Relying on bogus retention argument, McCain opposes modernized GI Bill

Just a few days ago, appearing on ABC’s “The View,” John McCain talked about the importance of increasing the size of the U.S. military. To entice more volunteers, he said, the government should focus on incentives: “[O]ne of the things we ought to do is provide [the troops with] significant educational benefits in return for serving.”

Naturally, then, McCain indicated a few days later that he’ll withhold support for a bipartisan measure to renew and expand the GI Bill for a new generation of veterans.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, seemed to give a thumbs down to bipartisan legislation that would greatly expand educational benefits for members of the military returning from Iraq and Afghanistan under the GI Bill.

McCain indicated he would offer some sort of alternative to the legislation to address concerns that expanding the GI Bill could lead more members of the military to get out of the service.

Both Democratic presidential candidates — Sens. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y. — have signed on as co-sponsors, and the bill has gained bipartisan support from 55 senators on Capitol Hill. A vote on the proposal is expected before the summer.

But the bill, which would dramatically increase educational compensation for American troops, has run into some unexpected resistance, both at the Pentagon and now from McCain, who has remained silent on the issue, saying he had not studied the bill close enough.

McCain’s opposition comes a day after petitions from 30,000 veterans arrived at McCain’s Senate office, urging him to support the modernized bill to offer veterans a college education.

But the reason for the opposition is especially ridiculous.

Bush administration officials, and apparently McCain, “worry that a more generous and expansive GI Bill would create an incentive for troops to get out of the military and go to college.”

Just last week, Wesley Clark and Jon Soltz highlighted why this is nonsense.

First, it is morally reprehensible to fix the system so that civilian life is unappealing to service members, in an attempt to force them to re-up. Education assistance is not a handout, it is a sacred promise that we have made for generations in return for service.

Second, falling military recruitment numbers are just as serious as retention problems. To send the message that this nation will not help you make the most of your life will dissuade a large number of our best and brightest from choosing military service over other career options.

This should be a no-brainer. The GI Bill was instrumental in helping send a generation of U.S. veterans to college and helping create the nation’s post-WWII middle class, but the law has not kept up with the times. Whereas veterans used to be able to count on the government to pay for all of their college expenses, troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan are finding that the GI Bill barely scratches the surface of today’s college costs.

Sens. Jim Webb (D-Va.) and Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) unveiled a GI Bill modernization bill over a year ago, which would increase troop benefits to pay for their education. From a patriotic perspective, this is showing real support for the troops. From a military perspective, it might make recruiting easier if young people know they can go to college after their service for free. From an economic perspective, the country benefits when thousands of educated young people enter the workforce with degrees, as opposed to the alternative. (Even Joe Lieberman supports the bill, and he never wavers from Bush’s position on matters relating to the military.)

And yet, there’s John McCain. Typical.

This should be a no-brainer.

Which is why McCain and the perfumed princes of Versailles-on-the-Potomac oppose it.

  • McCain’s plan to build recruitment is to start another war (with Iran). That will require a draft, which of course will allow lots of loopholes for the children of the rich to swim through.

    Let them eat cake.

  • Note that I am for a draft, which would be designed properly, so that every strata of society is represented in proportion to its share of the national wealth. In other words, the top 1% would send 80% of the needed soldiers.

  • What McCain in essence is telling the military, “Go marry your own Beer heiress!”

  • First, it is morally reprehensible to fix the system so that civilian life is unappealing to service members…
    Second, falling military recruitment numbers are just as serious as retention problems.

    Morally reprehensible? Absolutely. But if you live in a world where morality is limited to abortion, gay marriage and stem cell research, you would probably focus, as McCain or Bush would, on retention of the military, especially officers.

    Recruitment? Education is a great incentive for many, but consider that 1) we are in a war whose justification has never been truly explained, 2) McCain would at best see a drawdown in Iraq as an opportunity to go into Iran, 3) the American public seems to be more focused on flag pins and orange juice than the war, and 4) the Republicans have a consistent record of stop loss, longer rotations, blame the private justice, and under equipping the troops. That’s a big price just to become an elitist.

  • I have started to speculate that McCain actually IS going to aim for a draft merely because he’ll need warm bodies for an attack on Iran. In this case, he’s going to need to break out from the crowd with his own bill and approach to GI issues, to set the stage for his plans.

    There will be some excuse to gin up aggression towards Iran, and then promptly a push for an emergency draft to fight the war.

  • Once again it is the bottom line that matters to these people. They don’t really want an educated soldier or an educated citizen. Education actually makes people ask questions, do research, seek the truth, and find reality. Remember that reality always seem to have that pesky liberal bias.

  • McCain’s approach is a prescription for building our own home grown insurgency, ala Tim McVeigh style. So, how is it that libs always get tagged with the “hate America first” label when it is Republicans like McCain that seed the land for the real haters? You want bitter? Bring it on!

  • If there are already 55 supporters, it seems to me the perfect time to make McSame filibuster, and I mean actually get up there and hold the floor all through the night, not threaten-to-filibuster and so the bill gets buried.

    This can’t possibly be a winning issue for him, he’s only taking this stand because he can’t stand the thought that Dems might get credit for legislation in an election year. Make him stand up and defend not increasing GI benefits.

    Paging Sen. Reid: Get this to the floor soon, before McSame comes up with “alternate legislation” that his media enablers will certainly hail as another maverick stroke of genius, but will actually screw our fighting men and women.

  • If he can’t get glory for sponsoring a bill in a “bipartisan” way, McCain won’t support any bill, even for veterans.

  • John McCain: the Forrest Gump of war heroes.

    have another donut, Johnny, while the real heros have to eat through a straw at Walter Reed.

  • You almost have to hope he doesn’t change his mind, because if he doesn’t support it, we can clobber him over the head with this until November. It seems likely to pass even without his support, so I don’t mind injecting politics into this.

  • The officers — career military — have already been to college (West Point, VMI, etc). And the cannon fodder? Who gives a flying duck? Bad enough they’ll be coming back well trained in killing and pissed off with the folks “upstairs” (the govt). Educate them, and they’ll be that much more dangerous…

  • This just doesn’t make any sense. Why go out on a limb and oppose something like this when you’re the War Hero Candidate??!?!? Not to mention it’s a seriously great thing to get behind– how is it not political suicide to oppose this? Is it lacking a great name or something?

    I just don’t get it. Is his opposition really just based on preventing the Dems from taking credit for something that is clearly pro-troops?

    I really hope he doesn’t change his mind– this would be a most excellent issue to talk about ad nauseum. We also might just get a lot of GOP military voters to think twice before voting for McCain. The GOP usually isn’t this dumb. What are we not seeing here?

    By the way, Dems, more like this please.

  • Three hours ago I sent this story to all my friends who are veterans, active duty, or their family members, almost two dozen people. Three of them have written me back saying that McCain’s lack of support for their educational needs is convincing them to not vote for him. Do the same, people!

    I’m a military veteran currently attending a state college using my GI Bill because I couldn’t afford to do so otherwise. My brother is a PFC in the Army. If he manages to survive his deployment to the sandbox this summer, he wants to study engineering. My little sister is looking at the Air Force or the Coast Guard when she graduates from high school next month, and wants to study psychology with her GI Bill.

    Johnny McSame can kiss my family’s collective ass.

  • What a dreadful outcome… are more highly educated America. Perhaps it’s because the Armed Forces is populated from the less privileged members of society and do not deserve help from the Government.

  • “Not to mention it’s a seriously great thing to get behind– how is it not political suicide to oppose this?”

    It’s not political suicide because the media ignores anything said or done by McCain that doesn’t fit the “maverick war hero” scenario that they’ve decided on.

  • Gosh, what a morale booster for the troops in the field. This really defines what a scumbag flip-flopper McSame is. Against torture, the for it. For education, against it. This pretty well sums up what we’re (not) gonna get.

  • GI Bill: The GI Bill made much difference to me and many other Viet Nam Era vets. Though it did not pay all college expenses, a combination of part time work and the Govt. grant helped me to complete my BA. This made me a more productive citizen who was able to serve my Country in other ways besides the military.
    I am not sure that professional politicians such as Sen. McCain understand this. He wants vets to go on giving blood until they are completely drained. Did he do it when he had served his military term? Was he drafted or was he a volunteer? I realize he became a POW and respect him for his fortitude and the strength which helped him overcome a great time of adversity.
    Pres. Bush, on the other hand, never served in combat and some say did not even complete basic training before he left the scene. Most politicians make sure their sons and daughters don’t go to the military according to statistics, yet they are “hot to trot” when it comes to sending those less fortunate to battle. They consider themselves the elite and the rest of us as “those people.” This is what Mr. McCain should consider when he talks about “elitism.”

  • McCain actually has a point. I mean, we wouldn’t want our troops to become elitists, now would we?

  • Comments are closed.