Monday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* The devastation in Burma is just staggering: “The death toll from the Myanmar cyclone is more than 10,000 people, Myanmar’s Foreign Ministry said Monday. Survivors were facing their third night without electricity in the aftermath of the historic cyclone that also clogged roads with thousands of downed trees. Diplomats were summoned to a government briefing Monday as the reclusive southeast Asian country’s ruling military junta issued a rare appeal for international assistance in the face of an escalating humanitarian crisis. A state of emergency was declared across much of the country following the 10-hour storm that left swathes of destruction in its wake.”

* On a related note, these fears seem fully justified: “House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) both expressed concern Monday over the response of the Burmese government to a massive cyclone that hit the country over the weekend, which has left up to 10,000 dead and tens of thousands missing. ‘I am concerned with the reported slow response by the military regime to help the Burmese people during this critical time,’ Pelosi said in a statement. Burma is ruled by a military junta which has spurred international aid for decades. According to the Associated Press, as of Monday afternoon the Burmese government had not granted permission for a Disaster Assistance Response Team into the country.”

* Unbelievable: “The number of suicides among veterans of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan may exceed the combat death toll because of inadequate mental health care, the U.S. government’s top psychiatric researcher said.”

* It’s hard not to like numbers like these: “Voter excitement, always up before a presidential election, is pushing registration through the roof so far this year — with more than 3.5 million people rushing to join in the historic balloting, according to an Associated Press survey that offers the first national snapshot. Figures are up for blacks, women and young people. Rural and city. South and North.”

* State welfare rolls, after a lengthy decline, are on the rise again.

* Remember when Bernie Kerik was supposed to be training Iraqi police? He was raiding whorehouses. Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez said Kerik’s “whole contribution was a waste of time and effort.” (Remember, Bush wanted him to head DHS.)

* Gas Tax Scam.com.

* Sen. Bob Corker, a conservative Republican from Tennessee, said McCain’s “gas-tax holiday” scheme qualifies him as a “pandering extraordinaire.”

* After watching Hillary Clinton pretty closely for 16 years, I’ve never been as disappointed with her as I am after seeing her new gas-tax ad.

* House Republicans talk tough, but by a two-to-one margin, they don’t want a moratorium on earmarks.

* Kudos to Howard Dean for telling Chris Wallace the truth about Fox News’ coverage often being “shockingly biased.”

* Can fun movies be considered for Academy Awards?

* In 2005, Clinton thought McCain was right about a long-term presence of U.S. troops in Iraq. Clinton now knows better. McCain? Not so much.

* Why going after oil companies’ tax breaks is better than going after oil companies’ profits.

* Dear WaPo editors, we’re still waiting for that editorial on Cindy McCain.

* And finally, we warned Nevada voters about this guy: “To call Nevada Gov. Jim Gibbons’ tenure troubled doesn’t quite capture it. It started off with a bang with accusations that he’d drunkenly assaulted a cocktail waitress in a parking garage in the middle of the night. That probe was eventually closed due to insufficient evidence. And then there’s the federal investigation as to whether he took bribes from a defense contractor while he was a congressman. And now he’s seeking a very public divorce from his wife.”

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

You’ve probably read where Steny Hoyer is working with Rockefeller on a new FISA bill which would backhandedly give the telecoms immunity. I got an email from the ACLU about this this morning.

Swell, just what we need, which makes me ask myself…WTF these dems are thinking? Hoyer, you suck!

Which brings me to the meat of this post.

There is a bill in Congress now which is not-so-lovingly called “The Thought Crime Bill.” And it was introduced by a dem; Jane Harman of CA.

What I read of this bill scares the crap out of me and it should you, too. This bill passed in the house with overwhelming support!

Read about this, and then, please call your elected officials and tell them about your concerns.

Jane Harman, Democrat of the great state of California, you suck!

  • And then there is this.

    Now, an influential group of physicians has drafted a grimly specific list of recommendations for which patients wouldn’t be treated. They include the very elderly, seriously hurt trauma victims, severely burned patients and those with severe dementia.

    The suggested list was compiled by a task force whose members come from prestigious universities, medical groups, the military and government agencies. They include the Department of Homeland Security, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Department of Health and Human Services.

    The authors suggest hospitals would need a triage officer who would be the ultimate authority. Those people would have to be educated well in advance and would need legal protection to shelter them from the possibility aggrieved relatives might take punitive legal action later, Wax said.

    It’s not bad enough we have bureaucrats at insurance companies saying what treatments we can and can’t have, now we get a government official to determine who lives and doesn’t? Holy shit. That’s all I can say.

    Well, gee, since water isn’t a basic right, I don’t know why I am surprised by that.

  • From that AP link on voter registration:

    Voters are flocking to the most open election in half a century, inspired to support the first female president, the first black or the oldest ever elected.

    (It’s not closing my bold. I am nvg at html.) bwahahaha, yes, voters are flocking to register to support the oldest candidate evah!

  • Obama’s slight delegate lead is largely due to caucus results in red states, and the fact that Obama was not vetted by the media until just before Pennsylvania’s primary, with nothing but adulation and softball questions from the MSM, and his message of hope (anyone hitting the hope bong lately??), and his insistence that HRC was too polarizing and had too many negatives to be electable, compared to his squeaky clean image and his status as a uniter.. In light of recent events, all I can say is… Really?!?

    At any rate, the times have changed, and the superdelegates know it.

    Check out the general election map for Obama vs. McCain, he does not get the necessary 270 electoral votes to beat him in the GE.

    Now check out Hillary vs. McCain, she wipes the map with him

    This is not new, this trend has been the same for weeks. Hillary is handily beating McCain in GE polls, largely due to those BIG swing states with lots of electoral votes, you know, the ones BO say don’t matter because he can possibly win in smaller states that were previously red states.

    The math does not add up folks, and the super delegates are well aware of that fact.

    That said, let the people’s voice be heard!! The voters get to decide tomorrow, we’ll soon find out which candidate is actually gaining momentum, and which is barely holding on.

  • Unbelievable: “The number of suicides among veterans of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan may exceed the combat death toll because of inadequate mental health care, the U.S. government’s top psychiatric researcher said.”

    Sounds a little like Vietnam but the Vietnam Vet’s decided to wave their flags and wear their pins rather than do the right thing. Another dumb ass Texan killing young people by putting them in a war they cannot win.

  • Sorry Greg. Momentum doesn’t mean jack. Obama “closed the deal” in Wisconsin. No matter how well Hillary does going forward, when all is said and done, he’ll have the most elected delegates, the most states and the most popular votes. In short, he’s our nominee. You lose, buddy.

  • Gibbons openly admitted that he was trying to help a drunk woman find her truck so she could drive home. That should have been enough to do him in, don’t ya think?

  • bwahahaha, yes, voters are flocking to register to support the oldest candidate evah!

    I’m howling at this also!

    The voters get to decide tomorrow, we’ll soon find out which candidate is actually gaining momentum, and which is barely holding on.

    Greggy, we will be tomorrow night exactly where we are right now, except that Obama will have increased his delegate lead by a handful. It is time for the not-so-fat lady to stop singing, if that’s what you call that god-awful noise.

  • I just wanted to add:
    Iron Man was excellent. After watching that movie, I also decided I needed to price a SegWay. (sp?)
    That is All.

  • CJ, with all due respect, you cannot possibly know that Obama will win the most popular votes.

    Check out big tent democrat’s explanation as to why Ezra Klein’s math is wrong. BTW, this is referring to the same article that CB wrote about earlier.

  • Hey RacerX, my hope bong never needs to be refilled, and always satisfies because it is filled with more substance than anything Obama can fill it with, so stick that in your pipe and smoke it 🙂

  • BTW, as a frequent smoker of marijuana, I find the “hope bong” exchange insulting. I hope that Hillary keeps a closer eye on Greg in the future, or she may lose the “pothead computer chair quarterback politico” vote.

  • Thanks for the heads up, MsJoanne.

    I see a Baptist minister of all people, asked John McCain in a townhall meeting whether he called his wife a cunt or not. McCain said that people didn’t want to hear that kind of language and the questioner was escorted away by police. Now the cops are one escort service I definitely avoid.

    Cindy McCain has a new memoir coming out. My bet is that it’ll be more Barbara Bush than Betty Ford.

  • Correction, that was another article that big tent democrat was referring to.. maybe I should put the hope bong away now 🙂

  • Dale, we all know how McCain handles having his own words thrown back in his face. I can’t wait to see his head explode when he’s called on it during future “debates” and such.

    It will be a joy to see.

  • Greg, with all due respect, using RPF numbers, your dream scenario includes elections where Hillary pledged not to campaign “or participate” (i.e. MI & FL).

    I’m at a loss as to how somebody can claim to win an election in which she didn’t participate. Sounds to me like Hillary is trying to benefit from her dishonesty (she could have honored her pledge not to participate by removing her name from the Michigan ballot and by not advertising the fact that she would be in Florida to make her “victory” speech).

    No sir. She lost the popular vote too.

  • Check out big tent democrat’s explanation

    Heh.

    I love how the Hillbots all pimp ‘statistics’ and ‘analysis’ that come exclusively from their alternate universe that consists solely of Talk Left, Taylor Marsh and Corrente.

    It’s sad how much like the reviled wingnuts at Red State and LGF they have become.

  • Greg, you’re engaging in circular reasoning. “Because Hillary’s attacks have weakened Obama against McCain, she would win the general against McCain if she were the nominee and the general election was held today.”

    Some people (for unknown reasons) still have some respect for the Clintons. If she gets behind Obama, as she has said she would, his position vis-a-vis McCain would change.

    There is zero chance that she will be the nominee. Now it’s just a matter of how hard the Clintons will work to either undermine or support Obama in the general election. My guess is that they’re already looking at running against McCain in 2012. We’ll see if the party and populace are that forgiving; I personally don’t think so.

  • Greg, you say “the times have changed, and the superdelegates know it,” and “The math does not add up folks, and the super delegates are well aware of that fact.”

    I’ll grant you that superdelegates can read the writing on the wall. But they’re not seeing what you want them to. Obama continues to close the 100-superdelegate lead that Clinton racked up before the primary season even started.

    Late-deciding superdelegates are breaking for Obama. For instance, today the count is Obama 5, Clinton 1/2.

    One thing superdelegates know is that general election polls are meaningless in May. In 1992, Bill Clinton was polling in the mid- 20s, GHWB in the low 30s, and Ross Perot in the high 30s.

  • It’s exceptionally telling to see Greg cite “Electoral Vote Dot Com”—especially when it has so-ooo many ties to the McCain campaign website. Sorry, Greggie—you just gave folks another reason to believe that “your candidate” is a GOP shill….

  • Wallace: Why are so many Democrats now appearing on Fox?
    Dean (in my dreams): Well Chris, polls show your viewing audience has been “left behind”. We are here to discuss issues of substance; to help them be better informed in the hope they can stop this vicious cycle of voting against their best interests”.

  • CJ, you misunderstood. She still has a chance to win the popular vote without MI & FL, it’s a longshot, but she still can. If she does, would you not agree that would be a phenomenal accomplishment?

    Brooks, I’m sorry to say it, but Obama’s wounds are self inflicted, don’t blame Hillary for his downward spiral.

    Glad to see such spirited responses, but like I said before, it doesn’t matter so much what I say, let’s see what the voters have to say tomorrow 🙂

  • So, according to Nell, we’re faced with a choice between four more years of incompetent, narcissistic cronyism and political pandering, or a Republican?

    Kinda depressing, don’t you think? Another thing about the Clinton supporters I’ve noticed is that they’re really down on the American voter. I doubt much of anybody has a high regard for them, after the last several elections, but still, I think it’s too pessimistic to believe that only panderers and faux populists can be elected.

  • She still has a chance to win the popular vote without MI & FL…If she does, would you not agree that would be a phenomenal accomplishment?

    Totally. I’m heading out for a run right now. If I should get up to 35 mph, faster than a cheetah, would you not agree that it’d be a wowzer of an achievement?

  • CJ, check out RCP’s spreadsheet, the default numbers are very conservative

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/horseraceblog/chooseyourown.html

    The reality is that Puerto Rico will likely get a lot more turnout than 1 million.

    At any rate, check out the margin of victory for Obama without MI & FL, it is less than 100k.

    Most analysts agree that Florida is much more likely to be counted in the end than Michigan anyhow.

    The DNC rules only specify that 50% of the delegates should be removed as punishment, Howard Dean went way beyond that and disenfranchised millions of voters by removing 100% of the delegates.. but guess what.. those voters came out and voted anyhow, myself included, and he nor anybody else can undo that. So if you want to give Obama the delegate advantage, fine, those are the rules, but you can’t take away the actual votes that were counted in a fair election on the books, and I say fair because they did have a level playing field, despite his advertising in FL which he pledged not to do.

  • Greg, you’re such a single-minded guy, could you show your patriotism and join the Army? I’m sure you’ll be the guy to volunteer to patrol IED Alley because “it must be done.”

    In case you’ve forgotten, the definition of insantiy is doing the same thing that failed before in the expectation of a different outcome. Your posts clearly demonstrate that, when they were passing out brains, you thought they said “trains,” and expressed a preference for bicycles.

  • MsJoanne, Thanks for the additional horrifying items.

    With respect to the tragic news out of Myanmar
    ( http://news.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics/general/view.bg?articleid=1091899 ),
    we see the Bush administration dancing on the knife-edge of irony:
    The first lady sharply criticized Myanmar’s ruling military regime on other fronts, suggesting that it kept critical information about the storm from people in its path.

    “It’s troubling that many of the Burmese people learned of this impending disaster only when foreign outlets … sounded the alarm,” she said. “Although they were aware of the threat, Burma’s state-run media failed to issue a timely warning to citizens in the storm’s path. The response to this cyclone is just the most recent example of the junta’s failures to meet its people’s basic needs.”

    Gee, Laura, I’d say such administrative incompetence in the face of a terrible natural disaster warrants a change in regime, wouldn’t you agree?

  • I read the entire text of the Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007. I don’t think anyone who’s scared of it did, though. Because all it does is appropriate funding to find out legal methods for detecting and policing terrorist acts. I can’t say it’s ‘thought crime’ until you see what recommendations the results of the act would be.

  • I wanna know NOW! Why do I have to wait for all that voting before I know who won Indiana and NC?

    I suppose polling is scientific, but if that is the science that was used to prove evolution I’m gonna become a doubter. 🙂

  • Crissa, read the speeches surrounding the Homegrown Terrorist Act or 2007. The verbiage is very vague, but if you read the speeches (snips of the speeches are on my blog as well as a link to the text of the speeches. Click here). It’s then that you get a good idea about just what they think this bill encompasses. And that is frightening, IMHO.

    Plus, if you Google it, you will find a ton of analysis on this act. It is not a good thing.

  • Tom Cleaver, am I to understand from your post that I believe we should be in Iraq? Maybe I’m all about war, and all of the negativity towards Bush should be directed at Clinton or any supporter of hers?

    FYI, I enlisted in the Army in 1991, not because I love war, but because I love my country and wanted to defend it with my life if necessary. Would you like to continue questioning the patriotism of our men and women in uniform, please continue to show your true colors my friend.

  • @#2

    Reading it written out like that, yes, it’s horrifying. But from what I’ve seen on the internet, we’re way behind a lot of other countries in our planning. And basically if it’s a pandemic, if things held together long enough to follow a list like that? We’d be lucky. That counts on hospital workers sticking around to treat patients. (Unlikely to happen once a massive pandemic is underway.)

    We’re talking about hundreds (if not thousands) of people lined up for, say, each respirator. We could just go with whoever got there first (likely the people already in the hospital?) or who had the most money…

    If there’s a pandemic, you either want to be the first to get it (and get treated) or you want to hole up in your house until it’s over (and sometimes there’s a second wave).

    We’re totally unprepared. We were unprepared for Katrina. We’re talking something like that on a world scale.

  • CJ is right…Clinton can’t close the gap on the popular vote.

    Having said that…the popular vote is irrelevant. Campaigning for the most popular votes is an entirely different strategy (where one would limit his or her campaign to large metropolitan areas while ignoring more rural areas) than campaigning for delegates (where it’s important to campaign in more rural and less populated areas).

    As CJ said, it’s dishonest to claim to have won primaries she pledged not to participate in. Now Hillary “it’s the delegant count that matters” Clinton is trying to benefit from her incompetence in winning the most pledged delegates by singing a new tune…”it’s the popular vote that matters”.

    Clearly, the supers aren’t buying it. Popular vote…big states…momentum? All bullshit. It doesn’t matter what happens going forward. Hillary is our Huckabee, and Obama is our nominee.

  • N. Wells, I agree wholeheartedly about Myanmar, those people are truly suppressed. Maybe someday in our lifetimes they will be free.

  • “House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) both expressed concern Monday over the response of the Burmese government to a massive cyclone that hit the country over the weekend, which has left up to 10,000 dead and tens of thousands missing. ‘I am concerned with the reported slow response by the military regime to help the Burmese people during this critical time”

    And this was said without even a hint of irony regarding Hurricane Katrina? Burma is a Third World military dictatorship. They are shocked by the response, fine. It was not too long ago I seem to recall hundreds (if not thousands) dead and missing in New Orleans Louisiana from a hurricane we knew was coming for a week or more! This is beyond silly.

  • Fred, my last post was intended as a response to your post in case there was any confusion.

  • Popular vote…big states…momentum? All bullshit. It doesn’t matter what happens going forward. Hillary is our Huckabee, and Obama is our nominee.

    Exactly. Well put.

  • Why don’t we just throw out all the primary results where Obama won and declare Hillary the queen of America already.

    Sheesh. Why is wrong with you people? Can’t you see that Hillary is owed this?Her 8 years of living in the White House make her ready on day 1– after all, she already knows her way around the Oval Office.

    After this election I think we should adopt a new amendment to the constitution banning the children or spouses of presidents from being elgible to become POTUS. I thought we broke away from England and intentionally chose not to have a royal family?

  • I do have a serious question for Greg and Hillary’s other apologists– do you think the gas tax is a pandering move? Do you think her calling all economists “elitists” is an honorable position? Do you have any trouble with her pretending that she’s an ordinary person when her whole life has been about her being extraordinary? Do you find anything she has done or said on the campaign trail troubling whatsoever?

  • zoe from pittsburgh – shillary is not “owed” the presidency cuz when she was in the White House, she would not blow the then-president, her husband, bill.

    She failed in her most basic duties to this nation and bill had to turn to monica. And the cigar thing is not bill’s fault either – have you seen that woman? No wonder bill mistook her for an ash-tray.

    Maybe this nation was founded to be ruled by bush-clinton-bush-clinton monarchs – 2 ruling elite families. Maybe I misread my history book.

    But even if America as suppose to be ruled by a criminal cabal that uses 2 families as figureheads (and I am not convinced this is what the founding fathers had in mind), surely shillary gave up her entitlement to the presidency by letting the country down and forcing bill to turn to monica.

    Perhaps is she had done her wifely duties, she could be entitled to the WH, but she didn’t.

    And greg – you are just a liar – exactly what we would expect from a shillary shill, never let a fact get in the way.

  • The FRAUD is in the “big” states where shillary is being proclaimed the winner – no surprise there, she represents the same criminal cabal that stole 2 elections for dur chimpfurher.

    Nonverifiable vote counts, in states that disinfranchise voters, and where preliminary analysis of the data (when possible) indicates gross errors, shouldn’t count – but that his where shillary gets her “victories”.

    Why do you think that rush supports her anyhow?

  • the definition of insantiy is doing the same thing that failed before in the expectation of a different outcome.

    You mean like expecting change from a bush-clinton-bush-clinton dynasty of 2 elite families?

    Clearly this is not what America was founded to be – sure – it works for NASCAR, but we’re talking serious government her, not more dog and pony shows.

  • Some of the comments from Obama followers are vile and lack substance, and truly disgust me. You attack HRC for no apparent reason, bring up Monica Lewinsky like it belongs in this conversation, and instead of debating the issues, you choose to take the low road just like Obama does in truth, despite his elite claims to be better than that.

    http://www.attacktimeline.com/

    You are doing your candidate harm by representing him in such a way, and he is doing just fine on his own without your “help”.

  • cheetahs run at 70 mph…

    …until they hit the wall—and flat-line. Methinks I see a wall in the distance. It is called “The Great Wall of Delegate Count Mathematics.” Upon that wall is found the fact that Obama only needs about 280 delegates to seal the deal—and when both pledged and supers are combined, there are almost 680 delegates remaining in the contest.

    This clearly indicates that She-Unworthy-of-Naming needs an average of 605 in all remaining contests to secure the nomination.

    She will not obtain that margin of victory—not even in Indiana

    Beyond that, her credibility as a functional member of the United States Senate has been irreversibly compromised.

    She has insulted to an egregious degree the majority of States within this Union.

    She has intentionally denounced the scientific community as being irrelevantly elitist.

    She has conjured and connived innumerable insults against Citizens who saw another path to a Better America than the “stay-the-course” mentality that she offers.

    She has promoted the warmongering, profiteering ideologies of the current administration.

    She has adopted the strategies; the talking points; the very persona of the Right—and audaciously dares to still call herself a Democrat.

    Or am I being obtuse?

  • Line 6 above should read “60%.”

    *Goes in search of nuclear blend coffee….

  • Greg – LOL

    At least I do not officially represent anyone and have NEVER posted anything pro or con Obama’s candacy here.

    The fact is shillary and her campagne have regularly slimed obama and have run illegal vote suppression phone operations too!

    Here “wins” in some of the big states like OH, CA, PA (to name a few) are NOT HONEST, not verifiable, and do not correspond to the little scrutiny that these vote counts have received.

    She operates like chimpy – but pretend that you are on the “high ground” with your disgusting, dishonest, and corrupt rhetoric and candidate.

    My posts are just to tick you off anyhow because you are a LIAR just like shillary.

  • Funny how our “concern troll” greg never touches the legitimate issue I bring up – the majority of Americans want change.

    We will not get change via a bush-clinton-bush-clinton junta that largely represents the same corporate interests and the military-industrial complex.

    Lie all ya want greg – America knows better.

  • Comments about going after the gas company subsidies instead of giving a gas tax holiday ignore the motive behind the holiday — to give some relief to commuters and truckers who are paying more at the pump. Going after gas co. subsidies will certainly eat into their profits but it will do nothing to help consumers. Helping consumers has been called “pandering” to voters, but I find it offensive to imply that anything that would help the average person is somehow shameful and shouldn’t be proposed.

    On another topic — I find it offensive that the media seems to be using the deaths of now over 22,000 people in Myanmar to score political points against its military dictatorship.

  • Steve, is it obtuse to point out that BHO has voted to fund the war every year since he has joined the United States Senate?

    Did you somehow get offended by her sniper fire comments, or are you saying she offended people because of the completely debunked non-existent racist remarks? It was actually BHO who insulted Americans with his bitter comments.

    Hillary Clinton is pushing for science to take a lead role in policy for advancement of medicine, including stem cell research. Which brings me to my next gripe with shallow people like you, why do you and little bear feel the need to merge Clinton with Bush, as if they were the same person? This is such an obvious falsehood that her policies mirror his, yet you continue to spew this garbage as truth.

    Hillary will withdraw troops from Iraq at the same rate as BO has promised, but unlike him she will do so with very specific policy in place that includes intense negotiations with Iraq’s neighbors, the ones who will pounce all over weak little BHO and undo any advancement of democracy within Iraq, doing little to heal the deep wounds of this torn country.

    Your false statements that Hillary promoted war mongering is offensive in its idiocy and ignorance.

    Zoe, you obviously don’t speak for most people from Pittsburgh, Obama lost pretty badly considering the demographics and the fact that he was expected to win there. BTW, I’m from Fayette county right next to Pittsburgh and have a lot of family there, as a county we voted for Clinton 79% to 21%, and Allegheny county went pretty heavily Clinton at 54%, once again considering how heavily favored he was in your home town, that says a hell of a lot.

    So, that being said, don’t take my word for it that the people have turned against BHO, all you have to do is pay attention to the remaining contests to see, starting with today’s contests in Indiana and North Carolina.

  • I drive for a living and have a working class job. Telling me that saving $2.00 every time I fill up my tank is INSULTING to my intelligence. It also shows just how out of touch that some wealthy people are– while I don’t make much money $2.00 is still just $2.00. Even if I saved $2 a week for 12 weeks that’s only $24 over three months. It’s not going to make or break my budget. Not to mention that there is no way to stop the oil companies from just jacking up the price by that much– plus prices always go up in the summer– so there might be an awfu lot of evergy put into something that is superficial and doesn’t help the problem.

    So, yeah, I find it insulting and shameful pandering because it’s like offering starving people cookies just to try and get someone to vote for them. It’s an empty gesture that is supposed to make me feel good about a candidate and not much else. I’d rather my president put their efforts into doing meaningful things and not fluffy, attention-diverting ideas like the “gas holiday.” It’s a pathetic temporary fix that is designed to help Hililary get elected and not much else.

  • Zoe, you obviously don’t speak for most people from Pittsburgh, Obama lost pretty badly considering the demographics and the fact that he was expected to win there.

    You clearly don’t know Pittsburgh. Allegheny County is not Pittsburgh. Obama did win Pittsburgh– by pretty nice margins– it was the very separated, lily white suburbs that went for her. So don’t tell me what I know and don’t know about Pittsburgh when you don’t know what you’re talking about. For pete’s sake, Squirrel Hill went for Obama. You know, diverse areas where there are a lot of educated people– we like Obama and see Clinton as a phony. Why do you think that is?

    Greg, you’re sort of delusional if you see her ahead or believe that she should win by getting the “elite” members of the party to support her, to overturn the popular vote and the delegate count. What do you think would happen to the party if the “elite” did that? What if the situation were reversed, wouldn’t you think it would be an outrageous proposition for them to take her victory away and give it to Obama?

  • When you people point out that consumers won’t actually be helped by Senator Clinton’s gas tax plan, the oil companies will actually benefit, and the infrastructure and the environment will be hurt, it’s deeply offensive, not to mention hostile, and it shows an elitist expectation that voters are largely adults with brains. Senator Clinton “gets it” enough to understand that voters can’t handle that. She knows that even bringing all that confusing stuff up is a direct assault on normal Americans.

    Instead of throwing big, fancy, knowledge-based arguments at people who are just trying to make a living and, God bless them, don’t have the time to think this through because they’re too busy working to pay for the lazy blacks, Senator Clinton shows her empathy and compassion by helpfully recasting this argument in terms appropriate for any child. Unlike Mr. Ivy League on an Affirmative Action Admission, she thus ensures that even the least informed voter can and should take an active part in the American policymaking process.

    Does she get praised and thanked for her ability to speak to the common woman at a level that this poor individual can understand? Well, does she ever get credit for her achievements? The answer is no–and I don’t need to tell you that it stinks.

  • zoe, you’re just confused by all the economists’ rhetoric surrounding this issue and you’re too embarrassed to admit that you don’t understand it all. Most voters are pleased and grateful that Senator Clinton has taken the time to simplify this issue for them, and if you don’t mind my saying so, they’re a little more gracious than you are about what she’s doing for them. I suppose there will always be ungrateful and vicious members of the underclass who refuse to be helped.

  • I love how all of BHO’s followers throw themselves in with the “smart” category that is being cast upon some of the academics who also support him. I’m currently in pursuit of my Master’s degree, do you think I should see the error of my ways now and fall in line with the Obamabots who blindly follow without regard for the very real issues with his character, which include his acting like a typical politician who goes negative?

    The MSM just repeats his falsehoods without questioning them when he says that Hillary is negative, and that he is not. This makes him a wolf in sheep’s clothing, but what is becoming apparent is that his cheap sheep suit is coming apart at the seams.

    http://www.attacktimeline.com/

    Zoe, everybody knows that blacks are voting for BHO at over 90% (and HRC supporters are called racists), so I don’t care what neighborhoods here and there did because as a whole the people in PA and Allegheny county forcefully spoke out against him. This same trend will continue today, and as a result of demographics, he will likely be able to claim victory in NC, but considering he was favored by 20% there less than 2 weeks ago, anything less than 10% will be under achieving big time. Beyond NC, he will not be winning much from here on out.

    If the upcoming states held their primaries earlier in the primary season, he would not hold much if any delegate lead, even with the current disenfranchisement of FL & MI. That said, hold on to your seat because it is going to be a very bumpy ride for Obama followers in the coming weeks.

  • Greg,

    You consider Hillary’s victory in PA to be some kind of “forceful rejection” of Obama? Are you kidding? She won by less than 10%. That’s not a forceful rejection, in ordinary circumstances that is understood to be a pretty close race. You act like she won by 80% or something.

    Yet again, you don’t seem to know ANYTHING about Pittsburgh and are making rather ugly assumptions about its demographics. Pittsburgh proper is 27% black according to the 2000 census. But don’t let facts get in the way of your argument. One of the largest neighborhoods in Pittsburgh is Squirrel Hill– which is predominantly Jewish and almost completely white– went for Obama. (Outside of NYC Pittsburgh has the largest Jewish population in the country.) Same can be said about a number of mostly white neighborhoods in Pittsburgh– ones with a lot of academics and people in the medical profession– who voted for Obama. It wasn’t the black vote that helped Obama win Pittsburgh– it was the white, educated vote that did.

    So, yeah, keep on thinking that Obama is only winning because of the black vote– it just shows how little you understand. You also seem to believe that AAs are only voting for him because he’s black instead of it having to do with them turning their back on the Clintons– because the Clintons turned their backs on them.

    The bottom line is that you don’t like Obama and despite your own slavish love of Hillary you like to call his supporters “Obamabots.” You have lost your ability to recognize the string of misakes she has made or that at this point she is practically unrecognizable from whom she was previously.

  • Greg,

    Additionally, anyone who argues that the votes of urban centers shouldn’t count because there are too many black people who like Obama should stop pretending that they are any kind of real Democrat.

  • Comments are closed.