Friday’s campaign round-up

Today’s installment of campaign-related news items that wouldn’t generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers:

* Superdelegate announcements have been relatively spare this morning, with only one endorsement I can find: Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.) endorsed Obama.

* On a related note, the Obama campaign issued this press item on delegates: “Yesterday, Obama secured the support of 4 superdelegates (Reps. Henry Wexler, Jim McDermott and Howard Berman and Larry Cohen (CWA DNC)), 1 pledged delegate in North Carolina (because of updated vote tallies in the state) and 7 pledged delegates that had previously supported John Edwards. That means that the number for Obama to secure a majority of pledged delegates has gone down from 25 to 17. And the number Obama needs to secure the nomination is 121.5.”

* Democrats pushed back pretty hard against Bush’s “appeasement” talk yesterday, but this afternoon, Obama will reportedly do some pushing of his own: “Obama foreign policy adviser Susan Rice vowed on MSNBC this morning that Obama will respond forcefully today to President Bush’s claim yesterday that Democrats’ willingness to negotiate with hostile foreign powers constitutes ‘appeasement.’ ‘What you’re going to hear is a very vigorous response to what was an outrageous, unprecedented, and divisive attack from President Bush yesterday,’ Rice said.”

* Despite some rumors Wednesday night, John Edwards flatly ruled out the possibility of joining Obama’s ticket as VP.

* Clinton continues to take the high road this week, and indirectly defended Obama yesterday against Bush’s ridiculous smear. Campaigning in South Dakota, Clinton told reporters, “President Bush’s comparison of any Democrat to Nazi appeasers is both offensive and outrageous on the face of it, especially in light of his failures in foreign policy. This is the kind of statement that has no place in any presidential address and certainly to use an important moment like the 60th anniversary celebration of Israel to make a political point seems terribly misplaced. Unfortunately, this is what we’ve come to expect from President Bush.”

* On a related note, Clinton also criticized McCain yesterday for his opposition to the Senate-passed farm bill.

* The Tennessee Republican Party has decided the way to help McCain win is to attack Obama’s wife.

* I actually like the idea of Tom Daschle serving as Obama’s White House Chief of Staff.

* A non-partisan Research 2000 poll, commissioned by Daily Kos, shows Democrats ahead in both of Alaska’s major statewide campaigns this year. Mark Begich leads Ted Stevens in the Senate race by five (48% to 43%), and Ethan Berkowitz leads Don Young by 10 (50% to 40%).

* Speaking of Senate races, a new SurveyUSA poll shows Rep. Tom Udall (D) looking very strong in New Mexico, leading both of his possible Republican rivals by about 25 points.

* And Alan Keyes, after having been rebuffed by the Republican Party and the Constitution Party, has decided to create his own entity, called “America’s Independent Party.” He claims to have groups of supporters getting to work in Texas, California, Florida, New York, and Missouri, though he already fell far short of qualifying for the ballot in Texas. The state required 74,000 signatures; Keyes had 10,000.

how about that – if clinton takes the high road, many others will not find it necessary to point out the “issues” involved with her candidacy.

  • And Alan Keyes, after having been rebuffed by the Republican Party and the Constitution Party, has decided to create his own entity…

    … thus demonstrating clearly the point at which stubborn becomes delusional.

  • The Tennessee Republican Party has decided the way to help McCain win is to attack Obama’s wife.

    Don’t worry, it’s still early in the campaign. Rest assured they will come up with a ‘Harold Ford’ ad featuring a sexy, white woman overlayed with pictures of Obama.

    Concerning the attack on Michelle Obama, the common thread in all of these attacks is to savage a misquote of what she said. She said “for the first time IN MY ADULT LIFE, I am REALLY proud…”

    Put this into some context. She is 44. That makes her adult lifetime at between 20-25 years. In the last 20 years, I can find many things to be proud of as an American. In the last 20 years of Bush-Clinton-Bush presidencies, I agree with Michelle that there is nothing to be REALLY proud of. Unless we want to be really proud of starting wars and destroying the middle class.

  • That means that the number for Obama to secure a majority of pledged delegates has gone down from 25 to 17.

    Does anybody have any insight on the number of pledged delegates Obama is likely to win in Kentucky? What about Oregon?

  • John Edwards flatly ruled out the possibility of joining Obama’s ticket as VP.

    If Obama can’t persuade Edwards to join the ticket, then what kind of leader is he???

  • LOL, Grumpy.

    Of course, I presume we this statement by Edwards is worth about as much as his “we’re going to keep going” statement 48 hours before suspending his campaign.

    These are just the rote things to say in these situations.

  • Too bad I don’t live in Texas.

    I love Keyes. The campaigns are so boring without him.

    Don’t forget Keyes gave Obama a run for his money. He only lost by 2.2 million votes!!!

  • Thanks Nautilator.

    OpenLeft is predicting that Obama will win 18 pledged delegates in Kentucky and 30 pledged delegates in Oregon. With only 17 needed, that ought to do it.

    Victory in May 20.

  • From the article regarding TN Republican attacks on Michele Obama: “While Mrs. Obama has trouble being proud of the country where she earned degrees from Princeton University and Harvard Law School and then became a multi-millionaire, her husband makes statements that belittle average Americans’ response to the difficulties of life.”

    Excuse me? When did she become a multi-millionaire? Not according to their joint tax returns from 2002-2006. Their combined income for 2006 was slightly less than $984,000. Granted, that’s alot of dough. But not multi-millionaire level!

  • Since Clinton is no longer a contender, the timing of this piece quoting Clinton insiders on what went wrong in her campaign, and I suppose of my posting this link to it, is a bit like piling on. But it makes fascinating reading for anyone involved in political campaigns, as at least some here are.

    Everyone quoted is anonymous, so take what they say with some healthy skepticism–there is score settling and ass covering galore here. But much of what’s said confirms what we already knew–having your chief strategist be your only pollster is an insane idea, Solis Doyle was in way over her head, Penn was clueless and arrogant, the campaign messed up big-time by not planning past Super Tuesday, running as an incumbent is risky when people are looking for change, valuing loyalty over competence will come back to bite you, etc.–and it’s interesting to hear insiders say it. A good read if you take it with a grain of salt.

  • Dammit, why didn’t anyone ask me to put Alan Keyes on the ballot here in Texas? I DEFINITELY would have signed that. Man, I need to get out more often. I had no idea that buttwad was even considering a run, but would have loved to see him on the ballot.

  • actually, Maria, reading that piece and this one from earlier in the week together really do explain a lot. I’m not sure which piece was more interesting. You do get the idea from the piece you linked, however, that Mark Penn truly does not have the first clue what he is talking about – he doesn’t understand the proportional delegate allocation rules and he doesn’t understand caucus rules. I got the impression they blew off caucus states so he wouldn’t have to admit he didn’t know what to do there.

  • God help all us if this country votes in a demican or republicrat.
    We will all be sorry.

  • Mark Pencil said:
    LOL, Grumpy.

    Of course, I presume we this statement by Edwards is worth about as much as his “we’re going to keep going” statement 48 hours before suspending his campaign.

    Elizabeth Edwards has Stage 4 breast cancer, which means the cancer has spread to other parts of her body. Treatment can slow the cancer, but won’t stop it. She almost certainly won’t live to see the end of the next president’s term in office.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/22/AR2007032200155.html

    Refusing to accept a VP position is a classy and loving decision by Edwards.

    (Sorry this response is so late.)

  • CNN missed the 57 state SLIP but the Republicans are making a video for TV>>BREAKING NEWS,

  • Comments are closed.