The right has its foe, but not its friend

Hostility towards John McCain among most leading conservative bloggers has been linked to the Arizona senator’s recent rise — the more McCain looks like the Republican frontrunner, the more conservatives express their ire.

The past couple of days have been particularly striking in this regard. With polls showing McCain in a pretty good position right now, National Journal summarized some of the more notable examples from the conservative end of the ‘sphere.

* Right Wing News‘ John Hawkins: “[W]e’re talking about a man who could fairly be called a Rockefeller Republican, a Country Club Republican, a RINO, or just a toweringly arrogant, out of touch D.C. insider who seems to assume that any position he takes is right solely because he happens to hold it. However, what John McCain cannot fairly be called is a conservative.”

* Townhall‘s Hugh Hewitt: “A GOP vote for McCain is a vote for a shattered base and a desultory campaign in the fall. It is a vote for lecture after lecture on global warming, campaign finance reform, and the bridge to nowhere. It is a vote for an old warrior way past his prime.”

* NRO‘s Mark Levin: “There’s a reason some of John McCain’s conservative supporters avoid discussing his record. They want to talk about his personal story, his position on the surge, his supposed electability. But whenever the rest of his career comes up, the knee-jerk reply is to characterize the inquiries as attacks. The McCain domestic record is a disaster.”

* NRO‘s Mark Steyn: “McCain has an almost Edwardsian contempt for capitalism, for the people whose wit and innovation generate the revenue that pay for your average small-state senator’s retinue of staffers worthy of a Persian Gulf emir.”

* Townhall‘s Patrick Ruffini calls McCain “a tax-loving, free speech-crushing, amnesty-awarding, big government Republican nominee.”

The question, of course, is what they’re going to do about it.

These bloggers’ reactions are not at all uncommon; Republican activists have been expressing these concerns for quite a while. In Iowa, the GOP’s far-right base responded well to the criticisms, and McCain finished fourth (behind a guy who barely campaigned). In New Hampshire, the party’s voters were unmoved, and he won.

The irony is, I’m cheering these conservative bloggers on because they want what I want: someone other than McCain to get the Republican nomination. We have different motivations, of course, but the goal is identical.

With that in mind, I have some advice for my friends on the right, because they’re going about this the wrong way.

First, they’re going to have to settle on a favorite. Historically, the race for the GOP nomination boils down to a two-man contest. This year, the field is huge, and the base is divided. I’d say the top conservative bloggers are spread thin with their support for at least three different candidates. That’s not going to work — McCain’s already the frontrunner; the debate over whether Romney or Thompson is the best choice should be over by now. By the time the right settles on the anti-McCain, it’ll be too late.

Second, the laundry list of McCain’s heretical behavior is pretty good, but I’d emphasize his flirtation with Dems. Josh Marshall mentioned today:

With John McCain now firmly in the position of frontrunner and possibly on track to come close to settling the matter in Michigan tonight, is it time to revisit the fact that McCain considered and even got into preliminary talks about switching parties back in President Bush’s first year in office?

Why, yes, it’s the perfect time. In 2001 — in discussions initiated by McCain, not Dems — the Arizona senator was in talks to leave the Republican Party altogether. Three years later, he reportedly reached out to John Kerry to join the Democratic presidential ticket, and told a national television audience that he would consider an invitation from Kerry, if it were offered. Around the same time, just as the national Republican campaign was beginning in earnest, McCain said, “I believe my party has gone astray…. I think the Democratic Party is a fine party, and I have no problems with it, in their views and their philosophy.”

Want to beat McCain in the primaries? Start advertising this quote.

But, do me a favor. Hurry.

I still see this as a concerted effort to obfuscate his conservative past. These people can’t be so foolish that they don’t know he’s’ consistently one of the 10% most conservative Senators.

It’s smoke and mirrors to further establish his undeserved ‘maverick’ image and peel off independents and moderate Democrats.

Unfortunately, it’s a strategy I think could work very well.

  • Just jumping on the bandwagon and pointlessly speculating:
    When those stories came up, just a few months ago, about McCain as Kerry’s VP in ’04, some Kerry people said “He came to us, we didn’t go to him. I was waiting for the furious denials from McCain, and they never came. Pretty telling, I thought, and I wonder if there isn’t a sleeping dog of an email somewhere that the Sainted One from AZ doesn’t want to wake up.

  • I keep asking myself: Self, is it possible for this election to get any better? And I keep getting the same answer: You ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

    I expected the hyperventilating when cHuckabee won but I didn’t expect it to be so blatant: “OMG! Who let all these damn Evangelists in to our big tent?! I hate Iowa! Christian’s SUCK!! It’s not fair!! Waaaah!”

    But now they’re going after McCain? Wow.

    They really want their choices to be Mitt “Whatever U Want Me 2 B” Rombot or Fred “Zzzzzz!” Thompson?

    Wow.

  • John McCain would be a terrible president, but an excellent candidate. For us, I mean, because he’s so very beatable. He’s old, quick tempered, spouts the most outrageous nonsense that only gets by because it’s only aimed at a limited audience so far.

    If he were the nominee and subjected to the full attention of the entire electorate, it wouldn’t even be close. No wonder the wingnuts have cranked up the froth machine “Orgasmatron” to such epic proportions. They know they’re sunk but they’ll sink even faster with ol’ John on the menu.

    Needless to say, I hope he gets the nomination. 😉

  • I am all for fomenting the Republican “circular firing squad” to help the Democrats.

    These Republican pundits are having one helluva hard time accepting the loss of power, brought about by the trashing of the Republican brand by Bush and the congressional Republicans. Beating the conservative drum will not readily reverse the trend of 2006.

  • Hugh Hewitt: “A GOP vote for McCain is a vote for a shattered base and a desultory campaign in the fall.”

    And why, pray tell, would that be so Hugh?

    Could it be because you keep LYING to the base about McCain’s conservatism?

    John Hawkins: “[one] who seems to assume that any position he takes is right solely because he happens to hold it. However, what John McCain cannot fairly be called is a conservative.”

    Really? After thirty plus years reading conservatives that seems to be exactly what being a conservative means. That your positions are ‘right’ simply because you take them.

  • This criticsim makes McCain all the more appealing to the many indpendent/moderate thinking voters who lean to the right!

    Or on second thought: Is this a vast right wing conspiracy to drive all those independents and moderates into McCain lovers. Then at the last minute these so called conservatives will all whip around and become McCain lovers themselves, securing a general election win????

    The reality is that Mitt will be finished after tonight and Thompson is two breaths from endorsing McCain.

  • I’m no right wing blogger, but John McCain reminds me of Shakespeare’s “Coriolanus”. Consider:

    Coliolanus, a Roman general, recklessly leads part of a Roman army in a battle at the Volscian city of Corioli. Though his efforts achieve little, the Romans win the battle, and Coriolanus is lauded for his bravery and even more for his wounds. While some question whether valor alone is a sufficient virtue, others see his refusal to show off his wounds as a sign of humility, and elect him to the Roman Consul.

    Once in office, Coriolanus alienates everyone with his temper, arrogance and disdain for republicans. Oops, I mean Roman citizens. (To be fair, Shakespeare never gives the reader much cause to like these petty, jealous, greedy cowards.) Eventually Coriolanus is expelled from the city. At this point he rallies support from the enemy Volscians, and promises to lead them in a revolt over Rome. When he ultimately changes his mind and refuses to attack, and instead, enters into a peace agreement that angers the Volscians, they accuse him of betrayal, exclaiming that he stole his glory at their expense, and murder him.

    Whether you see an analogy here or not, I would ask is valor alone a sufficient virtue for leadership? Does McCain have any other virtues? Does he actually have any political victories other than being elected? McCain-Feingold didn’t take money out of elections or dissolve the “iron triangle”. Bush signed a bill requiring the military to follow their handbook in regards to torture, but there were reports that they rewrote the classified handbook before he signed it and that he wrote a signing statement, essentially neuterng the law. McCain held hearings into the Abramoff handling of Indian contracts, but only after the Washington Post had written lots of articles about it, and with few if any results.

    One last thought – It is true that McCain supported troop increases well before the surge. He also was critical of Rumsfeld and Casey. However, when the surge was announced, McCain said it would not work, because the increase was too small. I guess “straight talk” is a relative term. It’s as closely related to truth as Obama is to Cheney.

  • What these guys want is someone at least as stupid as George Bush and as charismatic as Ronald Reagan. Say, a rutabaga with great hair. Although I can think of a lot of adjectives that apply to McCain, “charismatic” isn’t one of them. Romney has a sort of “Westworld” fascination (“He looks so lifelike!”) but zero charisma. I also hear that he can correctly pronounce the word “nuclear” so he’s dead out. Half-Dead Fred Thompson is definitely the sleeper candidate in my book.

  • The right-wing blogosphere may lament that McCain isn’t bellicose enough to earn the title ‘conservative’, or maybe they’re just being cleverly disingenuous, but I suspect they know what is rather obvious: McCain is not easily electable. They probably prefer corporate robot Romney, but they really have no one who would keep their unstable base together. Their best hope is a Bloomberg run, which would be a disaster for the Dems.

  • Oh, I could write the line for the debate. Some moderator (or better, John) raises the question why Hillary didn’t leave Bill in 1998:

    Hillary: “You know Chris (it would have to be Matthews), a lot of people have raised that question, why didn’t you leave Bill in 1998. My Husband, the Father of my Child, was suffering a level of political abuse we hadn’t seen thrown at the White House in that century. And at that time he needed my support, public and personal. And by the time Bill left office he was more popular than the current President is today. Twice as much, as he still is.

    And in 2001 there were those who wondered why Bill stayed with me. Why stay with the shrew (and believe me in 1998 in the private quarters I was one) after the pressure was over and the abuse was done. Maybe you don’t believe it was love, or companionship, or family that has kept us together. But it certainly was, to a large degree, loyalty. Loyalty we have given to each other and shared.

    But than (looking hard at McCain) that’s not a kind of loyality my opponent values, as I understand it.”

    I’d like to see McCain try to paste his John Cage Smile Therapy Grin on then.

  • WingNuttia will never support McCain; they’ll stay home instead, allowing a Dem to take the election, and then start plotting “Xian Coalition Deux: The Resurrection.”

    Scheduled for a November, 2012 nationwide release, of course.

    Likewise, they won’t fall in behind Romney, as the Tali-Vangee crowd has been “bred since before conception” to believe that Mormonism is heresy.

    The profiteers won’t buy into Huckabee, the cognitively-aware won’t support Thompson, anyone who can type a more than 100 words in the same paragraph without doing a cut-n-paste job from a campaign website won’t support Paul—and even the roadkill has more fashion sense than to support “Queen Quasimodo” Giuliani. (I’ve called that particular misfit “GhoulChild” for so long that I had to look up his name, just to make certain that I spelled it right!)

    If the infighting within the Dem camp can be resolved, and the entire camp can get onto a ‘total war” footing, then the GOP is going down for the count—294 days from tonight.

  • Or on second thought: Is this a vast right wing conspiracy… -JRS Jr

    When media outlets are controlled by such a small number of people, a conspiracy needs not be vast.

    I think a lot of people misunderestimate just how much people in general like McCain and fully believe that he is different. The Republicans are master campaigners, and with a good selection for Vice President, I believe a McCain ticket would be powerfully hard to beat.

    It certainly doesn’t hurt that, if mentioned at all, the current news about Iraq is that it’s going swimmingly.

    I’m sure our elusive nemesis will pop up to see his shadow in October again. Oh no! Four more years of war!

  • Oh, I don’t think it’s a strategy on the part of the far far right to make McCain look too moderate, and then elect him. I think they really don’t like him — he may be right wing, but to them at least, he’s not way the %&^%&* out there (except on foreign policy) like they are. However, that might be the effect. I am terrified by McCainiac’s ‘centrist’ and independent appeal. The posters who think he will do badly in the general are nuts I’m sorry to say. Have they seen any polls, ever? His favourables even among Dems are high. He would crush Obama or Clinton unless he freaks out with his temper on the campaign trail and every single evangelical stays home.

  • Baby Hewitt said: “It is a vote for lecture after lecture on global warming, campaign finance reform, and the bridge to nowhere.”

    All of which are pretty good, solid, serious points to run on – which is why the typical no-frontal-lobes-or-opposable-thumbs far right whackjob, a Professional Celebrant of Ignorance like Hewitt, would be opposed.

  • Why is it only the wingnuts look at McCain’s conservatism and don’t accept it?

    Maybe because, in the end, there really is no conservatism. It’s all a facade designed to distract us from the fact they are using Government to enrich the already damn rich to the point they are f**king damn rich and no longer envious of the super f**king damn rich.

    Which never happens of course, because they are all so envious of Warren Buffet and Bill Gates, the incredibly super f**king (but not damned) rich.

    So what have we learned today. There there is no such thing as conservatism, only a plot to see that as many middle class Americans are impoverished as lower class Americans rise out of poverty while the Rich gain control of more and more of the wealth and income of this country and the world.

  • Note that Hugh Hewitt is for earmark spending on bridges to nowhere.

    The death knell of fiscal conservatism has been tolled.

  • “I mean, because he’s so very beatable.”

    You might want to see the historic polling data that shows McCain ahead or even with Hils and Obama.

  • I heard about 3 minutes of rush just before 1:30 and a caller said it was important for all republicans to vote for Huckabee or McCain if they are the nominee.

    Rush responded that there are a lot of people who will sit the election out if either of them get the nomination.

    Rush said if either of them get the nomination it will be the “end of the republican party. Mark my words.”

    Maybe all the Democrats in open states should skip the race between Obama and Clinton and vote for Huckabee????

  • Okay, I have to ask, because I certainly don’t agree, why the heck do so many people seem to think McCain is easily beatable? I honestly see him as the worst possible choice. How many other candidates have McCain’s likability level across the board? Crumudgeon says he’s prone to outbursts, but when has that hurt him? He has the perception of being a ‘maverick,’ and if we don’t think the base will come out to vote against Obama or Clinton, then we are being naive.

    We may be able to hope his age sidelines him, but I have a feeling he’s got the same deal with Satan that Cheney does that has kept him alive for centuries.

  • “they are all so envious of Warren Buffet”

    Huh? Uncle Warren is supporting Hils and Obama!

  • Curmudgeon,

    John McCain would be a terrible president, but an excellent candidate. For us, I mean, because he’s so very beatable.

    I beg to differ. The MSM love McCain and continue to shower that love on him and thier audiences. The constant adoration and willful avoidance of anything even slightly negative (whether it be his voting record or any instances of rage, mean-spiritedness, etc.) will be a high hurdle for the Dem nominee.

    I think the general election still favors the Dem nominee, regardless of who the GOP nominee is, but McCain is the GOPs best bet, IMHO.

  • Truth be told, If McCain taps a “real conservative” like Thompson for VP, and hints he’s in it for a 4 year stint while setting up the VP for a run in ’12, the “conservatives” will be silenced and then flock to him for the general like the sheep they are.

  • The MSM love McCain and continue to shower that love on him and thier audiences.

    Please Note: That is the same MSM that almost cost him his campaign this summer by calling him “out”.

  • I wrote: “…they are all so envious of Warren Buffet.”

    JRS Jr said: “Huh? Uncle Warren is supporting Hils and Obama!”

    Try to keep up JRS. They envy Buffet his billions (versus their meger hundreds of millions).

    They hate him for being a liberal.

  • Amazing…we will never have to worry about McCain ever being president…ever. But if it makes you feel more secure about dems winning the WH this year by having McCain not be the nominee then I would suggest you quit aiding the GOP’s decision by making it known that McCain would be the republican nominee you would fear the most…whom you consider to be the most difficult to beat as this will be the motivation used to make sure he becomes the nominee.

    None of the republican nominees are electable…All of the dems are electable. Face it…everything the republicans have done or attempted to do has failed miserably. They have caused our economy to tank and their foreign policy is an embarrassment so they don’t have a leg to stand on no matter who their nominee is. They have no successes to build on and certainly have shown they have no integrity and cannot be trusted. Remember…Bush had the support of his party to do everything he has done. To think American voters would put a republican in the WH in this election is absurd. They are actually at a place where they should just loudly announce “We are sorry for what we have done to our nation. Our plans failed and we were wrong about everything. Please find it in your hearts to forgive us and tell us what we can do to help get our nation out of the mess we put her in.” That’s why I don’t fear McCain or any of the others.

  • This stuff looks like perfect McCain campaign material for the general election. A RINO? Seriously? In that case, Obama has no business calling himself a Democrat. He’s too fiscally responsible, cares too much for unborn children and wants nothing more than to defeat Al Qaeda. He’s going to destroy the Democrat Party.

  • Fair enough, guys. But I wouldn’t put too much faith in either polls or the MSM this time around. The polls were completely wrong in New Hampshire and so were the pundits, by their own admission. The people are fed up and that’s what is going to determine the outcome this time, not the hot air of a lot of overpaid gasbags who are only trying to make reality conform to their own prejudices anyway.

    Is it November yet? 😉

  • JRS Jr.,

    Please Note: That is the same MSM that almost cost him his campaign this summer by calling him “out”.

    While at the same time telling thier audiences what a maverick he is, what a straight-shooter, what an independent thinker…thus keeping his campaign alive. He is where he is now because of the MSM and to a much lesser extent the patheticness of the rest of the GOP hopefulls.

  • McCain and Thompson are the two that would likely give the Dems a race by pulling in some independents.

    The other three are suit wearing clowns with limited appeal. It’s good to see that many Republicans like a circus. 🙂

    Just hope the independents are paying attention.

  • Curmudgeon @28,

    From your lips to Gods ears. Or the flying spaghetti monsters hearing orifice.

    Is it November, yet, indeed!

  • The polls were completely wrong in New Hampshire and so were the pundits, by their own admission. -Crumudgeon

    The polls were also wrong in 2004 when Kerry’s impending landslide victory was all I heard about for months prior to his soul crushing defeat, so forgive my skepticism, but I will forgo naivety this time around.

    Do not underestimate the Republicans’ ability to campaign, cheat, and sell a maverick war hero, no matter how old, angry, or conservative he is.

  • I agree with Lance’ point at #16 that conservatism is essentially the most meaningless word in all of politics in America. None of the Republican candidates is conservative, not by a long shot. Conservatism has the implied meaning that it is about limiting government to only the most essential purposes, of limiting the government’s intrusion on the public through taxation, of limiting the government’s restrictions of personal freedom, of limiting the government’s use of regulation to impinge on the ability of citizens to do as they wish. Nice platitudes all but the real world shows these ideas tend not to work out in the way conservatives believe they will.

    But the current Republican field believes in a government with overly expansive powers over the individual, the have acted with extreme fiscal imprudence, they use the halls of government like a country club, the Bushists have implicitly raised taxes on us all by spending this nation into deep deficits, government spies, peers into and controls far too much of our lives and they are for a seemingly limitless expansion of government powers and bureaucracy under the cover of looking out after our “security.” Call them theocrats, plutocrats, racists, misogynists, spendthrifts, liars or the like, but don’t call these candidates, nor the pundits throwing the slings and arrows, conservatives. Or Barry Goldwater will get his zombie *ss out of his grave and strangle you.

  • Comments are closed.