Friday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* NBC Universal President Jeff Zucker has released a statement: “We are heartbroken at the sudden passing of Tim Russert. We have lost a beloved member of our NBC Universal family and the news world has lost one of its finest. The enormity of this loss cannot be overstated. More than a journalist, Tim was a remarkable family man. Our thoughts and prayers are with his wife, Maureen, their son, Luke, and Tim’s entire extended family.”

* The flooding tragedy in the Midwest is growing increasingly severe: “Rising water from the Cedar River forced the evacuation of a downtown hospital Friday after residents of more than 3,000 homes fled for higher ground. A railroad bridge collapsed, and 400 city blocks were under water… Gov. Chet Culver declared 83 of the state’s 99 counties to be state disaster areas, and nine rivers were at or above historic flood levels. Elsewhere in the upper Midwest, rivers and streams tipping their banks forced evacuations, closed roads, and even threatened drinking water.”

* A breakthrough appears unlikely: “Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki declared Friday that talks with the U.S. on a new security agreement were deadlocked, as Sunni and Shiite preachers spoke out against the deal that would enable American troops to remain in Iraq after year’s end. Al-Maliki said negotiations will continue, but his tough talk reflects Iraqi determination to win greater control of U.S. military operations after the U.N. mandate expires at the end of the year.”

* Cheney’s office has admitted that the VP was wrong about China drilling for oil in Cuba’s waters. Will congressional Republicans make the same concession?

* The housing crisis is not improving: “The number of U.S. homeowners swept up in the housing crisis rose further last month, with foreclosure filings up nearly 50 percent compared with a year earlier.”

* Inflation: “Americans faced sharply higher prices in May, the government said today, as soaring costs for energy drove overall prices up at the fastest rate since November.”

* Colin Powell might vote for Obama. I don’t blame him.

* Olbermann offered a more subdued special comment last night on McCain saying it’s “not too important” when U.S. troops come home from Iraq. “The full context is that the Iraq you see is a figment of your imagination,” Olbermann said.

* It looks like Sens. Dodd and Conrad have some explaining to do about their mortgages.

* The NYT tackles the issue of sexism in the presidential campaign, and Krugman has an interesting item on the subject.

* Give ’em hell, Henry: “Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) has had enough of the great stonewaller himself, EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson. In a letter today to Johnson, Waxman threatens to hold Johnson in contempt for failing to comply with congressional subpoenas requesting information on two recent controversial decisions by Johnson that overruled EPA’s professional staff: his refusal to grant California a waiver to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles and his refusal to fully raise ozone standards.”

* Why has ABC News assigned a full-time journalist to cover Hillary Clinton during the general election campaign?

* Have I mentioned today how truly ridiculous the obstructionism from Senate Republicans has become?

* Have I mentioned today that there is no talking point too stupid for the McCain campaign? In response to negotiations over extra debates, McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds said, “Barack Obama requires more preconditions to meet with voters and John McCain than he does Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.” Does McCain really want to be associated with such transparent idiocy?

* And finally, my very favorite right-wing headline of the week: “Kos Tries To Pass Off Obama’s Birth Certification As Birth Certificate.”

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Has anyone read this – Bloomberg Warns Voters Against Confusing Charisma With Substance

“When we are electing our leaders I think we have to apply a different standard,” he said. “And sadly we sometimes confuse charisma and presentation with substance, and that’s difficult for the voters to separate out but that is the great challenge in democracies every place in the world.”

http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/2008/06/10/bloomberg-warns-voters-against-confusing-charisma-with-substance/

  • as Sunni and Shiite preachers spoke out against the deal

    Since Iraq is now a “democracy”, I wondered if maybe ministers was mistranslated as preachers. But no. It actually is the clerics who are protesting.

    “The occupier came with shiny mottos, claiming that they were democratic,” said Sheik Ahmed Hassam al-Taha during prayer services at Baghdad’s main Sunni mosque. “But if they really were, how come they want a long-term agreement without the approval of the Iraqi people?”

  • “Have I mentioned today how truly ridiculous the obstructionism from Senate Republicans has become?”

    You’ve mentioned it many many times….. It’s the liberal establishment that seems to keep on thinking that it’s worth more to let it go than to go at it with the right wingers and let them wear the “obstructionist” label that they so truly deserve. I don’t understand why they let such a great argument go by when they could get them back on their heels and force them to respond to each bill they’re forcing a 60 vote on by declaring a filibuster. It’s just such a lost opportunity, and it only enforces the idea that Democrats are too “high and mighty” to get in the dirt and slug it out.

  • Where is the President while the midwest is drowning? Oh yeh, he is strolling through the Pope’s private garden worrying about people in Iraq. I heard he was looking for Brownie to take care of the floods…

  • CB said: “Colin Powell might vote for Obama.

    I have difficulty understanding people (sometimes lovingly referred to as independents) who, in the voting booth, frequently swing back and forth between conservatives and progressives. I speculate that such persons are seriously uninformed, don’t trust their own judgment, or both. So what’s Colin Powell’s excuse?

  • I’m sorry to hear about Tim Russert and I send my sincere sympathy to his family.

  • I’d be watching for some serious news dumpage from the GOP this weekend, with all the Russert remembrances that will be sucking the air out of the news cycle.

  • * It looks like Sens. Dodd and Conrad have some explaining to do about their mortgages.

    Who needs vetters?

  • Why has ABC News assigned a full-time journalist to cover Hillary Clinton during the general election campaign?

    Because as the Philadelphia debate demonstrated, they desperately want to keep her on the stage because, I suspect, she’s good for ratings, she has right-wing tendencies that they like, or both.

  • Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki declared Friday that talks with the U.S. on a new security agreement were deadlocked,

    The funny thing here is that al-Maliki was supposed to be OUR guy when the neocons engineered his rise to power after the last Iraqi Prime Minister refused to toe the line.

    I wonder how long it will be before we start hearing a few neocons calling for al-Maliki’s ouster?

    How many governments did we go through in Vietnam? (oops not supposed to make that comparison. Sorry)

  • Regarding the ABC/Hillary muck-up, we’ve seen a lot of movement the past few days in the overall media machine; movement suggesting that they might be starting to realize that their bread is going to be buttered on the other side from now on. Rupert starts coming out with positive comments and suggestions of support for Obama; FOX (We lie—because we have a Constitutional Right to do so) backpedals on several gaffes, culminating with the sh**-canning of E.D. Hill; conservative media types start ganging up on McFour-More-Years-Of-Failure as though it’s a current fashion trend. Given that Clinton has said she’ll do all it takes to get Obama into the WH, maybe even ABC is seeing the writing on the wall.

    *Besides—I hear that Goofy is a Democrat, and his trademark yelp is copyright-protected. You go against Goofy, and half of Disney’s broadcast lineup goes off-air….

  • * The housing crisis is not improving: “The number of U.S. homeowners swept up in the housing crisis rose further last month, with foreclosure filings up nearly 50 percent compared with a year earlier.”

    Shaq O’Neal is buying housesfrom people threatened by foreclosure and selling them back to the people with more affordable terms. Imagine if Countrywide did that.

  • Al-Maliki said negotiations will continue, but his tough talk reflects Iraqi determination to win greater control of U.S. military operations after the U.N. mandate expires at the end of the year.

    Is this the part where they take back the flowers and the candy and do what our own “leaders” are too cowardly, too stupid, too stubborn or too imperialist to do?

  • I glanced over and noticed gas for 4.59 a gallon at my goto cheap place and I remember this comment from last week: We need to start hanging some oil gamblers.


    On June 12th, 2008 at 4:03 pm, james k. sayre said:

    We’re being ENRONed again: this time by oil futures contracts speculators who are unnecessarily and very profitably driving up the price of crude oil and hence retail gasoline prices. Curious as to why you are suddenly paying over four dollars a gallon for gasoline? No, it’s not due to “supply-and-demand,” no, it’s not due to “OPEC,” nor is it due to “peak oil.” It’s due to totally unregulated electronic oil futures trading in world markets. Check out the very lucid article that explains the unseen financial machinations in oil futures markets written by F. W. Engdahl on May 2, 2008, entitled, “Perhaps 60% of Today’s Oil Price is Pure Speculation.” It may be viewed at .
    http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/engdahl/2008/0502.html

    In a nutshell, he suggests that the Bush Administration dropped the ball in January 2006, when they allowed totally unregulated electronic trading of oil futures contracts in New York. Previously these electronic trades had been made at the London Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) Futures Market. With that decision by the Bush Administration, all of the world’s oil prices were then opened to upward pressure from speculative futures contracts. In essence, oil futures contracts made by speculators, banks, hedge funds and pension funds all competed with real demand on the spot markets and had the effect of driving up both wholesale oil prices and retail gasoline prices. Speculators have made billions of dollars on their trading of oil futures contracts. All of their profits come right out of our pockets.

    Even with a stable oil supply, there is a slow worldwide increase in demand for oil, which creates a long-term upward pressure on oil prices. However, with the relentless saber-rattling and war-mongering by Bush and Cheney in the last several years, and the more recent war talks by McCain and the Israelis, the oil futures markets are rife with speculation and paranoia. This war talk keeps ratcheting up the prices on the oil futures contracts and hence the wholesale spot market prices. It is an endless spiral of greed and paranoia.

    As long as there is no tough and effective oversight of the electronic oil futures markets by the Bush Administration, the oil prices will climb endlessly. These oil prices will be quickly followed by hikes in the retail gasoline prices at the pump. The 60% speculation share of the $4.25/gallon gasoline price, is about $2.55/gallon, which is what we consumers are paying to these oil speculators as a “service fee.” Not a bad “fee,” since the speculators produce no usable goods or services…Just a few large greedy oil futures traders helping themselves to your gas money.
    Without this added-on oil futures “service fee,” you would be paying about $1.75/gallon for gasoline. Write, call or smoke-signal your Representatives and Senators today and suggest that they read the June 2006 report by The U. S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations entitled, “The Role of Market Speculation in Rising Oil and Gas Prices.” Then demand that they investigate and then force the Bush Administration to firmly regulate the computerized oil futures contracts trading in New York, London and Dubai.

    This electronic oil price futures scandal is costing US drivers about $969,000,000.00 per day! That number is based on 60% speculation fee of a gasoline price of $4.25/gallon and on US 2004 consumption of 380,000,000 gallons/day. Tell you Senators and Congresspersons to simply shut down this unregulated electronic oil futures contract trading market. Then the price of gasoline will slowly drop to about $1.75/gallon…The only way that oil price futures contracts make money is if the price of oil goes up in the future, say, 30, 60 or 90 days later. This futures market serves no social need. It is just for corporate greed. The corporate speculators are probably also gaming/ENRONing the wheat and corn futures markets the same way.

  • Olbermann offered a more subdued special comment last night

    I agree with ROTFLMLiberalAO @10.

    Olberman has been arguing about the Hillary feminism thing. I love old Keith but anyone who denies feminism is a big factor in politics — hell in life– sounds stupid. It’s there and it’s almost invisible at times, especially to us men, but sexism is viral.

  • * NBC Universal President Jeff Zucker re: Russert: The enormity of this loss cannot be overstated.

    Sure it can and is.

  • Oh, Dale, how true. I have experienced it but it’s been a long time.

    I see it daily on the tubes. Some is subtle, other, not so much so. Even now I am seeing it in how people refer to Hillary and Michele Obama.

    They say Confused it ageist to McCain. There is by far more less subtle shit out there about women. And strong women especially. When Pelosi became the first woman SOTH, we got a wonderful primer of her mint green Chanel suit. Has anyone ever heard someone talking about a guy’s suit or tie or what have you? Didn’t think so.

    I still don’t think Hillary was the better candidate, but she definitely got a lot of bullshit tossed her way simply for being a woman.

  • “Cheney’s office has admitted that the VP was wrong about China drilling for oil in Cuba’s waters. Will congressional Republicans make the same concession?”

    Will the media make the same concession? Will John McCain?

    “Colin Powell might vote for Obama. I don’t blame him.”

    I really don’t give a damn who that spineless weasel votes for.

    “It looks like Sens. Dodd and Conrad have some explaining to do about their mortgages.”

    Sen. Dodd was my first Dem presidential choice, but then I happened across a list of his contributors–mind you, this man is chair of the Senate Banking committee. 90% on his contributions come from financial institutions. Conflict of interest, much?

  • The flooding tragedy in the Midwest is growing increasingly severe:

    God to Mankind: “I’ve got a message for you…

    GLOBAL WARMING IS REAL!”

  • Re the midwest floods…The lower 1/3 of Indiana is under water and there is no reporting in the national news. If you happen to see any reports of the flooding anywhere, note how no one mentions how many people have been displaced and the reporters never ask about numbers.

  • it is sad to see Tim Russert die at such an age, and i feel bad for his family. I wish them nothing but strength & peace. i am sure he was a decent person.
    however, he was a cheerleader for the war, and he was Cheney’s favorite newsman. he wasn’t one of mine.
    the thing that really bothers me is the way the TV folks are covering this. you would think he was the pope. Suarez on PBS called him a journalist and an insider…seems to me those two cancel each other out…..which is the problem with TV news specifically and the MSM in general these days.

  • NBC’s incessant coverage of Russerts death should tell you all you need to know about the MSM. 500 hundred year flood in the Midwest is off the radar. Today’s awful economic news is off the radar. Etc, etc…And why not, what does that have to do with them?

  • I enjoy the humor in your link , libra—it’s as good as an oil CEO showing up for a Congressional hearing with a barrel of oil chained to his ankle—with a $200.00 price-tag on the oil-can and a “more for me” sign taped to his back.

  • MsJoanne said:

    Oh, Dale, how true. I have experienced it but it’s been a long time.

    They’re too scared of you now. 🙂

  • NeoCon talk radio host, Michael Reagan, calls for political executions of anti-war activist: http://youtube.com/watch?v=WdJO-kUINMs

    If unchecked, this is another tipping point in our nation’s slide toward fascism and the end of our free, open and democratic society. Only the people of the United States can reverse this trend toward totalitarianism and Nazi Röhm-Putsch-style (“Night of the Long Knives“) political violence.

    Compare Reagan’s diarrhea of the mouth with Don Imus’ past indiscretions–which is worse?

    “Thoughtcrime does not entail death. Thoughtcrime IS death.” 1984, George Orwell

  • Check this out (esp. Cryos, who doesn’t think Obama can think on his feet):

    Barack Obama Explains the Meaning of Life
    At a town hall meeting in Kaukauna, Wisc., Thursday afternoon, amidst questions about health care and the economy, a young man said he had a question for Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, and Obama should “please be as intellectual or spiritual as you would like.”
    “Well this is a lot of pressure,” Obama said to laugher.
    “My question is: what does life mean to you?” the young man asked.

    Go here to read the answer:
    http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/06/barack-obama-ex.html

  • The NYT tackles the issue of sexism in the presidential campaign, and Krugman has an interesting item on the subject.–CB

    Well, I was hoping the Clinton primary campaign had finally become part of the past, but I guess it hasn’t. Now we get analyses of “sexism” (but not racism) in the primary race. Perhaps if Hillary had won and Obama had lost the nomination, then racism would be a topic of discussion.

    Anyway, I don’t particularly want to beat the dead horse of the primary campaign, but I find the claims of sexism more than annoying when those claims don’t include the following information:

    Friday, Nov. 2, 2007–The Associated Press reported earlier today that advisors to Hillary Clinton acknowledge, in the AP’s words, that it’s a “clear and long-planned strategy to fend off attacks” on Clinton “by accusing her male rivals of gathering against her.” The idea, the AP said, is to “change the subject while making Clinton a sympathetic figure, especially among female voters who often feel outnumbered and bullied on the job.”

    If that’s the policy, Clinton certainly tried to distance herself from it in New Hampshire today. “I don’t think they’re piling on because I’m a woman,” she said of her Democratic challengers. “I think they’re piling on because I’m winning.”

    http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2007/11/02/clinton_response/

    Too bad. Hillary spoke too soon, but her campaign DID do what they planned, which was to win sympathy for her by claiming sexism to keep the heat on low. And the media gave her what she wanted, even if she couldn’t make the charges against her Democratic opponents.

    So it is without much respect that I read now about “sexism” in the campaign. It was cynically used by Clinton herself in hopes of gaining votes.

    Let’s have a discussion at some other time when the recipient of political heat hasn’t planned to use the claim to “change the subject”.

  • Colin Powell. I seem to remember that there was once a man named Pilate. Sir, this does not wash.

  • * Have I mentioned today how truly ridiculous the obstructionism from Senate Republicans has become?

    This clip is less than 5 minutes and a treat to watch.
    You can hear the “unnamed Republican Senator” squirming off camera.

    I could get to like Whitehouse.

    Won’t that be a hoot if he runs for president one day?

  • Comments are closed.