The president’s one-track, refuge-targeting mind

Bush held a press conference this morning on the South Lawn, most of which was dedicated to discussing the economy, gas prices, and the intersection of the two.

The president seemed anxious to demonstrate that he’s aware of the problems, and almost desperate to address them, but didn’t have much to offer in the way of solutions. Bush did, however, rely on an old standby.

“[Democrats in Congress have] repeatedly blocked environmentally safe exploration in ANWR. The Department of Energy estimates that ANWR could allow America to produce about a million additional barrels of oil every day, which translates to about 27 millions of gallons of gasoline and diesel every day. That would be about a 20-percent increase of oil — crude oil production over U.S. levels, and it would likely mean lower gas prices. And yet such efforts to explore in ANWR have been consistently blocked.”

Asked about a possible summer moratorium on the federal gas tax, Bush said, “I will tell you this, that if Congress is truly interested in solving the problem, they can send the right signal by saying we’re going to explore for oil and gas in the U.S. territories, starting with ANWR.” (By the way, Alaska is a state, not a territory.)

Asked about peak oil and renewable energy research, Bush said, “[Y]ou say that people think we can’t — there’s not any more reserves to be found. Well, there are reserves to be found in ANWR; that’s a given. I just told you that there’s about 27 million gallons of diesel and gasoline that could be — from domestically produced crude oil that’s not being utilized. And not only that, we can explore in environmentally friendly ways.”

Asked about possible steps the administration can take “in the short term,” Bush said, “[O]pening up ANWR is not long term, it’s intermediate term. But it sends a clear signal, is what it does.”

In all, in a 50-minute press conference, Bush touted drilling the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge six times, including a few times in response to unrelated questions.

I know we’ve been down this road before, but since it’s been a while, and in light of Bush’s emphasis on ANWR this morning, it’s probably worth keeping a few details in mind that the president neglected to mention.

Drilling in ANWR would likely produce only 3.2 billion barrels of oil, according to the U.S. Geological Survey, not even enough to satisfy six months’ demand; oil would not begin to reach the market for another 10 years; and it would take 50 years to extract the full amount. For this pittance, the House leadership and the administration are willing to disturb hundreds of acres of pristine wildlife habitat.

I’d just add that the NYT reported a while back that oil companies are now “largely uninterested in drilling” in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, because “any oil from the refuge would meet only a tiny fraction of America’s needs.”

My hunch is, the White House wanted to a) look like they were offering a proposal to address the gas-price problem; and b) try to pin high prices on congressional Democrats. I’d be surprised if anyone really fell for this nonsense, but given the president’s enthusiasm, it’s worth setting the record straight.

I watched most of that press conference this morning; it was painful. Bush seems to have given up all pretence of being a credible authority on anything. He has absolutely nothing of substance to say, and he seems to have given up on the job. It is a hard job after all.

  • That feisty little lemming will do—and say—anything to save his pathetic pittance of a legacy, won’t he? Now if he’d only do the Republic a favor, and fling himself mercilessly from atop the Grand Canyon, I think we’d all be better off….

  • Here’s a thought:

    Instead of relying on century-old technology and utterly destroying habitats in the process, how’s about we find something other than oil to power our cars?

    The real solution to high gasoline prices isn’t to drill for more oil and produce more gas — it’s to make cars that don’t run on gasoline.

    Why is this such a difficult concept for some people to grasp?

  • Funny how the president always wants what ExxonMobil wants.

    I’m surprised he’s not saying we should invade Venezuela, after all, they have a chemistry set and links to people we call terrorists.

  • Is anyone still paying attention to this ignorant moroic fuckwit?

    267 more days!!

    The only thing that makes me not wish Air Force One would crash and end up in a fireball at the next takeoff is my concern for the innocent aircrew.

  • Mark D asks:

    Instead of relying on century-old technology and utterly destroying habitats in the process, how’s about we find something other than oil to power our cars?

    The real solution to high gasoline prices isn’t to drill for more oil and produce more gas — it’s to make cars that don’t run on gasoline.

    We had such a fuel, about 100 years ago, but the oil magnate John D. Rockefeller killed the ethanol industry. Now we will bring it back…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jew3ah24Zj4

  • What a surprise he didn’t mention energy conservation or reducing our reliance on dinosaur juice.

  • Ah yes. Dana Purina was clattering about “Environmentally friendly oil drilling” the other day. I’d like to find the word-perv who concocted that term and reduce him to a few pounds of environmentaly friendly fertilizer.

  • Damn it damn it damn it damn it!

    As an ALASKAN, will someone tell Bushy to count (if he can manage) the stars on a fricken flag? ANWR aside, we are a state. Damn it! AK stands for Alaska, not Arkansas. We are a big fricken state. We are not a tiny island off the coast of Washington (as depicted on some weather maps, when depicted at all.) Crack open an atlas or something.

    Sorry. This sort of thing is difficult enough to handle on a daily basis from ignorant tourists from Outside (as in being asked if we accept ‘dollars’ by people from Carolina or being told by US companies that they don’t ship ‘internationally’ to Alaska.)

    But for the President of the US (all 49) states to do it on national TV?

    Damn it!

  • I’d put “Environmentally friendly oil drilling” right there with “Bush’s towering intellect.”
    Sure, we can trust the big oil companies to handle this, after all, they wouldn’t take advantage of our dependancy, would they?
    Let’s turn off the sarcasn now.
    Most crack and heroin dealers would blush at Bush’s tactics.

  • What Bush doesn’t seem to get, nor any of the other ANWAR drilling fans, is that it is a WORLD market for oil. Just because it is drilled in the US does not mean it is going to stay in the US. It will go to the highest bidder (unless the Republicans are going to put in a Government mandate). As there is not enough to glut the market, it should have no obvious effect on the price of oil or gas.

    Supply & Demand. Globalization. “Free Market”. Do they really know what these words mean?

  • DaddyO (#3) EXACTLY!

    Carter put up solar panels on the WH, Reagan tore them down. GM screwed the pooch on the electric car. There are practically no one in any of the past administrations who have done anything significant (Clinton signed Kyoto but what else was done from an administration level? I don’t know…anyone care to enlighten me, please do).

    This should have been at the top of the list since the 70’s when the last round of oil problems hit. But no, we let it go completely.

    Oh, and GM, thanks for letting the Japanese companies take the lead in the hybrid market. You not only screwed the pooch, you screwed American workers who could have benefited from your moving forward with a vastly popular (and very limited run) car.

    God only knows how long it will take to get us to that alternate option. I am not even sure what the options might be. Retaining oil run vehicles is NOT an option.

  • I continue to be distressed by all of the unwarranted attacks on OUR PRESIDENT!

    After all the effort he went through to combine the virtues of many historical leaders:
    – the economic insight of Herbert Hoover
    – the governmental integrity of Warren Harding
    – the foreign policy approach of Genghis Kahn
    – the smirk of Alfred E Neumann

  • Americans do not want to hear that they have to give up on their cars.

    But that’s what’s going to happen, whether we like it or not.

    Gasoline will soon be $5, then $8, then $10.
    Ethanol production competes with food production for cropland,
    so attempting to sate our gargantuan thirst for gasoline with ethanol
    means high food prices, food shortages, and famine in poor countries
    and among poor Americans.

    The car: it was fun, we loved it, but now it’s almost over.
    Our descendents will marvel at how we took nearly-free energy for granted,
    and completely squandered a geological treasure in less than two centuries.

  • Bush said, “[O]pening up ANWR is not long term, it’s intermediate term. But it sends a clear signal, is what it does.”

    Yep, the signal would be to the Saudis to not bother increasing their productive capacity because we are trying to reduce the price of oil. So they won’t and it won’t go down.

    And this guy is the candidate of the Texas Oil Mafia. What an idiot.

    Joel Hanes wrote: “The car: it was fun, we loved it, but now it’s almost over.”

    We can still have cars. It’s the gasoline-burning combustion engine we have to give up. Hybrid plug-ins running on point-of-sale generated hydrogen are (one possible) solution.

  • Clinton signed Kyoto but what else was done from an administration level?

    Well, he opened up drilling just north, south, east and west of ANWR — in fact, he opened up an area many times the size of ANWR to drilling, which has since led to the destruction of a ridiculous amount of habitat.

    In other words, not much that’s good.

    (That and his inability to just come out and tell the truth about Monica are a couple of the things that really chapped my ass about his presidency.)

  • Poor Bush .. It seems that he’s truly losing what little mind he has. After lying to the American Public (256 times) about all of the reasons to get involved in his 3 trillion dollar (Mission Accomplished War), after promising twice on TV to help the Katrina victims (“your doing a heck of a job Brownie”),after stating 2 weeks ago that he hadn’t heard about gas prices reaching $4, after defending Rove / Rumsfeld / and pardoning Libby / after lying about torture / lying about the firing of appointed attorneys / no progress on Social Sec. reform / no progress on Immigration Reform / infrastruture falling apart / 40 million uninsured / 30 million under-insured / on and on and on. Hey I know what we can do .. let’s make the tax cuts to the wealthy permanent .. that will fix everything. As Tony Snow once said “the man is an embarassement.

  • Here’s some background information:

    The US consumes 20.7 million barrels of oil per day:
    http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/ene_oil_con-energy-oil-consumption

    The US produces 7.6 million barrels of oil per day:
    http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/ene_oil_pro-energy-oil-production

    The ANWR is expected to be able to produce 0.9 million barrels of oil per day (by 2025) and would reduce imports from 70% to 66% of consumption.

    If it produces 0.9 million barrels a day at full production, the 7.7 billion barrels in ANWR would run out in about 23 years.

    http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/ogp/pdf/sroiaf(2004)04.pdf

  • Bush touted drilling the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge six times

    That’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Mr. Corrector Guy.

    “…we’re going to explore for oil and gas in the U.S. territories, starting with ANWR.” (By the way, Alaska is a state, not a territory.)

    We may be narrowing down exactly when Dubya suffered his crippling brain damage. It must’ve been sometime before January 1st, 1959, when Alaska became a state. Young George would’ve been 12 years old at the time, so he would’ve already learned everything about geography that he’d ever need to know.

  • Mark D: “Well, he opened up drilling just north, south, east and west of ANWR…”

    Strictly speaking, east of ANWR is Canada, over which President Bush has no jurisdiction. Yet.

  • ANWR, the last refuge of the oil scoundrels.

    I wonder why it never occurs to anyone that using up our own reserves is about the stupidest thing we could do. We might actually need to fuel our war machine someday with our own oil, or use it for some other catastrophe, when we’re cut off from foreign supplies.

    Obviously, as others have observed, getting off oil, not drilling everywhere for the last precious drops, is the solution to not one, but two potential disasters in the 21st century – global warming, and peak oil. Isn’t it ironic, that the stuff we’re going to start running out of in a decade or two will last just long enough to turn the planet into an inferno? Why can’t we get this country to take action?

    It seems as if we can’t do anything anymore, because everything has become politicized and dominated by entrenched industries that refuse to adapt to changing times.

    Solar power is the ultimate answer, along with electrically powered cars. All we have to do is develop them. But our government won’t do this, because it is controlled by the special interests who can’t be bothered investing in the future when there’s plenty of money to make the old fashioned way.

  • As stated previously, ANWR would not make much difference in our price of gas now, nor will it when it comes online.

    The comment regarding saving reserves was a wise one. Do we really need to use up some of last new discoveries just so we can buy our gas for 50 cents per gallon less? When that oil could be used to make vital pharmaceuticals or medical supplies at some date in the future?

    Regarding the proposed alternatives, I think those posters make good points. The problem with those alternatives is a problem of scale. Think 200 million private vehicles in the US. If every new car sold in America was an electric car starting today, it would take at least 5 years before half of us could get one, possibly longer. Also, which new power plants are going to run all these electric cars?

    It’s not an easy problem to solve. I imagine that all the alternatives will play a role, but no combination can replace the relatively inexpensive and highly energy dense oil we use every day.

    The bottom line is that we Americans, are going to have to learn to live a much lower energy (consuming) lifestyle. Whether that’s because of global warming legislation, declining oil production, growing demand, or devaluation of the US dollar I can’t say. All I know is that energy in all its forms is going to continue increasing in price long term.

    If you think gasoline is expensive now, please consider something. How much would it cost you to pay 10 men to push your vehicle (insert your cars MPG here) miles? And how much longer would it take? How about a team of draft horses?

    Gas at $3.50/gallon is still a bargain.

  • I think we’re missing something else here too…what about refinery capacity? Wouldn’t we still be behind the eight ball after mucking up nature? Like the gas tax holiday, this is another idea that belongs in the garbage…

  • All the time wearing a GREEN TIE. The man has absolute disdain for all of us, but we knew that already.

  • Comments are closed.