Wednesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Remember that bizarre veto during the winter congressional break? It looks like there’s been progress on a resolution: “Congress has reached a compromise with the White House over a defense authorization bill provision that had drawn complaints from the Iraqi government. Those complaints prompted President Bush to veto the defense bill last month. He complained that a provision in the bill that allowed victims of terrorism to be awarded compensation from frozen foreign assets of state sponsors of terror could have crippled the fledgling Iraqi government with billions of dollars in liability. Under the compromise, Iraq is excluded from the provision, but other state sponsors of terrorism, such as Iran and Syria, could see frozen assets used as compensation. The compromise is likely to leave American victims taken hostage and tortured by Saddam Hussein’s regime during the first Gulf War without recourse in U.S. federal court.”

* More details about the story behind the torture tapes: “In late 2005, the retiring CIA station chief in Bangkok sent a classified cable to his superiors in Langley asking if he could destroy videotapes recorded at a secret CIA prison in Thailand that in part portrayed intelligence officers using simulated drowning to extract information from suspected al-Qaeda members…. The CIA had a new director and an acting general counsel, neither of whom sought to block the destruction of the tapes, according to agency officials. The station chief was insistent because he was retiring and wanted to resolve the matter before he left, the officials said. And in November 2005, a published report that detailed a secret CIA prison system provoked an international outcry.”

* I can’t tell you how much I’m looking forward to Giuliani dropping out: “In an interview up at the National Review, Rudy Giuliani foreign policy advisor Norman Podhoretz says that ‘by any reasonable historical standard,’ George W. Bush’s war on terrorism has been ‘a triumph, not a disaster.’ Podhoretz weighs the war on terrorism — he calls it World War IV — against both World War II and the U.S. Civil War. He says the mistakes made in Iraq — ‘assuming they were all mistakes, as alleged, rather than judgment calls that might have gone worse the other way’ — are ‘chump change’ compared with the mistakes made in World War II. As for the Civil War, Podhoretz says: ‘It took Lincoln three years to find Sherman and Grant. It took George Bush three years to find Petraeus.'”

* I think we all saw this one coming: “To review: it’s debatable whether Blackwater can even be prosecuted because they don’t seem to be covered by any law. Beyond that, the State Department provided the Blackwater guards involved in the incident with limited immunity in order to get their version of events, thus further compromising the investigation. And don’t forget that Blackwater quickly mended the trucks involved in the incident, destroying key evidence as to whether the guards were actually under attack when they opened fire (Blackwater says that State gave them the green light to do that). So those are the difficulties.”

* I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that CNN’s John King does not respond well to criticism. The email he sent Glenn Greenwald was pretty stunning.

* James Kirchick reminded me that the Washington Times, which John Solomon considers a legitimate newspaper, has “a rule that the word ‘gay’ can never be used in news copy (except when quoting someone), only ‘homosexual.'” Seriously.

* Remember, CNN gives this guy all kinds of money: “[Yesterday] on his CNN Headline News show, Glenn Beck went on a rant against former President Franklin D. Roosevelt, blaming him for making the Great Depression ‘go on and on and on for a decade.’ He then added: “I have to tell you, I said on my radio show today, I`m beginning to come to a place where I just — I love my grandfather, but I just want to slap himself across the face for liking FDR. I think that was one evil son of a bitch.”

* Common Cause issued a statement this week, announcing that former Rep. Jim Leach (R-Iowa) has been named as the chairman of the group’s national governing board. Think about that one for a second — a Republican who repeatedly supported Tom DeLay for the congressional leadership is now going to help lead a good government group.

* A positive step towards improving miner safety.

* The Michigan Republican Party issued a press release last night congratulating John McCain for winning the state’s primary — right around the time Mitt Romney won.

* And finally, this may not make sense to those who never watched Buffy, but this is a very clever item, matching the Republican candidates to the appropriate Buffy villain. If you can’t appreciate the obvious similarities between the Mayor and Mitt Romney, well, you’re just not paying attention.

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

I love the Buffy villian comparisons.

Please, Guiliani must be destroyed. Drive a stake through the Ghoul’s heart.

  • Are Republicans still obsessively bad-mouthing FDR after all these years? Geez – I guess that saving Western civilization from the 1940’s version of the Axis of Evil wasn’t good enough for them.

    In some of the 1999 polls, FDR was at or near the top of the list for “person of the century.”

    Glenn Beck is an idiot.

  • Common Cause issued a statement this week, announcing that former Rep. Jim Leach (R-Iowa) has been named as the chairman of the group’s national governing board. Think about that one for a second — a Republican who repeatedly supported Tom DeLay for the congressional leadership is now going to help lead a good government group.

    Hey now! Jim Leach is a good guy, and a good government guy as well. He did not take PAC money, he was among the highest in voting against party among Republican lawmakers, I’m not sure I ever heard an ideological word come out of his mouth — many Democrats in Iowa were heard to apologize for beating him. He was widely considered more progressive than Rep. Boswell, the Democrat from the neighboring district. Yes, he needed to go as a matter of Congressional control, but Leach is no villain. He is one of the most honorable — and intellectual — politicians I’ve met.

  • To counter the unfortunate misrepresentation of Leach, I would encourage everyone to read this Wikipedia entry which provides vast detail.

    Note that Leach – a Republican – voted against the 2002 AUMF. Given the then-current environment, that was an honest to goodness Profile in Courage.

  • John King? Glen Beck? Fortunately, I’ve already eaten my dinner, so invoking the Cro-magnon “N”uckledragger Network twice in one Mini-report will not suppress my appetite. But as for those two, their combined journalistic integrities are probably worth the current real-estate investment value of a time-share on a shoe-shine stand.

    Fifty miles due north of Cleveland, Ohio.

    In December.

  • In an interview up at the National Review, Rudy Giuliani foreign policy advisor Norman Podhoretz says…

    Bwahahaha! “foreign policy advisor.” 9iu11iani needs to lay a trail of Cheetos to his headquarters so that he can add Bill Kristol and Jonah Goldberg to bolster his proven winning team.

  • John King is a petty, preening little bug of a man.

    These double digit IQ talking head, MSM fucks can not stand the fact that they are as useful as a used condom.

  • Glenn Beck is no more idiotic than the Republican moron who sent me an a-mail today “correcting” a statement I made in an article published elsewhere, to wit: the Nazis weren’t right wingers, they were left wing liberals.

    Jonah Goldberg’s nuttiness is nothing compared to the rest of them.

    I don’t know where you start with these people, but calling them halfwits is giving them a whole lot more credit than they’re due.

  • I just finished reading the John King e-mail. Two thoughts: I think he used half the arguments I have used in e-mails to him and Wolf Blitzer. I cannot stand it when someone argues that if the left and right both hate me, I must be perfect.

  • I discovered John King was an unbelievable moron when I found out he was engaged to ditzy blonde Dana Bash. But that email underscores the point — what a pathetic douchebag.

  • On “simulated drowning:” This phrase needs to be called out for the distortion it is. There is nothing “simulated” about it: it is drowning. Just because you’re not drowning them in a lake or a bathtub, doesn’t mean you’re not drowning the subject. Introducing water into their nasal cavities and their mouth, filling up their airways with water so they choke and cannot breathe, causing disorientation, pain, and panic; leading, in the direst cases, to brain damage and even death. That’s DROWNING. Where is the “simulation?”

  • Glenn Beck is no more idiotic than the Republican moron who sent me an a-mail today “correcting” a statement I made in an article published elsewhere, to wit: the Nazis weren’t right wingers, they were left wing liberals.

    Tom, you’ve obviously never seen Leni Riefenstahl’s “Putschstock.”

  • ***zeitgeist*** You can hardly blame anyone for being suspicious of someone supporting Tom DeLay for congressional leadership. It’s not like the guy wasn’t easy to see through.

    Glenn Greenwald sure has King’s ticket as demonstrated by the repulsive, self serving, egotistical email King used as a reprimand (“I’ve never read you but you can’t write for crap”??) pretty much sums it up. “Just because I was a suck up to McCain in my interview doesn’t mean you can accuse me of being a suck up by posting my suck up interview”. These people really believe they are special.

    Beck has a need to get recognition and tries to come up with the most outrageous crap so we will notice him. He’s got some female accomplice repeating the same claim. Not by any stretch of the imagination, but it’s Rovian in nature…make the lie outrageous like the dems started the war, or began the tax cuts for the wealthy. The only really pathetic thing is that CNN feels they need this to get watched. The hospital stay wasn’t scary enough for old Glen Prick.

  • Before the sordid Hillary agitprop known as Robert Johnson gets swept off the main stage:

    1) Former guest poster dNA has a wonderful video blog up on his site giving some perspective:
    http://halfricanrevolution.blogspot.com/2008/01/his-whole-career-has-been-about.html
    You won’t dig 2) unless you watch that video…

    2) In last night’s debate Billary (Note: since Big Dog inserted himself in the election so prominently in New Hampshire I think that monicker is more than fair.) tried to have it both ways:

    RUSSERT: Shortly thereafter, that same afternoon, Robert Johnson, at your event, said, quote, “When Barack Obama was doing something in the neighborhood, that I won’t say what he was doing, but he said it in his book,” widely viewed as a reference to Senator Obama’s book ,”Dreams From My Father” from 1995, where he talked about his drug use as a teenager. Will you now not allow Robert Johnson to participate in any of your campaign events because of that conduct?

    CLINTON: Well, Bob has put out a statement saying what he was trying to say and what he thought he had said. We accept him on his word on that.

    So for the record:
    Both Hill and Bill (aka Billary) accept him on his word…
    (Did you watch the video? Did you see “his word”?)

    RUSSERT: Were his comments out of bounds?

    CLINTON: Yes, they were.

    Huh? What? You accept him at his word and the comments were out of bounds?
    I CALL BULLSHIT ON THIS ONE!

  • Huh? What? You accept him at his word and the comments were out of bounds?

    It strikes me as quite possible to both (a) accept Johnson’s explanation for what he was trying to communicate and (b) nonetheless think the comments were out of bounds either because you think even’s Johnson’s alleged meaning was still out of bounds or that it was so poorly communicated that whatever the intent the words as spoken were out of bounds (or, i suppose, that you “accept” – as in you can refute what is in someone’s own mind – but don’t really believe and so it is to you out of bounds; this honors both party’s subjective views)

  • I think that zeitgeist is right.

    Jim Leach was a really great congressman.

    He doesn’t deserve cheap shots like that.

    While you are at it, you are insulting everyone at Common Cause who decided he was the best choice even though we have a Democratic Congress and will probably have a Democratic President.

    CB: You seriously owe Jim Leach an apology

  • Thanks zeitgeist for that shining example of party obedience, situational logic, and candidate loyalty. You are really good at this!

    Now if I can just help me figure out what the definition of “is” is…

    Want to take a stab at that one?
    And after that…
    Maybe you can explain the one about “I did not have sex with that girl.”
    I never quite understood the parsing of sex into oral versus intercourse.
    I am sure it makes perfectly good sense.
    I suppose I just need the right (or “left”) colored lenses on to see the truth…

    Guess I am just tad slow…

    Hey! I got lots more. But I will let you answer those first.
    I’d hate to think the Clintons are serial liars like the Bushes.

    Side note to Tim Russert:

    Cut the crap Timmy. Next time just ask her if she plans on letting the slimeball Johnson sleep in the Lincoln Bedroom like he hinted so ruefully in the Wapo article…

  • i’m curious where all of those extreme property rights conservatives and libertarians are that went nuts over the Supreme Court’s Kelo decision now that it is the Bush Administration abusing eminent domain for its pointless political projects? — zeitgeist, @17

    Where? Basking in their warm feeling of (false) security, no doubt…

  • You know, I’m really feeling the Lord on this blog tonight, really.

    + + +

    WHOA! CB, three crosses just appeared on my blog comment!!!

    That must mean something!!

    I’m going to hit “Submit Comment” and make sure this gets preserved for posterity!

  • I was thinking about when David Koresh was around- he convinced a whole bunch of people that he was Jesus, before the ATF killed him and a bunch of his followers, and he did stuff like forbidding his followers from eating ice cream, although he himself ate ice cream, which was supposed to be ok because he claimed to be Jesus.

    And I was wondering how much this is different from Mike Huckabee and religious pandering of other candidates.

    David Koresh claimed he was Jesus. He was wrong. These guys claim to speak for Jesus. What makes them any less wrong than David Koresh was about his humanity/divinity?

  • re Swan @ 21… My personal favorite was the Heaven’s Gate gang of 38, who committed suicide in 1977 so that they could hook up with Jesus on a spaceship that was hiding behind the comet Hale-Bopp. What’s the biggest difference between these folks and the rapid religious right? Numbers.

    re Rudy Giuliani @ 20… have you thought about putting your comment up for auction on e-Bay? Should go for at least $ 9.11.

  • Does anyone know if this new defense bill includes provisions for a “Truman Commission”? (To investigate war profiteering.)

    Just curious. I can’t find an article that includes a stinking bill number.

  • ROTF, for starters I have no idea what the hell you are even talking about.

    Second, while the “what do you mean by ‘is’?” has been fodder for lots of punch lines, in context it actually made perfect sense — and any decent lawyer who had done a decent job of prepping the witness for deposition would have expected that same question to be asked. The attorney deposing Clinton asked a question with an ambiguous time reference — whether it was present tense or past tense. Clinton, as all persons being deposed should do, sought clarification before answering as to whether the examiner really meant “is,” or was using it to refer to a “then-current” time, using it in place of “was.”

    There was nothing improper or even unreasonable about Clinton’s question to the examing attorney. But context is irrelevant to the simple minded sheeple.

  • Glenn Beck went on a rant against former President Franklin D. Roosevelt, blaming him for making the Great Depression ‘go on and on and on for a decade.’

    If only that idiot cripple lightweight FDR had continued Hoover’s laissez Faire policies, we would have been booming again by 1934 after a mere FIVE year depression.

    Most of the work had been done by Hoover and in 1933, FDR blew it all to Hades.
    Rat bastard.

    WWII would have been wrapped up in a jif if Hoover’d had 4 terms. Pearl Harbor never would have been bombed. The man was a miracle makin’ dynamo. Hey, think BIG when you wildly speculate, huh? Why not?

    I wish there were more people like Glenn Beck and me who would recognize Hoover as one of our greatest presidents ever. The egghead academes have RUINED our higher education system beyond hope, Itellya.

  • Hey, when judgment calls go wrong they are called MISTAKES! Rudy’s advisers are as stupid as he is.

  • Comments are closed.