McCain’s ‘base’ considers its role in the campaign

Last week, after Barack Obama suggested that John McCain had “lost his bearings,” the McCain campaign responded with a lengthy memo that, among other things, went after campaign reporters for not favoring McCain enough. As Mark Salter insisted, Obama is “hopeful that the media will continue to form a protective barrier around him, declaring serious limits to the questions, discussion and debate in this race.”

For anyone who’s watched any aspect of the campaign for more than five minutes no doubt realizes, the McCain’s campaign’s response was a kind of projection. Nevertheless, on “Meet the Press” yesterday, the NYT’s John Harwood briefly touched on the subject.

For those who can’t watch clips online, Harwood explained that the McCain campaign, in a move that “many Republicans would find ironic,” is pushing the line that the press is friendlier to Obama. Harwood said, “John McCain’s benefited from very friendly press coverage for many years, but he’s going to try to argue, which will have corollary benefit of rallying conservatives, if he can pull it off, of saying, ‘The press wants Obama to win. I’m pushing back, too.'”

Tim Russert added, “In 2002, John McCain referred to the press as his base.” To which Harwood responded, “They were his base.”

What’s less clear is what reporters and news outlets plan to do about this realization. They know they’ve offered McCain fawning, sometimes sycophantic, coverage. They know that it’s incumbent on them to be more professional. They know they’ve repeatedly fallen short of their own standards.

But I haven’t seen any evidence that the media is taking steps to correct the mistake. Just the opposite, actually.

By now, we’re all pretty familiar with the “work the refs” phenomenon. Part of me has assumed that the media, tired of the pro-McCain bias being highlighted and ridiculed, would want to go out of their way to prove they aren’t in the tank for this guy. It would seem like a natural response — when the coverage becomes almost comically ingratiating, reporters want to prove their mettle by pushing in the other direction.

But that hasn’t happened at all. I’ve been waiting for nine years for news outlets to stop treating McCain like a folk hero — I mean that literally; Roger Simon actually once labeled McCain a “folk hero” — and yet the fawning coverage continues.

In March, McCain brought his buddies from the media over to his house for a barbecue. A month later, reporters gave McCain some his favorite tasty treats.

McCain’s moderators, the AP’s Ron Fournier and Liz Sidoti, greeted McCain with a box of Dunkin’ Donuts. “We spend quite a bit of time with you on the back of the Straight Talk Express asking you questions, and what we’ve decided to do today was invite everyone else along on the ride,” Sidoti explained. “We even brought you your favorite treat.”

McCain opened the offering. “Oh, yes, with sprinkles!” he said.

Sidoti passed him a cup. “A little coffee with a little cream and a little sugar,” she said.

And when will this end? To hear reporters tell it, someday.

Let’s not forget that the back in 2004, Tim Russert, Chris Matthews, Barbara Walters, Charlie Rose and all the other major media figures attended John McCain’s BIRTHDAY PARTY.
http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh031108.shtml

  • “They know they’ve repeatedly fallen short of their own standards.”

    Are you trying to imply that Russert and Matthews have standards? Stephanopolous and Cokie Roberts have standards? Brian Williams? Standards?

    I think the coverage of Rev. Wright, turning an 8 year old video clip into a 2 month long daily news item, has proven our MSM has no such standards.

  • It will end on January 21st, 2009—the day after the inauguration of President Obama—when his Press department starts bringing in a new flock of journalists who have not “consumed mightily from the endless ocean of kool aid” proffered by the Republikanner Beast.

    Knowing this justifies the current MSM sycophancy; for they, too, know all too well that the ending of the status quo will likewise herald their “extinction event….”

  • Part of me has assumed that the media, tired of the pro-McCain bias being highlighted and ridiculed, would want to go out of their way to prove they aren’t in the tank for this guy. It would seem like a natural response — when the coverage becomes almost comically ingratiating, reporters want to prove their mettle by pushing in the other direction.

    Members of the press still cringe like a whipped dog whenever conservatives drag out the “liberal media” canard. Obama needs to get in their face about his coverage.

    From now on, whenever a journalist asks Obama about a Wright, Ayers, or Rezco, Obama should say something like, “The only people who want to hear more about these people are other ‘journalists’. Maybe I should invite them all to a barbecue, too.”

    And the next time a reporter tries to insist the the coverage of Obama has been fair he should reply, “Well, no one in the media has given me a box of donuts yet,”

    The Right has been beating up the press for decades. It’s all they respond to anymore. “Journalistic ethics”? (snort) Yeah, right!

  • Typical propaganda – just like we are constantly told about a “liberal” bias in the mainstream media which does not (nor never has) existed.

    This is the type of lies that “catapult the propaganda” and allowed an AWOL alcoholic/cocaine-addicted chimp to be fraudulently hoisted into the White House as a war president.

    The shamelessness of the laying liars has no bounds – this is really no difference than the way the media proclaims mclame is a “maverick” and a “straight-talker.” All easily proved false, but then again, isn’t propaganda always false?

  • …new flock of journalists who have not “consumed mightily from the endless ocean of kool aid”THIS crowd out?

  • If all the media is owned by Republican interest, like TNR, Washingtop Post, Newsweek and with Murdock trying recently to even buy up Newsday – surely we can why the press fawns over John McCain. Murdock fired the WSJ editor the other day – so we know that the Republcain own media is not going to be critical of Bush and it’s WHY McCain said the press is his base a hostile takeover of the press is exactly what occurred. It’s way we get people like Joe Klein and Peter Beinhart and the TIME won’t get rid of Klein and why TNR parades these people about on the media as if there actual voices of the left, insteading being hand pick voice from the right, to represent the left.

    ABC This Week didn’t get rid of Sam Donaldson and replace him with non-journalist yes-boy George Stephanopoulos for nothing,. Stephanopoulos is weak and incapable of controlling George Will, a person that Republican owned interest wanted intensified and magnified.

    How is it that we know that the Bush Administration has stacked the DoJ, but understand how Republican have STACK everything else too, from PBS, the WP to WSJ? The way Murdock handles his media ownership is clear, you do what he says or you’re fired.

    It’s of interest that there are truly horrible news worthy items of discussion out there that are COMPLETELY being left out of the what should certainly be consider HEADLINE news, like this amusement park being planned for Iraq’s Green Zone or fact that Bush has spent a Billon dollars each on military bases in Iraq and US Embassy?

    Or that Murdock wanted to create the meme than somehow CNN is liberal? It’s not liberal and as long as Murdock owned CNN it never been and never will be liberal news. There is far too much intentional news suppression going on, but still we have bloggers wondering WHY the press had a truly trash talking Dem debate the other day why it seems to fawns over McCain and NEVER ask McCain any serious questions?

    It’s because Gonzales, as AG served at the pleasure of George Bush – It’s Because FOX news, WSJ, and CNN serve at the pleasure of Rupert Murdock – and rest of the news serve other powerful, controlling Republicans, Duh!

  • Here is an interesting POLL.

    Americans get their news online

    SEVENTY PER CENT of U.S. Americans think traditional journalism has lost its touch, and nearly half of them are turning to the Internet to get their news instead.

    In the online poll carried out by a We Media/Zogby Interactive, 48 per cent of the 1,979 American respondents who took part in the survey said that they got their main fix of news and information from the Internet, a figure which is up 40 per cent from last year.

    I guess Republican owned or Murdock laced news is becoming a hard sell since a majority of American are catching on to fact that FOX really is BS.

    Anyway, for journalist – there must be this drive to produce quality news, and if NYT and WP and certainly TV cable programs don’t cut the muster anymore WHY is there this headlong rush to news startup companies. Bloggers are getting paid decent money for advertising too – why not start up a news service that provides for what 70% of what Americans are looking for? Better than Google – a team of sharpshooting journalist that want to put the quality star back in journalistic standards. Why limit yourself on being judge partisan enough by the nasty likes of Murdock – there is absolutely room for internet newspapers of quality journlism – NOT opinion but with an occasional Edward Morrow bite where it’s needed. Sometimes you just have the tell the public, there is something nasty going on here.

    Be aware!

  • When the Corporate Fart called Russert was talking to the other Corporate Pimp called Harwood about this and Harwood said the Media was/is McBush’s base Russert defensively reacted by saying ‘speak for yourself Harwood’ as if Russert himself was not part of this CORPORATE MEDIA CONSPIRACY. Never mind that Russert, at every opportunity, places himself directly in front of McBush , pant suit down, bent over, spreading the ass cheeks, screaming over and over ‘fuck me, fuck me’ ………..

  • Powdered or sprinkled? Cream and sugar?

    please.

    these dino-sores can’t compete with the instantaneous voice of the people. Potatohead Russert and his ilk have forgotten everything they’re learned in Journalism 101.
    Who, What Where Why and How….

  • And when will this end?

    Never.

    With apologies to Atrios, this has been another edition of simple answers to simple questions.

  • What SB said. I really recommend folks click through the link in the first comment. Though there’s a lot of competition, that birthday party with the press where McCain informally launched his 2008 campaign probably takes the cake as the ultimate expression of the McCain-press codependency.

  • A LOT of people — the diety of your choice knows why — thought highly of McCain — including Harry Reid and John Kerry — one reason I think he’s been so silent this year. And if McCain HAD taken Reid’s invitation, he might have finished ahead of Hillary in THIS year’s Democratic race.

    But, despite the paranoia in so many of you, the media will be looking closely at him as time goes on — the Republican race isn’t *the big news* now. And the closer you look, the worse he looks. But we — both bloggers and Democrats in general — HAVE to make the issue, or it won’t BE news.

  • For the media to stop treating McCain as if he were their kind old grandpa, they need to stop repeating the “maverick” line over and over again. Enough already! Since Bush has been President, he has voted pro-Republican matters 95% of the time. Prior to Bush, he was maybe 85% pro-Republican with his votes. That does not make you a maverick.

    The press keeps bringing up campaign finance and the fact that he took on big tobacco as the reason he is a maverick. The fact is, many Republicans were pro-campaign finance because they felt it would actually hurt Democrat coffers more. Secondly, McCain’s campaign finance bill barely beat a Democratic version that another member submitted a day later than McCain’s.

    As for his “taking on big tobacco”…his bill to take them on was voted down! If he wanted to take them on so much, then why didn’t he refile the bill the next session, or any other session since?

    To get a real grasp on how much the media has been brushing a lot of McCain’s dirt under the rug, you have to read David Brock’s “Free Ride: John McCain and the Media”. Its a great look on McCain’s ability to hide his true colors.

  • Ever seen the wife that busts her tail trying to please a husband that is never satisfied?

    There’s only so hard she can work so only two things can happen.

    She keeps working as hard as she is or she leaves him.

    I don’t see an upside for McSame with this strategy.

  • Comments are closed.