John Edwards to end presidential campaign today

I noticed this morning that John Edwards had cancelled some events scheduled in Feb. 5 states today, and would instead travel to New Orleans to deliver a speech. “Hmm,” I thought, “that seems odd.”

Apparently, there was a logical explanation for the scheduling change: the AP is reporting that John Edwards is ending his presidential campaign today.

Democrat John Edwards is exiting the presidential race Wednesday, ending a scrappy underdog bid in which he steered his rivals toward progressive ideals while grappling with family hardship that roused voters’ sympathies but never diverted his campaign, The Associated Press has learned.

The two-time White House candidate notified a close circle of senior advisers that he planned to make the announcement at a 1 p.m. EST event in New Orleans that had been billed as a speech on poverty, according to two of his advisers. The decision came after Edwards lost the four states to hold nominating contests so far to rivals who stole the spotlight from the beginning — Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama.

The former North Carolina senator will not immediately endorse either candidate in what is now a two-person race for the Democratic nomination, said one adviser, who spoke on a condition of anonymity in advance of the announcement.

If Edwards hoped to throw the political world a curveball, he succeeded; I don’t think anyone saw this coming. On the contrary, the Edwards campaign gave every indication that the former senator wasn’t going anywhere. Just a few days ago, top Edwards aides, including Joe Trippi and David Bonior, conceded that Edwards was a long-shot for the Democratic nomination, but the campaign had a clear strategy going forward, including a slow-but-steady collection of delegates and a convention strategy in which anything could happen.

But that was yesterday. Today, Edwards is exiting stage left.

At this point, it’s hard to say what drove Edwards to end his campaign. He was clearly short on funding, and it’s possible he just didn’t have the resources to compete well enough to win delegates. Some of the reports this morning indicate that Edwards sees the race as a Clinton-Obama contest, and simply didn’t want to be the third wheel anymore.

There will be plenty of analysis in the coming days about Edwards’ contributions to the presidential race, but at this point, I think there are two broader angles to consider.

First, Edwards exits with his head held high, knowing that he ran a strong, uphill campaign, which drove the Democratic message more than a lot of people realize. I’m reminded of this recent piece from Chris Hayes.

No matter who wins the Democratic nomination, the fact remains that the Edwards campaign has set the domestic policy agenda for the entire field. He was the first with a bold universal healthcare plan, the first with an ambitious climate change proposal that called for cap-and-trade, and the leader on reforming predatory lending practices and raising the minimum wage to a level where it regains its lost purchasing power….Ultimately, though, the Edwards campaign has been both a campaign and a cause, with the latter outperforming the former. Few remember that the signature economic policy of Bill Clinton’s presidency, balancing the budget, originated as a plank in the platform of his primary rival Paul Tsongas. If the next Democratic President manages to pass universal healthcare or a carbon cap-and-trade, we’ll owe the Edwards campaign a significant debt.

Agreed. Edwards did what Kucinich wanted to do but couldn’t — he moved the Democratic field to the left, leaving the progressive agenda stronger than it probably would have been without him.

Second, of course, is what Edwards’ departure does to the race. It’s an open question, which will draw plenty of scrutiny soon — either Edwards’ exit helps Clinton, because the white vote will no longer be split, or it helps Obama, because the “change” vote will no longer be split.

While that’s hashed out, hat’s off to John Edwards for a job well done. I suspect he’ll stay engaged in public life, and we’ll all be better off for it.

Edwards was my early favorite simply because he seemed closest to what I see as the progressive soul. Once things got rolling, it became increasingly clear he had no chance to win the nomination — and would have had less of a chance in the general — but his message was important to have in the mix.

Like CB, I still think he has a lot to offer and hope he finds a place in public life.

  • It just seems even more strange that he would choose now to drop out, clearly impacting the race, and not endorse another candidate? I have a hard time believing that is the case.

  • I can’t believe how sad I feel. And given that he was still actively fundraising as late as yesterday, I can only hope that this decision is not related to Elizabeth’s health.

    I hope he will continue to stay engaged and to help push the two candidates on the issues he has been advocating so strongly for.

  • Thank you, John Edwards. Although I am disappointed that the campaign never really seemed to take off I am elated that you managed to move the debate in a more progressive direction.

    Here’s hoping that there’s a Cabinet post in your future.

  • I join Anne in hoping that his departure has nothing to do with his wife’s health. She’s a fireball and I hope she has a long, productive life.

    He was my first choice for president. I even sent him money yesterday.

  • Even though I am extremely anti-Hillary, I will acknowledge that—whether the WH goes to Obama or Clinton—there needs to be a solid place in the next administration for John Edwards. Justice, perhaps? We’ll need a firebrand for AG come next year….

  • I think the bulk of his support will swing to Obama. -Haik Bedrosian

    After looking at exit polling data, and some of the opinions of the Edwards supporters we know and love here, I think it will be a bit more of an even split, 60/40 for Obama and Clinton respectively.

    That, however, is assuming Edwards doesn’t endorse anyone. And endorsement would shift the bulk of his support to whichever candidate he chooses, I believe.

  • Anyone think the timing is interesting? The day after Hil’s big “win” in Florida, John comes out and announces this in order to make sure she doesn’t get any of the news cycle? Maybe I’m just looking too much into this, but why else would he announce today. Either way, Thanks John for a great run, and thanks for announcing it today.
    Cheers

  • Edwards has always been my first choice, Obama my second. As I was listening to the radio while getting up this morning, I was agonizing over who to vote for next week, Edwards or Obama. I continue to believe that Hillary is the weakest Democratic candidate, especially against McCain.

    No problem now. I’m voting for Obama.

    Thank you, John and Elizabeth Edwards. Keep fighting.

  • John Edwards does deserve our thanks and respect for his run and for pushing issues that very well may have been left behind otherwise. I sure hope that whoever the eventual nominee is that, if elected, he or she will consider Edwards for AG or SCOTUS.

    So, maybe the Dem Florida election, even sans-delegates, actually did matter or have meaning. The timing of this can only indicate that Edwards thought to some degree the Florida vote was important. Maybe the Dem Florida results should receive a bit more consideration than they have been getting.


  • JRS Jr. @ #4: 0 for 2

    Would the untimely death of his wife in the coming weeks/months wipe the delighted smirk from your face?

    I thought not.

  • Its a shame in all the polls he clobbered all the republican more the Clinton or Obama, plus he had better progressive ideas…

  • According to what Stephanie Miller just said, the Edwards campaign says his decision has nothing whatever to do with his wife’s health.

    I think we can all breathe a sigh of relief at that news, no matter what candidate we’re supporting.

  • I’m an Obama supporter, but I feel very sad for Edwards and his supporters today. His was a passionate campaign and I believed him when he said how personal this was to him, and I know the same hold true of his supporters.

    Thanks to the Edwardses for all of their hard work and dedication, and hopefully this was a decision based on financial an political considerations and nothing more. I wish them nothing but the best and hope they continue to fight for what they believe in.

  • Jeremy,
    Not sure which polls you are looking at? McCain scored pretty well vs. Edwards.

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/national.html

    JTK — If that is the reason why he’s dropping out (which it doesn’t seem like it at this point) I wish them the best. In reality, it looks like he’s dropping out because his class warfare tactics didn’t sit well with a majority of the Dems and certainly not most Americans.

  • Hats off to him.
    It was the right decision.
    Glad he sensed he has a different, but equally vital, role to play.
    That takes introspection of a different kind.
    Frankly… I didn’t think he had it in him.
    I am surprised and a bit awed.

    Now lets see, in the days ahead,
    if he understands what role the evolution of humanity is asking him to play.

    If so…. I will be a lot awed.

  • As far as who Edwards will help more, I predict that, based upon the results in South Carolina as well as the upcoming projections in other parts of the country, the ratio will shift along regional lines. In the northern and midwestern states, Edwards’ departure helps Obama, since all of the “change” vote will go to him. In the southern states, the white vote that would have gone to Edwards will now go to Hillary. So, will it all even out? Maybe. As someone commented above, the ratio could tilt a bit based upon who Edwards endorses (if anyone).

    Either way, as Anne said above, I certainly hope Elizabeth’s health has not taken a turn for the worse. That family has had enough tragedy already.

  • Standing ovation for Edwards… great run – principled, fiery and platform-shaping.

    Top prosecutor is not the best place where he could shine in a Dem White House – I would have him focus on either domestic/global Poverty issues or Labor Issues.

  • I’m sad as well. He just spoke here in Minnesota last night; packed Carpenter’s Hall on the coldest night of the winter. I’ve been torn between Edwards and Obama since before this whole thing began, and while my choice has now been made for me, I’ll miss John and Elizabeth. They made me proud of my party,

    I can’t believe I hadn’t thought of it before reading TR’s post, but I agree he would indeed make a wonderful AG. In any event, I sincerely hope this is not the end of his public life. We need his heart, mind, energy, voice and vision in our future.

    Thanks, John and Elizabeth, for all you’ve done for your country!

  • I don’t think anyone saw this coming.

    Well, that’s how he and Andrea/Melissa parted ways — he said they were staying on as his Internet people, then, a day or two later, it was gently announced that they were no longer on the team. I think that’s his style, to wait a couple of days; he seems to prefer that painful decisions not be announced in the heat of the moment.

    At this point, it’s hard to say what drove Edwards to end his campaign.

    Er, maybe the fact that the Gossip Girls of our political press never even considered him worth covering?

  • Thanks for the reassurance on the Elizabeth Edwards front.

    One wonders – I do, anyway – how this race would have shaped up if the media had actually let Edwards participate; guess we’ll never know, but I cannot shake the feeling that the media decided a long time ago that the steelcage death match between Clinton and Obama would be so much better for ratings. Now the trick will be seeing who they will be pushing for the nomination.

    The departure of Edwards means that a lot of people are feeling today that we lost the best chance we could see for finally having a seat and a voice at the table, with a candidate who would draw the line in the sand and work like a dog to push the corporations to the other side of it.

    If there is a place in the next Democratic administration for Edwards, I think he would be better suited for HHS or Labor – both places where consumer advocacy was dropped like a hot potato when agencies were gutted and we got a crop of agency heads who all came from the same industries they were charged with overseeing, or with whom they had all-too-cozy ties.

  • The Caped Composer’s comments above are similar to my own regarding who benefits from Edwards ending his campaign. Overall, 60/40ish favoring Obama….with regional variations.

    New polling done this week may shed some light on this. The most recent Rassmusen poll in Connecticut put it at Clinton 40% Obama 40% in that state…and this was conducted on the DAY of the South Carolina vote and well before the Edwards news.

    There are signs that Obama is picking up some momentum. Colorado, for instance, seems to be moving toward Obama. Clinton is likely to hold on in California and New York, but by very slim margins…and those are no longer givens for her.

    But enough about the horserace for a moment…Kudos to the Edwards campaign for carrying the progressive banner. I think the two remaining candidates are stronger because of his efforts.

  • I’m an Obama supporter, but I feel very sad for Edwards and his supporters today. His was a passionate campaign and I believed him when he said how personal this was to him, and I know the same hold true of his supporters.

    Very well put. Sen. Edwards played an extremely positive role in this race, and I hope he stays engaged in public life–with his heroic and inspiring wife by his side.

    I’ve thought for weeks that he’d make an outstanding Secretary of Labor–a role in which he do enormous good in helping to bring the economic playing field back to level. But he’d do fine work at the head of Justice or HHS as well. And he’s still plenty young enough to make a third run for the White House in four, eight, or even twelve years’ time.

    As for the impact on the race, my guess is that it helps the Clintons–that tribalism and brand loyalty will trump the change constituency. But I’m in a bad mood this morning, so maybe my instincts are off because of that.

  • Edwards was my first choice. He was the only candidate who seemed to speak from his heart and not from a poll generated list of talking points. When asked a question, he would pause and then give a thoughtful answer that almost always went to the core of my feelings. I think the guy truly has a vision for America that we cannot affored to lose. I hope there is a place for him in the next administration where that vision can be put into practice.

  • In different circumstances, Edwards could have been a truly successful candidate. However, this time around, Obama cornered the market in excitement and change, and Hillary dominated the hearts and minds and obligations of party insiders, and the horserace between those two vacuumed up all the press coverage. His lack of success was not due to his shortcomings, so much as the greater advantages of the other two candidates.

    I wonder if he’d like a Supreme Court nomination?

  • I’ll just add my nickel’s worth here–like others I was torn between Obama and Edwards for next Tuesday. Last night I decided to vote for Edwards. So much for that. I look forward to seeing him in the new Democratic cabinet beginning Jan. 2009. He’d be terrific in any number of posts. Between now and then I wonder if the media that ignored him will invite him on as an “analyst.” If so, I wonder if he’ll tell them to kiss his you-know-what.

  • The Edwards campaign presents a classic case study of contemporary politics as acted out on TeeVee. It’s entirely visual and superficial. Anything requiring more than reading so much as one sentence (e.g., policy or program) is headed for entropic doom. The reich wing’s “hair, home, hedge fund” sums up the critical thinking of most Americans. This clip illustrates that the shallowness isn’t all on the right.

  • JRS Jr, just when I see hope on your horizon, you prove time and time again how the brain is such a difficult thing to unwash. ;o)

    JRS Jr’s Bill O’Reilly talking point for the day: class warfare. For those unfamiliar with its meaning, class warfare means any acknowledgment that economic disparity has any impact on the stability of an economy or the quality of life of those who live within it (whether rich or poor).

  • The Edwards campaign presents a classic case study of contemporary politics as acted out on TeeVee. -Ed Stephan

    Who’d have thought we’d see the day where ‘TeeVee’ punished a candidate because they were a nice-looking white male.

  • I am disappointed that he did not stay in the race at least until after Tuesday, if only to give his supporters like a chance to demonstrate support for his agenda by voting for him. I don’t particularly like Clinton or Obama, and I am not sure which one is more likely to win the general election against McCain, or whomever is nominated by the Repubs, so I will probably vote for him next Tuesday anyway. It would not be a wasted vote.

  • Why dropout now? The only way to figure out what Hillary’s saying is to figure which side of her face she’s speaking from, or maybe it’s Bill with a ventriloquist act. Obama’s like ‘Howdy, Doody’ out there and he’s two faced also. Neither, merits or deserves, an endorsement.

  • Open Roadster: Perhaps he specifically wanted to get out before SuperTuesday, so as to give his supporters a chance to vote for someone else. Maybe this means SuperTuesday will actually mean something!

    And I join with all of those in being relieved this has nothing to do with Elizabeth Edwards’ health. I hope she and John are around for a long time!

  • Now the John Edwards is dropping out will Obama heed the advice of Paul Krugman and gain my support? Obama’s disrepect for even modest partisanship invites the Republicans to destroy him either during the fall campaign or during an Obama presidency.

    Here’s how I sum it up … Obama: Bound for glory, or bound to disappoint.

    Bill Clinton’s presidency is good example of disappointment. He was a successful president, nonetheless he disappointed an awful lot of people by not achieving more. I don’t look forward to being disappointed.

  • You’ll be missed Senator Edwards. Thank you for your eloquence on the economic disparities in this country. Like many others, I sincerely hope you’ll continue to be a public champion for progressive causes.

    …media decided a long time ago that the steelcage death match between Clinton and Obama would be so much better for ratings. Now the trick will be seeing who they will be pushing for the nomination.

    I think they will push Clinton. They know there is a vocal minority that can’t stand her or her husband thus they will get more nasty soundbites to play with. Plus it seems pretty clear that while Race is off limits for polite media play, Gender is fair game. Much to our nation’s discredit, in my opinion (to be clear I’m glad for the former, and saddened by the latter).

  • I’m enough of a realist to have known that Edwards leaving the race, or getting so far behind it would be impossible for him to get the nomination, was always a possibility, made greater when it became clear that the media was simply never going to treat him as a viable candidate and give him the same level of coverage as what was allocated to Clinton and Obama. It wasn’t something I was happy to have to contemplate, but I never had blinders on about it.

    In many of my comments over the last month or so, I have been more defensive of Clinton than Obama – maybe because the Hillary-hate has been so pervasive here, often unfairly-based and deserving of something that attemnpted to be objective. Many of you regularly accused me of being a stealth Hillary supporter – someone even referred to me as a Hillbot, of all things. Whatever.

    I’ve tried – although it may not have been particularly evident here – to like Obama, to feel some of the magic that a lot of people clearly feel, and am still not persuaded or convinced that he is what he is selling himself as. However, there is a real possibility that this is the man who will be the Democratic nominee for president, I’ve always said I would vote for him if he were the nominee, and I stand by that.

    I think it is – or should be – part of our internal debate as Democrats to cast as cold and analytical eye at the field of contenders in order to weed out and identify the problems, encourage the candidates to address them, and shape their candidacy to be reflective of the people they wish to represent. I’d rather we figure all these things out among ourselves than to sit and watch the GOP do it for us.

    Sorry to be waxing so philosophical; just wanted to express some of my thoughts as I come to grips with Edwards’ departure and prepare to turn my attention in a different way to the remaining candidates.

  • “…Edwards did what Kucinich wanted to do but couldn’t…”
    Everything Edwards came up with came from Kucinich. I don’t know how you figure Kucinich couldn’t or didn’t make all the candidates more progressive when he was the very definition of a progressive candidate. He came up with the health care plan that the others imitated but still can’t seem to make ‘not for profit’.

    Still, Edwards was the only candidate talking accountability. The only one willing to point to the lobbyists as being detrimental to our democracy. The only one willing to try to push money out of politics. Edwards was, as Anne mentioned, our only chance at having a seat at the table and at pushing the greedy corporations feasting there away from our economy, away from capitalizing on our energy needs and the future of our planet. He was the hope of the campaigns for a progressive agenda and a long shot for restoring our democracy and protecting our nation from the robber barons, the “economic royalists”, the war profiteers. To quote our president, “Money trumps….er…a..peace (and democracy) sometimes”.

  • Anne,

    I think it is – or should be – part of our internal debate as Democrats to cast as cold and analytical eye at the field of contenders…

    Not that I necessarily disagree with you, but can’t the argument be made that this is what gave us Dukakis and Mondale as a nominee? We are not nominating someone to be Chairman of the Federal Reserve or US Trade Representative. We are nominating someone for a political position. Charisma, like it or not, is a critical part of the job. Given that I’m not sure that a “cold and analytical” eye is sufficient to the task. Shouldn’t emotion and “gut instincts” also play a key role in our evaluation?

  • Edo – I don’t discount the value of emotion and the gut instinct at all – I just think that cannot be the only measure. I suppose what I did not express too well is that I would rather we kick around all the pros and cons among ourselves, have our eyes wide open as to what the potential or real problems are, and be prepared through this internal debate to successfully answer the inevitable garbage that is flung from the other side.

  • Sorry if it was suggested earlier, as I haven’t had the time to read all the comments as of yet.

    EDWARDS FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL

    Do a good job going after the misdeeds, which will prepare you for your appointment as the next

    EDWARDS FOR SUPREME COURT JUSTICE.

    That is my ideal.

  • ***Anne*** Ditto…exactly how I feel. I too got sick of all the biased Hillary hate from many who, for some reason seem to have a problem with ‘women’ in general. I too have the same misgivings about Obama even though I will vote for him but anytime one questions Obama it is regarded as an attack and so getting a discussion going on Obama’s plans or how they could be improved (when you could find out what they were) always resulted in you hate Obama and are a Hillary shrill. I believe I got one person on this site to even look at the Nation’s article on Obama’s economic advisers and their economic plans that Obama puts forth and he was attacked for commenting on just the background of these advisers.

    Most of the Obama supporters I talk to can’t tell me anything about his stands on the issues except “he’s for change and uniting the country by getting us all involved”. Hell, they can’t even tell me what that is supposed to mean.

    There are a lot of us who feel like you do Anne and explaining yourself is unnecessary as we’ve agreed with your perceptions and have understood your motivations all along. Keep commenting…you’re a great asset to this site.

  • Anne,

    thanks for the clarification and for what its worth I agree that we should go into this process with our eyes open. I, too, don’t care for the high level of anti-Clinton sentiment that seems to raise its ugly head here. having said that, I’m undecided. But frankly, I actually like the idea of a Clinton/Obama ticket. Obama says he can bring people together and get meaningful legislation passed? Great. Lets see it in action at the Federal level. 8 years of being VP and getting meaningful legislation passed would set him up nicely for 8 years of being President. And the thought of 16 years, minimum, of a Dem in the White House puts a lot of my fears of a disastrous Supreme Court to rest.

  • to EDO

    I would not like to see a Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton ticket. Why? because we would loose 2 good senators.

    If Obama is the nominee, I’d rather see Clinton becoming the Senate Majority Leader.

    If Clinton is the nominee, I’d rather see Obama as the Senate Majority Leader.

    That will embellish their respective careers and they’d have the microphone to progress their respective agendas.

  • Bruno,

    Fair enough. I was just a thought. I don’t think such a ticket would actually ever materialize. And FWIW, I think Clinton would make an excellent Majority Leader. I’m not so sure about Obama in that role.

  • Bravo Edwards. Exiting now is a classy thing to do. Now your supporters won’t have to choose between being unfaithful and being irrelevant.

    Now use the leverage you’ve earned and endorse someone already!

  • Anne, Edo, bjbotts… I’d agree (as if it wasn’t obvious) that vetting candidates is exactly what we should be doing here and what we are doing as a nation. If some Obama supporters aren’t willing to look past his lofty, non-specific and sometimes idealistic rhetoric, they’re not doing their job. On the other hand, anti-Clinton sentiment is not something that people dream up out of the blue. She has a way of doing and saying things that tick people off, and as another commenter said (on another post, I believe), once she’s lost you, you’re gone. So, just as I would admonish blind support of Obama, I would not let HRC supporters get away with using Hillary-hate as a means of deflecting criticism of her. Generating strong opinions in others is part of who she is.

  • I’m betwixted, and betweened, and very definately bewildered I hate that we lost the best candidate for the presidency. It is a sad day in political history.

  • John Edwards is a champion for our tired, our poor, our un-insured huddled masses yearning to breathe free, everything Bush is not, everything we as a country should strive to be.

    Here is too you John, and candidate or not, you still have my primary vote.

  • I, for one, never even considered Edwards a contender. Just what we need, another President with that lying smirk on his face. Glad he’s out.

  • Comments are closed.