Thursday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Good move: “The House on Thursday approved an extra three months of jobless benefits for all unemployed Americans, knowing the plan’s chances are slight in the Senate and almost nonexistent at the White House. After failing to get a veto-proof two-thirds margin by three votes on Wednesday, Democrats got an exact two-thirds margin on Thursday with a 274-137 vote — the amount needed to overcome a threatened presidential veto.” (Here’s the roll call.)

* Not a big surprise: “New U.S. proposals have failed to overcome Iraqi opposition to a proposed security pact, two lawmakers said Thursday, and a senior government official expressed doubt an agreement could be reached before the U.S. presidential election in November.”

* Republicans are pretty livid about this morning’s Supreme Court ruling on habeas, and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) is talking about overturning it with a constitutional amendment. He’s quite an excitable young man, you know.

* Even by GOP standards, this is quite a mess: “A scheme by a former treasurer resulted in a loss of about $725,000 to the House Republicans’ campaign arm, according to an audit released today. Christopher J. Ward, long a trusted financial figure in Republican circles, funneled money belonging to the National Congressional Campaign Committee and covered up his scheme by faking external audit reports between 2002 and 2006.”

* Fox News backpedaled on the Michelle Obama/”baby mama” story, with the Republican network’s Vice President of Programming conceding that the producer “exercised poor judgment.” You don’t say.

* On a related note, Sean Hannity accidentally identified himself on the air last night as a surrogate for the McCain campaign. He might as well make it official.

* And in still more Fox News-related news, Mike Huckabee has signed a one-year contract with the network to be an on-air contributor. Because what the network really needed was another conservative Republican voice offering political commentary.

* McCain’s flip-flopping on immigration is not without consequence.

* Remember when the White House used bogus intelligence from Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi to sell the war in Iraq? At the time, the CIA questioned his “credibility” and “truthfulness.” Apparently, that didn’t much matter.

* Apparently, we can keep saber rattling in Iran’s direction, but that doesn’t have the desired effect.

* Castro, Hamas, and now Qaddafi have all criticized Obama lately. Don’t they realize they’re undermining Republican talking points?

* Brownie may be gone, but FEMA is still screwing up, this time giving away about $85 million in household goods meant for Hurricane Katrina victims.

* If you were getting tired of the Olbermann vs. O’Reilly feud, perhaps you’re ready for the Olbermann vs. Couric fued?

* Campus Progress has a sharp new blog: Pushback.

* And finally, Mark Penn, talking about Hillary Clinton possibly trying another campaign in the future, told GQ, “A lot of people have come back. It’s pretty unusual for somebody to win the nomination the first time out.” That’s true, except for Barack Obama, John Kerry, Bill Clinton, Walter Mondale, Jimmy Carter, George W. Bush, JFK, and Dwight Eisenhower. Yep, pretty unusual.

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

* Even by GOP standards, this is quite a mess: “A scheme by a former treasurer resulted in a loss of about $725,000 to the House Republicans’ campaign arm, according to an audit released today. Christopher J. Ward, long a trusted financial figure in Republican circles, funneled money belonging to the National Congressional Campaign Committee and covered up his scheme by faking external audit reports between 2002 and 2006.”

Oh goody, it’s gotten so bad for Republicans they’re stealing from each other now.

  • Olberman is doing a “Special Comment” tonight on McCain’s “it’s not too important” comment.

  • And finally, Mark Penn, talking about Hillary Clinton possibly trying another campaign in the future, told GQ, “A lot of people have come back. It’s pretty unusual for somebody to win the nomination the first time out.” That’s true, except for Barack Obama, John Kerry, Bill Clinton, Walter Mondale, Jimmy Carter, George W. Bush, JFK, and Dwight Eisenhower.

    Penn needs to go back to working for Republicans and Republican causes. His capacity for lies and spin make him a perfect fit in their circles.

  • Graham wants to change the Constitution to revoke the Constitution? HUH? Did I read that right? Un-freaking-real.

    I bet the WH is fuming about giving anything to Americans. HA! Good news for a change.

    (On a side note: Are you a first class snarker? I am looking for YOU! You’re gonna love this! Come join the fun and tell us why YOU are voting Republican.)

  • Shade Tail’s video is the same as mine…but do join in the discussion on my site. Some of the freaking funniest snarkers have given us some good chuckles.

    /blogwhoring

  • Castro, Hamas, and now Qaddafi have all criticized Obama lately. Don’t they realize they’re undermining Republican talking points?

    Nothing can undermine Republican talking points. I’m sure the Republicans response is “They’re criticizing Obama because they want us to think they don’t like him! Of course they like him, they’re trying to fool us into thinking that they don’t!”

  • Racer X, that was my first response. Because Obama owns them, dontchano.

    Honestly, it’s like the Goopers WANT to lose. And guess what? I think they do. They know how badly Bush has driven this country into the ground (ground, hell…down to the molten core!) and it is going to take a long time to recover. The Bill O’Hannity’s of the world will be able to rail on the Dem’s for the next four years 24/7/365 so that the American populace is as sick of hearing about it as they were about hearing blowjob, blowjob, blowjob back in the day.

    If I thought they had half a brain cell between all of them, I would think this is their plan.

  • “Graham wants to change the Constitution to revoke the Constitution? HUH? Did I read that right? Un-freaking-real.”

    Well, that’s theoretically perfectly possible– the whole point of an amendment is to alter the existing text– but Graham would have an impossible time trying to get that amendment passed. I urge him to try, though; it would make for entertaining political theater and get the electorate even more energized about voting for Democrats in the fall.

  • Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) is talking about overturning it with a constitutional amendment. He’s quite an excitable young man, you know.

    Mmmm, that’s some tasty snark.

    And finally, Mark Penn, talking about Hillary Clinton possibly trying another campaign in the future…

    When the gravy train left the station
    It had two lights on behind (now I’m going to mix verses)
    Well, I felt so sad and lonesome
    I could not help but cry

  • When the train left the station
    Well, I looked Hill in the eye
    ‘Cause the blue light was Obama
    The red light was McCaiiiiin

  • CNN’s Situation Room is doing a story about how wonderful most lobbyists are. I kid you not. And Wolf introduced the segment by saying that McCain and Obama are jettisoning lobbyists from their campaigns left and right. I’m surprised he didn’t go further and specify that McCain’s lobbyists are the good kind and Obama’s are the ones with cooties.

  • In regards to habeas corpus:
    “[Even] the Nazis never had that right.”

    Could someone tell me WTF that’s supposed to mean?

  • Shalimar – No kidding. Once again, let’s eliminate the issue by simply saying everybody does it. I wonder after Abramoff and Cunningham and frankly a lot of others, whether even CNN’s audience is that naive. It seems to me there is often a disconnect between the news they offer and the comments they get both on Wolf’s blog and Cafferty’s.

    MsJoanne – I went to livefrankly to offer a snark (5). And while I had no problem leaving a comment, I couldn’t read the others. I’m guessing it’s my software, so I hope I didn’t duplicate, and I’ll never know if I offended anyone.

  • DanP, I saw your comment (awesome!) and thank you. It’s a shame you can’t read it, there are some first class snarkers there and it’s a hoot to read. It uses a CSS, so maybe that’s the problem.

    Maria…do drop by. I’d love to get some snark from you. And MMOO…please, please, please make an appearance! Oh, if I had half of your amazing talent. (sigh) I’m so lame.

    Come join the fun and tell us why YOU are voting Republican.

  • Wait a minute, Hannity said he backs McCain???? So that’s why he still runs the Wright sermon video every show. It all makes sense now…

  • Questions:

    1. What is Lindsey Graham smoking?
    2. Does he have any idea how long it takes to get a Constitutional amendment passed?
    3. Does he know what the Constitution is?

  • Now I’m trying to imagine just what the wording of Huckleberry Graham’s proposed constitutional amendment would be.

    Something along the lines of “The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless the President decides he wants to ignore it,( in which case, he can go right ahead, because really, why bother with eight HUNDRED years of Anglo-American judicial principle when scary brown men are running around loose?)”

  • He’s quite an excitable young man, you know.

    Huh, never heard that one. There’s always new euphemisms out there to learn about.

  • Ten to one says Mary Moo is just looking for greener pastures to spread her toxic manure on. (Stomping off, nose in the air…)

  • N.R.C.C. Lost $725,000 to Former Treasurer, Audit Finds

    first off…
    he’s a “former” treasurer because he QUIT….AFTER this was uncovered….
    but WHILE THE CRIME WAS COMMITTED….
    HE –WAS– the treasurer !!
    next point…
    they……lost….$725k?
    an article earlier in the spring used the word…diverted…
    its actually called…
    EMBEZZLEMENT !!

    i thought the goal of headlines were to get people to READ the story…

  • I like how you Steve simply called Fox News the Republican network. Perhaps we should start putting an R by their name. “Fox News (R) reported today that …”

    On the other hand, that would seem to indicate that there’s no conservative bias anywhere else, or even that there’s liberal bias everywhere else, which is false. The fact is, people have said “liberal media” for so long now that a lot of people, even some liberals, actually believe that to be the case.

  • MsJoanne @ 8….

    If I thought they had half a brain cell between all of them, I would think this is their plan.

    Well, hey — I’ve got a few cells to spare… not using them at the moment…. I’d be delighted to have them transplanted into BillO and Hannity.

  • Comments are closed.