McCain to meet with three possible running mates

The next big step in the general-election phase of the campaign is poised to get underway. The Obama campaign indicated this morning that it has begun the search for a running mate, and Jim Johnson, a former top aide to John Kerry, will lead the process. John McCain, meanwhile, is going to have some possible picks over to one of his houses for a casual get-together.

Senator John McCain of Arizona is set to meet with at least three potential running mates at a gathering at his ranch this weekend in Arizona, suggesting that he is stepping up his search for a vice-presidential candidate as the Democratic contest heads toward a conclusion, according to Republicans familiar with Mr. McCain’s plans.

Gov. Charlie Crist of Florida, Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, and Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts and a onetime rival for the Republican nomination, have all accepted invitations to visit Mr. McCain at his ranch in Sedona, Republicans said.

After a week of campaigning, Mr. McCain is heading home on Friday for three days without a public schedule. His campaign described this as a social weekend that would include 10 couples, and — as has been its policy — declined to discuss any aspect of the vice-presidential search.

The point, apparently, is to measure “personal chemistry” with those likely to make McCain’s shortlist.

Controversial lobbyist-turned-strategist Charles Black told ABC News that no one should read too much into the meeting, saying it has “nothing whatsoever to do with the vice presidential selection process,” adding that it would be “pretty awkward” given that Crist, Jindal, and Romney would presumably be in competition with one another, and yet, they’ll all be at the same social gathering together.

Fair enough. It’s probably best to consider this the opening, getting-to-know-you phase of the VP-selection search. It’s hardly a stretch to think these three will be seriously considered, but the list almost certainly will include several others.

That said, Jonathan Martin does a solid rundown on these three, and what they bring to the table.

Jindal, for example, is extremely conservative and would immediately garner enthusiastic support from the GOP base. On the other hand, he’s just 36 years old: “His youth could offer a contrast with the 72-year-old McCain but it might also highlight the presidential nominee’s age, rather than assuage voters about it. And despite his depth of policy experience, he has no national security credentials. Given the threats that confront the nation — and McCain’s stated desire to find a vice-president who could quickly become commander-in-chief — Jindal may represent a risk.”

Crist, meanwhile, is a great campaigner from one of the nation’s most important electoral states, and if Crist were on the GOP ticket, Dems probably wouldn’t even try too hard to win the state. Martin notes the odd downside:

His populist streak, however, leads some in the party to be wary of Crist. Conservatives in Florida prefer his predecessor, Jeb Bush, and don’t view Crist as one of them. One problem is that Crist embraces what he calls a “live and let live” approach to cultural matters. He was once pro-choice and is now pro-life, though he displays little enthusiasm for the issue. He’s also single, something that makes him unique among a crop of vice-presidential prospects who are all married with children.

Romney, of course, became well known as a competitive presidential candidate, where his strengths and weaknesses became rather obvious. McCain and Romney clashed more than a few times during their competition, but Romney has since become an enthusiastic McCain cheerleader. (He really wants to be the VP, but knows it’s unseemly to push too hard for the gig.)

Stay tuned.

Pawlenty – perhaps nervous about the lack of an invite – could not have been campaigning any harder for the ask on TV this morning. It was shameful.

  • Racer X, Lieberman has repeatedly stated that he has no interest in being VP. Methinks he has his eye on being SecDef in a McCain administration.

    Meanwhile, it worries me that the Obama campaign has hired the guy who vetted Kerry’s and Mondale’s veep picks . . . we need outside-the-box thinking, not the standard misguided strategy of demographic-placation, or the wrongheaded idea that anybody who speaks with a drawl will win southern states!

  • Bobby Jindal is 36 years old and has a total of three years in public office. Overcompensation for superannuation much? “Don’t worry! If the old guy pops off, you’ll get the wettest-behind-the-ears president possible!”

  • Bobby Jindal? If Obama is “inexperienced,” this guy is a babe in the woods. Isn’t that just the kind of VP you would want to back up the oldest president ever to take office? And his Wikipedia picture looks a bit like Alfred E. Newman.

    Mitt Romney? Empty suit.

    I don’t know much about Charlie Crist, but he looks like the sort of guy you would cast as the President in a movie, and he seems to be popular in Florida. Do VP candidates actually have coattails?

  • Even though he’s a Republican, I tend to like Crist. He is much more centrist then Jeb Bush is by far. However, he’s got some issues. There’s still some question about his handling of a talent scout ponzi scheme when he was Attorney General. The Christian Right aren’t fans; he dealt them a blow in the Terri Schiavo case. He’s also 51 and was married only briefly (one year) when he was 23. There are rumors, of course, about his sexual preference which is a BIG DEAL with Republicans.

    Neither of these three have any national security background, not just Jindal. I think Romney is dangerous and has absolutely no principals at all. Jindal appears to be a “true believer.” The guy is far-far-right. My bet is still on Lieberman.

  • Please do not take these remarks in the wrong way. There is no way Jindal gets on the ticket. He is darker than Obama and the people inclined not to vote for Obama for reasons we dare not talk about will have no place to turn.

    I think he was invited to placate the extreme right.

  • For all those who keep speculating about Lieberman, let me spell it out in bold letters one more time:

    Lieberman has said he doesn’t want to be VP. He is holding out to be Secretary of Defense.

  • Caped Composer: Lieberman has said quite a lot of things that later turned out not to be true. I don’t believe he wants to be VP, but people may be excused for taking his words at far from face value.

  • Why not Ron Paul? Really, it would probably be a good choice for McCain in terms of stemming lost votes to Bob Barr and the Libertarian Party this year.

  • According to MSNBC, Pawlenty was also invited but had a scheduling conflict. I’m not sure what the talking head’s source was, but it sounds like spin to cover for leaving him out.

  • Hmmm. When does McCain meet with Senator Clinton to offer her his VP slot?

    Laugh if you must, but then please list for me any good reason why (a) she wouldn’t take it if offered, and (b) that ticket wouldn’t win in a landslide.

    Go ahead. I’ll wait.

  • I look at this “A List” and see how wrong people are to be worried about Hillary’s idiocy. If there is one certain thing is that the Republicans can’t win without the Religious Right. So his choices for VP start with a gay man, a conservative “outside the church there is no salvation” Catholic — Jindal — and a Mormon. And his Hagee-go-round has managed to annoy those RRers who share Hagee’s belief and the rest of us who find him repugnant. McCain is leaking support like a sieve, and none of these will help him regain it — okay Crist hrelps him with some Independents, but only if he comes out first — if he doesn’t and is outed it will be an Eagleton-disaster in the making. And if he does, there go the homophobes.

  • The Obama campaign needs to be notified of this so he can have surrogates on TV denouncing this hiring. This guy is sleazy.

  • starfleet dude: Even McCain won’t be dumb enough to take Paul. (Why should he? Paul’s only positive is his attack on the war — but that would be running against McCain’s main position.) Paul has a long history of publishing — unsigned, but believed to be by Lew Rockwell — viciously racist comments in his personal newsletter, he shares the Tom Tancredo-approach to immigration — to the point of wishing to repeal the Constitutional provision making anyone born here a citizen. He is strongly anti-abortion, has no record of being pro-equality for gays, and has supported most religious intrusion into the private lives of people despite his putative ‘small government stand. (Not only was Rockwell his chief of staff for many years, he also had Gary North on his staff — and North, the son-in-law of Rousas Rushdoony, is a true dominionist who believes — as many RRers are accused of, inaccurately — in replacing the Constitution with laws based on biblical principles.)

    Paul has close ties with — and I believe has spoken in front of — the Council of Concerned Citizens, which is the successor to the White Citizens’ Councils that some of us are old enough to remember from the civil rights era. (If you don’t, they were considered the ‘respectable’ equivalent of the Klan, who looked down on the Klan’s violence and ‘crudeness’ but agreed with them in their overall goals.) — In fact, the CofCC might be an issue for Obama to bring up, since too many Republicans have ties to them, including Haley Barbour.

    But the clincher for Paul is his supporters. Obama condemned Farrakhan and, eventually — to my eyes necessary but still wrong — Wright. McCain has tried to laugh off Hagee’s idiocy and publicly called them ‘nonsense.’ Paul has been supported, strongly and consistently, by the truly scary part of the Radical Right, including the whole Stormfront, National Vanguard crowd, his rallies frequently have biker-Nazi types in full regalia showing up and hawking their literature — and he has NEVER rejected this support or criticized them in any way.

    And, simply on a policy level, McCain has admitted he is weak on economics. I’d love to see him try to defend Paul’s libertarian economics. “The government is an intrusive and useless force slowing down the benefits unfettered capitalism will bring’ is an argument that sometimes ‘sells’ in good times, when the economy is booming. But when ‘unfettered capitalism’ costs you your house, sends your job oversees, and creates the current healthcare mess — somehow you don’t buy it so readily.

  • I have written a parody of a mental status exam which includes a memory question on naming the last seven losing vice presidential candidates. So far only one person has been able to answer that question and he has a freakish memory. VP candidates do very little for the ticket except for some internal pacification. While having a very young barely tested conservative of East Indian descent is interesting, it only counts if Senator McCain dies in office (which is a possibilty.) Otherwise he will be as well remembered as John Nance Garner, and he won the spot.

    I don’t think it will make much difference who he picks as far as the General Election goes, but it might make a difference later on. Look at Cheney, who knew that he was really Darth Vader?

  • #8: I don’t take your remarks to mean that you have a problem with Jindal’s skin color, just as I hope no one takes my comments that way… But you’re correct, and to add more to the discussion, Jindal is of Indian (as in India, not Native American) heritage IIRC, and… don’t many US companies outsource jobs to India? Some will have a problem with that. Some will see him as a foreigner, as they do with Obama.

    For me, the real problem is his youth and inexperience… And the first speech he gave on the floor of the House in January 2005, which was the day that Stephanie Tubbs Jones and Barbara Boxer challenged the seating of the Ohio electors (for W) from the 2004 election due to fraud, etc. Jindal had a huge problem with this… my first speech should have been a joyous occasion, but alas these ridiculous legislators were taking away it away by inferring that Ohio didn’t really elect bush (a paraphrase of what he said, really!)… Alas for poor Jindal, democracy got in the way. 😛

  • Here’s how I’m handicapping McSame’s VP choice:

    2:1: Crist. Florida becomes reliably red.

    1:1: Romney or Huckabee. Romney has cash and looks; Huckabee can bring the theocrats

    1:5: Jindal. Too young, Lousiana is already reliably red.

  • mikeyes,

    I have written a parody of a mental status exam which includes a memory question on naming the last seven losing vice presidential candidates.

    (without using the awesome power of the intertubes):

    2004 Edwards
    2000 Lieberman
    1996 Kemp
    1992 Qualye
    1988 _____
    1984 Ferarro
    1980 Mondale
    1976 Dole

    okay, so I can’t remember Dukakis’ running mate. I was living abroad at the time and although I voted absentee, I didn’t see a single campaign ad and the Japanese newspapers really didn’t cover the race. It was also my first time voting in a presidential contest.

  • Mikeyes, lemme see if I can meet your challenge . . . and I swear I’m not looking any of this up on the Internet:

    The Last Seven Losing VP Candidates:

    John Edwards
    Joe Lieberman
    Jack Kemp
    Dan Quayle (incumbent was ousted)
    Lloyd Bentsen
    Geraldine Ferraro
    Walter Mondale (incumbent was ousted)

    And one more for good measure:
    Bob Dole

    How did I do?

  • 1992 should also include Admiral Stockdale, Ross Perot’s running mate. I remember this because it was the first election I followed – mostly for my highschool history project.

  • VTIdealist, continuing with your line of thought, we should also include Winona LaDuke for 2000, since she was Nader’s VP pick, and Nader’s candidacy played a significant role in the outcome of that election.

  • It won’t make any difference who McCain chooses…no matter how they try to dress him up he’s still Bush with viagra. But going on their normal path it will be some personality based choice. They just have to “look” good, they don’t have to be real, but watch for a choice that is detached from Bush thinking…if there is such a person in the republicunts party.

  • Edo, @21,

    Totally OT, but I had been wondering whether your handle was for the old capital of Japan or some kind of a nickname for Edward (like Kevo for, probably, Kevin). I made a bet with myself that it was the capital. Your today’s post kinda confirms it; I’ve won my bet 🙂

  • libra @21,

    You were right on both counts. My first name is Edward and in Japanese that’s pronounced Edowado. So I shortened it to Edo while I was there. And given the name of the old name for tokyo, that’s the kanji I use. Nice work!

  • Caped Composer,

    Nice work on Bentson. Despite my excuse, I should have remembered that. One question for you, was Admiral Strickland Perot’s running mate in 1996? I seem to recall that it was actually someone else, but I just don’t know.

    Not that Perot played a big role in 1996, but it did prevent Clinton from getting over 50% of the popular vote which is a big point to the freepers.

  • I got everyone except Lloyd Bentsen. How could I forget Lloyd Bentsen!?

    Admiral Stockdale deserves a category of his own. That poor man just had no idea what he was getting into. Even today, I cringe to remember the look on his face during that debate.

  • How can anyone forget Bentsen in ’88?

    “…and you, Senator, are no Jack Kennedy”.

  • I know, phoebes! It was such a devastating line! But it went clean out of my mind, probably because of my extreme youth at the time. Just kidding.

  • Maria, @31,

    Stockdale, right (not strickland…got Obama VP possibilities on my mind, clearly).

    who was Perot’s running mate in ’96?

  • On a lighter note, a failed VP candidate became even better known as one of the spokesmen in early American Express commercials with the theme, “Do you know me?”

    Well, do you know him, and who he was the running mate of?

    Answer later, before I sleep, if you kids are too young to remember it.

    — Old Man Prup

  • William Miller! Ran with Goldwater! Man, was he ever a failed VP candidate.

    And some of us “kids” are political geeks who read constantly.

  • Thank god you didn’t say Yankees. We would have had problems. Big problems.

    I’m pro-Mets, however.

  • Coupling the “fake” conservative like McCain with

    either

    A. A rumored gay man
    B. A dark skinned south asian man or
    C.A morman man

    would be political suicide when trying to court the knuckle dragging bigoted Rethug electorate.

  • Comments are closed.