Petraeus concedes Iraq not making ‘sufficient progress’

A month ago today, Gen. David Petraeus sounded relatively optimistic about political progress in Iraq: “The passage of the three laws today showed that the Iraqi leaders are now taking advantage of the opportunity that coalition and Iraqi troopers fought so hard to provide.”

That was then; this is now.

Iraqi leaders have failed to take advantage of a reduction in violence to make adequate progress toward resolving their political differences, Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, said Thursday.

Petraeus, who is preparing to testify to Congress next month on the Iraq war, said in an interview that “no one” in the U.S. and Iraqi governments “feels that there has been sufficient progress by any means in the area of national reconciliation,” or in the provision of basic public services.

Well, I’m not sure if I’d say “no one” feels encouraged by the steps (or lack thereof) towards political reconciliation. John McCain, Joe Lieberman, Bill Kristol, and most of the Bush administration seem to tell us all the time that Iraq is nothing but a big helping of “progress.”

I don’t doubt that this will sound like a broken record to anyone who keeps up even passively with current events, but the entire point of the surge was to give Iraqis “breathing room,” which they would then use to make political progress and achieve some semblance of reconciliation. This, regrettably, hasn’t happened.

If there hasn’t been “sufficient progress” in these areas, and this is so obvious that “no one” should argue differently, then … wait for it … the surge hasn’t succeeded as a policy.

As the Speaker’s office said today, “After almost five years of war and nearly 4,000 American lives lost, General Petraeus’ admission proves that the President’s Iraq policy has failed. President Bush and other Republicans can no longer credibly claim that their status quo Iraq strategy is working.”

And yet, I have a hunch they’ll claim it anyway, credible or not.

In what appeared to be a foreshadowing of his congressional testimony, which his aides said he would not discuss explicitly, Petraeus insisted that Iraqi leaders still have an opportunity to act. “We’re going to fight like the dickens” to maintain the gains in security and “where we can to try and build on it,” he said.

The next question, as the war enters its sixth year, is how much longer we’re supposed to “fight like the dickens” and wait. For McCain, Bush, and the GOP, the answer is, “Indefinitely, no matter the costs.”

For everyone else, the more people learn that “no one” in the U.S. and Iraqi governments “feels that there has been sufficient progress by any means in the area of national reconciliation,” the less they’ll feel patient about investing more blood and treasure.

I’m sure that soon the Republicans will argue that the failure of the Iraqi political leaders to reconcile occurred because the Democratic presidential candidates have been talking about withdrawing US forces. They’ll say that al Qaeda has caused the Iraqi political impasse, in hopes that a Democrat will be elected, and that they’ll be rid of the US troops (and then they’ll take over Iraq).

Of course this is pure rubbish, but mark my words, some Republicans will say it and some idiots in the media will repeat it.

  • The intentionally-engineered chaos in Iraq and the Orwellian Global War On Truth are progressing on the front lines of the disembowelment our Constitutional Republic. The surge worked. Iraq is a permanent prefecture of the global American Empire. It’s almost time to select another target for expansion of the empire and for another cycle of military Keynesianism.

  • A number of realizations of the obvious need to be made here by Petraeus and company:

    -The battle in Iraq is political and not military. The number of US will never resolve what only politicians and and other Iraqi leaders must do.
    – The surge that needs to take place is a surge in diplomacy by the US, and not with unqualified Bushist knuckleheads, but real diplomats working in both Iraq and throughout the region.
    – That the current crop of Iraqi heads of state may have been legitimately installed in power, but their leadership has been illegitimate by not working to represent ALL Iraqis. The Iraqi Parliament needs to issue a call for new elections.

    Until the Iraqi government begins to actually work, there will be no peace. Quit putting the cart before the horse by trying to ensure a peace by fiat of American troops enforcing an occupation. Have the leadership of Iraq create the peace through their constituents.

  • This is terrible, but we should give them some time to get it all together. We should know for sure in about six months.

  • Two more Friedman Units should do it. By it, I mean cover Bush’s ass. And that was the purpose of the surge from the start.

  • If Petraeus continues with these kinds of comments, we may soon see another resignation of a military commander.

  • Racer X (#1): I’m sure that soon the Republicans will argue that the failure of the Iraqi political leaders to reconcile occurred because the Democratic presidential candidates have been talking about withdrawing US forces. They’ll say that al Qaeda has caused the Iraqi political impasse, in hopes that a Democrat will be elected, and that they’ll be rid of the US troops (and then they’ll take over Iraq).

    Of course this is pure rubbish, but mark my words, some Republicans will say it and some idiots in the media will repeat it.

    Yeah, pure rubbish, like when ChimpyMcBushHitlerCheney said there were links between Saddam and Al Qaeda when EVERYONE knows that wasn’t true. Oh, wait…there are links; not necessarily “direct operational” links, but links. Financial links, communications links…you know…links. Relationships. For a long time.

    Yeah, that whole thing about the evil ChimpyMcBushHitlerCheney censoring that Pentagon report, except they weren’t since the Pentagon was making it available on request? Well, ABC put in a request. And got the report. Yeah, there’s no “smoking gun” regarding “direct operational” links. But there’s a “smoking Gatling gun” of all kinds of other links between Saddam Hussein, his IIS, Osama bin Laden, and Al Qaeda. So far, it seems that only has reported on it, but you can tell he didn’t read the actual report.

  • #1 Racer X says, “Of course this is pure rubbish, but mark my words, some Republicans will say it and some idiots in the media will repeat it.”

    Moments later on #7 it happened. At least the “some Republicans” part of the prediction.

    If there were any detail in that report remotely similar to SteveIL’s interpretation, it would be in every MSM news story for the next two weeks. I think SteveIL is thinking along the Six Degrees of Separation plot line. They were connected because they were mentioned in many of the same articles, often in the same sentence. They may have chewed the same flavor of gum. They both liked to shoot guns. The connections are mind blowing. Just no operational links, like communicating with each other.

  • CB, I hate to disagree but…

    I don’t doubt that this will sound like a broken record to anyone who keeps up even passively with current events…

    I believe that Iraq was in the news 1% of the time in past weeks.

    One needs to do more than the average American who sits on the couch eating bon bons and drinking Billy Bob Beer to get a clue.

    I wish it weren’t so, but….

  • Breaking News Bulletin: Petraeus agrees that gravity is a force to be reckoned with. Dana Perino insists Petraeus was speaking for himself and points to birds as evidence that he is simply expressing an opinion. Bush remains confident that objects rise when dropped and believes history will prove him correct. Asked to respond, Petraeus says his comment was taken out of context.

  • How much evidence do you need? :

    1. Neither Saddam and Osama were born in the United States (which is a pity, as the Republican party needs a strong candidate right now)

    2. Both were alive at the time of 9/11

    3. Both really hate the United States

    4. Both are inclined to violence

    5. Bush said they were associated.

    It lays out like a geometric proof!

  • Sounds like Petraeus is going to “fight like the dickens” until his rotation is up, and then he will kick this can down the road just like Bush is going to leave this steaming pile of $hit for someone else to clean up.

    Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is it’s own form of insanity. The Repubs essentially want to keep doing the “surge” over and over until we have wrecked our military and bankrupted our country. My six year old can come up with a better plan than that.

    It’s long past time to do something different, ANYTHING different.

  • 7. SteveIL said: Yeah, pure rubbish, like when ChimpyMcBushHitlerCheney said there were links between Saddam and Al Qaeda when EVERYONE knows that wasn’t true. Oh, wait…there are links; not necessarily “direct operational” links, but links. Financial links, communications links…you know…links. Relationships. For a long time.

    Using your incredibly loose definition of “links”, there were probably 100 times as many links between Saddam and United States intelligence services as there were between Saddam and Al Qaeda. You gonna argue Saddam was responsible for CIA actions too?

  • SteveIL—by your own methodologies, one can successfully argue that there are “links” between the Bu$h administration and al Quaida. Probably even more so than between saddam and al Quaida. Maybe even more than between Bu$h/McCain and bin Laden DIRECTLY.

    Please—keep playing your scary-thing scenario. It’ll be good for Dems this fall if we can play up the triangulated connections between the GOP and the terrorist threat.

  • Wasn’t the Surge supposed to be over last September 2007?
    I guess the general has been in a coma, cause it’s March 2008, and he’s just now noticed that he’s failed?

    Not surprising, since the Commander-in-Cheep, who hand picked Petraeus, declared victory in, I think, the Fall of 2003. He has been in a coma since then.

    But hey who cares, they will both retire with full benifits and get paid big bucks sitting on big business boards of directors, like Colin Powell does. And they can do that, and not have to wake up!

    I’d make a pun about history’s comas, but I just ate.

  • Comments are closed.