FISA fear-mongering flies from Fratto

The on-again, off-again debate over the Bush administration’s surveillance powers is, with Congress soon returning to work, on again. And with it, comes White House demagoguery.

As readers no doubt recall, Congress approved a FISA revision — called, believe it or not, the “Protect America Act” — last fall, but given how tilted it was in the Bush administration’s direction, Dems put an expiration date on the legislation. It’s set to expire on Feb. 1, and one of the main sticking points is whether lawmakers would grant retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies that cooperated with Bush’s warrantless-surveillance scheme.

Democratic leaders are open to a compromise, including a one-month extension of the status quo, while the White House wants it all, now, permanently. Like clockwork, the Bush gang is doing what it always does at this point in the process: rely on fear.

Spokesman Tony Fratto told Congressional Quarterly yesterday that without the immediate passage of legislation, “terrorists” will soon “be free to make phone calls without fear of being surveilled”:

“We’re exactly three weeks away,” he said, “from the date when terrorists can be free to make phone calls without fear of being surveilled by U.S. intelligence agencies”.

First, Fratto’s comments might sound far more compelling if the administration hadn’t put its own surveillance program in jeopardy by failing to pay its telephone bills. (Indeed, let’s not forget that the Justice Department found that at least one FISA investigation — highly secretive and sensitive cases that allow eavesdropping on suspected terrorists or spies — was “halted due to untimely payment.”)

Second, Fratto, who was speaking on behalf of the president, apparently doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

Fratto’s contention is flat-out misleading. As CQ’s Keith Perine notes, “intelligence agents would not be instantly hobbled if the law were to expire Feb. 1.” In fact, surveillance authorizations would still “remain in effect until a year after they were issued”:

“The existing law allows the National Intelligence director and the attorney general to authorize surveillance aimed at people outside the United States — even if they are communicating with people inside the country — for up to one year, subject to some conditions.”

Even after Feb. 1, any such surveillance authorizations would remain in effect until a year after they were issued.

Given this, People for the American Way called Fratto’s comments “a bold-faced lie.”

I sometimes wonder if the White House ever gets tired of being this wrong. It’s been seven years, and watching from afar, it looks exhausting.

How low can they go? Lower than you can imagine.

Can they get more mendacious? Oh yes, much more – more than you can imagine.

These asswipes will be doing this at 11:59:59, Januray 20, 2009.

The good news is, that’s only 370 days from now.

  • Second, Fratto, who was speaking on behalf of the president, apparently doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

    Because he is, after all, speaking on behalf of the president;>

  • Although a “bald-faced lie” is the actual saying.

    And who’s to say the Sadministration is ‘wrong’ as defined by them–lots of their friend and family are making a shite-load of money off of such ‘failures.’

  • I’m sure the telecommunications companies and their media buddies will be glad to repeat those lies until they get the retroactive immunity they want.

    Bush wouldn’t be a problem if he didn’t have so many willing accomplices.

  • “We’re exactly three weeks away,” he said, “from the date when terrorists can be free to make phone calls without fear of being surveilled by U.S. intelligence agencies”.

    Until then the terrorists will just have to settle for text messaging, e-mails and VOIP communications. That’s the tricky thing about terrorists — they monitor the laws our Congress passes so that way their terrorist activities won’t be illegal. Damn them!

  • They aren’t just wrong they are lying, they know they are lying and they are doing it intentionally. If it was so damn important to them why didn’t they pay their phone bill? And if the telecoms were so damn “patriotic” why did they cut off the phone lines for non-payment? Can we spell HYPOCRISY?. How much longer must we put up with congressional complicity in the erosion of our freedoms and this fear mongering blackmail to protect Bush’s and the telecom’s lawbreaking. I demand the dems in the senate act like adults and put this situation in order to protect our freedoms and to make those breaking the law accountable. I live more in fear of empowering the Bush administration to eavesdrop on us than I fear any terrorist.
    “Vote for me or you will be attacked…give me power to wiretap without accountability or you will be attacked…pass a new FISA law quickly or Washington will be attacked…Give me more money for the surge or we will be attacked…”

    I guess Trent “run for your life the terrorists are coming unless we pass FISA and get out of DC’ Lott was more concerned about becoming a greedy lobbyists than the terrorist threat-ha. Enough is enough. These fear mongering goobers are so full of shit it’s coming out of their ears. Of course they are lying, they’ve been lying all along, about everything, from NIE to 9/11. Protect America Act is just a Protect Bush and the Telecoms Act for all their law breaking and spying on democrats and business/personal finances of the nation. America is awake and sees the lying…now we have to make congress and the senate aware that there will be consequences for their complicity in this corrupt FISA affair.

  • Nice one Martin.

    “We’re exactly three weeks away,” he said, “from the date when terrorists can be free to make phone calls without fear of being surveilled by U.S. intelligence agencies”.

    So this means:

    1. They currently have all terrorists under survillance.

    and

    2. They know who all the terrorist are but aren’t doing anything about it.

    Riiight.

    Speaking of blithering, babbling WH mouthpieces, what ever happened to Dana Purina?

  • “I sometimes wonder if the White House ever gets tired of being this wrong” — CB

    Actually, I think it’s a point of pride — and remarkably effective when you look back at how far they’ve been able to go through waters that they muddied themselves.

  • The only way that someone can lie with such vigorous mendacity is if they’re putting their own cojones on an anvil and slamming down the hammer with reckless abandon. Given the nature of the ensuing squeal caused by such a truly masochistic act of self-debasement, one might label this particular form of lying the “Fratto Falsetto….”

  • The truly sad thing is, there will be people who are (a) genuinely frightened by this threat, and willing to sign away another chunk of free will in exchange for “protection” from their government, and (b) smirking, self-satisfied twats who want it to go ahead because they’re convinced they’re in the “in” crowd, the chosen ones who will be exempt from such surveillance because they are loyal Republicans.

    Think for a moment, if you can bear it, at what America might look like now if Rove’s dream had borne fruit; if willingness to live in a surveillance state had caught on, if more people were sufficiently docile, if the scandals hadn’t gotten so brazen that nobody could pretend any more not to notice. Think of America under one-party rule for the rest of your lives.

    It was meant to happen.

  • Comments are closed.