Gore to endorse Obama at Michigan event

As recently as May 20, Nobel Peace Prize-winner Al Gore did not want to weigh in on the fight for the Democratic nomination, telling reporters, “I have not decided whether or when I will” support a candidate.

Now, of course, the nominating fight is over, and Gore is willing to enter the fray a bit. He posted this item on his site about an hour ago.

A few hours from now I will step on stage in Detroit, Michigan to announce my support for Senator Barack Obama. From now through Election Day, I intend to do whatever I can to make sure he is elected President of the United States.

Over the next four years, we are going to face many difficult challenges — including bringing our troops home from Iraq, fixing our economy, and solving the climate crisis. Barack Obama is clearly the candidate best able to solve these problems and bring change to America.

I’ve never asked members of AlGore.com to contribute to a political campaign before, but this moment and this election are too important to let pass without taking action. That’s why I am asking you to join me today in showing your support for Barack Obama by making a contribution to his campaign today. […]

Over the past 18 months, Barack Obama has united a movement. He knows change does not come from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue or Capitol Hill. It begins when people stand up and take action. With the help of millions of supporters like you, Barack Obama will bring the change we so desperately need in order to solve our country’s most pressing problems.

Specifically, Gore and Obama will appear together at a rally in Detroit, Michigan. I suspect the event will be on TV, but it will also be streamed live on Obama’s campaign site, starting at 8:30 pm eastern. (It occurs to me that John Edwards also announced his support for Obama at a rally in Michigan, suggesting this is seen as a key state this year.)

For nearly 17 months, every high-profile endorsement was considered in the context of what it would mean, and the extent to which it would benefit the Democratic candidate. In this case, Gore’s support is largely inconsequential — the primaries are over, and in a general-election context, it’s assumed that Gore would back the Democratic candidate.

That said, it’s kind of a thrill anyway. Al Gore is, after all, Al Gore. For a geek like me, Gore is a visionary leader and something of a hero. He’s steered clear of partisan politics for a long while now, so knowing that he’ll share a stage with Obama tonight is exciting, whether it has far-reaching electoral consequences or not.

As long as we’re here, though, maybe now would be a good time to raise the baseless, borderline-ridiculous speculation about Gore maybe, just maybe, being Obama’s running mate.

Just a little bit of buzz picked up last Wednesday when James Carville told Wolf Blitzer: “I think if I was Senator Obama I would say the biggest economic problem we face is the biggest national security problem and the biggest environmental problem. And if I were him, I would ask Al Gore to serve as his vice president, his energy czar, in his administration to reduce our consumption and reliance on foreign energy sources. That would send a signal to the world, to American people, to Congress, to everybody, that America’s getting serious about this horrendous problem that we face.”

Soon after The American Prospect’s Paul Starr noted a variety of reasons Dems are “likely to take this option seriously”:

* Gore answers the need for “experience,” but unlike Nunn and various others who’ve been mentioned, he doesn’t contradict the message of change or raise any tensions or conflicts with Obama’s views.

* Gore could help Obama govern, and he would be fully competent — and perceived as fully competent — to become president should something happen to Obama.

* Although in a different way from 1992, Gore is a reinforcing choice — he reinforces the sense that Obama would bring visionary leadership.

* Gore provides a link to the prosperity of the 1990s, but without the baggage that Hillary would bring.

* Gore also has the defense and foreign-policy credentials that the ticket needs.

* Gore has run a national campaign, and he has been fully “vetted.”

* All of the other options have more serious drawbacks.

The same day, TNR’s Dayo Olopade also made a very compelling case for an Obama-Gore ticket.

Do I think this is even remotely possible? Well, no. In fact, Gore has made it abundantly clear: “I don’t intend to be a part of any administration. I’ve been Vice President, I ran for President twice, so I don’t have any interest in being a cabinet member. I think my best use is in building grassroots support. I will, of course, give advice to whoever asks me for advice on this and will work to help, but not in a formal way.”

That said, a guy can dream….

Building on a Nobel Prize by becoming Obama’s veep? I think not.

Informal ‘Energy High Priest’ sounds better.

  • I think Gore would do his duty and serve as VP if Obama asked him to do it.

    And I think he would make a great VP, at least partially because then he would be the guy who would be there to keep the party rolling in 2012.

    Gore has been out of Washington for long enough to be seen as legitimately “not from there” and Obama’s ticket needs that more than most tickets. One reason why Hillary would make a terrible choice would be Obama’s insistence that Washington is broken.

    One more reason why Gore would be perfect: he was with the DFHs on Iraq.

  • An Obama-Gore ticket would send a message that Obama by himself doesn’t have the experience to be president, but that’s okay, because he’ll co-president with Gore. Not gonna happen.

  • “Gore has run a national campaign, and he has been fully “vetted.”

    I don’t think that would be valid. Gore has had a life since 2000, and as we all seem to notice about Bill Clinton’s latest business dealings, eight years makes a difference.

    Also, Gore doesn’t really answer to the question who’s going to be the standard bearer in 2016. Though I suppose he could serve just the first term and let Obama pick a new running mate in 2012.

    I’d like him if he wasn’t such a bad campaigner. But than I’ve seen the movie. Maybe he’s improved since then.

    He (like I) needs to lose some weight however.

  • It’s a nice thought, but it is gonna be Hillary. Obama already tipped his hand when he talked about the book by Doris Kearns Goodwin, “Team Of Rivals”.

  • Having Hillary on the ticket would be like bringing a rattlesnake into the house, followed by another one just a few feet behind. Gore would certainly bring in the credentials Obama “supposedly” doesn’t have.

  • Having Hillary on the ticket would be like bringing [two] rattlesnake[s] into the house

    after they bit you a couple of times.

  • I think Gore would be a perfect choice, not just for his experience and credibility on global warming but also from his (now forgotten but very impressive) work on improving the quality of public services through the “reinventing governement project.” (Remember when FEMA actually worked?) Tasking Gore with reviving that process would be a huge help in reversing the damage caused by the incompetence and cronyism in the Bush years.
    Regardless what he’s said in the past I think there’s a strong likelihood that Gore would take the offer if it came with an agreement from Obama to give him the support and freedom he’d need to push through an historic climate change law. After all, it’s likely that he sees lots to like and admire in Obama… and this would give him a unique opportunity to advance his global warming campaign… and it would put him in line to seek the presidency in 2016 — at which time he’ll be only 68. Win. Win. Win for him — and for us.

  • Should have known you’d get the announcement first, Steve :> It landed, just 10 minutes ago, in my Inbox — not from Gore, but from Obama.

    I got my citizenship (and with it, the voting privilege/obligation) in early 80ties and, although I’ve always voted Dem, it had been simply on the lesser evil principle; none of the candidates tickled my fancy. Until 2000 and Gore. I really, really, liked him (and adored Tipper). He didn’t just “say whatever the saliva brought to the tip of his tongue” (to use a Polish phrase); he said things in a measured way. And slowly enough for me to follow and understand. And he was obviously intelligent — I’m a sucker for intellectuals…

    So I hoped he’d try again in ’04. And even early on in this campaign, I hoped again. But, now? I think his path has diverged too far into a different direction, to go back to politics. As much as I’d love to see Obama/Gore ticket — doubling the excitement of having both guys I admire right there on top — it would be silly of him to be a VP once again. And silly he’s not.

    Informal advice sounds much more in tune. He could do that, while continuing his work in the area which had become his specialty.

  • I don’t believe the amount of enthusiasm a Hillary veep pick would generate would come anywhere near equaling the disappointment that would occur among Obama’s faithful. It wouldn’t be worth it. I know I would roll my eyes and lose interest in the process pretty fast.

  • I really doubt Gore wants to be VP *again*. Aside from the fact that he has said so, playing second fiddle to the top guy really isn’t the kind of job a person would want twice.

    It’s too bad he’s also declared that he won’t be in the cabinet. Some kind of high-profile slot where he can have a direct impact on the agenda would be a good place to have him.

    Oh well. At this point, I still trust Obama to make smart choices on who to surround himself with.

  • Good Al we need unity and it is especially good when it starts from the top. I hope he actively campaigns for him to and not just endorse.

  • Another gutsy move. Gore weighs in after yet another hellacious fight ends.
    Sort of like when he appeared on Stewart’s show 5 years after the election and said he won the presidency.

    Quisling? Not at all.
    Milquetoast? Yes.
    VP? You want to be in a trench with this guy when the going gets rough?
    Not me. Not ever.

    nuf’ said.

  • Gore shows unmitigated disloyalty to the Clintons, without whom he would be an earthtone-clad two-bit senator from a nothing state, by endorsing Mr. Con Man. Gore doesn’t have to do it now, but he couldn’t wait to slap Clinton in the face by prematurely moving toward Obama. I guess Al’s humiliation at her achieving so much more during Bill Clinton’s presidency than he did has caused jealousy and hostility that is spilling out now at this inappropriate time.

    Men walking out on women is nothing new, but this is outrageous. As a former Clinton employee, Gore should have waited until the convention, which is the only time superdelegate votes are binding and which will be the time when we choose our nominee.

  • I think they should have made this announcement in Florida. It would have made for some nice symmetry.

  • The woodie backing the wind bag . Gore has tainted himself by backing the second jimmy carter ( obama) . what a shame . We women will remember in November . We will vote for the war hero Mccain , not the idiot obama . Obama is a racist elitist white hating butt hole . Never obama . Vote McCain in 08

  • Well, that cements it! I will NEVER vote for Obama! I pretty much have to vote for McCain now.

  • It does come across that Gore would be a good match for Obama, and Americans: seen from my side of the pond (Europe), you do need to straighten things up and get some attention to the environmental side of things. And fast, please.

    So, fellow world citizens please do us all a big favor: If they run as a team, just vote them in, will you? No more mediocre precidential performance, please.

  • ChrisP, we’re trying, but we’re hampered by all these recalcitrant fellow citizens (figuratively and literally) littering the landscape. Wish us luck.

  • My fantasy is that President Obama makes Gore the a special envoy to the United Nations on climate and environmental issues.

  • Democrats cannot be serious about this? Al Gore is the Michael Moore of the DNC. All propaganda and no substance. As a Republican, I am hoping for this team.

  • I had to call your attention to this from CNN last night:

    JEFFREY TOOBIN, CNN SENIOR LEGAL ANALYST, “NEW YORKER” MAGAZINE COLUMNIST: He is now an iconic figure in Democratic politics, really revered, especially now that he’s won the Nobel Prize. What’s interesting, if you look at the polling data about Al Gore, is he is still not very popular among Independents and, of course, especially Republicans. They still regard him as the sore loser of the 2000 campaign.

    Sore loser? WTF?

  • Like an old soldier, Al should just fade away. He lost, that’s it folks.

  • I’m warming up to the idea of Sam Nunn, who is apparently being floated as a very strong possible veep. Al Gore as Secretary of Energy. John Edwards, Attorney General.

    And Valerie Plame for head of the CIA. Mwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

  • We women will remember in November .

    We women will remember in November to vote Obama.

    Vengeance votes just won’t matter, Sweetie.

  • It’s funny how some liberals believe that Al Gore should be Secretary of Energy. Everything he has done, IS PROPAGANDA and for his own gain!!!!!! What did he do as VP under Clinton? AAHHH nothing!

  • Comments are closed.