Thursday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* These guys are going to need good lawyers: “Two former Bear Stearns hedge fund managers, Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin, were indicted Thursday by a federal grand jury on charges they intentionally misled investors in two funds that collapsed last summer under the weight of wrong-way bets on mortgage-backed securities. Cioffi and Tannin, who surrendered Thursday morning to the FBI, face charges of conspiracy, securities fraud and wire fraud. Cioffi faces an additional charge of insider trading. The case turns on the question of what the men knew when they told investors they were hopeful about the funds’ prospects – at a time when their performance was deteriorating and some investors were trying to withdraw money.”

* One of the few issues on which John McCain has been entirely consistent is his opposition to drilling ANWR for oil. Apparently, even that long-held position is now on the table.

* I’ve been wondering the same thing: “Someone help me here. McCain is grandstanding on public financing when he is, as we speak, breaking the law by continuing to spend unlimited primary campaign money after opting in to public financing for the primary phase of the campaign? And then greenlighting the outside 527s to go after Obama only days ago? Something doesn’t compute.”

* Remember, these are the words of a retired U.S. general, not just some blogger: “[T]here is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be answered is whether those who ordered the use of torture will be held to account. ”

* Dems and Republicans in the House struck a deal on a war supplemental bill late yesterday. The breakthrough suggests Sen. Jim Webb’s (D-Va.) modernized GI Bill will be in position to become law.

* We can say with a high degree of confidence that the Bush/McCain drilling plan won’t produce oil anytime soon: “As oil trades at more than $135 a barrel — up from $68 a year ago — the world’s drill-ships are booked solid for the next five years. Some oil companies have been forced to postpone exploration while waiting for a drilling rig, executives and analysts said.”

* Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas) gave a speech on the House floor today, urging everyone to be nicer to “our friends,” the oil companies. Wow.

* Taking Bush’s legacy on the road.

* Brian Williams will host “Meet the Press” this weekend, but there’s no word about a permanent replacement for Tim Russert.

* I’m not at all sure the “Media Bloggers Association” is a reliable, representative outlet.

* I’ve always liked Nirvana, too.

* Remember that re-Baathification law passed by the Iraqi parliament in January? And how it was supposed to be a breakthrough? It’s not being implemented.

* I’m really not sure who Elisabeth Hasselbeck is, or what she’s done to become some kind of celebrity, but if her Fox News appearance last night is any indication, she’s not very bright.

* Republicans are apparently worried about what Scott McClellan might say if he testifies before the House Judiciary Committee as planned.

* And people wonder why I make fun of the Washington Times: “Times columnist and editor emeritus Wesley Pruden opened with a line stating that the AIDS virus is ‘the gifts of the gays.'”

* And finally, the #1 nightmare in the right-wing worldview is bringing Islamic Sharia law to America. I look forward, then, to hearing the conservative reaction to Blackwater’s request that a federal U.S. judge apply Sharia law to a civil case against the company. I guess this means Blackwater is literally trying to destroy Western civilization?

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Elizabeth Hasselbeck is the dimwitted conservative on “The View.” She’s currently married to a backup QB in the NFL, Tim Hasselbeck, and if memory serves, she became mildly famous by being a contestant on Survivor.

No, I’m not kidding. Welcome to the bottom of the conservative barrel.

  • Two days ago I din’t even know Elisabeth Hasselbeck existed.
    Now, Thanks to this blog,
    over the past two days,
    I’ve seen her on Faux Snooze and she was one of the gang on “The View” with the future First Lady.

    She was better on The View.

  • Re: McCain and campaign financing – they depend on the public not knowing what is going on and taking them at their “word”. Perception is everything and they use it to their advantage.

  • Elisabeth Hasselbeck rose to fame as a contestant on Survivor: The Austrailian Outback. She’s married to NFL flop Tim Hasselbeck, who has only played seven games in 2003 for the Redskins. He was traded once or twice before retiring to, you guessed it, work for FOX as a sports commentator. Elisabeth is now a co-host of the view.

    She is awful, stupid, and awfully stupid. She’s as good at life as her husband was at football.

  • Re Elisabeth Hasselbeck:

    She is better on the view because no one else on the panel ever lets her talk. 🙂

  • Hey! Ease up on Elisabeth! She’s one of the smartest, most articulate, best informed conservative commentators around!

    Name one who’s better. Go ahead, just try!

  • LOL at Okie (G). Does anyone know what time McLellan is going to appear? I looked over at CSPAN and didn’t find it.

  • If you saw Michelle Obama on the view you might have noticed Elizabeth giving her the dreaded fist bump. And you are right she is the cream of the crop of the worthless conservative pimps but a totally failed human being.

  • David Gregory is about to let his panelists debate which “spouse is proudest of America.” I’m drooling in anticipation.

  • “Name one who’s better. Go ahead, just try!”

    Pat Buchanan.

    No, I’m not kidding.

  • Pat Buchanan has a new book out blaming England for WWII because they didn’t appease Hitler enough. I wish I were kidding.

  • “Someone help me here. McCain is grandstanding on public financing when he is, as we speak, breaking the law by continuing to spend unlimited primary campaign money after opting in to public financing for the primary phase of the campaign? And then greenlighting the outside 527s to go after Obama only days ago? Something doesn’t compute.”

    I believe this is what my mama, usually describing some defiantly wayward behavior of mine, used to call “brazening it out.” As anyone with a sibling knows, pointing at one’s brother or sister and screaming about some wrong suffered at his or her hands tends to distract the parent, usually only briefly, from one’s own poor comportment.

    McCain has nothing to lose by trying it because a) he has every reason to believe the MSM will let him get away with it and b) he’s got nothin’ else. I, however, have every reason to believe Obama will push back and then some.

  • * Dems and Republicans in the House struck a deal on a war supplemental bill late yesterday. The breakthrough suggests Sen. Jim Webb’s (D-Va.) modernized GI Bill will be in position to become law. — CB

    Do get your facts straight, please, Steve Benen; it’s *not* Jim Webb’s bill:
    http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/19/mccain-bush-gi-bill/

    Seriously, however… I *am* surprised to hear that Webb’s bill didn’t have the transferability; seems like a no-brainer (a la SS).

  • Someone please sort me out. All the media outlets are putting out the word that Obama is the “first” candidate not to use public funding in the general election. I’ll be the first to admit to a less than perfect memory, but as I recall Sonny Bush opted out as well and raised enormous amounts in 2000 and 2004. Am I wrong about that?

    And if I’m not wrong, why hasn’t anyone jumped on it?

  • I believe Bush raised enormous amounts for the primaries, which can be spent up to the convention, and then accepted public finances for the general election and let the 527s and RNC do the dirty money-intensive work for the last 2 months before election day. I was surprised by that too, I could have sworn Bush opted out for the general.

  • Quoting the So-Ho Hasselbeck:

    “It bothered me that he seemed for a while more willing to give the fist bump to Ahmadinejad than our own General Petraeus.”

    60 years ago, Americans had the courage to hang general staff officers who were nothing more than battlefield-enabling puppets for a war-crimes-committing head of state—and this blonde doofus complains because Obama “disses” Betray-us?

    Please….

  • I was going to post this in the alaska thread but it’s dead there.

    The state is in the midst of a major generational shift, with it’s current Politicans coming form the the pre-statehood era and a sizeable chunk of the population having now been born after the construction of the pipeline. The two periods are hardly reconcilable, the governor is young and hated by the state’s republican establishment, most people expect responsible government that fits the democratic model as a result of recieving permanent fund payments every year. A state visit would deliver the state to Obama, that being said, big oil gets what it wants up here and will throw money to get results.

  • i get sick every time
    i think about some things
    one of them is petroleum products
    gasoline kerosene #2 oil
    vasoline valvoline plastic
    and the like sandwich bags
    and tires tar shingles
    they make my blood boil
    so does napalm

  • hmmm said: …that being said, big oil gets what it wants up here and will throw money to get results.

    Well, that’s because big oil pays the bills up here. It would be interesting, in a sort of apocolyptic way, to consider what the state might look like if the oil money suddenly dried up.

    I agree that the state is going through a big political shift. I couldn’t believe it when the GOP dumped a sitting governor and former senator to nominate the former mayor of Wasilla. Even the GOP is in a “throw the bums out” mood! I live in Southeast and don’t travel much in state. It’s hard for me to gauge the political mood in the rest of the state. But, perhaps a visit by Obama could deliver Alaska in the general election.

  • AK liberal, people are pretty into it up here, I hear discussion of national politics in Anchorage bars and it shocks me. There is also a fair amount of anger as well, people see the price of oil (which has a production cost of $7 a barrel on the north slope) and feel they should be getting a far better deal.

  • I’ve been reading a fascinating book called “Six Degrees: Our Future on a Hotter Planet.” by Mark Lynas. I don’t remember hearing much about it when it was first released — maybe because the author is British? It has a chapter about what the various models are saying would happen, and where, for various levels of catastrophe from 1 degree of change through 6 degrees (the maximum forecast at the time of writing, Celsius).

    This book describes the issues Obama and all of us will actually be dealing with during the next decades. I realize that campaigning on fear of catastrophe isn’t Obama’s style, but what exactly do people think is happening in the Midwest right now? Some solid proposals about addressing global warming would be welcome, and some sense of urgency to go with it — I only hear minor tinkering with the business as usual proposals (CAFE standards, alternative energy subsidies) but nothing effective — at a minimum, why couldn’t he say he would appoint Al Gore as a Global Warming Czar? Where is Obama’s leadership on this issue?

  • They were saying on Morning Joe that McCain’s flip flopping is more accepted because of the price of oil and people’s desperation for relief. Apparently it is polling pretty well.

    I don’t really agree that this is the solution, but I believe there is some truth to the fact that it won’t hurt him very much to be called out on this one because in truth, a lot of people who said they didn’t want to expand oil drilling in Florida or Alaska are changing their minds.

    The 527’s are going to go after Obama regardless of what McCain says or does, he does not control them. That said, I’m not so sure this excuses Obama for taking back his promise to accept public financing.

    Florida is still against Obama in general according to Rasmussen, I tend to think this is more closer to reality than the poll from yesterday which had Obama winning here. A lot of other polls are really close, this is going to be a nail biter.

    I hope Obama really has enough support to win in November, I don’t want 4 more years of Bush.

  • That said, I’m not so sure this excuses Obama for taking back his promise to accept public financing.

    I rather think the thing that excuses him for “breaking his promise” is the fact that he never made one.

  • RE: Remember, these are the words of a retired U.S. general, not just some blogger: “[T]here is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be answered is whether those who ordered the use of torture will be held to account. ”

    And not a single word in my local paper, Rocky Mountain News, this morning. I’m waiting for tomorrow before cancelling my subscription.

  • Now, now. I’m sure Erik Prince is a good Christian man, and his Blackwater is a good Christian company.

  • * Remember, these are the words of a retired U.S. general, not just some blogger: “[T]here is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be answered is whether those who ordered the use of torture will be held to account. ”

    Those aren’t *just* the words of a retired US general. They’re the words of the general who led the Abu Ghraib investigation. If anyone’s in a position to know, he is. So how do we as a country answer his question?

  • McCain is crying sour grapes that Obama is raising his OWN money, which is the way it SHOULD be. If I were McCain I would have never admitted to the public that he and Obama made a deal to accept public financing — I would have to believe there are few US ctizens who like the idea at all. And then to try to spin Obama’s reversal into a “trust” issue — shows you just how desperately McCain is grasping at straws. I think he would have MUCH preferred a Clinton as an opponent.

  • I’m a realist Tom, I want Obama to win but I’m not going to close my eyes really tight and just hope it can happen. He’s practically TIED in the electoral college count.

    God help the Democratic party, Clinton would have been a sure thing.

  • He’s practically TIED in the electoral college count.

    Nonsense. What a dishonest little boy you are. When electoral-vote.com had Clinton ahead in the EV count, you quoted it 20 times a day here. Now that every EV watcher, including electoral-vote.com, has Obama hugely ahead of McCain, you suddenly decide…what, that the MSM’s pretending it’s a horserace is credible?

    You really are a tool, Greg, a person completely without integrity.

  • * Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas) gave a speech on the House floor today, urging everyone to be nicer to “our friends,” the oil companies. Wow.

    Does he mean a “friend of ours” as opposed to a “friend of his”?

    Snark might get you hurt here, CB.
    Sessions is speaking in code.

  • Comments are closed.