Lobbying, influence peddling aboard the ‘Straight Talk Express’

John McCain’s website tells visitors, “Too often the special interest lobbyists with the fattest wallets and best access carry the day.” That, apparently, is especially true of the lobbyists who dominate McCain’s campaign staff, at least one of whom does lobbying work directly from McCain’s bus.

Of all the lobbyists involved in the McCain campaign, the most prominent is [Charles] Black, who has made a lucrative career of shuttling back and forth between presidential politics and big-time Washington lobbying…. [E]ven as Black provides a private voice and a public face for McCain, he also leads his lobbying firm, which offers corporate interests and foreign governments the promise of access to the most powerful lawmakers. Some of those companies have interests before the Senate and, in particular, the Commerce Committee, of which McCain is a member.

Black said he does a lot of his work by telephone from McCain’s Straight Talk Express bus.

So, let’s see if we have this straight. John McCain, the “reform”-minded Republican who decries the power and influence of lobbyists, not only has more lobbyists working on his staff or as advisers than any of his competitors from either party, he actually has a corporate lobbyist doing business directly aboard his campaign bus.

McCain’s signature legislative accomplishment after a quarter-century in Washington is legislation to weaken the power of special interests. It’s kind of ironic, isn’t it?

The rest of the Post article drives the broader point home.

For years, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) has railed against lobbyists and the influence of “special interests” in Washington, touting on his campaign Web site his fight against “the ‘revolving door’ by which lawmakers and other influential officials leave their posts and become lobbyists for the special interests they have aided.”

But when McCain huddled with his closest advisers at his rustic Arizona cabin last weekend to map out his presidential campaign, virtually every one was part of the Washington lobbying culture he has long decried. His campaign manager, Rick Davis, co-founded a lobbying firm whose clients have included Verizon and SBC Telecommunications. His chief political adviser, Charles R. Black Jr., is chairman of one of Washington’s lobbying powerhouses, BKSH and Associates, which has represented AT&T, Alcoa, JPMorgan and U.S. Airways.

Senior advisers Steve Schmidt and Mark McKinnon work for firms that have lobbied for Land O’ Lakes, UST Public Affairs, Dell and Fannie Mae.

The WaPo added, “In McCain’s case, the fact that lobbyists are essentially running his presidential campaign — most of them as volunteers — seems to some people to be at odds with his anti-lobbying rhetoric.” Ya think?

McCain added yesterday that no one should be concerned about any of this, because the army of lobbyists he’s surrounded himself with are “honorable.”

What a relief. I was afraid that the corporate lobbyists that make up the Republican’s team were the dishonorable kind, but with a compelling argument like McCain’s, there are obviously no grounds for concern.

One thing’s for sure: McCain will have the “more of the same” vote completely locked up in the fall.

Reminds me of a talk I heard from an Editor of The Baffler at U of Chicago. He said “rebellion” is now a marketing strategy by companies selling cool. “Be a Rebel: Drink 7 Up”. “I’m an individual — I wear Bugle Boys”.

I think McCain has found a way to achieve his lobbyists goals by marketing “reform”. Companies like him because he’s cool like Nike.

  • McCain needs to get ahead of this story quickly! After all he is 71, and people may think he can’t keep his story straight because of age. Oh the foibles of running for president! -Kevo

  • What’s the positive alternative to “cynical?”

    I don’t believe any of them from either party – haven’t since I was eighteen.

  • But lobbyist stories are boring. I don’t think any of this resonates.

    I agree. Let’s begin the national debate as to whether the nation is ready to accept a mentally disabled, brain-damaged First Lady. I want to hear John McCain defend his decision to subject his handicapped wife to the rigors of a presidential campaign and worldwide scrutiny.

    As recently as last September, Mrs McCain spoke about the damage from her 2004 stroke. She acknowledged her short term memory loss and admitted that she is unable to remember what she did last week. With regard to her long term memory, she can only recall the major events in her life.

    I’m not trying to be cruel to Cindy McCain. The extent of her brain damage will become a campaign issue just as soon as the issue can be framed appropriately in the media. I can already imagine the look of concern on Katie Couric’s face when she delicately probes the extent of the brain damage in her Cindy McCain interview. Of course, NBC will have medical experts galore explaining what causes a stroke, etc.

    Once the floodgates are opened, I expect the media will press the McCains to reveal the true state of Cindy’s health. Last October, for example, she fell in a Phoenix grocery store and had to hobble on crutches for awhile.

    On the other hand, I am quite happy to admit that I am looking forward to the inevitable cruel Cindy McCain jokes and parodies.

    Paybacks are a bitch.

    John McCain, 1998-

    Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly?
    Because her father is Janet Reno.

  • These sharks don’t do anything for free. That they publicly call themselves “volunteers” just means that they get fat and happy off the back end of the bus instead of the front end, which probably couldn’t afford them if they had to pay a straight salary upfront.

    “Straight Talk Express” my Aunt Fanny!

  • “The army of lobbyists he’s (McCain) surrounded himself with are “honorable.” How do we know they are “honorable” people? Because, all conservatives are “honorable”!

  • I can’t figure out which would make McCain look worse, whether Vicki Iseman got undue influence over him by sleeping with him, or just by flirting with him. Moreover, if she is paying for his influence with her affections, and he’s paying for her affection with his influence, which one of them is the bigger prostitute?

    Daniel Shorr briefly discussed McCain & Iseman on NPR’s Weekend Edition today, and referred to him as “a living symbol of good ethical behavior”. I was very disappointed at how much even Shorr had bought into the McCain mythos.

    Cindy McCain would make a really convenient Attorney-General for her husband – few other people in Washington could so credibly testify, “Sorry, Senator, I don’t remember”.

  • Senator Johm McCorruption can’t see the Forest of Corporate Lobbyists for the Corporate Lobbyist-trees…

  • The NYT only reported the story of McCain’s campaign aids concern about an inappropriate relationship, not that there was a relationship. And I agree that those aids should have been concerned- if it looks like nooky and smells like nooky, someone’s gettin nooky.

    I was not aware of his wife’s condition though and I think it’s disingenuous that she’s made to look like a manequin in front of the cameras. That’s a phoney and sad ploy. And so is John McCain.

  • Please leave Daniel Schorr out of this, he’s an old man.Heh. In contrast, McCain is a snot-nosed kid. Dementia knows no age group..hence McCain.

  • Should Cindy McCain’s Brain Damage Be A Campaign Issue?

    I don’t know whether Americans care if the First Lady is mentally disabled – that’s a question for McCain’s pollsters. What I want to know is why McCain would even subject his poor wife to the rigors of a presidential campaign and worldwide scrutiny in the first place. The question speaks directly to McCain’s personal cruelty and unbridled ambition.

    Although the true extent of the brain damage has not been publicly disclosed, Cindy McCain’s 2004 stroke is not a secret.

    In a very flattering September 2007 interview in More, Paul Alexander wrote about the stroke damage:

    “In conversation, she will occasionally have trouble remembering certain facts, especially from the recent past, and if you look closely you realize she cannot make her right hand into a complete fist, which has affected her handwriting, if not her ability to grasp a gearshift knob. “It’s not bad,” she says, describing the damage to her hand. “I can function. I have short-term memory loss. I can remember all the major details of my life, but I sometimes can’t remember what happened last week.”

    I suspect that John McCain, viewed his wife’s stroke more in terms of how it would affect his bid for the presidency than else.

    From a January 2005 Larry King show:

    “MCCAIN: I was the one at home that everyone came to to program their computers, fix their phones, do anything electrical, technical, anything on the computer. I can’t get near it now. I’m overwhelmed by it.

    And it’s weird for me. And I might also say, I suffer from migraines also. And your last caller that called in — and I just had an episode about a week and a half ago, where I didn’t know, I thought I was having another stroke. It was a different kind of…

    KING: Has the senator been very sympathetic?

    MCCAIN: Yes. And I — please don’t — let me explain that. He was very confused in the beginning. He didn’t — like everyone in the family, how could it happen to my wife? I’m 18 years older than she is. It doesn’t happen to someone that’s younger than you are. So on his behalf, I think he’s trying to understand all this. It’s a lot for him to take in.”

    In October 2007, Cindy McCain was hobbling around South Carolina as the result of a fall down in a Phoenix grocery store. Was her fall caused by her brain damage? Is the question any of our business?

    Inevitably, the issue of the extent of Cindy McCain’s brain damage will enter the public arena. So far, Mrs McCain has only had to field softballs lobbed at her by sympathetic journalists. Can the McCain campaign limit her public appearances to three-minute soundbites until November? I don’ think so, not in today’s political environment.

    Why, Senator McCain, would you do this to your wife?

  • Comments are closed.