9/11 Tourette’s can only get a guy so far

Rudy Giuliani’s “strategy” (I use the word loosely) of blowing off all of the early contests and betting the farm on Florida was always a rather transparent sham. He tried to compete in Iowa, but voters rejected him en masse. He campaigned heavily in New Hampshire, and found the same result. It was only then, out of desperation, that Giuliani’s team came up with a post-hoc rationalization for failure — “We meant to lose in those other states, because Florida is the key to winning the nomination.”

Last night, the charade came to an end, and Giuliani came in a distant third. Today, he’ll end his campaign and endorse John McCain.

Rudy Giuliani will board a plane to California on Wednesday morning, as planned. But, sources tell ABC News, once there, instead of participating in the GOP debate, he will drop out of the presidential race and endorse Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. […]

Negotiations between the two campaigns had been ongoing as Florida returns came in, with ABC News and other organizations projecting a McCain win in the Sunshine State.

“We ran a campaign that was uplifting,” Giuliani said, not officially leaving the race but speaking in the past tense.

Giuliani’s failure in Florida hardly comes as a surprise. The WaPo’s Dana Milbank wrote a very amusing item the other day, after following Giuliani and actor Jon Voight as they campaigned together in Florida. In a humiliating turn of events, at one event after another, reporters covering the campaign outnumbered voters who turned up to hear the former mayor speak. (At an event in St. Petersburg, 120 people showed up — a number “appropriate for a city council race.”)

At one Florida rally, Giuliani found a crowd that “would fit in a living room.” Voight said, “This is great! This is like the Beatles or something.”

Yes, it literally took a professional actor to make it seem as if Giuliani were a credible presidential candidate.

For a few days, I’ve been trying to think of the appropriate campaign analogy for Giuliani. Kevin suggested the other day that Phil Gramm might work, but I think Brendan Nyhan found an even better one: “Rudy is the Joe Lieberman of 2008 — his name recognition led to strong early numbers in national polling, but he’s just fundamentally unacceptable to the base.”

Precisely. I continue to be surprised that the media is marveling at Giuliani’s “historic collapse,” going from frontrunner to loser in a few short months.

The reality is Giuliani’s position as a credible candidate was a mirage from the start. He started high, thanks to an unearned 9/11 halo and high name recognition, but fell once voters actually got to know him. John Dickerson noted, “The more he campaigned, the more he went down in the polls.”

Following up on an item from last week, Giuliani’s collapse was inevitable and unavoidable. (I’m not just saying this now; I wrote the same thing more than 11 months ago.) When Giuliani was still riding high last summer and early fall, most Republican voters, especially in the early voting states, had no idea he supported abortion rights, gay rights, gun control, stem-cell research, liberal immigration policies, Mario Cuomo’s gubernatorial campaign, and is a thrice-married serial adulterer estranged from his own children. Some pundits, who saw Giuliani as a credible frontrunner for the GOP nomination, said, “None of that matters because he has a 9/11 halo.” The rest of us said, “Wait.”

By the beginning of, say, 2006, both Giuliani and Mitt Romney were in the same boat — moderate Republicans in a conservative party preparing to seek votes from a far-right base. Romney decided to reinvent himself; Giuliani decided he’d repeat “9/11″ over and over again and hope no one notices his record or beliefs. Romney got pretty far with his approach; Giuliani embarrassed himself with his.

He could have run the perfect campaign, giving perfect speeches, hiring perfect aides, and airing perfect ads, but it wouldn’t have made a lick of difference. Once GOP voters learned who Giuliani was, he never stood a chance.

At this point, I assume Giuliani will go back to private consulting and the high-priced speakers’ circuit, but he does so with his stature diminished and his ego bruised.

ghoulianni would have done better if he had campaigned with the fred thompson style.

  • “The reality is Giuliani’s position as a credible candidate was a mirage from the start.”

    Yes, to anyone with a functioning brain. But that leaves Chris Matthews out–he seemed actually surprised last night that those who early on predicted that Giuliani was a one-trick 9/11 pony, or that all Giuliani was is “a noun, a verb, and 9/11,” were spot on accurate. And this is a guy who actually follows this stuff for a living. They really do fail the american people, these twits.

  • This is yet another example of how the media can latch onto a story and repeat it endlessly, never asking anyone with any sense if it’s true or not. They really just cannot express complex ideas, and I guess that’s because the people they’re trying to sell Viagra to have remote controls and ADD. So what we get is flashier graphics and shallower reporting. The only media outlet that has any respect for the viewer is PBS.

  • “At this point, I assume Giuliani will go back to private consulting and the high-priced speakers’ circuit, but he does so with his stature diminished and his ego bruised….”

    One wonders how well he’ll do on the speaking tour, with his 9-11 Tourette’s going untreated:

    “Thank 9/11 you 9/11 for 9/11 9/11 having 9/11 me 9/11 here 9/11 today.”

  • ***the appropriate campaign analogy for Giuliani***

    CB—a typo, perhaps? I’m sure you meant to type “eulogy” instead of “analogy.” Unless, of course, the appropriate analogy would be a great big slab of rock with the letters “RIP” (for “Rot In Purgatory) chiseled nice and deep….

  • Last night the CNN people were saying that Rudy and McCain were “negotiating” Rudy’s endorsement.

    Rudy for Secretary of Defense? No, Homeland Security would be an even better playpen for Rudy’s unique talent for cronyism and corruption.

  • …but he does so with his stature diminished and his ego bruised.

    And with Biden’s “a noun, a verb and 9-11” joke forever attached to his name.

  • Since 9udi loves war (as long as he isn’t there), the best analogy I could come up with would be the Franco Prussian War of 1871. Started off well for the French then the Prussians came at them. As each battle was lost, the French fell back to a new defensive line saying that this was their stand till they ran out of land and Napoleon III was captured.

    9udi as Nap III? Seems fitting. Went on past reputation. Social climbing wife. Weak and ineffectual leadership despite the propaganda. Incredibly stupid strategic thinking. Poor grasp of the terrain.

    Who says history can’t be fun?

  • @ #1:

    > ghoulianni would have done better if he had
    > campaigned with the fred thompson style.

    And how did that turn out for him?

    I’m sure rudy had 911 reason to stay in the race

  • An MSNBC correspondent quipped that once people were paying to hear Giuliani speak and now he can[t get anyone to listen to him.

  • I hope Rudy drops off the face of the political map. The idea of him in anyone’s Cabinet is revolting, but McCain’s will be full of like minded dolts if he’s elected president.

  • “Rudy is the Joe Lieberman of 2008 — his name recognition led to strong early numbers in national polling, but he’s just fundamentally unacceptable to the base.”

    Eh – i don’t think “unacceptable to the base” is what lost Giulianni the nomination. Rudy’s problem is that the more he speaks, the less you want to listen to him. Not only are his talking points bad policy, he’s completely unable to phrase them in any way other than one that makes him sound like a lunatic on a street corner screaming incoherently. Bad policy may not be a hurdle for Republican politicians these days, but you have to be able to package your garbage with a nice bow and make it at least SOUND acceptable to people – especially if you’re already taking a few stances that play against the “identity politics” of your party.

    It makes me wonder what he sounded like when he was running for Mayor of New York. Did he sound like such a clueless nutjob then too? Or is this one of those things that 9/11 changed when it “changed everything?”

    I’ll just be curious to see if those Rudy supporters in the GOP move to Romney or McCain.

  • Remember when Jon Voight was swallowed and then regurgitated by a snake in Anaconda?

    I mention that for no reason whatsoever.

  • (At an event in St. Petersburg, 120 people showed up — a number “appropriate for a city council race.”)

    Gee, did these people know that Jon Voight was going to be there?

  • So, a has-been actor endorsed a has-been. That’s right down there with Chuck Norris endorsing the Hucklebuck.

    I wonder what the holiday conversation is like between Angelina Jolie and dear ol’ dad.

  • I recall a lot of dark talk from lefty blogs about how the fundies would be willing to overlook the abortion stand and the personal baggage if Giuliani were willing to project a strong authoritarian front. I just thought that, in addition to the abovementioned, it was crazy to think the GOP southern base would rally around a big city ethnic catholic.

  • THANK YOU for pointing out something I’ve tried to explain to so many people who talk about Rudy’s “risky” campaign strategy. I remember him campaigning in Iowa; I remember him campainging in New Hampshire. The reason Rudy had to bet it all on Florida was because people LOATHE him; at least in Florida (he hoped) he could cruise to a win based on (i) 9/11, (ii) an IMMENSE television ad buy, (iii) name recognition, and (iv) the leser need to actually go out and meet w/people.

    And, b/t/w, this probably is a point in favor of the traditional “retail politics” rationale offered by Iowa and New Hampshire for being first in the nation. I’m not saying they should always be first, just saying that forcing candidates to campaign first in small population states where they actually have to meet voters probably does have some good points to it (maybe a rotating “first-in-the-nation” among some such states?)

  • Jon Voight?? Really?!? God damn, I knew he’d appear in anything, but had assumed he limited his embarrassing appearances to bad movies. Can someone get this man a better agent?

  • “The reality is Giuliani’s position as a credible candidate was a mirage from the start.”

    Are you completely out of your mind? It was media soothsayers like you who anointed Giuliani as the national frontrunner in the first place… and then ridiculously kept him there in the “top tier” for the entire primary season — even though he was consistently getting whacked by Ron Paul.

    Now you think you can get away with spinning your glowing prognostications into erstwhile skepticism? No, sir. You’ll have to stand with the other idiot “analysts” in the corner with the dunce cap on.

    Hindsight certainly is 20/20, especially when you have your eyes and the rest of your head buried up that hind end.

  • Rudy with a bruised ego? That’s worse than Dolly Parton with a chest cold. Will he live through it, or will it be fatal?

  • Let’s not forget, the Faux News crew must be in mourning… talk about backing the wrong horse.

  • I prefer the spelling “9ui11iani”. I’d credit the blog I saw it on, but I can’t remember. It had me laughing for quite some time.

  • Comments are closed.