.”

Donahue concluded, “Sell yourself on your issues, not on what your religion is.”

There’s no word on whether Donohue suffered some kind of head trauma that made him sensible, or whether he’d been replaced with a body double who looks like Bill Donohue, but is actually some intelligent person in disguise.

Of course, Huckabee, who surely expected his ad to generate some discussion, was quick to defend himself.

In Texas for a fundraiser yesterday, he said the ad was a harmless holiday greeting even though it excludes other religions.

“If we are so politically correct in this country that a person can’t say ‘enough of the nonsense with the political-attack ads, could we pause for a few days and say Merry Christmas to each other’ then we’re really, really in trouble as a country,” Huckabee said. […]

Huckabee said the bookshelf is just a bookshelf and shrugged off the controversy: “I will confess this: If you play the spot backwards it says, ‘Paul is dead. Paul is dead.'”

Yes, we’re apparently watching a debate between a right-wing evangelical Christian and right-wing Roman Catholic activist over a political Christmas commercial. Strange days.

For what it’s worth, why did Donohue criticize Huckabee? Given that his remarks seems to contradict everything he believes in, I suspect it’s because Donohue supports a rival Republican candidate, and was prepared to take on Huckabee on anything. I can’t think of any other realistic explanation.

And speaking of Huckabee flaps, I’d just add that a Huckabee campaign spokesperson responded yesterday to questions about the former governor equating homosexuality with necrophilia in his 1998 book, which told readers, “It is now difficult to keep track of the vast array of publicly endorsed and institutionally supported aberrations — from homosexuality and pedophilia to sadomasochism and necrophilia.”

Joe Carter, Huckabee’s director of research, said we’ve got it all wrong.

“He’s not equating homosexuality with necrophilia,” Carter told us. “He’s saying there’s a range of aberrant behavior. He considers homosexuality aberrant, but that’s at one end of the spectrum. Necrophilia is at the other end.”

Carter added: “No way is he saying that homosexuality is like having sex with dead people. That’s not it at all.”

Allow me to translate for the reality-based community: “Mike Huckabee is disgusted with those who are different from him, but there are degrees of disgust. On the revulsion hierarchy, Huckabee puts homosexuality and necrophilia on the same list, but he hates one more than the other.”

The mind reels.

Not sure why the floating cross is getting so much attention as some sort of hidden imagery. His little speech pretty much makes the cross superfluous.

If he was making some sort of generic non-religious greeting, wishing people a Merry Christmas and he didn’t mention “The celebration of the birth of Christ” then I think the cross would be news. He sort of tips his hand in the commercial with that line about the baby Jesus.

The cross is just a little bonus for all those who would already be receptive to such a message.

  • huckabee quipped “if you play the ad backwards, it says ‘paul is dead, paul is dead’, but com’on huck — if you’re asking us to believe that pan shot of the bookshelf cross was by accident (and were the three ornaments in the corner symbols of the holy trinity?) then i’ve got a few shrouds of turin in my trunk i’d like to sell ya.

  • I don’t quite understand the significance of the homosexuality/necrophilia issue. Huckabee’s spokesman is right; he clearly isn’t “equating” anything with anything else; he’s simply giving a list of (in his mind) deviant behavior that is encouraged by secular society. There’s no indication whatsoever that any item on the list “equals” any other item. As for the fact that the statement reveals that Huckabee considers homosexuality to be deviant behavior… well, yeah. He hasn’t made much of a secret of that. We may disagree with him, of course, but it’s not exactly scandalous for him to have stated a position 10 years ago about which he’s been pretty open since then.

    It reminds me of that episode of South Park where Richard Dawkins mentions that he’s an atheist, and the teacher immediately shouts, “Ah ha! I’ve found you out!” Anyone who wants to know where Huckabee stands on homosexuality doesn’t need to go digging through statements he made in 1998 to find that information.

  • “I suspect it’s because Donohue supports a rival Republican candidate, and was prepared to take on Huckabee on anything. I can’t think of any other realistic explanation.”

    That statement has as much credibilty as me saying that you support Obama based on all your posts that gush about him.

  • I still say that this was Huckabee’s attempt to keep his face in front of these early voters in what he believes is the least offiensive way possible, at a time when all the other candidates are pulling back on their political advertising and phone-calling for the Christmas holiday; I have a feeling he equates this with receiving a Christmas card – and who would be offended by that?

    Unfortunately for Huckabee, people’s heads are already aching from being hit in the head multiple times a day with his “I’M A CHRISTIAN” 2×4, and they – and we – don’t need another whack in the head from his reminding us – AGAIN – that HE’S A CHRISTIAN.

  • “I suspect it’s because Donohue supports a rival Republican candidate, and was prepared to take on Huckabee on anything. I can’t think of any other realistic explanation.”

    Possibly, and likely. But I have no doubt that Donahue’s comments also reflect his views that his church is The One True Church and that Huck’s church is either paganist or, more likely, blasphemous, and that use of the Catholic Cross and mention of the Christ by a non-Roman Catholic to push the non-Roman Catholic’s political AND blasphemous religious views is just too much of an affront to Donahue’s True Church for him to bear.

  • The Bill Donahue?

    Mr “Hollywood likes anal sex”? Mr “gays haven’t apologised to straights for AIDS”?

    Good thing he doesn’t want to see people inject religion into politics though, cause that’d just be nuts.

  • So at one end of the spectrum theory, we have pedophilia and homosexuality together, and at the other end we have sadomasochism tied (if you’ll pardon the term) with necrophilia?

    Homosexuality is as “aberrant” as pedophilia?

    Sadomasochism between consenting adults is worse than pedophilia?

    Is it just me, or is Huckabee hustling for the pedophilia vote?

  • I agree with bubba. Anyone that has been raised catholic knows where he is coming from. He owns the baby jesus, and hates that some blasphemer is using this imagery for his advantage.

  • Donahue concluded, “Sell yourself on your issues, not on what your religion is.”

    This is pure hypocrisy.

    If you are a good Catholic then you can’t vote for someone like John Kerry because he is pro-choice.

    I want to find someone who USED to support Huckabee say that the ad went to far.

    It is easy for people like us, who are against virtually everything the modern Republican Party stands for, to oppose Huckabee’s ad.

    It is easy for supporters of the other Republicans to criticize the ad because they oppose Huckabee.

    I am looking for anyone, a single person, who supported Huckabee before the ad but thinks the ad went too far.

    I doubt such a person actually exists.

  • Re 4: Don’t be deliberately dense, JRS Jr.

    CB made it clear enough in the post that it’s out of character for Donahue to criticize Huckabee for something like this. It’s natural, then, to wonder what gives.

    And from where I’m sitting, CB has refrained from playing favorites in the Democratic race. So it makes no sense to say that he supports Obama.

  • “He owns the baby jesus, and hates that some blasphemer is using this imagery for his advantage.”

    Exactly. And it would really be a huge blow to The One True Church and its far-right-crazy-wing followers if some other competing and blaspheming religion obtained the greatest and biggest and baddest bully pulpit of them all in the world, the US Presidency, for use by someone who would have absolutely no problem pushing and blasting and singing the doctrine and beliefs of that allegedly blasphemous and competing religion from that big pulpit–the White House.

  • The trouble with injecting religion into politics is that it turns a Jeffersonian contest (“option 1” vs “option 2”) into a contest between “good” vs “evil”, like the Inquisition with its auto da fe. Under Jefferson’s system a compromise is possible, and when “option 1” loses there’s always another day. Under the Inquisition it’s the “good” way or the highway to Hell, forever and ever, Amen.

    From 1782 until 1956 our official national motto was “E Pluribus Unum” (out of many, one; unity in diversity). That’s definitely Jeffersonian. Eisenhower changed it to “In God We Trust” to distinguish us from “godless, atheistic communism” of the Soviet Union, a statement which has lost its meaning when the “Red Menace” disapeared into the dustbin of history.

    Under Reagan-Gingrich-Limbaugh-Rove, that meaningless motto “In God we trust” has been used as a modern auto da fe for redefining Americanism. Those who either don’t believe or who, like our Founding Fathers, hold that if God does exist He doesn’t take sides in football games or even contests among nations, are not so much “wrong” as they are “Evil”. They are (prepare to hiss) “secular humanists”. They are not to be argued with but only hated and ridiculed (think Hillary or Kerry).

    Donohue, crank though he is, understands politics played the old way. You get in the fight, scrap, bend the rules, even gouge some eyes. But you can share a bourbon with the loser, you respect the rules of the game. Perhaps moreso because you have a memory of publicly stated religious intolerance (“Help Wanted / No Irish Need Apply”, “Rooms for Rent / No Democrats”) and you’ve learned how to overcome it within the rules (JFK).

    Huckabee and his ilk, by contrast, have the smugness of the Taliban, the Inquisition, the intolerant mob in the Darrow-Bryan “monkey trial” courtroom, the KKK. Many of his devout followers don’t realize how un-American they seem from a Jeffersonian point of view. But that’s just the point: self-satisfied bigots often don’t realize how peculiar they are within a Jeffersonian framework.

    I think, for starters, that it’s high time we change back to our original national motto. Under “E Pluribus Unum” Huckabee and Donohue would be seen as people who at lest care enough to get into the political arena, perhaps quaint to some of us, but still American and certainly not Evil. I’m reminded of an aphorism of Nietzsche’s: “When you battle monsters, be sure that you don’t become a monster yourself”. That’s the trouble, once “Good” vs “Evil” replaces “Good” vs “Better” — everyone who want to enter the fray becomes a monster (think Northern Ireland, Crips and Bloods).

  • sarabeth@11
    I’ve heard CB gush about Kucinich, Dodd and Biden too.

    Gravel he’s given vague hatchet jobs on occassion.
    Richardson has gotten dressed down for his balanced budget amendment talk.

    Is JRS disappointed that CB doesn’t openly praise someone in particular? Maybe that candidate needs to actually SAY SOMETHING SUBSTANTIVE so one can lodge an opinion. Pro or con. Biden, Dodd, Kucinish, and Obama have reaped the benefit, Gravel and Richardson has gotten torpedoed. The last two don’t get much play either way because they play middle-of-the-road most of the time or rely on chicken poop safe topics like telecom immunity and drunk drivers.

  • ***Huckabee said the bookshelf is just a bookshelf and shrugged off the controversy: “I will confess this: If you play the spot backwards it says, ‘Paul is dead. Paul is dead.’”***

    I read this, and couldn’t help myself—I mass-emailed a whole bunch of Paul supporters, and told them that their “candidate” is dead—because Mike Huckabee says so!

  • Is Donahue a Guiliani man by any chance? Guiliani’s Catholic, isn’t he? Not a very good one (they still don’t approve of divorce, though they’ll give you one if you ask nicely).

    Or perhaps this is just an issue of him not wanting a religious president to hone in on his territory? After all, Clinton was clearly better for these guys than Bush has been, in terms of generating enough outrage to shake money out of people. So perhaps he realizes that having an openly religious president would be bad for business (as opposed to Bush, who still used code to speak religiously). But I’m not sure if Donahue is wily enough for that kind of thinking, and just prefers a sinning Catholic over a evangelical preacher as president.

    Besides, America isn’t nearly as religious as people like to imagine, and I doubt that four years of a preacher president would sit well with most people. Even of the Christians who go to church regularly, a majority only like to be there one hour a week. I doubt they’d like to hear regular addresses from a preacher who isn’t even of their faith. That’s why I think this ad might work out to be a big backfire. There’s a certain segment that it will speak to, but they’d have already liked him. But most people don’t like the “in your face” Christ references. They like to think of themselves as religious, but they still don’t like to think about God all the time.

  • Shorter “Butt Sex Bill” Donohue: No explicitly faith-based candidate unless he’s on my team, and/or pledges to flay Jews alive

  • Donahue = Roman Catholic + Attention Whore.
    Huckabee = Evangelical Protestant + Con Man.

    We know Donna is going to leap up and cry Outrage! at every possible opportunity and a chance to score points off an EP is a bonus. Remember, Donna is the chap who saw a PLOT in Hilary’s inability to attend a St. Patrick’s Day parade.

  • Relgion shmeligion. This race is about dieting. LDS has strick dietary rules. Huckabee went on a strict diet. This election is a food fight.

  • I watched the Huckster’s ad on MSNBC. I’m not a good judge of charm–I like intelligence in politicians–but the Huckster didn’t seem charming to me. To me an obvious ad that pretends not to be an ad is just dishonest in a very clumsy way.

    BUT what really interested me is that the two MSNBC talking heads sneered at the Huckster. They called him on the dishonesty and one said that he wasn’t running for pastor of a church, that as President he had to represent all Americans of all religions or nonreligon.

    I’m pretty sure that the ad will go reasonably well with its very narrow target audiance, but I’m not sure it will do anything but backfire aoutside that audiance. Too swarmy.

  • Pingback: Balloon Juice
  • i do appreciate, however, Huck’s “Paul is dead” joke. i’m not sure any other candidate on either side would have come up with that appeal to pop culture loving boomers.

  • Huckabee should do an ad with himself carrying a limping Christ on his shoulder away from a tomb with the rock pushed away from it.

    A voice over can do the script from this ad, or some other Christiany stuff.

    At the end of an alternate version of the ad, we see Christ floating up and away towards the sun, and Mike Huckabee waving goodbye to him.

    *just kidding*

  • Agree with those who think Donohue’s just miffed that a non-Catholic has the nerve to claim Christianity. If Alan Keyes had run this ad, Donohue would be creaming himself in ecstasy.

  • For what it’s worth, why did Donohue criticize Huckabee? Given that his remarks seems to contradict everything he believes in, I suspect it’s because Donohue supports a rival Republican candidate, and was prepared to take on Huckabee on anything.

    Yeah, I agree with that. The religion thing is their ace to play, so they can’t let a rival pimp it out too much, start to own it in the public’s mind by association.

  • sarabeth said:
    “So at one end of the spectrum theory, we have pedophilia and homosexuality together, and at the other end we have sadomasochism tied (if you’ll pardon the term) with necrophilia?”

    Homosexuality is as “aberrant” as pedophilia?

    Sadomasochism between consenting adults is worse than pedophilia?”

    Actually, since pedophila simply means finding children more compatible as friends then adults, there is no comparison.

    The aberrance is Child Molastation or Child Abuse.

    People throw the word pedophilia around without understanding it, because they think it’s like necrophilia, which does refer to the object of one’s sexual tendencies.

  • “…During this time of the season…” Christmas or election season? Are we expected to believe that this is not a political as under the guise of a Christmas greeting. After all his public ad last year was just a Christmas greet…wait…he didn’t do one last year. Guess he didn’t need anything from the public last year.

    “It’s just a innocent “Christian” Christmas greeting…” He would stand on Christ’s dead body to get a vote…shameless bigot. We’re supposed to believe he didn’t know what response he’d get. name recognition…even when bad…is still name recognition.

  • Lance,

    That might be a valid point except that it’s completely wrong. “Pedophilia” is defined as “The act or fantasy on the part of an adult of engaging in sexual activity with a child or children.” (Dictionary.com); “Sexual desire directed towards children.” (New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, Thumb Index Edition (1993)); “1. An adult’s sexual disorder consistent in the desire for sexual gratification by molesting children, esp. prepubescent children. 2. An adult’s act of child molestation.” (Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th ed. (2004)). Not that I’m a devout prescriptivist, but those definitions are consistent with every use of the word I’ve ever encountered until your post. Of course, you’re free to define words however you like, but it’s a bit much to criticize others for using a term in the commonly accepted way simply because such usage conflicts with your own idiosyncratic definition, don’t you think?

  • Ann: “We don’t need another whack in the head from his reminding us – AGAIN – that HE’S A CHRISTIAN.”

    Hate to break it to you, Ann, but you are not the target audience the Huckabee campaign had in mind when it aired the Merry Christmas ad. They couldn’t care less whether you liked it.

    In fact, they were no doubt counting on its being criticized by the “don’t mention that he’s a Christian” crowd, and the benefit and support they’d win as a result from the audience the ad was targeting.

    And the folks to whom it was targeted will think it’s

  • Lance, @27,

    “Paedophile” did, in original Greek, mean “boy-lover” (a lover of boys) and, ostensibly, was about befriending and mentoring those youngsters. But, even then, the “love” was both spiritual and physical. OTOH, the boys weren’t little, prepubescent kids, either; it’s just that love between adult and almost adult men was acceptable (and even considered of a higher order than love between men and women) then and there.

    The term — like so may other words — has changed its meaning since. As James Dillon (@29) says, it now covers both sexes and applies to a much younger group. I think even the old Greeks would have found the modern version of pedophilia repugnant.

  • Just remember Huckabee was a televangelist. His charisma and well-practiced ability to turn a phrase – such as the Paul comment – almost ensure him a loyal following (as long as he doesn’t get caught having sex with a man – that’s the only sure takedown). Donahue instinctively understands the potential depth of his power, along with the fact that Huckabee doesn’t ultimately respect Catholicism much more than he does Mormonism. It really gets me that when these people refer to Christians, they don’t mean those who believe in Christ; they mean, rather, those who believe in the same way that they do. Scary stuff.

  • “…institutionally supported aberrations — from homosexuality and pedophilia to sadomasochism and necrophilia…”

    Well you’ve got a number of groups that support homosexuality, and NAMBLA that supports pedophilia (though I’ve heard that 90% of their membership is undercover law-enforcement agents) and the Republican Party that supports sadomasochism; but name me one institution that supports necrophilia. (Really, I want to know.)

  • He criticized Huckabee for the same reasons that Krauthammer, Noonan, et al., did. Despite the fact that Huckabee is the embodiment of what the Republicans have touted as a perfect candidate in the past (while NOT actually believing that), there is an obvious culture/class issue developing here. I must admit I am enjoying the entire scenario.

  • Comments are closed.