‘Jukebox John’ McCain — every four minutes, he changes his tune

I don’t want to alarm anyone, but it appears that John McCain’s immigration policy is dependent entirely on who he happens to be talking to at the time.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., met Wednesday evening with Hispanic Republicans in Chicago. In an Associated Press story about the meeting, one quote jumped out at me: “He’s one John McCain in front of white Republicans. And he’s a different John McCain in front of Hispanics,” Rosanna Pulido, a Latina who heads the Illinois Minuteman Project, told the AP.

“He’s having his private meetings to rally Hispanics and to tell them what they want to hear,” she said. “I’m outraged that he would reach out to me as a Hispanic but not as a conservative.”

Pulido is probably not your typical Minuteman Project member. Though her parents were from Mexico, she was born in the U.S., and has become a staunch opponent of illegal immigration. She hoped to hear McCain last night reiterate the position he took on immigration policy late last year (well, one of the many positions).

“I have friends in Washington, DC, on this issue,” she told ABC’s Jake Tapper. “We’ve had conversations on this issue.” McCain abandoned his own immigration bill after it was killed in the Senate a year ago, and Pulido was optimistic, saying, “[W]e were hopeful after John McCain started saying, ‘I understand where the American people are coming from, there’s gotta be enforcement first,’ we thought great, he’s had a change of heart.”

“Sure enough,” Pulido said, “his mantra at the meeting was comprehensive immigration reform.’ And there were cheers and applause whenever he mentioned comprehensive immigration reform.”

“Then he said, ‘I bet some of you don’t know this — did you know Spanish was spoken in Arizona before English?’ And the crowd roared. I was appalled,” Pulido said. “He was pandering to these people — that’s what they wanted to hear.”

There’s nothing necessarily wrong with emphasizing different issues in front of different audiences, but McCain’s habit is far worse — he embraces an entirely different policy agenda depending on the audience.

At this point, one would like to think McCain knows by now that he needs to stick to at least one of his positions on this fairly important policy. About a month ago, in a relatively high-profile speech in California, McCain went back to the position he’d given up to win the Republican nomination, boasting about having worked with Ted Kennedy and argued, “[W]e must enact comprehensive immigration reform. We must make it a top agenda item.” McCain went on to take an anti-deportation position on immigrants already in the U.S. who entered the country illegally, saying “they are also God’s children, and we have to do it in a human and compassionate fashion.”

Soon after, far-right activists were apoplectic, especially given McCain’s repeated assurances during the primaries that he’d given up a “comprehensive” approach to immigration reform. So, the day after his speech, McCain reversed course yet again. And then yesterday, he switched back. Again.

For those keeping score at home, McCain does not support “comprehensive immigration reform.”

Yes, he does.

No, he doesn’t.

Yes, he does.

No, he doesn’t.

Yes, he does.

No, he doesn’t.

And as of yesterday, he does again.

Nearly all of these, by the way, come from the last six months.

Truth be told, in terms of my issue priorities, immigration reform is relatively low. But I know for Republicans, it’s among the most important issues, if not the most important domestic policy issue. And yet, here’s the Republican nominee, running on a platform of consistency, shifting with the wind and changing his position from day to day.

My amgios, you have nothing to fear from me

  • McCain has now shown that he too is a politician, and therefore unfit to be POTUS.

    I wouldn’t go as far as to say that this issue actually influences my vote, but it’s kind of funny considering the accusations about flip-flopping being hurled at Obama.

  • McCain went on …, saying “they are also God’s children, and we have to do it in a human and compassionate fashion.”

    I’l bet he wouldn’t dare say this in front of a Hagee/Parsley crowd.

  • I don’t think the Republicans really want to win this time around. What other explanation can there be? I find it hard to believe McCain doesn’t realize that we’re out here keeping score.

    Seriously, if this guy wins it won’t be the voters who made it happen – it will be Diebold.

  • @ Limbaugh’sDiabetes

    I wish I could share your optimism, but the RCP averages show McSame within striking distance, and the 527’s haven’t begun to attack him yet, and won’t until after the convention.

    Diebold, aren’t they the ones who made the voting machines that were used to usurp elect George W. Bush to a 2nd term?

  • nerpzilla – Did you read the article you posted? I’m guessing you missed this.

    It does, however, grant retroactive immunity, and I will work in the Senate to remove this provision so that we can seek full accountability for past offenses.

  • They were bound to compromise on this issue nerpzilla, I doubt the Senate will have the ability to pass the bill without retro-active immunity either. It’s a lose-lose scenario.

  • Danp-

    You’re guessing wrong.

    If, by a miracle, he pulls off an amendment removing that provision, then I will not only give him my vote back, but I will become a “Obama is the second coming” type of supporter. He will vote for an amendment that will go down 70-30, and he’ll say “I tried.” As I said on the other thread, his better chance to stop this was actually in the House, using his position. In the Senate, his power is diminished to one vote, and not nearly as much clout. Think Lieberman will vote to support his amendment? Rockefeller? This is trying to have it both ways – his given the bill his blessing. He could have really led on this issue, and had Pelosi kill it or keep in in committee. Instead, he’s gone for a talking point. I’m upset, so I’m not trying to be personal, but I wouldn’t start betting anyone or holding your breath – the final Senate bill will include amnesty. This is over – those are hollow words, and he knows it. Procedurally, there is no chance he has the votes to get an amendment taking it out. Maybe there are judicial holes in it, but if we want to preserve the Constitution, we’re going to the Courts.

  • There is a full scale Minute Man Alert underway right now.

    This is a chance for John to firm up his support among the anti-immigration crowd and the far wingnut right by firmly calling for a cease to this pending invasion from south of the border.

  • Make sure you call him “Juan McCain” when you’re talking to a wingnut. They don’t like him because he’s taken a reasonable stance occasionally.

  • The press sees nothing…hears nothing…what a maverick.

    The hispanic hordes are among us unless they’re republicans then they are… my friends.

    I forget, Is he Fencing in or fencing out…as long as there’s no cap on cap and trade what difference does it make. Time for milk and cookies Mr. McCain.

  • CB, not to be pain in the ass (again), but, to my reckoning, since 2 > 1, he is “stick[ing] to at least one of his positions….”

  • You would think that Mr. McCain could see how well his State is doing without the ILLEGAL ALIENS and want the same for all the States he will be representing if he is elected. I wish all 50 States would get a State law and put an end to all this ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. Sooner or later, we got to realize that these ILLEGAL ALIENS are tearing our Country down, NOT building it up.

    The BILLIONS we spend on these CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS every year from their ANCHOR BABIES to their free medical care. This has all got to stop! I hope McCain finally sees the light and gets the fence built and these ILLEGAL ALIENS out of this Country.

    To enter this Country is a privilege. IT IS NOT A RIGHT! No ILLEGAL ALIEN has the right to be in this Country.

  • McCain or Obama are going to swamp America, with another AMNESTY proposal. That will legalize millions that taxpayers will be forced to support. Then millions more from third world countries will hop the border, looking for free handouts and nothing on earth will stop the rush.
    We must get our Democratic representatives to sponsor the Federal SAVE ACT (H.R.4088) But right now Backroom discussions continue on whether to de-fund effective efforts that deter illegal immigration

    U.S. House leaders continue to gauge whether next Tuesday (June 24) they can escape public wrath if they take funding away from a couple of the most effective enforcement procedures resulting in illegal aliens leaving the country.

    No. 1: 287(g) program allowing and equipping local agencies to arrest and detain illegal aliens of all kinds.
    No. 2: Arrests of any illegal alien encountered while looking for criminal alien fugitives.

    You can continue to phone committee members at 202-224-3121, asking for expanded funding for the 287(g) program for local immigration enforcement.
    Anti-Enforcement Ideas Circulating
    All unsuppressed details at NUMBERSUSA. Your jobs, your children’s future is in peril.

  • It does not matter which of the two Amnesty for Illegals wins the
    Presidency, Legal U.S. citizens will continue fighting
    from the Grassroots up to bring back the Rule of Law
    to U.S. cities balkanized by the massive influx of
    illegal aliens who mostly are part of Mexico’s Agenda
    to create an Illegal Mexican Nation within
    the borders of the USA!!

  • Two words to scare the tar out of the Republican “base” (as identified by Dubya):
    Employer prosecution.

    No one hires illegals, they deport themselves.
    Cheap labor without access to the vote, unions, or court relief… history.

    This is what keeps CEO’s up at night.

  • Comments are closed.