The master of his flip-flopping domain

(Update: This list has been revised and updated.)

At this point, I’m inclined to publish a new-and-improved version of John McCain’s Greatest Flip-Flops about once a month. I was concerned for a while that McCain would discover the importance of consistency at some point, and make my flip-flop list less important, but so far, that hasn’t become a problem.

ABC News reported a new one yesterday.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., was less than forthcoming on Tuesday about “rogue-state rollback,” a policy he championed during his 2000 presidential campaign.

“I wasn’t saying that we should go around and declare war,” said McCain. “I was saying that we nations of like values and principles and belief in democracy and freedom should make efforts to modify the behavior of other nations.”

McCain’s claim, which he made on Hardball’s “College Tour,” is directly at odds with the description of “rogue-state rollback” that the Arizona senator offered during his 2000 presidential campaign.

While participating in a Republican debate moderated by CNN’s Larry King on Feb. 15, 2000, the candidates were asked: “What area of American international policy would you change immediately as president?”

“I’d institute a policy that I call ‘rogue state rollback,'” said McCain. “I would arm, train, equip, both from without and from within, forces that would eventually overthrow the governments and install free and democratically- elected governments.”

He was, apparently, for “rogue-state rollback” before he was against it.

It’s part of an ever-“evolving” ideology on McCain’s part.

Confronted with the inconsistencies in McCain’s record a month ago, the senator’s aides told the New York Times that the senator “has evolved rather than switched positions in his 25-year career.” That’s a perfectly sensible spin — when a politician holds one position, and then, for apparently political reasons, decides to embrace the polar opposite position, it’s only natural for his or her aides to say the politician’s position has “evolved.”

But in McCain’s case, the spin is wholly unfulfilling. First, McCain sells himself as a pol who never sways with the wind, and whose willingness to be consistent in the face of pressure is proof of his character. Second, Republicans have spent the last four years or so making policy reversals the single most serious political crime in presidential politics. The dreaded “flip-flop” is, according to the GOP, the latest cardinal sin for someone seeking national office.

And if we’re playing by Republican rules, McCain’s “evolutions” should be a fairly serious problem.

Here’s the updated list:

* McCain pledged in February 2008 that he would not, under any circumstances, raise taxes. Specifically, McCain was asked if he is a “‘read my lips’ candidate, no new taxes, no matter what?” referring to George H.W. Bush’s 1988 pledge. “No new taxes,” McCain responded. Two weeks later, McCain said, “I’m not making a ‘read my lips’ statement, in that I will not raise taxes.”

* McCain claims to have considered and not considered joining John Kerry’s Democratic ticket in 2004.

* In 1998, he championed raising cigarette taxes to fund programs to cut underage smoking, insisting that it would prevent illnesses and provide resources for public health programs. Now, McCain opposes a $0.61-per-pack tax increase, won’t commit to supporting a regulation bill he’s co-sponsoring, and has hired Philip Morris’ former lobbyist as his senior campaign adviser.

* McCain’s first mortgage plan was premised on the notion that homeowners facing foreclosure shouldn’t be “rewarded” for acting “irresponsibly.” His second mortgage plan took largely the opposite position.

* McCain vowed, if elected, to balance the federal budget by the end of his first term. Soon after, he decided he would no longer even try to reach that goal.

* McCain’s campaign unveiled a Social Security policy that the senator would implement if elected, which did not include a Bush-like privatization scheme. In March 2008, McCain denounced his own campaign’s policy.

* In February 2008, McCain reversed course on prohibiting waterboarding.

* In November 2007, McCain reversed his previous position on a long-term presence for U.S. troops in Iraq, arguing that the “nature of the society in Iraq” and the “religious aspects” of the country make it inevitable that the United States “eventually withdraws.” Two months later, McCain reversed back, saying he’s prepared to leave U.S. troops in Iraq for 100 years.

* McCain used to champion the Law of the Sea convention, even volunteering to testify on the treaty’s behalf before a Senate committee. Now he opposes it.

* McCain was a co-sponsor of the DREAM Act, which would grant legal status to illegal immigrants’ kids who graduate from high school. Now he’s against it.

* On immigration policy in general, McCain announced in February 2008 that he would vote against his own legislation.

* In 2006, McCain sponsored legislation to require grassroots lobbying coalitions to reveal their financial donors. In 2007, after receiving “feedback” on the proposal, McCain told far-right activist groups that he opposes his own measure.

* McCain said before the war in Iraq, “We will win this conflict. We will win it easily.” Four years later, McCain said he knew all along that the war in Iraq war was “probably going to be long and hard and tough.”

* McCain said he was the “greatest critic” of Rumsfeld’s failed Iraq policy. In December 2003, McCain praised the same strategy as “a mission accomplished.” In March 2004, he said, “I’m confident we’re on the right course.” In December 2005, he said, “Overall, I think a year from now, we will have made a fair amount of progress if we stay the course.”

* McCain went from saying he would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade to saying the exact opposite.

* McCain went from saying gay marriage should be allowed, to saying gay marriage shouldn’t be allowed.

* McCain criticized TV preacher Jerry Falwell as “an agent of intolerance” in 2002, but then decided to cozy up to the man who said Americans “deserved” the 9/11 attacks.

* McCain used to oppose Bush’s tax cuts for the very wealthy, but he reversed course in February.

* On a related note, he said 2005 that he opposed the tax cuts because they were “too tilted to the wealthy.” By 2007, he denied ever having said this, and insisted he opposed the cuts because of increased government spending.

* In 2000, McCain accused Texas businessmen Sam and Charles Wyly of being corrupt, spending “dirty money” to help finance Bush’s presidential campaign. McCain not only filed a complaint against the Wylys for allegedly violating campaign finance law, he also lashed out at them publicly. In April, McCain reached out to the Wylys for support.

* McCain supported a major campaign-finance reform measure that bore his name. In June 2007, he abandoned his own legislation.

* McCain opposed a holiday to honor Martin Luther King, Jr., before he supported it.

* McCain was against presidential candidates campaigning at Bob Jones University before he was for it.

* McCain was anti-ethanol. Now he’s pro-ethanol.

* McCain was both for and against state promotion of the Confederate flag.

* McCain decided in 2000 that he didn’t want anything to do with former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, believing he “would taint the image of the ‘Straight Talk Express.'” Kissinger is now the Honorary Co-Chair for his presidential campaign in New York.

Now, it’s worth noting that there are worse qualities in a presidential candidate than changing one’s mind about a policy matter or two. McCain has been in Congress for decades; he’s bound to shift now and then on various controversies.

But therein lies the point — McCain was consistent on most of these issues, right up until he started running for president, at which point he conveniently abandoned practically every position he used to hold. The problem isn’t just the incessant flip-flops; it’s the shameless pandering and hollow convictions behind the incessant flip-flops.

The sooner the democrats get a nominee, the sooner they can wipe the floor with John McCain.

  • * In 1998, he championed raising cigarette taxes to fund programs to cut underage smoking, insisting that it would prevent illnesses and provide resources for public health programs. Now, McCain opposes a $0.61-per-pack tax increase, won’t commit to supporting a regulation bill he’s co-sponsoring, and has hired Philip Morris’ former lobbyist as his senior campaign adviser.

    That should be one of our main talking points. The only people less popular than Dick “go fuck yourself” Cheney are the tobacco lobbyists. The other talking point I recommend is this statement:

    I think that gay marriage should be allowed… I don’t have any problem with that”

    The fundies will drop off in droves if they think they’re being asked to vote for a gay marriage supporter.

  • Obviously the challenge will be: how to get all of these flip-flops into a 30 or 60 second ad.

  • “rogue-state rollback?” How about “Taliban creation program.” I’m glad he flip-flopped on that issue at least, but that’s one hell of a long list Steve’s compiled. That many is not a trend, it’s a pathology.

  • “the campaign was over and that our actions in office would not be dictated by what had to be said in the campaign,” – Dick Cheney

    Or I think it was Cheney. It’s getting harder to tell the difference.

  • But really, why should we play by Republican rules? I thought the “flip-flop” criticism was nonsense when used against Kerry in 2004, and I don’t see any reason to embrace it against McCain now. Personally, I want my elected officials to be open to adapting their policy decisions to new information or evolving circumstances. “Rogue state rollback” was a stupid idea in 2000, but nevertheless a superficially plausible one during America’s brief post-Cold War and pre-9/11 and pre-Iraq sense of infallibility. It sounds like McCain has learned from our experience since then that unilaterally righting all the world’s wrongs is simply beyond the logistical and moral capability of the United States– and his recognition of that fact is a good thing.

    I confess that I didn’t read your list in its entirety, but it seems to me that McCain should be criticized for the substance of many of his later positions (anti gay marriage, embracing Falwell, opposing the DREAM Act, etc.), rather than the fact that his position has shifted.

  • OK, but other than those 30 or so flip-flops, he’s a straight shooter who stands firm, right?

  • jhm said:
    Obviously the challenge will be: how to get all of these flip-flops into a 30 or 60 second ad.

    [REM]

    “. . . It’s the End of McCain as we knew him
    And I feel fine . . . ”

    [/REM]

  • And if we’re playing by Republican rules, McCain’s “evolutions” should be a fairly serious problem.

    Silly Carptebagger … don’t you know that there are rules for Republicans, and different ones for Democrats?

    If a GOPer changes stances, it’s an “evolution.” If a Dem does it, it’s a “flip flop.”

    For the GOP, gay marriage and sex should be banned by constitutional amendment and various laws … unless done in a public bathroom, or in the ceremonial Wet Suit right before the nightly Stuffing of the Orifices. Democrats support equal rights for all consenting adults, which, naturally, makes them dirty, Satanic homo lovers.

    The GOP is the party of morality and family values, even though more of them have been divorced and involved in sex crimes. The Dems can maintain relationships and have lower divorce rates (out of the three remaining candidates, only McCain has been divorced), but are somehow the party of infidelity and a lack of morals.

    The GOP is the party of the regular guy, even though every single policy they advocate is for big business and the wealthy. Dems fight for worker’s rights, civil rights, and equal rights for all, yet are branded as elitist, limousine-riding snobs.

    The GOP is the party of national defense, even though they have no clue about the larger dynamics of our current issues. Dems advocate diplomacy over never ending war (thus saving the military for when it’s truly needed), can provide much more sane and accurate analysis of Middle Eastern dynamics, yet are seen as clueless on the issue.

    The GOP is the party of personal responsibility, even though they blame all the issues on anything but themselves and try to change the rules when one of their own gets busted. Dems punish members of the party as much as possible (stripping committee assignments, etc.), yet are portrayed the “do whatever feels good party.”

    I could keep going, but this isn’t exactly new. The media has done such a good job of pushing forth GOP frames that up is down, black is white, evil is good, and sanity is insane.

    It’s going to take a lot of work to get the same rules for everyone.

  • Only a fool goes through life with the same opinions in spite of new information, changing times and the wisdom that normally grows with experience. But as CB notes, McCain’s position adjustments just happened to coincide with his presidential bid, which harks back to something I used to write about way back; this guy is desperate to become president and recognizing that this is his last shot, he’s trading his soul for a chance at the prize. That alone disqualifies him to be president in my book.

  • BTW, I’ve always loved the list CB. I hope you keep it going, although you may need to pickup another drive to store it on.

  • Overwhelming evidence that McCain is nothing but a shameless opportunist, isn’t it? A man whose ambitions outstrip any principles or convictions he might have had. And yet, I doubt the Democrats can, or will even try, to present this truth to the American public.

    Look, McCain used the same old tactic in his recent economic speech – they’re going to raise your taxes thousands of dollars, he said, when he knows very well that the Democrats are talking about targeted rollbacks of Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest among us. But do the Democrats fire back and explain that McCain is lying? No! They’re afraid to. They’re afraid of that “class warfare” accusation. So they remain mute, when the Republicans attack them over taxes, and allow the public to think they’re going to raise everyone’s taxes.

    They just don’t know how to play politics. They don’t even like to play politics. Look how everyone on the left is hammering Hillary, when she’s only dabbling with Republican style tactics. Nothing like the real thing Obama is going to face in the general. She’s not even giving him a good scrimmage, and yet all the liberals are calling “foul!”

    The Democrats just don’t know how play this game.

  • Great work, CB. Maybe you could start a McCain Flip-Flop Reference – an easy to access metalog blog catalog; indexed/categorized (economy, war, torture, religion, etc.) with hyperlinks and videos on your home page. How handy that would be.

  • “I would arm, train, equip, both from without and from within, forces that would eventually overthrow the governments and install free and democratically- elected governments.”

    Obviously, anyone who can say that contradiction and expect to be taken seriously will not be bothered by “inconsistencies.” That’s for academic pinheads.

  • Right now it appears as though McCain’s conducting a Machiavellian campaign whereby nothing, and I mean nothing, makes sense to anybody focused on issues, and he intends to continue this way and bank instead on those voters who “like and admire” him. His campaign is totally disconnected from reality, though he makes some half-hearted stabs in that direction. What the hell is he doing?

    While I agree that he can certainly be creamed on the issues and his relentless gaffes and misstatements (and maybe his campaign finance troubles), ARE there people who will vote for him anyway even when he has a rational Democratic opponent who knocks him out of the ring time and time again on integrity and the issues? He seems to be counting on something like this.

    This is one of the weirdest campaign seasons I’ve seen in my life.

  • When is CNN going to grow some hair on their fanny and endorse Mr. Obama and finally stop pretending they are not already supporting him?

  • Out of linguistic curiosity, Mike @17…
    Are you using “fanny” the Brit way or the US way?

  • I think it’s important to point out three things in trying to be sure McCain loses:
    (1) He’s almost identical to Bush
    (2) He “Flip-Flops” about as often as he blinks
    (3) HE RECEIVES (AND KEEPS) THREE DIFFERENT CHECKS FROM THE GOVERNMENT, WHILE CLAIMING TO BE FOR SMALLER GOVERNMENT. I guess that’s smaller government for you and me, but larger for him and his caviar-eating corporate lobbyist friends.

    No Copyright – This post can be freely copied and/or reposted!

  • I am a 50 year old women. I hope I am getting wiser as I see more, read more, and research more as the years pass by. The same can be said for me as you are trying to say about Sen. McCain -I am a FLIP FLOPPER AND PROUD OF IT. When any one does the research on Sen. McCain,they can tell we are looking at a lot of years not just one month or two weeks.

    A proud flip-flopper’s change on some issues:I.E.

    I use to believe in “women’s lib”. I then notice the effect on our nation. Women’s lib was good at first but then it went to far.

    1.When I was in my early twenty’s -I used to think that a career for all women was out of the house, in a nice office and driving a nice car and I had all that. When I was in my early thirty’s -I gave it all up to stay at home and raise my own children. I came to the conclusion that mothers need to go back to raising their children and fathers need to make enough to support their families.

    2.I use to believe that I was a strict democrat. That was when I thought that the democratic party was the only one that cared for the hard working class and family life. As I got wiser I now could be called an independent. I vote for the best person for the job now not the best democrat for the job.

    The list could go on and on just like Sen. McCain’s list does. You do not have a bone here to chew on Sen. Obama!

  • I guess he felt the same way about his first wife too until a younger one came along LOL

  • RE: A proud flip flopper

    I don’t think that anyone would argue that life experiences can alter one’s views over the long term. The problem with McCain is that the changes that we see with him aren’t a long term gradual shift, but the sight of a weathervane that shifts back and forth immediately reacting to the current political winds of the campaign. It’s not hard to see it as anything but pandering when he contradicts himself about his own recent positions and then denies that he ever even held the former.

  • Comments are closed.