John McCain’s ‘secret anti-Romney ad’

With the polls narrowing in New Hampshire, Mitt Romney’s campaign has launched a negative TV ad against John McCain, noting the senator’s votes against Bush’s tax cuts, against a repeal of the estate tax, and for an immigration-reform bill the GOP’s far-right base condemns as “amnesty.” The commercial says McCain is “an honorable man,” but asks, “Is he the right Republican for the future?”

Slate’s John Dickerson obtained a McCain ad — ironically, created by media advisors who quit McCain’s campaign to join with Romney — that Dickerson calls “the perfect counterpunch” to Romney’s latest spot.

Apparently, the McCain campaign put the ad together six months ago, but sat on it, allegedly “reluctant” to go negative.

Dickerson sees this as the kind of ad that could seriously undermine Romney’s campaign. I don’t see it that way at all.

Here’s Dickerson’s take:

The McCain team’s response is that Romney has to talk about the future because he’s spent much of the campaign running from his past. This may become more than a quip if the campaign decides to air the following television ad, which they’ve had on the shelf since the spring.

The ad hangs Romney with his own words — he advocates for a woman’s right to choose and gun control, gets tongue tied on his own hunting practices, and distances himself from Ronald Reagan).

I disagree. The two ads are accurate — Romney hits McCain for breaking party ranks on issues important to Republicans, and McCain’s “secret” ad hits Romney for having been a moderate-to-liberal Republican on culture-war issues.

But here’s the thing: everyone, including Republican voters, knows all about Romney’s previous beliefs. He’s spent the entire year assuring conservatives, or at least trying to, that he bears no resemblance to his former self. To hear his pitch, Romney is a convert to the conservative cause. (Whether one believes his transformation is sincere or not is another matter entirely.)

McCain, however, has a record that a lot of Republican activists may not remember, and unlike Romney, he hasn’t been peppered with questions about his Republican apostasy throughout 2007. Romney’s ad hits McCain on taxes and immigration, but he also championed sweeping campaign-finance reform with Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) that conservatives generally hate, joined with former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) to support a Patients’ Bill of Rights that conservatives generally hate, voted against an anti-gay constitutional amendment that conservatives generally love, and told a national television audience in 2004 that he would consider joining the Democratic ticket as John Kerry’s running mate.

Indeed, in April 2004, just as the national Republican campaign was beginning in earnest, McCain said, “I believe my party has gone astray…. I think the Democratic Party is a fine party, and I have no problems with it, in their views and their philosophy.”

Everyone knows Romney was pro-choice; does everyone know McCain said this?

I kind of doubt it. Dickerson argues that McCain has the “perfect” response to Romney’s criticism of his record. But unless McCain is prepared to do what Romney has done — disavow everything he used to believe — McCain has far more to lose from this fight.

Everyone knows Romney was pro-choice; does everyone know McCain said this?

I’m not convinced that all the GOP primary voters know that Romney was pro-choice, pro-gay, and pro-immigrant. He’s done plenty of dissembling on these issues and he’s not all that well known on the national scene. McCain however, as you point out, was a candidate in 2000 and widely discussed as a potential candidate in 2004. I’m not convinced that voters in say the Feb 5 primary states are as aware of Romney and his positions as they are of McCain and his stances.

If you are speaking only about New Hampshire, then I can see your point. However for the nation as a whole, I think McCain is a pretty well-known commodity in GOP circles.

  • Yeah but if Romney changed all his positions to become more conservative in order to win the nomination it indicates that he is a phony and what’s to stop him from changing his stances back again? Romney has been labeled a phony anyway and this ad emphasizes that point…that Romney will be anything that will get him elected. So it will hurt Romney…
    But as you say McCain has much to lose in the way of credibility and frankly CB I doubt that Romney’s campaign could have come up with as good an attack ad as the one you have put forward in this article. Thanks to you and the information presented here Romney will probably put together exactly this ad anyway whether McCain runs this ad now or not.

    You’re not working for Romney are you..Ha? Thank god I don’t have to worry about either of these two ever becoming president or the other GOP yahoos.

  • This ad-war is bound to hurt Romney more simply because it links him to a John Kerry-esque flip-flop moment. Even if you are right, and McCain’s positions are new to some viewers, they generally see him as a maverick. Most people who support McCain do so because of his character, not because of his stance on particular positions. Romney is tied to issues; therefore, when his positions are attacked, people find it hard to understand why they supported him in the first place. Romney has more “mercenary” voters – those who have decided on him after being hammered with TV ads – rather than true believers, as evidenced by the dramatic Huckabee rise.

  • Comments are closed.