A record long on narrative, short on accomplishments

At Time yesterday, Ana Marie Cox offered a hint of what’s to come if John McCain and Barack Obama face off in the general election.

In a general, Obama won’t be running against Clinton, he’ll be running against McCain, a politician that has actually taken political risks and endured the wrath of party hacks in order to make progress on real issues: “What has Obama done? Show me a single issue or piece of legislation where Obama has done something politically unpopular in order to move forward toward a greater goal.” I pointed out that this argument hasn’t made much of a difference so far. Ah, replied the adviser, “That’s because Clinton can’t show that she’s done it, either.”

It’s a curious argument. Obama and Clinton, the McCain staffer argued, are at a disadvantage because they haven’t taken more unpopular positions in advance of their presidential campaigns. If you say so.

But I think the underlying argument is that neither Obama nor Clinton have passed sweeping, landmark pieces of legislation. Matt Yglesias mentioned the problem with this argument: McCain’s list of legislative accomplishments is surprisingly thin.

In terms of getting things done, what’s John McCain ever accomplished? Beyond a minor, years-old procedural reform to the campaign finance system — nothing. And he’s had much more time in Washington in which to get something done. But in McCain’s past 25 years in congress he’s managed to author not a single piece of legislation that’s been signed into law that helps any real people with any real problems. He’s spent a lot of time posturing on the Sunday shows, and affiliated himself with a few pieces of modestly progressive legislation that didn’t get passed, and then disavowed all those bills.

Everything I’ve seen from McCain suggests this is absolutely right, but it got me to wondering: what would McCain say his greatest legislative accomplishments were?

I took a look at the “About” page on McCain’s website, looking for accomplishments. It touts his “record of leadership,” but doesn’t include a single reference to an accomplishment from McCain’s quarter-century as a member of Congress.

Well, “About” pages tend to be kind of vague, so perhaps I was looking in the wrong place. There’s also a timeline of the important milestones in McCain’s life on his website. (It skips over some of the personal details, such as his adultery and divorce.) It’s a lengthy review of McCain’s awards and key moments, but it lists just one piece of legislation: “May 20, 2002 – Final passage of John McCain’s trademark McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform legislation, which reformed the influence of money in political campaigns.”

This, in and of itself, is kind of interesting. After more than 25 years in Washington, McCain mentions just one landmark bill — which he now no longer wants to talk about, because the Republican base hates the legislation. Indeed, it’s also worth considering the fact that McCain no longer stands by his only landmark legislation, and has flip-flopped on some of the provisions of his own bill.

It’s a particular oddity, given the length of his career. It’d be fascinating if a campaign reporter were to simply ask McCain, “Senator, after 25 years on the Hill, what would you say are your top five biggest legislative accomplishments.” My hunch is, he would struggle to come up with a list.

Now, I know what some of you are thinking: “OK, wise guy, what about the legislative accomplishments from Obama and Clinton?” Fair enough. I went by their “About” pages to see if they’re any better than McCain. As it turns out, unlike the Arizona senator, they actually list legislative accomplishments. Go figure.

From Obama’s site:

In the Illinois State Senate, this meant working with both Democrats and Republicans to help working families get ahead by creating programs like the state Earned Income Tax Credit, which in three years provided over $100 million in tax cuts to families across the state. He also pushed through an expansion of early childhood education, and after a number of inmates on death row were found innocent, Senator Obama worked with law enforcement officials to require the videotaping of interrogations and confessions in all capital cases.

In the U.S. Senate, he has focused on tackling the challenges of a globalized, 21st century world with fresh thinking and a politics that no longer settles for the lowest common denominator. His first law was passed with Republican Tom Coburn, a measure to rebuild trust in government by allowing every American to go online and see how and where every dime of their tax dollars is spent. He has also been the lead voice in championing ethics reform that would root out Jack Abramoff-style corruption in Congress.

As a member of the Veterans’ Affairs Committee, Senator Obama has fought to help Illinois veterans get the disability pay they were promised, while working to prepare the VA for the return of the thousands of veterans who will need care after Iraq and Afghanistan. Recognizing the terrorist threat posed by weapons of mass destruction, he traveled to Russia with Republican Dick Lugar to begin a new generation of non-proliferation efforts designed to find and secure deadly weapons around the world.

…and from Clinton’s site.

She was instrumental in designing and championing the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, which has provided millions of children with health insurance. She battled the big drug companies to force them to test their drugs for children and to make sure all kids get the immunizations they need through the Vaccines for Children Program. Immunization rates dramatically improved after the program launched. […]

After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Hillary worked with her colleagues to secure the funds New York needed to recover and rebuild. She fought to provide compensation to the families of the victims, grants for hard-hit small businesses, and health care for front line workers at Ground Zero. […]

Hillary passed legislation to track the health status of our troops so that conditions like Gulf War Syndrome would no longer be misdiagnosed. She is an original sponsor of legislation that expanded health benefits to members of the National Guard and Reserves and has been a strong critic of the Administration’s handling of Iraq…. She helped pass legislation that encouraged investment to create jobs in struggling communities through the Renewal Communities program…. She authored legislation that has been enacted to improve quality and lower the cost of prescription drugs and to protect our food supply from bioterrorism…. Her strong advocacy for children continues in the Senate. Some of Hillary’s proudest achievements have been her work to ensure the safety of prescription drugs for children, with legislation now included in the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, and her legislation to help schools address environmental hazards.

And I only included legislation that actually passed, as opposed to bills they sponsored that didn’t become law.

If the race comes down to legislative accomplishments, I think McCain’s in trouble.

Does all of this navel gazing really matter. There is no way that McCain can win given that Senator Obama can probably win every state that Kerry won in 2004 without spending any funds whereas McCain is going to have to spend money on states like Virginia.

The real question is whether the Democrats win 60 seats in the Senate and make the Republicans irrelevant.

  • In the Chron, McCain is said to dislike the uppity (I mean, upstart) Obama bc McCain is entitled to the position bc he’s sucked as a Washington insider for much longer than Obama and Hillary have been doing a good job.

  • You’re making just one mistake here, CB. The media doesn’t CARE about McCain’s legislative accomplishments. It’s how about him and his “Maverick” status.

    Accomplishments don’t play into the narrative and people (some would even call them voters) don’t care about those kinds of things. Can I drink a beer with him?

  • I guess keeping a chair warm in the Senate for 25 years counts for nothing in this campaign. He also did go shopping in a Baghdad market surrounded by hundreds of soldiers and close air support at taxpayer expense. Can’t forget about that.

  • … McCain’s life on his website. (It skips over some of the personal details, such as his adultery and divorce.)

    Give me a break. That’s his political website. What do you expect? And who says that adulterers don’t make good presidents?

  • And who says that adulterers don’t make good presidents? -Javier A

    James Dobson, Bill Donohue, Ken Starr, Larry Craig, Ted Haggard, Rudy Giuliani, Newt Gingrich.

    It’s the hypocrisy, stupid.

  • Damn you 2Manchu, I was thinking the same thing.

    Making the S&L scandal more expensive for taxpayers. That’s an accomplishment, well, sort of.

  • I think his major accomplishment, after surviving being shot down, was “the hug” which took place at at a rally for 6,000 soldiers at Fort Lewis (WA) June 18, 2004. I think so much of this accomplishment that I believe we should never let the public forget about it, especially given the Shrub’s popularity .

  • “You’re making just one mistake here, CB. The media doesn’t CARE about McCain’s legislative accomplishments. It’s how about him and his “Maverick” status.”

    We live in a new world, Jim. The MSM don’t have a monopoly on information any more.

    Here’s the new story line that the MSM will pick up once it has been firmly established in the blogosphere:

    “Sure, McCain is a “maverick” like we’ve been saying for so many years. But what has the “maverick” accomplished in his 25 years in Congress? Not much! His fellow senators don’t even respect him. What kind of success does his track record indicate that he will have in working with the Congress if he wins the presidential election?”

    Great post, Mr. Carpetbagger. Thanks for doing this research. I’m going to enjoy poking my Republican friends with this needle.

  • [Hillary Clinton] was instrumental in designing and championing the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, which has provided millions of children with health insurance.

    This was actually an accomplishment of the Clinton administration. Maybe she helped, but how do we know? I invented the internet. Don’t believe me? Prove I didn’t (by the way, Jake isn’t my real name).

    This approach is essentially what Senator Clinton does when she takes credit for accomplishments that took place under President Clinton. I don’t know about you, but it makes me squirm a little.

  • I’m not a McCain fan, but what about the anti-torture bill he got passed?
    Or doesn’t that matter because Bush decided to ignore it?

  • There’s an old AP US History essay gimmick that roughly runs ‘Mediocre presidents want to be president to be someone. Great presidents want to be president to do something.’

    McCain fits neatly into that schema.

  • Javier A,

    And who says that adulterers don’t make good presidents?

    The House Impeachment panel circa 1998 comes to mind.

  • I think his major accomplishment, after surviving being shot down, was “the hug”

    You know, I think it’s really too bad that if you search for McCain on google images, a picture of “the hug” isn’t the first thing that pops up.

    Really, really sad. Tragic.

    Ahem – in a contest of “who’s more proud of their legislative achievements” McCain is the clear loser. But that’s par for the course – Republicans hate government and don’t think that government CAN do anything. So if you had a successful Republican legislator they wouldn’t vote for him anyway because his mere existence would PROVE that government wasn’t horribly ineffective.

    That’s why Republicans like to rally ’round incompetent dolts. Competent people would force them to re-examine cherished beliefs.

  • Senator Obama worked with law enforcement officials to require the videotaping of interrogations and confessions in all capital cases.

    I live in the state of Illinois and I can tell you first hand he got a lot of shit for that..

  • Well, of COURSE John McCain is a maverick—and I can prove it. Being a “maverick” means that you go against the grain, reject the notion of common-ness, and march to the beat of your own drum. Every other member of the Senate shows up for work on a regular basis. That’s “common-ness.” John McCain, however, is a “maverick”—he doesn’t show up for work on a regular basis.

    Out on the campaign trail, he spouts off repeatedly about the evils of torture. That’s what any ex-POW would do. But when John gets around to showing up for work, he needs to do something to maintain that “aura of maverick-ness”—so he votes in favor of allowing torture.

    See? Just like I said—ol’ John “Evil Emperor Ming” McCain is a real, live maverick….

  • Since JFK, name me one President we have elected that has “passed legislation” as one of his accomplishments? You can’t because this country typically doesn’t elect sitting Senators as President. There’s a reason for that. I don’t vote for a President that knows how to pass legislation. That is not what Presidents do. President’s govern. Which is why this country tends to elect governors. The “skills” (if you can call them that) a Senator or Congressman has do not easily translate into managing and running the country. That’s what’s scary about this election. NONE of the candidates have any experience managing or governing. They have experience being lobbied, making back room deals, and duplicitous back scratching. Who wants that in a President? Presidents are not responsible for proposing, writing or voting on bills. Sure they have veto power, but that’s after all the work is done. Yea, if there is legislation they are in favor of they will in the background to get it passed. But, most have coupled that with actually having governed. NONE of the remaining candidates have ANY experience in that. Which is the single most important skill a President should have. The ability to govern.

  • That’s not a bad point, Dave. However, it’s also a cliche and not entirely true. The Whitehouse has enormous influence in legislative priorities and often executive branch departments have a hand in crafting bills that promote the President’s agenda. An ex-Senator President would theoretically have the advantage of knowing how to get things done in Congress and thereby get his policy agenda enacted. So the big question then becomes which candidate has an approach to policy that you can get behind. For me it’s Barrack, I think he has genuine candor and an intelligence I respect. I think we need fresh ideas. The more closely I look at Mccain, the more I think he’s a muddle.

  • ALL OF YOU LIBERAL WEASELS CAN SAY WHAT YOU WANT AGAINST MCCAIN, BUT HE DOES NOT HAVE THE KIND OF EVIL FRIENDS OBAMA HAS SUCH AS A FORMER(AND POSSIBLY STILL PRESENT)TERRORIST, BILL AYERS. MCCAIN NEVER ACQUIRED PROPERTY VIA A CONVICTED FELON, TONY REZKO. MCCAIN’S WIFE NEVER SAID SHE WAS NOT PROUD OF OUR COUNTRY. AND TO THINK, IF THIS CREEP, OBAMA, WINS, HE WILL HAVE ACCESS TO OUR NATION’S TOP SECRETS. UNBELIEVABLE!

  • Comments are closed.