Dems surging in party ID numbers

It’s easy to get discouraged watching the Democratic presidential race, and start to wonder just how badly the prolonged process will undermine the party’s chances in November.

But don’t feel too despondent — this is the kind of edge that can pay significant dividends on Election Day.

The Democratic Party has increased its margin in voters who identify with it rather than Republicans, and going into this year’s election has increased its advantage among independent voters and in swing states, according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted during the first two months of this year.

Pew says voters now favor the Democrats by a “decidedly larger margin” than the previous two election cycles.

Voters who identify themselves as Independents actually occupy first place at 37 percent, followed by Democrats at 36 percent and Republicans at 27 percent. That’s a 3 point gain for Democrats since 2004 and a 6 point drop for Republicans, putting them at their lowest ebb in 16 years.

Self-identified independents, if pressed on which way they lean, prefer Dems to Republicans, 15% to 10%. (Four years ago, this number was roughly even.) As such, if we include “leaners,” Dems lead Republicans, 51% to 37%.

This is even more encouraging still when we consider how this breaks down at the state level.

* In the 12 states were voting was closest in the last two presidential races, Democrats now hold a 38 percent to 27 percent lead among voters who identify with either party. Those numbers were roughly equal in the last two presidential elections.

* In states that Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry won by 5 points or more in 2004, the Democratic margin over Republicans has grown from 10 points to 18 points. “Red States” won by President Bush by 5 points or more have remained relatively stable.

* Democrats have made significant gains in three of four swing states – Pennsylvania (21 electoral votes), Ohio (20 electoral votes) and Michigan (17 electoral votes) while party identification remains relatively close in Florida (27 electoral votes). Democrats lead 37 percent to 25 percent in Ohio, a turnaround of 14 points since 2004; 43 percent to 31 percent in Pennsylvania, a gap 8 points greater than 2004; and 34 percent to 24 percent in Michigan, increasing the difference by 8 points. In Florida, Democrats lead 35 percent to 32 percent, about the same as 2004. […]

* Among key red states, there has been a marked falloff in Republican versus Democratic identification in North Carolina (15 electoral votes) where, after there being a roughly even balance a few years ago, Democrats lead 36 percent to 29 percent. In Virginia (13 electoral votes), where much has been written about it going from “red” to “purple,” Democrats have gone from a tie with the GOP in 2004 to a modest 4 point advantage. The Republican dominance in Texas (34 electoral votes) has fallen from 37 percent to 30 percent in 2004 to 33 percent to 30 percent now. Georgia (15 electoral votes) remains about even.

Obviously, it’s a mistake to extrapolate predicted election results from party ID numbers. It just doesn’t work that way. But this kind of swing, especially in key battleground states, points to a dynamic in which Dems go into the fall with a clear edge.

The party can still manage to blow the opportunity, but at least in the short term, consider this your morale boost for the day.

One day, this will be called the ‘Obama Effect,’ after our 44th President and his ability to excite and draw in new people.

It will mark the turning point of a new Democratic majority and the start of a political renaissance in the United States.

  • Americans are coming out in droves to vote this election in order to end this republican debacle. It’s a matter of necessity to save our democracy from privatization and restore our freedoms.

  • what doubtful said.

    I have done the canvassing, and I have seen these people. They are very real and they will be very happy to bury the Republicans in the fall. And 3/4 of them will stay in the party they choose initially, for life.

    And if Hillary takes the nomination by sliming Obama and then taking the supers, these people will be lost. Forever.

    We really need the supers to step up to the plate, now. But from what Bill Richardson said, it sounds like the Clintons are basically threatening anyone who crosses them. I can see why a lot of people might be a bit intimidated by threats from an organization that isn’t afraid to look like scum.

  • btw doubtful…young voters would be coming out anyway whether Obama was here or not out of the necessity to change the direction of this country…Obama just got in front of the parade. He will make a great president but the voters are out due to the necessity to stop what has been happening to this country. He’s still not that progressive or there would be no profiteering off our health care but perhaps we can change him like FDR changed once elected and finally took on the “economic royalists” and gave us the New Deal.

  • Does anyone know if the polling outfits have adjusted the statistical models for their general election surveys as a result of these shifts?

    Their models try to replicate the partisan spread of the general election, so it seems that if they’re going by outdated party ID data, their polls would overemphasize Republicans and thereby inflate McCain’s numbers.

    Anyone know more? Have they changed? Should they?

  • …young voters would be coming out anyway whether Obama was here or not out of the necessity to change the direction of this country… -joey

    Yeah! Just like they did in 2004, natch! 😉

  • 2004 was stolen, the race was close enough to manipulate, partly because Kerry was successfully swiftboated.
    2008 will not be like 2004.
    I think the close race for the Democratic nominee is energizing everyone. I think both candidates are bring new voters into the fold. Obama gets a nod for getting youngsters out to vote.
    If we the people of the democratic party can stay focused on the prize, the presidency, and leave off sliming our candidates and each other, this will be exciting if a bit nerve wracking.

    Please be my guest and slim McSame to your hearts content. He’s given us plenty of ammo.

  • I’d like to see a comparison of Clinton’s vote tallies vs. Kerry’s primary totals in 2004.

  • Comments are closed.