The danger of McCain hiring a team of lobbyists: their clients

The Republican establishment was surprised this week when John McCain passed over Paul Manafort as his national convention manager, instead tapping Doug Goodyear, CEO of the Washington-based DCI Group lobbying/consulting firm. It was part of a disconcerting pattern — McCain rails against the influence of powerful corporate lobbyists, but surrounds himself with nothing but powerful corporate lobbyists.

It turned out to be an even worse decision than the Republicans realized. This piece from Newsweek’s Michael Isikoff went online yesterday afternoon.

Goodyear is CEO of DCI Group, a consulting firm that earned $3 million last year lobbying for ExxonMobil, General Motors and other clients.

Potentially more problematic: the firm was paid $348,000 in 2002 to represent Burma’s military junta, which had been strongly condemned by the State Department for its human-rights record and remains in power today. Justice Department lobbying records show DCI pushed to “begin a dialogue of political reconciliation” with the regime. It also led a PR campaign to burnish the junta’s image, drafting releases praising Burma’s efforts to curb the drug trade and denouncing “falsehoods” by the Bush administration that the regime engaged in rape and other abuses.

Given what we’ve seen of the Burma military junta’s brutality, hiring the guy who runs the junta’s lobbying firm to be the Republicans’ national convention manager didn’t seem like an especially good idea.

Apparently, the McCain campaign couldn’t think of a compelling defense for this.

Just five hours after the Newsweek story was published online, and just a week after he was hired to run the GOP convention, Goodyear was gone.

Shortly after 5:00 p.m. this afternoon, the Republican National Convention announced that it had accepted Goodyear’s resignation, setting a new land speed record for shortest time lapsed between the “story breaks” and “ax falls” phases of a political scandal. “Today I offered the convention my resignation so as not to become a distraction in this campaign,” said Goodyear in written statement. “I continue to strongly support John McCain for president, and wish him the best of luck in this campaign.” Asked later by the Politico whether Team McCain had given him the boot, Goodyear said no. “My decision,” he added. “[It was] unambiguously the right thing to do.”

Ironically enough, though, Goodyear defended his involvement with the brutal Burmese regime in Isikoff’s original story. “It was our only foreign representation, it was for a short tenure, and it was six years ago,” he told NEWSWEEK at the time, adding that the junta’s record in the current cyclone crisis is “reprehensible.”

Funny how the spotlight changes things.

As it turns out, this story actually gets worse. McCain preferred Goodyear for the job, as opposed to the establishment pick of Paul Manafort because — get this — McCain was worried about some of Manafort’s lobbying clients.

The prospect of choosing Manafort created anxiety in the campaign because of his long history of representing controversial foreign clients, including Philippine dictator Ferdinand Marcos. More recently, he served as chief political consultant to Viktor Yanukovich, the former Ukrainian prime minister who has been widely criticized for alleged corruption and for his close ties to Russia’s Vladimir Putin — a potential embarrassment for McCain, who in 2007 called Putin a “totalitarian dictator.” “The Ukrainian stuff was viewed as too much,” says one McCain strategist, who asked not to be identified discussing the matter.

I see. When picking a manager for the Republican convention, McCain had to choose between a corporate lobbyist who represented brutal totalitarian regimes and another corporate lobbyist who represented brutal totalitarian regimes.

It’s quite an operation McCain’s running over there, isn’t it?

Republicans: They All Support Brutal Totalitarian Regimes.

(This message brought to you by McCain for President)

  • Obama said he would carry on diplomatic talks with rogue nations. McCain says, “let the money do the talking.”

  • “It was our only foreign representation, it was for a short tenure, and it was six years ago,” he told NEWSWEEK at the time, adding that the junta’s record in the current cyclone crisis is “reprehensible.”

    Reprehensible? Agreed. But the only difference between the cyclone crisis and every other act of these thugs is the world-wide publicity. They’ve always been reprehensible.

    May I suggest a candidate to run the Republican convention: Mike Brown. I hear he does a heckuva job running horse shows.

  • Marc Ambinder is reporting that the guy who “would have been directly in charge of the Myanmar account during 2002” is still on McCain’s campaign, as one of his campaign regional managers.

  • McCain appears to be downright stupid most of the time, tripping lightly over the grass heel to toe with Joe Lieberman, who checks ALL of his bearings, with McCain saying just about anything that floats out of what passes for his mind one day and then denying it the next day. Irresolute about everything.

    He’s a perfect fit for “a male bimbo … who even has to be tutored … in the clichés that comprise the basic interview”.

  • It used to be politically correct (for Republicans) to be friendly with brutal totalitarian regimes as long as they were anti-communist brutal totalitarian regimes.

    The collapse of the USSR really messed things up for Republicans. Thank goodness that today we have friends running brutal totalitarian regimes who are vital allies in the Global War on Terror.

  • Isn’t “brutal totalitarian dictatorship” the preferred Republican form of government?

    When you’re eyes-deep in a criminal conspiracy, it’s pretty hard to find anyone in the conspiracy who isn’t an indictable criminal.

  • Given what we’ve seen of the Burma military junta’s brutality, hiring the guy who runs the junta’s lobbying firm to be the Republicans’ national convention manager didn’t seem like an especially good idea.

    Seems perfectly apt to me.

  • This latest disaster only increases the odds that a prediction of mine will come true, so let me start a contest:
    Name
    a) the date when John McCain will drop out of the Presidential race (for “health reasons,” of course) and
    b) who will be chosen to replace him.
    (My own picks are June 16th — what a delightful 62nd Birthday Present for me — and Newt Gingrich.)

    If somebody comes closer to the date or gets the right replacement, write me — keeping my e-mail address findable is the main reason I keep my abandoned blog up — and I’ll ship them a package of 25 duplicate mystery stories from my collection.

  • Prup – that’s an intriguing prediction.

    I think it won’t happen. The only “health reason” that would keep the hyper-ambitious McCain from pursuing his dream would be death itself.

    I have thought for a very long time that ethically-challenged and widely-disliked Newt Gingrich was the strongest available candidate that the Republicans might have available. I have no idea why he didn’t run in the first place. Newt is evil, but he’s very intelligent, while McCain is “dumb as a stump” (to quote McCain from another context).

    I hope that your prediction is wrong. McCain is the weaker candidate.

  • Comments are closed.