The story gets worse for McCain’s buddy Rick Renzi

For Clinton detractors, Norman Hsu is a huge deal. For Obama detractors, Tony Rezko is incredibly important. But where does Rep. Rick Renzi (R-Ariz.), a member of Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) National Leadership Team and a co-chair of his Arizona Leadership Team, fit into the mix?

Renzi was, of course, recently indicted on felony counts of extortion, wire fraud, and money laundering, among other transgressions. Despite the charges, McCain hasn’t distanced himself from Renzi at all, saying he doesn’t know the “details” of the indictment, so he won’t criticize his political ally. McCain wouldn’t even comment on whether Renzi would remain a part of his campaign leadership, saying the issue “doesn’t matter.”

With all of this in mind, I couldn’t help but notice that matters for McCain’s buddy went from bad to worse yesterday.

Rep. Rick Renzi, R-Ariz., allegedly defrauded dozens of pro-life organizations for hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund his first congressional bid, according to an analysis of the recent indictment against him, a state insurance claim and an interview with an insurance lawyer involved in the case.

When federal prosecutors indicted Renzi, 49, on 35 felony counts two weeks ago, many reports focused on alleged crimes stemming from a complicated series of land swaps the congressman facilitated.

But the indictment also accuses Renzi, who ran an insurance firm before coming to Capitol Hill, of misappropriating hundreds of thousands of dollars in insurance premiums and using the money to fund his congressional campaign.

As I understand it, in conservative circles, it’s not an especially smart move to defraud anti-abortion groups.

Organizations such as Arizona Right-to-Life, the Hope Crisis Pregnancy Center and the Wickenburg Pregnancy Resource Center paid insurance premiums to Renzi’s insurance firm, Renzi & Company, but received notices their insurance coverage was going to be cancelled for nonpayment, according to a 2003 complaint filed with the State of Arizona. The complaint was first reported by the Phoenix New Times.

According to the indictment, Renzi funneled those payments — totaling more than $400,000 — through various accounts and finally to his campaign.

Renzi’s congressional office has directed all legal questions to his lawyer, Reid Weingarten. Weingarten did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Renzi says he is innocent.

Renzi has positioned himself as staunchly anti-abortion. “The sanctity of human life should always be upheld, and I will continue to fight for the rights of the unborn in Congress,” he said in 2003, as a freshman U.S. representative. In 2006, Renzi received a 100 percent rating from the National Right to Life Committee for his voting record.

The 2003 complaint was filed by an insurance broker who acted as an intermediary between Renzi & Company and the insurance company which held the pro-life groups’ policy.

In an interview, a lawyer for the broker confirmed that the payments his company did not receive from the pro-life groups were the same prosecutors allege Renzi embezzled to pay for his congressional campaign.

In all, according to the ABC News report, the insurance lawyer involved in the case said Renzi may have defrauded “roughly 50 pro-life organizations,” all of which “received cancellation notices because Renzi’s company had not forwarded their payments.”

It’s hard to know which narratives will catch on in a presidential campaign, but given Renzi’s close ties to McCain, and his positions within McCain’s campaign, I wonder whether Renzi’s name will take on the resonance Rezko’s and Hsu’s have.

This is a much bigger deal than Hsu or Rezko. This is part of McCain’s campaign. Alas, he is a republican and it can not be covered in the MSM.

  • I seriously doubt it. He’s a repub and he’s John McCain. Nothing to see here, move along.

  • Note to McCain: Rule 3523 in the Holy Book of Bushylvania—“Whensoever a political friend becomes as an albatross around thy neck, thou shalt cast him beneath the Bus of Vengeful Expedience—for he is become as an abomination in the eyes of the Holy Base, who must be placated with sacrificial blood upon the High Alter of Two-Fac’ed-Ness.”

  • LOL – The photo of Renzi in Justin Rood’s ABC News story makes Renzi look like a thug.

    I guess McCain and the wingnuts could point out that Renzi ultimately repaid the pro-life groups or at least his father did. That’s the father that is an exec with Mantech, a defense contractor with a huge interest in a military base in Renzi’s district.

    The Renzi trial is scheduled for April 29th which should be fun to follow.

    Speaking of GOP corruption, I posted a Kos diary with a timeline of the NRCC financial scandal. If the former NRCC treasurer, Christopher J. Ward, was acting in collusion with members of Congress, this scandal could blow the doors of the GOP’s prospects in November.

  • Let’s not dismiss this story too quickly. Remember that among the things that came out of the Abramoff scandal was the fact that Tom’s Delay’s wife collectied names of “favorite charities” from all the congressmen and was paid over $100,000 by a lobbyist to do so. Also Abramoff, himself, was using his personal charity to pay for his son’s education. A Republican conservation non-profit with ties to the Dept of Interior was sending money to an Israeli “sniper school” on Abramoff’s behalf. Senator Santorum was allegedly under investigation for using charities to launder money. McCain advisor and lobbyist Charles Black was on the board of advisors for Santorum’s charity. Last year, when the Senate was changing ethics and lobbying rules to forbid private jet travel paid by corporations and lobbyists, Senator Bennett (R-UT) introduced an ammendment that would make charities an exception. Every Rep. plus six Dem’s voted for it.

    It makes sense to use charities to launder money, because they don’t have normal quid pro quo relationships. While the story above suggests Renzi was stealing from these groups, I would suggest that the more likely scenario was that the charities were doing more than buying insurance through Renzi’s company.

  • I heard Saint McCain was going to lay hands on him and just wash away the sin with his Straight-Talking Healing Powers.

  • Danp,

    Interesting theory. In effect, the pro-life groups merely made a loan to Renzi’s campaign. Since their insurance coverage never lapsed and the premiums were eventually repaid, no harm was done.

    I like it!

    It will be interesting to see if Renzi uses that scenario for his defense.

  • mrspanstreppon (8) ” In effect, the pro-life groups merely made a loan to Renzi’s campaign.”
    Actually I would go one step further. Someone is making donations to a charity, which then gets transferred to a campaign, usually in the form of air travel, speaker fees, etc. The charity merely acts as a go-between. And the briber or illegal contributor not only bypasses the rules, but gets tax subsidies (deductions) in the process.

  • Has anyone else noticed that when this story is ‘reported’ on the corporate/repiglican media that he is only reported to be a ‘congressman from arizona’ .. and never, ever, is the fact that he was/is McCain’s co-chairperson for his campaign ? just one more example of the corporate media lying and shielding McCain .. oh well, another barbeque is what they are all waiting for …

  • Danp,

    But, if the charities were complicit (a conduit for money), then would they be screeching for his head on the platter because their insurance was about to expire? Or are you suggesting that the right hand didn’t know what the left hand was doing and that some of those charities knew the money was being laundered while others did not?

  • Pingback: 0ea7e29d16e9
  • Comments are closed.