A Christmas story and the gift it gives us

Guest Post by Morbo

It’s Christmas, so there may not be a lot of people visiting blogs today. But if you’ve happened to stop by, the Carpetbagger and I appreciate that. If you celebrate Christmas, we hope you have a merry one. If not, then just have a great day.

Isn’t it nice to have the choice? Some of the earliest European settlers in America, the Puritans, banned celebrating Christmas. Ironically, people who today are very much like the Puritans in many respects, the Religious Right, seek government sponsorship of the holiday.

As we wind up another holiday season replete with claims of a “war on Christmas,” let’s not forget what’s really going on here: Some people believe their religion is better than everyone else’s and certainly better than non-belief. It is their right to believe this, but merely believing it is never enough for these types. Increasingly, they are insisting that public schools, city halls, state governments, courts and other public institutions meant to serve us all adopt and promote symbols and phrases that reflect an understanding of what this holiday means that is held only by some.

And let’s be clear, they look down upon not just those who don’t celebrate Christmas but those who celebrate it in ways that they deem not authentic or serious. Some of us were raised in churches and grew up with Christmas. Although we may be less religious now, we still like aspects of the holiday and see no reason to discard it. Others celebrate it essentially as a secular holiday. Some honor the Pagan features that are still so pronounced in it.

No matter what holiday, if any, we celebrate at this time of year, many can look at the features of the Christmas story and take things of value from it. I have trouble wrapping my head about the idea of an all-powerful God sending his own son (who was an aspect of his own self) as a sacrifice to redeem humankind. But if we strip the story of its more fantastic elements we find at its core a more appealing tale: A tale of a Creator who, much like a watchful parent, loves his progeny so much he will lay down his own life for them.

The Carpetbagger noted on Saturday that the Archbishop of Canterbury pointed out that the story of the Three Wisemen is just a legend. Of course it is. In my view, the entire nativity story is a legend. There’s no historical proof for any of it. So what? It’s still charming, and I told it my children just as I read them the stories of Greek gods.

These tales are interesting, often teach moral lessons and form the canon of Western culture. They do not have to be true to enjoyed, and I feel sorry for the fundamentalists who insist that one must swallow the story of Jesus’ birth literally or it is useless. This is a false choice, one I reject when they thrust it at me. (As a practical matter, this is impossible to do anyway. The Gospels don’t agree on key facts. What we know as the “Christmas story” is a mishmash of elements taken from all four blended together to make an appealing narrative.)

This week, many newspapers reported on an astrophysicist who says he’s discovered what the star in the East really was: an alignment of the planets.

I had to laugh at the man’s silliness. In my view, there was no star. It’s just a story. Claims like this were made all of the time about prominent people in the ancient world. Their births were heralded by comets and other unusual celestial events. It’s an archetype. Rather than try to twist science and history to fit events that probably never happened, why not simply acknowledge that it’s all a story — but that the story has value, power and meaning after many centuries? We can say to ourselves, “That’s amazing. What does it say about us? Does the story have any meaning for me?” We don’t disrespect the story by examining its hold on us and asking why it touches so many people so deeply. There is great value in that very act itself. After all, if a Creator did make us, he gave us intelligence for a reason.

December holidays tend to share certain features in common: ideas of birth or rebirth, hope and light — a light that may seem to leave us for a time but that always returns. Ancient people cowered in fear of natural forces they did not understand. They conjured up rituals to comfort themselves and provide what seemed like answers to their confusion. Today we understand many of these forces, and, being social creatures, still find use for ritual.

We can make inquiries like this and appreciate the value of stories because we live in a country where we are free to ask questions about religion, challenge assumptions and strongly disagree with one another. We are free to acknowledge, worship or interpret God as we see fit. It was not always so. It is today because of some very wise people. The gift they gave us, religious freedom, is one of the best you’ll ever get. Enjoy it, even if you’re not celebrating a holiday today.

happy saturnalia to all.

and for the “real” story of the three wise men, watch monty python’s life of brian sometime today. i do it every christmas and easter.

  • Thank you once again for one of your typically thoughtful posts. With all the tedious “reason for the season” pontificating nearly behind us I find it useful and very “American”, if that’s the proper word, to choose this day to reflect on the old phrase, “the more things change, the more they stay the same.”

    If one thing seems clear to me, it’s the fact that throughout human history there has always been one group that is attempting to undermine, disenfranchise, destroy, or in some way, eliminate another group. Whatever method is chosen is largely secondary to the purpose. At its best religion is the search for a higher truth, an all-emcompassing reality that can unite all the conflicting ideas inherent in human psychology. It’s tempting to say that religion is the most sublime of human conceits since it is debatable that we humans with our totally subjective reality could actually recognize something that would be the very embodiment of an objective reality. At its worst, in the hands of the worst among us, religion is nothing more than a tool, a very effective tool, to be used in the service of the elimination of any truth other than that of the “believer”. I’m afraid all I hear is religion being co-opted for this purpose and its real intent, if it can be called that, is forgotten or ignored. Is it fair to say that it wasn’t a group of atheists that flew passenger aircraft into the World Trade Center, Pentagon, and a corn field in Pennsylvania? Is it fair to say that it wasn’t an atheist that nailed a list of complaints to the door of a church unleashing untold generations of conflict between people based on nothing more than different interpretations of a particular mythology? It may be unfair but it’s sure as hell the truth.

    …because we live in a country where we are free to ask questions about religion, challenge assumptions and strongly disagree with one another. We are free to acknowledge, worship or interpret God as we see fit.

    For the sake of democracy and America, CB, I hope this is the truth. According to some people in this country this is nothing short of apostasy.

    Thanks for being there and for all that you do to protect our right of freedom of conscience. Happy Holidays.

  • I can only think the astrophysicist being quoted is being misquoted. The suggestion that the “star in the east” was an alignment of planets in 6 BC goes back over forty years that I know of. For decades planetariums put on an annual “SOB” (Star of Bethlehem) program explaining it. If this astrophysicist is really claiming it as a new discovery of his based on new research, he deserves a large lump of coal in his stocking. More likely we are dealing with the usual media incompetence.

    In any event, a Happy Holidays to all!!!

  • We here at Pottersville agree that Christmas has become too commercialized and that we tend to forget in the hyped-up hoopla of getting and spending the fundamental, original meaning of Christmas.

    In this spirit, my lib’ral cronies and I have decided to celebrate Xmas at Pottersville in a more dignified and less profane manner by presenting the liberal’s version of Jesus Christ Superstar, or Dubya Bush Superstar.

  • in many respects, the Religious Right, seek government sponsorship of the holiday.

    How? What possible proof can you have for such a statement?

    There is no greater foe of the religious right in the GOP than me but it doesn’t help when opponents throw charges around with no basis in fact. How do the evangelicals seek to have the government “sponsor” Christmas?

    Any answer you come up with will be necessarily a huge stretch. Exaggerating – especially when it comes to something this important – only makes you look like a partisan hack.

    There’s plenty to criticize without just making stuff up.

  • A wonderful Tuesday to you all. I wish universal health and happiness to everyone, including Repug trolls.

  • “The Fool in His Heart says that there is no God”

    -Poverbs

    The only reason he would say that of course is that he is a fool.

  • Rick Moran – On a local level there are politicians who seek to use government resources (city hall) to ‘sponsor the holiday’ by displaying government sponsored nativity scenes, crosses, etc. in a way that tries to demonstrate official government support. The folks who sponsor this are almost universally from the religious right.

    The same folks indirectly sponsor the holiday by directly sponsoring christian religious beliefs with ‘faith based’ programs. And then there is Huckabee…

    Evangelicals are the ‘usual suspect’ because they seem to feel that it is religious duty and divine right to convert the rest of us to their belief system. I imagine that’s what he’s getting at.

  • I thinks its clear that the myth that the pilgrims came to America to escape religious persecution is, at best, only partly right.
    More likely they were trying to ram their thoughts and beliefs down everyone else’s throats. That created the backlash that sent them packing to the new world.
    Now if only the ring wing fundies would go away….

  • Let’s step this argument back a couple of notches before jesus.

    My definition of vanity (one of the seven deadly sins):

    Create an entire planet; populate it with a species that must pay homage to your greatness. Test them, make them weak, and bring your wrath down when they succumb to your pre-programmed weakness. Never ever give them any legitimate proof your existence. And even though you have supreme power over every waking second, never give them peace or help their suffering because one of the first created ate an apple.

    Next, send your son down to suffer and ultimately die for their sins even though they didn’t ask for it. Never mind that the species suffers a thousand times more every day, but since they don’t drop to their knees and pray to your greatness, send their souls to an eternity of fire and pain. Do all this while accepting the worse of the worse into an eternity of bliss so long as they accept your son as their savior.

    PLEAZE…

  • ***Morbo*** Please, after this you owe it to yourself to watch the first segment of the movie/documentary “Zeitgeist”. It perfectly explains the Christmas story and the rest of it. Without knowing this, you are fumbling in the dark.

    It’s a happy season remembered throughout the year.

  • Morbo,
    Thanks for your warm and well-written commentary. I appreciate the thoughtfulness and inclusiveness of the perspectives you share.

  • Merry Christmas Carpetbagger Report!

    I come here often, comment here often and I really enjoy this site.

    While many people will accept a belief in God, it’s hard being a believer in Jesus these days. You have people on the extreme “right” who would leave no room for an intelligent discussion of faith and those one the extreme “left” who would, quite literally, throw the baby out with the bathwater.

    I was raised in the Christian faith and although I rejected it for a while, eventually I came back to it, mainly and ironically, after reading the first few books in the Harry Potter series. I’ve read a lot of the bible for myself; maybe not as much as I should have and not as often as I should have, but I read a lot and the internet makes a wonderful tool for exploring faith further. Commentaries, alternative points of view, and tons of references to books and other commentaries that make going to the library fun again.

    And even for one such as myself, I find the government trying to make Christianity a state religion a frightening concept. Christianity, like anything taken too far and too literally, can be as bloody and warlike as Fox News wrongly portrays Islam to be.

    When I saw Carpetbagger’s report on Mike Huckabee, it reminded me of a local blog (Cincinnati area) that has done reports on Gothardism in the past and Huckabee is embracing Gothardism. At it’s root, it’s a twining of government and religion at every level and and instance on blind obedience to religion first.

    I think you will be interested in the links I include below from local blog turned print edition called the Cincinnati Beacon, noting Huckabee’s ties to this movement, which locally is known to include Ken Blackwell which means a direct tie to the Bush Administration.

    I have little believe that they are truly faithful, but I think they will do anything and everything to manipulate religion to their own ends.

    Article on Bill Gothard
    Cincinnati Police: Enacting the Will of God?
    EXPOSED! Mike Huckabee with Bill Gothard Last Week in Houston
    About Kids Helping Kids, Abuse and Gothardism”

  • Merry Christmas. And Happy Santa Claus.

    Actually, the Christmas season is a perfect example of the separation of church and state, except in recent years the religious right has been waging a war against Santa Claus.

    Each year before December 25th, parents of whatever religion or no religion at all can put a tree indoors, decorate it and place presents for their children under it…with Santa Claus (spoiler alert: children under the age of 10 must stop reading now) being touted as the one behind the presents appearing under the tree. Children (of whatever religion or no religion) are happy. Parents (of whatever religion or no religion) are happy. Merchants (of whatever religion or no religion) are happy.

    And why is this even possible? Because Santa Clause is Secular.

    In all my years, I’ve never heard anyone claim that Santa Claus is Christian, or Jewish, or Muslim, or Hindu, or atheist, or a follower of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. In all the stories of Santa’s North Pole workshop, no one has ever tried to put a chapel there of any sort, of whatever religion. Santa’s elves, too, are never portrayed as being of any religion, or no religion at all.

    Santa Claus is Secular. Santa’s workshop is neutral.

    Thus, parents of whatever religious ilk, or no religious ilk at all, can embrace the gift giving on December 25th, without stepping on anyone elses religious toes (or atheist toes) (or the Flying Spaghetti Monster’s noodly appendages), while using the Jolly Secular Fat Man from the North Pole as their toy-giving mythical front man. All in good fun. All to spread holiday cheer. Something for everyone.

    But some spoil-sports in the religious right have decided that Christmas belongs only to them. That the expression “Happy Holidays” (which is more secular, more religious-neutral) is an abomination, and everyone better start saying “Merry Christmas,” or else.

    Thus, the more secular, neutral Santa Claus is under attack, just as the religious right is constantly attacking our more secular, neutral democratic institutions, in direct defiance of our Constitution, and the separation of church and state. And these religious nutjobs are claiming that anyone defending our Constitution, and the separation of church and state, are somehow attacking them, even though I’ve heard of no reports that people defending our Constitution, and the separation of church and state, are advocating the shutting down of any religious facilities and the deportation of Christian religious believers from our nation. Nope. Nada. Nothing.

    So, in actuality, it is Santa Claus, the jolly secular fellow, who is under attack. And since Santa (per reports) keeps track of who’s been naughty, and who’s been nice, the fanatical religious fundamentalists responsible for this devious assault on Santa had better watch out…especially since Santa Claus is a close friend of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.. Arrrgghhh.

  • I have trouble wrapping my head about the idea of an all-powerful God sending his own son (who was an aspect of his own self) as a sacrifice to redeem humankind.

    My own semi-heretical take on the Christ myth (not a dismissive term) is that we’re all already up on that cross, day in and day out. This is a story about God that says He freely chose to experience that condition with us, up to and including the sense of radical abandonment to an insensate and inimical universe (Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani).

    If there is a god, I guess that’s the kind I’d prefer, paradoxical as it is. Unfortunately there’s nothing to stop nutjobs like Justice Scalia from arguing that by allowing himself to be crucified Jesus was endorsing capital punishment (true–try using the Crucifixion as an argument against c.p. with a pro-c.p. fundie; this is one of the rote responses). If I was god, that one alone would probably persuade me to give up the whole mess as a lost cause. “If people don’t get it when I’m being that obvious….”

  • Comments are closed.