Today’s edition of quick hits.
* AP: “President Bush, still voicing concern about special project spending by Congress, signed a $555 billion bill Wednesday that funds the Iraq war well into 2008 and keeps government agencies running through next September. Bush’s signed the massive spending bill as he flew on Air Force One to his Texas ranch here to see in the new year…. ‘I am disappointed in the way the Congress compiled this legislation, including abandoning the goal I set early this year to reduce the number and cost of earmarks by half,’ the president said in a statement.” He signed it anyway.
* Juan Cole: “Top Ten Myths about Iraq 2007.” Well worth reading.
* On a related note, Matt Yglesias notes that the surge is going to end in a few months, so it’s worth considering what will happen next, especially given that the policy has failed to produce its desired political results: “Well, things will just get worse again. [Bush and Petraeus] said that the temporary increase in troops would lead to a temporary increase in security which would lead to political reconciliation which, in turn, would lead to sustainable security gains. But it hasn’t happened. So when we start desurging, we’re just going to find that nothing’s changed and nothing’s been accomplished.”
* Glenn Greenwald: “One of the few things I dislike more than end-of-the-year ‘looking back’ articles is the incessant chatter and worthless speculation over the upcoming primaries.” As a remedy, Glenn offers an actual look back with his favorite quotes of 2007. There are some real doozies in there, most of which are a reminder of why the political media establishment is a near-constant source of bitter disappointment.
* Paul Krugman: “I very much hope that the next president will open the records and let the full story of the Bush era’s outrages be told. But Bush will soon be gone. What progressives should be focused on now is taking on the political movement that brought Bush to power. In short, what we need right now isn’t Bush bashing — what we need is partisanship.”
* I foolishly thought Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens’ (R) corruption scandal couldn’t get much worse. I stand corrected: “The Seattle Times reports on its interview with David Anderson, a foreman for the corrupt oilfield services company, Veco, who supervised the renovation of Stevens’ Girdwood, Ak., home. Anderson is the nephew of former Veco chairman Bill Allen, who has pleaded guilty to bribery in the wide-ranging federal criminal investigation into political corruption in Alaska. According to Anderson, Veco provided $150,000 worth of labor renovating the Stevens home, which the FBI raided earlier this year as part of its investigation into Stevens and his connection with the Veco. That’s compared to the “more than $130,000″ Stevens claimed last summer to have paid for the renovation. So if labor alone was $150,000, what does that make the total price tag on the project?”
* We’re all very lucky that Sen. Jim Webb (D) lives in northern Virginia: “In case you missed it — and we hope you did — the Senate gaveled open at 9:30 a.m. on Friday, and closed up shop 26 seconds later. On Sunday, the Senate slept in a bit, opening up shop for under a minute at 11 a.m. And today, the day after Christmas, the Senate gaveled open and gaveled closed another one of these meaningless ‘pro-forma’ sessions in less time than it took you to take out your trash bags full of wrapping paper.”
* Oh my: “A September 2007 State Department report, obtained by TPMmuckraker, found that contractors DynCorp and Blackwater can’t account for $28.4 million in U.S. government-issued property in Afghanistan, including armored cars, guns and radios. The report, prepared by the State Department inspector-general’s office, hits the department for its lack of ‘adequate internal control over the government property held by contractors.'”
* And finally, Charles Murray loves Jonah Goldberg’s “Liberal Fascism”: “‘It is my argument that American liberalism is a totalitarian political religion,’ Jonah Goldberg writes near the beginning of Liberal Fascism. My first reaction was that he is engaging in partisan hyperbole. That turned out to be wrong. Liberal Fascism is nothing less than a portrait of 20th-century political history as seen through a new prism. It will affect the way I think about that history — and about the trajectory of today’s politics — forever after.” Well, if Bell-Curve Murray loves it, the book has to be good, right?
Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.