Obama, evangelicals, and the ‘Matthew 25 Network’

Last night on “The Daily Show,” Jon Stewart was chatting with Ralph Reed about a variety of election-related news regarding people of faith (Reed was the former head of the Christian Coalition, before destroying his reputation by hooking up with disgraced GOP lobbyist Jack Abramoff.)

Stewart noted, “There’s talk that 40% of evangelicals will go with the Democrat [on Election Day]. When did the evangelicals lose their values?” Reed responded, “I don’t think that’s supported by the polling data. I think if you look at most of the general-election polls, McCain’s getting about 60 to 65 percent of the evangelical vote.”

This, of course, struck me as rather amusing. If McCain is getting about 60% of the evangelical vote, unless Reed thinks evangelicals are going to flock to Nader and Barr is large numbers, Obama’s on track to get about 40% of the vote. One doesn’t need polling data to reach this conclusion, just arithmetic.

Nevertheless, on the broader point of Stewart’s question, Obama is moving forward with various aggressive outreach. It was Mark DeMoss who brought up the 40% figure last week, but it’s the Obama campaign that’s committed to making it happen.

A spokesperson said the meeting of some 30 people will include leaders from several denominations including Evangelical, Catholic and Protestant members of the faith community. Among those taking part are Bishop Phillip Cousin, the Rev. Stephen Thurston and Dr. T. Dewitt Smith.

“Reaching out to the faith community is a priority for Barack Obama and will be a priority under an Obama Administration. This is one of several meetings he will have over the coming months with religious leaders,” Jen Psaki told reporters on the campaign plane.

There are some serious heavy hitters in this meeting, whose names may not be familiar to a secular audience, but who are pretty major players in the religious community, including T.D. Jakes, law professor Doug Kmiec, Phillip Cousin, and the National Association of Evangelicals’ Rich Cizik.

And then, of course, there’s the new “Matthew 25 Network.”

There were reports a few days ago that the Obama campaign was launching a new outreach project targeting evangelicals, and yesterday afternoon, we got a better sense of what the initiative is all about.

A fund-raiser is being held tonight in Washington for a nascent political action committee that is hoping to reach out to Christian communities on behalf of Senator Barack Obama.

Called “The Matthew 25 Network,” the new organization, which is still in its earliest stages, is being spearheaded by Mara Vanderslice, who was director of religious outreach for the Kerry-Edwards campaign in 2004 and did similar work for several statewide Democratic candidates, including Governor Ted Strickland of Ohio, Senator Bob Casey of Pennsylvania and Governor Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas. […]

Ms. Vanderslice, who has been active in the budding movement over the last few years to encourage Democrats to be more willing to discuss matters of faith, declined to detail the group’s plans, because she said the organization is planning an official rollout later in the month.

Nevertheless, according to a description of the group that came with the invitation to its fund-raiser tonight in which the suggested contribution is $1,000, the committee is hoping to reach out to “targeted religious communities that are key to electoral success for Senator Obama, including Catholics, moderate evangelicals, Hispanic Catholics and Protestants.”

In case you’re wondering, the name of the project comes from the 25th chapter of the Biblical book of Matthew, quoting Jesus: “For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.”

The point, of course, is to expand the definition of what constitutes a “religious issue” beyond just gays and abortion, to include matters like poverty, the environment, social justice, and AIDS/HIV.

Are these efforts going to pay off? It’s too soon to say with any certainty, but I couldn’t help but notice that David Brody, the national correspondent for Pat Robertson’s network, noted Obama’s meeting with religious leaders and wrote, “Folks, this is an important development. It shows that the game has changed. Old rules don’t apply. We’re in uncharted territory.”

And noting the Vanderslice project, Brody added that the discussion over “faith and values” is “not JUST Republican territory anymore.”

Stay tuned.

Reed is using Faith Based Math! 100% – 60% = 25%

  • Whoa. Your first paragraph has a major factual error. Reed’s reputation sucked long before he hooked up with Abramoff.

  • I’m sure the conservatives will fire back with all the verses where Jesus condemned homosexuality.

    Oh wait, there aren’t any.

  • While I hate the idea of courting evangelicals, I love the idea of pulling apart the nutjob right-wing Christian fanatic voter base.

  • CB: Are these efforts going to pay off?

    Yes. It is called stealing someone’s thunder.
    Similarly: Obama’s large crowds need to pick up the U-S-A chant.
    That is a must.

    You want to neutralize the goopers acid?
    Steal their base: Hoist the flag and cuddle up to family values.

    This also provides a way for Michelle to smack goopers back too.
    Talk family values a lot. About her children. About raising her kids. About the possibilities of having young children in the WH, and what responsibilities that entails.

    Steal the goopers thunder!
    Wear the flag pin…
    And God bless America! (After every major speech.)

  • I like feeling like Obama can reach out to evangelicals without shameless pandering. *coughmcaincough* And I like seeing a REAL uniter in action – it’s not like he’s going to go around shouting “Ah’m a uniter” *coughbushcough* because he’ll be too busy doing it. Good times! 🙂

  • It is going to be a most excellent adventure, this campaign season. Obama will take up the Sword of America, gut McPander-Bear like a fish, and throw him on the grill.

    Pass the tartar sauce….

  • Obama will take up the Sword of America, gut McPander-Bear like a fish, and throw him on the grill.

    Then he can serve him to the press with teriyaki sauce. Nothing inspires media loyalty like a free barbecue.

  • Perhaps Reed was denying the premise of Stewart’s question. That is, if the majority of evangelicals are still voting GOP, then there’s no phenomenon. The joke, “When did the evangelicals lose their values?” is nonsense if the majority of evangelicals are voting the way they usually do.

  • I like feeling like Obama can reach out to evangelicals without shameless pandering. -Stacy6

    More of a ‘here’s why you should agree with me already,’ approach, instead of the flipity-flopity approach of some other old politics candidates.

  • Historically, populist progressive movements in the United States have had their best and longest lasting effects when they were championed by the religious community. Obama is smart to engage in outreach and to emphasize shared values.

  • I think splitting the religious base of the Republicans is one of the best ideas yet out of the Obama campaign. Religious voters are crucial to the GOP, and if they’re split then the GOP is toast, especially since the “conservatives” are pissed at the GOP for all the “big government” that they have created.

    I think the “conservatives” will be back in line once Obama is president, but a serious fraction of religious American voters could be peeled off permanently they do it properly.

  • Ugh – tainted, rotten, old fish on the grill? Just throw it out for the seagulls & buzzards.

    BuzzMon—after 8 years of Bush and the spectre of his dementia-riddled mini-me heir apparent, I think even the seagulls and buzzards deserve to have things “dressed up a bit.”

    Don’t you?

  • On the one hand, T.D. Jakes is egocentric asshat.

    On the other hand I don’t care much so long as Obama doesn’t put a Family Values (TM) plank (Translation: Smear the Kww33r) on his platform.

  • Another example of Obama taking the fight too the repulbicans rather than relying solely on his base as previous Democratic candidates have.

    This is a good thing. It will force McCain to put even more resources into trying to keep the evangelical vote. That means he’ll spend more time talking ‘family value’ issues like abortion and gays, which in turn will (hopefully) wake up the independents that he is a pure social conservative.

  • I think this is just a brilliant idea. Go after McSame’s “base”. Try to win them not by pandering but by convincing in logical ways. Another impressive move.

    John McCain: Your retirement is too secure as it is, don’t you think?
    John McCain: Can’t poor sick children just get a job already?
    John McCain supporting our troops by keeping them uneducated.
    Why do I put these links in all of my comments? Click Here.

  • So are we going to be reading Obama campaign news in The Week in God section now? I’m not sure how this outreach isn’t pandering.

  • In case you’re wondering, the name of the project comes from the 25th chapter of the Biblical book of Matthew, quoting Jesus: “For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.”

    Matthew 25 is also good when you’re talking to the religious about health care. Especially the last part, where it says that if you DON’T do the things above to “the least of my brethren”, then you get “everlasting punishment”.

  • “Outreach” to religionists (of whatever stripe) isn’t pandering when you remember that 90% + of Americans believe in God. Belief in God represents a person’s deepest appreciation for values; appealing to those beliefs is acting on the most common and deepest shared interest of human beings. If you’re an insincere religionist like say, GWBush, then of course it’s pandering. If Obama is sincere in his religious belief, and I believe he is, if you trust what he says in “The Audacity of Hope,” then there is reason to believe he can unite people through a religious paradigm that is innately more compelling than the political paradigm. It’s going to be something to behold if he can pull it off.

  • Considering the very hate driven, blood thirsty and anti-Christian, racially-ethnically intolerant, gender despising, attitudes, doctrines and acts of the so called Christian right. Why would Obama want to adopt them as part of his support? To woo them successfully he will have to promise and give them what they want, just as Bush did. Their intolerance is antithetical to a democratic system that promises the justice, equality and religious liberties of the Constitution of the United States.
    Conservatives are by definition not into negotiations or open mindedness, they are into absolutes, their absolutes.

    Oh that’s right Obama’s favorite “Christian” is one of the blood thirsty, hate driven, ethnically and racially intolerant so called Christian ministers.

    It is simply and purely impossible to represent the interests of the Christian right that backed the Repocons, and the war and ensuing slaughter of innocents in Afghanistan and Iraq, and to represent the interests of main stream Christian, Moslem, Jewish or just plain average American interests and virtues.

    Just how much is Obama willing to sell out his base support to get their support?

  • It’s only pandering if Obama doesn’t mean it and he’s only cynically using these groups in order to get votes like Bush did. Also, he’s trying to get those religious people who believe in social justice and caring for the poor and the environment, etc. Believe it or not there are people who are religious and believe in secular values. The civil rights movement was built on such people. I don’t believe Obama is interested in getting the vote of racist, intolerant bigots who would never vote for him in a million years anyway.

  • This one — and particularly when coupled with Obama’s use of the phrase ‘Joshua’s Generation’ scares me — and saying this does not make me any less of an Obama supporter. (He said he would make mistakes, and he needed people around to tell him about them. Well, I’m not ‘around him’ but I’m saying that this one was a mistake.)

    NOT the reaching out to evangelicals — which is a very good thing. Not the references to religion — which may bother me as an atheist, but I agree with Michael Hart @34.

    And of the people involved, Cizik may be the most interesting — kicked out of a prominent evangelical position because he argued that Christianity should mean environmentalism and concern for the poor not just homophobia and anti-abortion. But Jakes bothers me. The ‘Prosperity Gospel’ that he teaches is one of the cruelest types of religious scams — and the people it draws money from are among the poorest — precisely the ‘Appalachian type’ — people who probably have already ‘tithed’ — given 10% of their meagre incomes to the Church.

    But the words that set my warning buttons flashing were “Joshua Generation.” As some of you may have guessed, the Religious Right has been a long-time interest of mine, not just fighting them but also attempting to understand their mindset, as warped as it is. And the phrase “Joshua Generation” is a code word that reaches into the heart of the farthest reaches of the group, the most truly theocratic of them, not just the homeschoolers and those who believe David Barton’s lies.

    (In fact there is already an existing organization called ‘Generation Joshua’ and it is far from Obama’s ideals. To quote excerpts from its own self-description (as discussed at Talk2Axtion — and google the phrase ‘Joshua Generation’ on the site-search for much more about the phrase itself:

    Generation Joshua is designed for Christian youth between the ages of 11 and 19 who want to become a force in the civic and political arenas. Our goal is to ignite a vision in young people to help America return to her Judeo-Christian foundations. We provide students with hands-on opportunities to implement that vision.
    In America today, battles are being waged over many issues–from judicial activism to attacks on traditional marriage to the moral disintegration of our society. In the midst of the battles, we can lose sight of where our nation has come from, and these pressing concerns could crush our hope for America’s future.

    John Winthrop, then governor of Massachusetts Bay Colony, wrote in 1630 concerning New England and America: “We shall be as a City upon a hill. The eyes of all people are upon us.” He warned that “if we shall deal falsely with our God in this work we have undertaken, and so cause him to withdraw his present help from us, we shall be made a story and a byword throughout the world.”

    Generation Joshua wants America to be a perpetual city on a hill. We seek to inspire every one of our members with the kind of faith that sees beyond our present circumstances to what America can become–if each one of us consistently impacts our sphere of influence for Christ and for His glory. [ ]

    To give young people a vision for taking America back to its Judeo-Christian foundations, Generation Joshua offers an online civics curriculum. Teens will not only learn how government works, they will also learn how it should work if the original intent of the Constitution is followed. [ ]

    Generation Joshua trains the newest generation of young people to be effective leaders today in order to change governmental policies tomorrow. Encouraging people of faith to vote is an important part of that goal. In 2004, the number of Christian voters increased dramatically, and the results could be seen across the nation as more men and women of faith were elected into office. But there is still more to do. Just a small increase in Christian voters could make a big difference in the outcome of any election. Generation Joshua encourages its members to register new voters, especially Christian voters, because voting is a vital part of every Christian’s civic responsibility. Christians have a duty to rebuild the walls of American politics that were originally constructed on the foundation of biblical values and self-government. [ ]

    [Even more scary is the frequent use of the phrase by “Watchmen on the Walls’ the truly dangerously violent, Eastern European based, homophobic organization that has been responsible for at least one gay-bashing that resulted in death. (These people are not publicity-seeking Clowns like the Phelps people. They really mean what they say, and are prepared to act on it. I hate throwing the term ‘fascist’ around — and have never used it for the Bush Administration — but these really are the tactics of the fascist street fighters, in Germany and — with the Coughlinites — in America.) I am sure that Obama didn’t realize this, but it’s another reason for avoiding the phrase.]

    Ignoring the WotW types, though, Obama may have an idea behind this ‘reaching out.’ (I’m not sure it is a good one, though.) These people, in a warped and ignorant way, do have a love for America, for the ideals it once represented — except for pluralism and secularism — and can again. Perhaps he thinks he can deflect their zeal, use that love to enroll them in activites that will be productive for America as a whole. It is risky, dangerous, and the first time I worry he may come to regret loosing the genie from that particular bottle.

    But so far, whenever he’s seemed to make a misstep, he’s turned out to be right. I’ll worry, and keep a close watch, but I am — as Mark Kleiman was — willing to pay him the ultimate compliment a ‘political junkie’ can pay a politician. I am willing to say that if he does something I wouldn’t have done, because of his track record, I’ll accept his judgment on it and assume he’s the one who is right. (Do you realize that this is like a baseball fan saying about his team’s manager “I’d have called for a different reliever there, but I’ll admit Skip knows more about it than I do and will back him.’ Just don’t happen.)

  • Obama stayed in a church of hate for twenty years, his associations with shady radical racist, anti-Americans is not acceptable….
    The truth is that anyone that belives in God does not hate…
    Obama is not trust worthy and I will not be voting for him…
    If Hillary should be on the ticket I would vote for him out of loyalty and I know she would never let anything happen to our country…I am hoping she is not on the ticket because as you have all see he is like “GOD” to the media and she will probaly be blame for all his naive and inexperienced dicisions and short commings.

  • Was that a McCain troll (#27)?

    I think Obama is smart enough to realize that there are a lot of people in this country for whom religion is important and that appealing to them in their own language is what a smart politician will do.

    There are moderate and liberal Catholics, Protestants, Jews, and Evangelicals (yes, it’s true). For the past two presidential election cycles the Democrats haven’t even bothered to try to court these voters.

    I think this shows how serious he is about winning. He’s not phoning it in. A 50-state strategy, reaching out to religious folk, and leaving no stone un-turned in search of potential Democratic voters.

  • CNN reports McCain’s campaign as saying:

    “The candidate intends to meet with grassroots leaders and organizations to stress that he is “the only candidate who shares their principles like a 24-year pro-life record and support for the belief that marriage is between a man and a woman,” Benton told CNN.

    Surely given McCain’s track record, that should be “marriage is between a man and as many women as you can get your hands on.”

    Didn’t Pilgrim John start the devil’s business with Cindy when his first wife was recovering from a near-fatal car crash?

  • I’m amazed that almost every one of you people responding are morons. I can’t wait to see you cry when Messiah Obama doesn’t usher in peace, tranquility and cheap gas. What a bunch of naive sheep you are. Have fun traipsing over the coming cliff.

  • Matt 24 tells the real truth about these luke warm Christians who have traded in their values and intregrity to follow obamessiah….How many times did God need to warn humanity about the false christ and false lukewarn christians who would ome and deceive the masses..we are there now guys.. Obama is not what peple think..

  • If Obama and his liberal extemists are the answer……. then the wrong question has been ask!!!! Vote experience and morals, not liberal lies!!!!!!!!!!

  • What a tragic day when Christians side up Obama and the anti-Christians. These foolish Christians have been bewitched by Obama. Obama supports partial birth abortion, he’s extreme and he’ll do little to stop it. The early church spoke out against abortion because they understood that a fetus is an unborn life.

  • Comments are closed.