Wednesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* First Rupert Murdoch took the Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones. Now he’s going after Yahoo? “Yahoo Inc. is discussing a possible partnership with News Corp. in its latest effort to repel Microsoft Corp. or prod its unsolicited suitor into raising its current takeover bid, according to a person familiar with the talks…. Both The Wall Street Journal and a prominent blog, TechCrunch, reported that News Corp. is interested in folding its popular online social network, MySpace.com, and other Internet assets into Yahoo — an idea that first came up last year.”

* So what happened on the torture measure we talked about earlier? “Later this afternoon, the Senate will be voting on a bill authorizing the government’s intelligence activities. Included in that bill is a measure sponsored by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) that would restrict the interrogation methods the CIA could use to the Army Field Manual, which bans waterboarding and other harsh techniques currently used by the CIA. The Republicans had been expected to challenge that provision, forcing a vote. But they didn’t. After a vote on the bill in 90 minutes or so, it will be on its way to the President, who has already announced that he will veto it.” Rumor has it Republicans wanted to make this easier on McCain.

* David Shuster caused quite a stir with his “pimp” remarks last week, but he’ll remain with MSNBC. “In the wake of the news that Hillary will debate on NBC later this month, an MSNBC spokesperson confirms that Shuster won’t be fired and will return to the network.” It’s not clear when he’ll be on the air next.

* The check is (almost) in the mail: “President Bush on Wednesday signed the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, calling it a “booster shot” for the American economy…. The government hopes the measure, which will send most Americans tax rebate checks by May, will either prevent a recession or make one relatively brief.”

* More discouraging news on the surge policy in Iraq: “Overall civilian fatalities in February, though still running at less than half the peak rate of 2006-07, are noticeably higher than in the past few months. Tension in the Sunni Awakening movement seems to be on the rise. Parliament is still deadlocked. Infrastructure improvements are nonexistent. And the surge is running out of time.”

* This should be interesting tomorrow: “As expected, things are finally moving forward in the House today to bring contempt resolutions against White House officials for ignoring Congressional subpoenas as part of the U.S. attorney firings investigation. House Judiciary Committee Chair John Conyers (D-MI) introduced two resolutions this afternoon related to the subpoenas. The first is a criminal contempt resolution against White House chief of staff Josh Bolten and former White House counsel Harriet Miers — both were subpoenaed and did not respond, citing the White House’s invocation of executive privilege. But Conyers also filed a resolution that Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) file a civil suit against the White House.”

* Bush wants his unchecked powers and he wants them now: “President Bush once again reiterated his objections to an extension of electronic surveillance legislation on Wednesday, dashing some House Democrats’ hopes for another three weeks to resolve differences with the Senate over the bill. The Senate version of the bill contains immunity for telecommunications companies who aided the government; the House version does not.”

* On a related note, Rep. Rush Holt (D-N.J.) had some very compelling things to say on the subject on the House floor.

* Interesting report in Time on a sought-after terrorist: “Imad Mughniyah, who was assassinated Tuesday in Syria, was a man of the Middle East’s shadows. He was a terrorist mastermind behind political causes. For him, though, it was as much about the fight as the cause. He shunned the light. He never gave public speeches or lectures. He is not known to have given any press interviews, not even to sympathetic or politically aligned journalists. Western reporters who sought the Lebanese Shi’ite group Hizballah’s help to arrange a rendezvous were politely but sternly advised not to go there. So, did the CIA or some other American intelligence agency finally do Mughniyah in? Everyone, including some of his friends, may have had a motive.”

* I’m glad this controversy is over: “After a day of raucous protests by veterans and anti-war activists, the Berkeley City Council admitted it had made a mistake by calling the United State Marine Corps “unwanted intruders” in this liberal city. ‘To err is human but to really screw up it takes the Berkeley City Council,’ said council member Gordon Wozniak. ‘We failed our city. We embarrassed our city,” according to the San Francisco Chronicle.”

* And finally, oh my: “A Utah state senator has apologized for comparing a school funding bill to a ‘dark ugly’ black baby, saying he did not intend it as a racist slur. Sen. Chris Buttars’ remark came during debate on the bill, which another senator had just called ‘the ugly baby bill,’ The Salt Lake Tribune reported. ‘This baby is black,’ Buttars said. ‘It’s a dark, ugly thing.’ Members of both parties criticized the Republican’s remark. Buttars apologized after a short break.”

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

From APOnline

“Democrat Barack Obama said Wednesday that as president he would spend $210 billion to create jobs in construction and environmental industries, as he tried to win over economically struggling voters…

Neera Tanden, Hillary Rodham Clinton’s policy director, said Obama was offering ideas Clinton proposed months ago. ”Voters may ask themselves that if Senator Obama cannot produce his own ideas on the campaign trail, how will he solve new problems as president?” Tanden said in a memo e-mailed to reporters.”

Is the the same Hillary Rodham Clinton who xeroxed John Edwards’ health care plan, whited his name out, and replaced it with hers. Who does she think she’s fooling with such hypocrisy? Both candidates are culpable, but she doesn’t have to add insult to injury by blowing smoke up our collective asses.

  • I have a general distaste for Microsoft, but I hate and despise Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. beyond all limitation. I shudder to think what would happen if he got his claws into Yahoo, so as of now I’m totally in favor of Microsoft being the victor here. At least Bill Gates isn’t trying to make the world safe for global domination!!

  • I may never Yahoo again.

    It’s too soon for Shuster to get out of the dog house. He needs to shiver in the cold for a little longer.

    Of course the Tucker show producer who whispered in his ear should be quietly fired.

  • Get a load of this:

    “If I really wanted to torpedo McCain, I would endorse him,” Limbaugh said on his radio show. “Because that would send the independents and liberals who are going to vote for him running away faster than anything.”

    “What people don’t realize is that I am doing McCain the biggest favor that can be done for him by staying out of this,” he continued. “If I endorsed him thoroughly and with passion, that would end the independents and moderates, because they so despise me and they so hate me.”

    http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/12/limbaugh-im-mccains-most-valuable-asset/

    Translation: “I’m actually supporting the guy by telling his potential supporters that he sucks. I need to do that in order to fool the people who will never vote for him into not hating him.”

    I think he just realized that he’s at risk of becoming a wingnut pariah if McCrappy loses, and of course there’s a good chance that McCrappy will lose.

  • A scary reminder of why Democrats must win in November —

    “Justice Antonin Scalia’s statement that inflicting pain on a terrorism suspect to elicit critical information could be constitutional was not the first — or second or even third — time he has commented on a legal controversy that ultimately could be settled by the Supreme Court.

    If past practice is any guide, Scalia won’t let his remarks or his critics’ complaints stop him from taking part in the court’s work…

    Scalia, 71, rebuffed calls in 2004 to step aside from a dispute involving Vice President Dick Cheney when it was disclosed Scalia accompanied Cheney on a hunting trip while the court was considering the case.

    ”I think the proudest thing I have done on the bench is not allow myself to be chased off that case,” Scalia said later at a law school forum in Connecticut.”

    Proudest thing? Holy shit!

  • Proudest thing? Holy shit!

    Have you read Scalia’s opinions? There’s nothing to be proud of there, so he had to look elsewhere.

  • The New York Sun is criticizing Obama for “banking” $31 million in “secret donations”. Of course they are talking about those donations of less than $200 that are exempt from public disclosure. They also claim his website “allows donors to choose an address in one of 227 possible countries or territories”, including Iraq. How many trees have to die for this nonsense?

  • How many trees have to die for this nonsense?

    I was once at an event with a reporter from the Sun there to cover it. He had a fedora, with an index card and the word “PRESS” written in magic marker on it.

  • Bush wants his unchecked powers and he wants them now: “President Bush once again reiterated his objections to an extension of electronic surveillance legislation on Wednesday, dashing some House Democrats’ hopes for another three weeks to resolve differences with the Senate over the bill.

    Send Bush the extension. If he wants to veto it, let him. He then becomes the one to let the original legislation lapse. No one is going to convince me that the only thing standing between us and an army of terrorist bombers is an ill-considered piece of right-wing authoritarian legislation with a hoaky name. “Protect America” indeed.

  • Or did I just date myself?

    You dated yourself beep52 @#10, but you helped teach me something about my city. I had never heard of Maypo before, but I know the old Maltex building down on Pine Street, alright. Now it’s the home of Dealer.com. Huh.

    1953 – Maypo, one of the original flavored oatmeals, was developed by the Maltex Corporation, Burlington, Vermont.

    Oh…uh…Sorry to go off topic Steve… Bush is an asshole.

  • The FCC needs to reinstate rules governing media ownership. What Rupert’s up to can only be bad and we shouldn’t open the door to even worse actors in the future controlling huge swaths of the nation’s information machinery. SB has to promise us that no matter how much money Rupert waves in front of him the Carpetbagger Report ain’t for sale. Please!?!

    “No one is going to convince me that the only thing standing between us and an army of terrorist bombers is an ill-considered piece of right-wing authoritarian legislation with a hoaky name.” Jim S. – ever think about running for Congress? It would make the Framers of the Constitution smile as well as whole bunch of us still on this side of the grave.

  • So, did the CIA or some other American intelligence agency finally do Mughniyah in?

    And, was it really Mughniyah in the first place? And, in the second place, was he as important as he was made out to be? If someone is *that* elusive and secretive, how do I know he even exists? He could be all smoke and mirrors — conjured up by CIA or whoever — for Bush’s convenience. I don’t trust those bastards “upstairs” *at all*; even if they told me that sun rose in the East, I’d check for myself before I allowed myself to half-believe it. With this mal-administration, it really has been “back to USSR” for the past 7+ years…

  • libra said: “So, did the CIA or some other American intelligence agency finally do Mughniyah in?”

    You imagine them that competent? A little too long behind the Iron Curtin.

    And besides, scary as the notion of sixteen intelligence ‘agencies’ may be, direct action is the responsibility of the CIA, not the rest.

  • “So what happened on the torture measure we talked about earlier?”

    Answer: John McCain voted **IN FAVOR** of torture!!! Or more precisely, he voted against the government intelligence bill that would have outlawed torture. Lots of people were busy saying that he wouldn’t even show up to avoid the conundrum this presents his campaign, and I felt that was most likely.

    Wow. Steve isn’t kidding. McCain really isn’t trying very hard to give Clinton/Obama a credible challenge. Is he that over-confident, or that stupid?

  • Shade Tail, what makes you think that the average American wouldn’t be very easily frightened into supporting torture? I think McCain made a political decision to shore up conservative support and doesn’t expect to pay any price at all for the general election.

  • Torture — It’s the new abortion in conservative politics.

    Wow.
    Bull’s eye.
    Too perfectly succinct.

  • Good words from Obama

    For our economy, our safety, and our workers, we have to rebuild America. I’m proposing a National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank that will invest $60 billion over ten years.

    And we’ll fund this bank by ending this war in Iraq. It’s time to stop spending billions of dollars a week trying to put Iraq back together and start spending the money on putting America back together instead.

  • “Shade Tail, what makes you think that the average American wouldn’t be very easily frightened into supporting torture?”

    By the fact that they’re already pushing back against the pro-torture extremists who’ve captured the republican party. Bush’s approval is at historic lows, people trust the democrats more than the republicans on every major issue (including national security), the “war” on terror is universally panned by everyone except neo-con hacks like Joe Klein, Faux “News” is steadily losing the ratings war, and on and on and on. And, most importantly, no matter how much these jokers rant and rave about the dangers we face, their approval ratings continue the steady slid downward, showing that the average American doesn’t believe a word they say.

    The only way Clinton or Obama could lose this one is if they make the same mistakes Gore and Kerry did about not pushing back against the GOP smear machine. That’s a very real possibility, I’ll grant you, but I’m cautiously optimistic that Obama, at least, learned the lesson. After all, he’s already done an excellent job of shutting out Faux “News” over the past year or so.

  • I think the whole Shuster thing was too far. He was right in pointing out how the Clintons are pimping out Chelsea. Just days after they made such a ruckus they had her go out on a lunch date with a young superdelegate to make him side with her mom.
    I personally like the NOT politically correct of MSNBC. I am a independent and liberated woman who is sick to death of the whining going on by the Hillary people about how poor HRC is such a victim. They want kid glove treatment. If she wants to be taken seriously, and women in general, then quit screaming at every imagined thing. They look for sexism where there is none and make the rest of us look stupid and irrational.
    Until the women who follow HRC can lightenup and quit demanding special treatment, no woman will be taken seriously.
    And as such, maybe they should stop taking themselves so seriously.
    Get over yourselves.

  • You really think Bush’s ratings are in the toilet because he decided to invade Iraq? Or is it because the American public thinks that he lost the war in Iraq once he started it? I think McCain is betting that enough people feel the latter that his “100 years” is reassuring to them. Not leaving means never having to admit failure.

    It’s depressingly cynical, and I’d be absolutely overjoyed to be proven wrong. But I think McCain’s strategy as the successful version of GWB is quite intentional.

  • vwcat: I’m an Obama supporter, but I still think you’re dead-wrong about the pimped-out comment. The Clinton camp’s response to that is quite on the mark, particularly because it isn’t an isolated incident. The media coverage about Clinton has been extremely sexist, and that’s a fact. Shuster isn’t the first MSNBC hack who has made incredibly inappropriate remarks about Clinton.

    Anyway, be serious. How was Shuster’s comment in any way correct? *Most* politicians with grown children have their kids campaigning for them. Bush’s daughters did for him. Mitt Romney’s sons did for him. What’s wrong with Chelsea campaigning for her mom? How does that make Clinton a pimp? Hint: It doesn’t. It’s a blatant double standard that Clinton gets criticized for this when other politicians (mainly men) get a free pass or even are admired and complimented for it.

    And Shuster’s excuse that “pimping” has been turned into a cultural reference is utterly ridiculous. The word still means the same thing in the Gansta Rap sub-culture as it does in the larger society; a pimp is a man who controls women. The fact that the concept is considered a positive in the Rap world is just another sign of mysogeny, which makes Shuster’s comment and excuse even worse.

    And on top of that, you have the unmitigated gall to say that the Clinton camp is seeking “special treatment” just because they are pushing back against this sexist double-standard? Clinton is accused of making her own daughter into a prostitute and you just blithely dismiss the outrage over this egregious insult? You just sneer about how she has to shut up about these outrages if she wants to be taken seriously?

    That’s not the way an “independent and liberated” woman would talk.

  • And now for something to get really outraged about: the New England Patriots taping the defensive signals of opposing teams since 2000.

    Said resident Republican moralist and tsk-tsker Arlen Specter, “We have a right to have honest football games.”

    Let’s see, right to honest football games … oh yeah, it’s right there in the Bill of Rights after “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” But that part about search warrants for spying on Americans is negotiable to dear Sen. Specter.

    Regarding the investigation into New England’s “Spygate,” Specter said “There was an enormous amount of haste.” He should know, he voted for the AUMF to start the Iraq war. No complaints from Arlen about that.

    “What’s that got to do with it? There’s an admission of guilt, you preserve the evidence,” Specter said. As for keeping the tapes out of the hands of others: “All you have to do is lock up the tapes.” Was Arlen talking about the millions of missing White House e-mails? Heavens no! He was speaking about the destruction of Bill Bellichick’s “Defensive Coaches Gone Wild” video collection.

    The New England Patriots: the Terri Schiavo of this election year, thanks to Arlen Specter. And if that doesn’t distract the media, there’s always steroids in baseball. The right to honest baseball must be protected at all costs. Habeas Corpus?, not so much.

  • “You really think Bush’s ratings are in the toilet because he decided to invade Iraq?”

    I didn’t say anything about that, so please don’t put words in my mouth. Regardless of the reason why, the republicans’ approval *is* in the toilet and Americans trust the democrats more to take care of things. Nothing the republicans say or do lately has done anything to turn that around. The way Obama and Clinton have both been talking, they clearly know which way the wind is blowing and how to take advantage of that.

    Again, the only way either of them can lose this is if they ignore the GOP smear machine and let them frame the issues and change the subject, as Gore and Kerry both did. And again, I acknowledge that this is a definite possibility but I am cautiously optimistic that Obama, at least, knows how to deal with it.

    Don’t believe for a moment that I’m unaware of the pitfalls here. The republicans will still lie and try to change the subject the way they always do, and if the dem nominee doesn’t push back aggressively it could easily cost us the election. The danger isn’t that the GOP will lie and smear, the danger is the dem nominee will let them get away with it (again).

    But as long as they don’t just sit back and let the GOP smear freely, we should do pretty well. Particularly given the huge gaps between the two parties in both public opinion and voter turn-out.

  • This — your last note — is par for the course for Chris Buttars, who Ed Brayton has dubbed possibly the Dumbest. State Legislator. Ever. (In his most recent post about a Buttars inanity he called him “[t]The terminally ridiculous Utah state Sen. Chris Buttars.)

    The man is an idiotic homophobe — Ed’s most recent story deals with Buttars’ protest against a “Salt Lake City … ordinance that allows people to put another adult in their household, whether related or not, on their health insurance.” Buttars is claiming that it ‘helps the gays’ even though the people most commonly affected are not gay — most typically parents put on the insurance by their children.

  • Lance, @14,

    The first sentence in my posting (regarding the killing of the Mug-what’shisname) wasn’t mine; it was a quote from Benen’s “bullet point”.I wasn’t questioning CIA’s competence (of which I know nothing) but their veracity.

    Petorado, @24,

    I’ve been wondering about Specter’s thirst for “justice in sports” (but not anywhere else) for a couple of days now… I guess it gives him a chance to enjoy a stiffness in one part of his body (though it may not, necessarily, be his spine)

  • Hillary sure is making this easy for me. I live in Texas, the crucial State in this primary, and I live in Houston, the most crucial city in Houston for keeping Hillary in the race.

    If Obama is going to win this thing, then I want to see it over with quickly so we can begin solidifying for the generals, and it looks as though he will probably come out ahead in delegates and the popular vote. Hillary, however has made it clear that she is going to take this thing, even if it means seating Florida and Michigan and strong arming superdelegates to get her over the top. So, the worst possible scenario is that Hillary hangs on, just close enough do a Florida style knife fight at the convention, and piss a whole lot of people off.

    So… OBAMA ALL THE WAY, BABY!!! I’ve got my thumb cymbals ready and donning my robes. YES, WE CAN! YES, WE CAN!

  • …which will send most Americans tax rebate checks by May…

    Out of curiousity, is this a pre-refund which will be deducted at your next filing (4/15/08 for tax year 07) or is this a real rebate type thing?

    As for Shuster, jeez, nothing compared to what others have said (Tucker, Matthews and Buchanon come to mind easily!) Was it appropriate? No. But neither is what we hear on more than 80% of media these days.

  • petorado (24): Thanks for the spygate humor. Those of us who hate Patriot-ism, want amnesty for Browns, cheer any and all spending Bills and root for stock market Bears, appreciate the irony. 🙂

  • Murdoch is only bidding for part of Yahoo! It doesn’t look like NewsCorp has enough money to buy the company outright.

  • To answer my own question @29, this from Yahoo Finance:

    Will a refund affect my rebate?
    Speaking of refunds, some folks have expressed concern that if their 2007 return gets them tax money back, they won’t get a rebate check. Not to worry.

    “Your refund has nothing to do with it,” says Scharin. “The rebate is treated as if you gave the government extra money and then it is sending it back to you. It’s sort of like extra withholding.”

    In fact, although the rebates will be determined by your 2007 tax filing data, the money actually is officially an “advance credit payment” against your 2008 income. So it has no bearing on your 2007 taxes, whether you owe or get a refund.

    And that leads to our last frequently asked question, or rather questions.

    What will the rebate mean to my 2008 taxes?

    Will I owe taxes on my rebate amount next year? What if this year my situation changes and that means my rebate amount should be less?

    For most filers, says Luscombe, this year’s rebate will appear as a simple gift from the government. The rebate amounts are tax-free.

    But filers will have to reconcile any money they receive this year when they file their 2008 returns.

    “It harks back to the 2001 situation when we got the new 10 percent bracket and got an advance check for that. Then on next return had to account for it,” says Luscombe. “It’s expected to be that way this time.”

    The 2008 tax forms should have a line for the new credit. When calculating taxes next year, taxpayers will have to subtract what they got as a rebate check the previous summer.

    “Some people might think that’s unfair,” says Luscombe, “but they got the money, and they got it early.”

    One thing taxpayers won’t have to worry about is giving back any excess if their 2008 taxes show that the advance this year was actually more than they should have received.

    “If it turns out that credit on your 2008 return is greater, you get to take that additional amount,” says Luscombe. “If it’s lesser than what you got in 2007, you don’t have to refund that back to government.” The law says the IRS can’t recover the extra payment by reducing your 2008 refund or adding to your 2008 tax bill.

  • Comments are closed.