Obama, McCain, and the ‘enthusiasm gap’

The notion of an “enthusiasm gap” between Democrats and Republicans this year is not new. In fact, it’s been a staple of the political landscape for most of the year. Democratic voters were excited about their presidential choices; Republicans kept wondering if someone new might throw their hat into the ring. Democratic turnout broke records; Republican turnout was average.

The phenomenon was not limited to the nominating fights. A couple of weeks ago, an NBC/WSJ poll found that most of Obama’s supporters are motivated by their support for him. Fewer than 40% of McCain voters could say the same. The Journal’s pollster noted, “It is not that these voters aren’t for McCain.” What’s lacking is “the enthusiasm, the passion, the energy” of the other side.

The problem for the GOP persists.

A new USA Today/Gallup poll has Obama leading McCain among likely voters by six points, 50%-44%.

But the most revealing numbers in the survey were the ones measuring voter enthusiasm: 61% of Democrats said they were more enthusiastic than usual about voting in this year’s election, while just 35% of Republicans said that.

Various intangibles — Bush’s record unpopularity, a struggling economy, dissatisfaction with the war in Iraq, a strong desire for change — make McCain’s task difficult. But if voters inclined to support him aren’t especially engaged, and aren’t particularly excited about the campaign, it makes his campaign’s task all the more challenging.

What’s more, it’s not just the horserace. The “enthusiasm gap” is manifesting itself in a variety of ways right now.

* Dems are just more excited about voting in general this year.

Sixty-three percent of Democrats questioned say they are either extremely or very enthusiastic about voting this year. Only 37 percent of Republicans feel the same way, and 36 percent of Republicans say they are not enthusiastic about voting.

“Republicans are far less enthusiastic about voting than Democrats are, and enthusiasm has plummeted among GOPers since the start of the year,” said Keating Holland, CNN polling director. “There was already an ‘enthusiasm gap’ in January, when Democrats were 11 points higher than GOPers on this measure. Now, that gap has grown to 26 points.”

* Organizers of the Democratic National Convention have more volunteers than they know what to do with. Organizers of the Republican National Convention are still hoping to find folks willing to sign up.

* McCain isn’t even enthusiastic about his VP choices. The four people he really likes — Joe Lieberman, Tom Ridge, Jeb Bush, and Mel Martinez — aren’t going to work, and he knows it. Indeed, Martinez, born in Cuba, isn’t even constitutionally eligible.

* As recently as two weeks ago, a national poll showed that only 52% of Republican primary voters were satisfied with McCain as their nominee, with 45% preferring someone else. That, of course, came more than three months after McCain had already secured the GOP nomination and got to work mending intra-party fences.

Now, I should note that the landscape can change. Parties generally become more enthusiastic after their conventions, which are still a couple of months off. If Obama makes a couple more moves like the one from last week on the FISA “compromise,” Democratic enthusiasm in general may wane. McCain isn’t generating excitement because his campaign isn’t firing on all cylinders, but he and his team have time to get on track.

Having said that, at this point, the “enthusiasm gap” has the potential to be the deciding factor. McCain could, of course, boost GOP enthusiasm by running even further to the right, but it would drive the rest of the electorate right into Obama’s waiting arms.

It’s a conundrum, isn’t it?

Someone needs to ask the 35%-37% of Republicans who are enthusiastic about McCain why that is. Is it that they think things are going so well and he is so much like Bush philosophically? Is it because he is such a man of principle and independence, who they trust even though he “pretends” to be a reliable conservative? Is it the folksiness of his Bomb-Iran jokes?

  • How can there be any enthusiasm when you know that your side is guaranteed to lose? Barack Obama is most probably going to win the election. He doubles the black vote and triples the student vote while retaining all other Dems. He will easily carry VA, NC, SC, GA, and MS. And even if our side should somehow squeak out a presidental win (I can’t see how), we will lose even bigger in the 2010 midterms. Even if we win we lose.

  • It’s not just the Bush backlash that’s hurting McCain. Fact is, he’s just not that exciting to begin with. He is, very much, “Bob Dole without the charisma.” His signature issue is campaign finance reform. Wow. How thrilling. Nothing gets a rally going like a discusssion of campaign financing law…Oh yeah, and he looks like hell on TV. Seriously, though I can’t beleive how lifeless McCain looks on the campaign trail. I’m not poking fun at his age, but I can’t get over how unexcited he looks. If he’s not “fired up”, why should the voters be?

  • I wouldn’t assume that McCain “really likes” Martinez, Bush, Ridge and Lieberman for VP just because Joe Klein (Joe Klein!?) says so. It’s much more likely that this is the old trick of tossing a bone to various constituencies (Cuban-Americans, Bush faithfuls/Floridians, Pennsylvanians, assholes) by pretending that you’d just love to have their guy on the ticket if only you could.

  • I’m enthusiastic about McCain. He’s been my favorite politician since the 2000 election when I was first old enough to vote. His inspirational life story can’t be beat. This year I’m particularly excited about the slim chance he’ll be elected president. If he beats Obama the Democrats will whine even more than they did when Bush won. It would be awesome! The prospect of bringing cocky Democrats down a peg should be enough to get any Republican motivated.

  • I think John McCain should choose Jeb Bush as his VP candidate.
    What do you think folks?

  • Sandra (5), What a patriot you are. What part of his ispirational life story can’t be beat? The five military jets he destroyed? The wife upgrade? Keating Five? But a hundred years in Iraq and more economic crisis is worth it just to see Democrats whine. How inspiring.

  • Ah, Sandra, your work is of a quality typical to McCain supporters and the candidate himself. I particularly like the lame pretense of youth support for McCain coupled with “bringing cocky Democrats down a peg” and “inspirational life story can’t be beat,” phrases so very representative of the way today’s 20-somethings speak.

    A flop all around, but that won’t stop you from getting reward points at the McCain Corral. Go to it, old fella!

  • How can you not be enthusiastic about a campaign whose senior political adviser characterized Benazir Bhutto’s assassination as “unfortunate” while allowing that it helped McCain win a couple of primaries. This is the same adviser, Charles R. Black Jr., who went on to say of his candidate that a fresh terrorist strike “certainly would be a big advantage to him.” I’m certain that the friends and loved ones of the victims of such a strike would be consoled by the fact that it helped John McCain to be elected.
    The enthusiasm gap is matched only by the outrage gap

  • Nice attempt to play the pile-on game. One problem with your thesis. Obama enthusiasm is rapidly melting away. Hard to be too thrilled about a candidate who breaks even his most basic and fundamental promises, will bring the rot and corruption of Chicago to our already ethically challenged Capitol, and whose associates are, in a word, scary (to put it mildly). Where’s that ethereal and unifying change you trumpet? Oh, it’s just the same old tired politics with a new face.
    Americans want the corruption and self-dealing in Washington to end. We want an end to pork-barrel spending, an end to earmarks, and an end to deficit spending. We want campaign finance reform, and a higher code of ethics. We do NOT want massive new entitlement programs and expenditures. In short, we want the change that can be DELIVERED, not change to believe in.

  • Sandra comment #5…you’re old enough to vote??? Your obvious closed minded observation of your candidate’s history suggests you swallow talking points and do no research. Have you ever heard of the USS Forrestal and McCain. Did you know he’s 100% diabled and receives $58K/yr disability pymnts? Have you noticed he changed direction on all the issues he used to support(known as pandering). Of course not. Republicans don’t want you to know. Visit McCain source…at least have an “educated” opinion as you merrily skip through voter land with “I just hate democrats” attitude. Grand pa McCain can’t even find his keys.

    Hard to get enthusiastic by a candidate who is confused, lacks energy, and struggles so hard to get out a complete thought much less to be the defender of this republican disaster to the point of wanting to continue to march the country right over the cliff.
    McCain is the least embarrassing candidate the republicans have and they had to make do with somebody so they said, “you want it so bad…go for it” but he’s about as enthusiastic as watching grass grow.

  • Conservatives aren’t enthusiastic about McCain because he’s NOT a conservative. He’s too close to being a liberal like Obama. We need a conservative choice. Not a RINO like McCain who just “me too”‘s the backward, braindead Democrat socialism.

    Where is the choice who will free the American people from the oppression of bureacracy and regulation? Why isn’t there anyone there to counter Obama’s belief that Americans are so helpless and incapable that the government must control us like cattle to the slaughter?

  • Conundrum? Sure. If you’re being kind and looking at the situation beyond blame or causality. I like to think of it more as a Republican petard, upon which they are being hoisted.

  • Conservatives aren’t enthusiastic about McCain because he’s NOT a conservative. He’s too close to being a liberal like Obama. We need a conservative choice.

    You’re absolutely right. Don’t put up with McCain’s nonsense. The only way to solve this is by voting for Barr or writing in the acceptably conservative candidate of your choice.

  • Why isn’t there anyone there to counter Obama’s belief that Americans are so helpless and incapable that the government must control us like cattle to the slaughter?

    Support that assertion. Somehow. In any way possible.

    It’s more of the mindless parroting of conservatives, who default on saying “LIBRULS THINK THE GOVERNMENT KNOWS BETTER” when challenged.

  • Mojo, that freedom from regulation added $70 to a barrel of oil and is sucking the life out of your wallet. Watch the congressional hearings on speculation in the oil market…yeah, that free market sure does work at lifting all boats! Most republicans don’t understand that you can be free and still have some boundaries (regulations). In fact, without those boundaries, freedom is just chaos.

  • This is why I continue to insist that the polls overestimate McCain’s support. They are weighted based on past performances of certain groups. (As I said — again a plug for a favorite old movie — there is no MAGIC TOWN, a town who perfectly mirrors the country as a whole) In the past, blacks and young people were less likely to go to the polls, so they will be undercounted in polling. Seniors and particularly the religous right went to the polls in higher numbers, so they are being over-counted.

    And this will be most important when it comes to the GOTV efforts. Even those RRs in particular who will VOTE for McCain won’t give up their spare time to stuff envelopes or make phone calls, and they are less likely to take time trying to convince their friends to vote for him in conversations.

    Again, the polls you see now are the highest McCain will be, and he will continue to drop as ‘our side’ does man the GOTV tables, or talk to their friends.

  • I, and many other Clinton voters are enthusiastic about voting against Obama.
    Wrong question. Most people vote against a candidate. That would be Obama

  • The fact that McCain is polling so close to Obama in spite of the anti-Republican climate speaks directly to the concern over Obama’s qualifications and character. He is not who he pretends to be-as anyone with the slightest people reading skills can attest. He is arrogant, self-important, ruthless, presumptuous (his own seal, for God’s sake!) and can’t speak without a teleprompter. He doesn’t know issues, can’t recognize even the names of world leaders and is beholden to corrupt Chicago pols as well as innumerable special interest groups. The majority of his supporters are also smug, mean-spirited and arrogant enough to think they can trash their fellow Democrats with impunity. The more Obama reveals his true self, the less likely he is to maintain his lead in the polls. I will not vote for such a man inspite of being a lifelong Democrats. Even if he wins, the damage he has done to the so-called Democratic party as well as to race relations in this country (via his constant use of the “race card”) will be longlasting.

  • If Obama makes a couple more moves like the one from last week on the FISA “compromise,” Democratic enthusiasm in general may wane.

    This is something we have to deal with, and sooner rather than later.

    Anyone who reads here regularly knows I am seriously pissed off over the FISA deal. This has to be dealt with, but it has to be dealt with in the context of everything else.

    Dahlia Lithwick’s article on the Supreme Court makes the primary argument for why this has to be dealt with in context. The article above about the drilling controversy – as a stand-in for all the environmental issues it represents – is also a major point of context. We haven’t had anything about the war lately, but what news one can find (I find more since I hear from those who are there), brings up the third side of the triumvirate of Big Isues that define this election (or at least do so to me).

    Yesterday I was at a meeting with some “heavy hitters” here in southern California who are equally upset with the FISA thing as I am. A lot of conversation and analysis went back and forth, and the irreducible bit of political math is this:

    Any outcome in November that includes either John McCain in the White House or 41 Republicans in the Senate (or both) guarantees that nothing gets done about any of these issues, that there are bad outcomes on all of them, and that there is no chance of changing the FISA.

    The only possible alternative that includes the possibility of solving the Supreme Court crisis (which would go a long way to resolving the FISA problem), dealing with the issue of energy development and global climate change, and ending the war, is Obama in the White House and 60 Democrats in the Senate (exclusive of Lieberman).

    I note that MoveOn has studied this math over the weekend and also concluded that 2+2 does indeed equal 4. The rest of us have to do the same, whether grudgingly or willingly, and work our asses off for that one possible alternative.

    So I am going back to work today, calling for the Obama campaign. And when I run across someone who is upset as I am, I have something worthwhile to say to them, that will hopefully “ring their bell.”

  • (Sigh) These McCainiacs almost make me wistful for the Paulbots. At least they were amusing and knew how to utiliza the caps lock key and the exclamation point. Talk about an enthusiasm gap.

  • Oh, and I forgot to say that none of the4 above means we don’t hold the national Dems feet to the fire on all these issues to make sure they know on which side their bread is buttered. They need to know the truth of “there go my followers, and I must run after them, for I am their leader.”

  • what the hell…?

    Who distributed the snowflake from GOP Zentral Kommand and opened the door to the clown car?

    Bozos, I say I’m surrounded by Bozos!!!

  • (Sigh) These McCainiacs almost make me wistful for the Paulbots. At least they were amusing and knew how to utiliza the caps lock key and the exclamation point. Talk about an enthusiasm gap.

    Exactly. This lifeless “lifelong Democrat” brigade totally lacks the zest and zing of a good Paulbot infestation. No one minds the idiocy, but we do demand a little entertainment to go with it. “Sandra” has been the only one who managed some.

  • If Democrats came out against eating dung Sandra would eat some and post the video on youtube while waving a flag with her right hand.

    At least the paulbots got some things right like opposing the war.

  • I’m one of those enthusiastic Republican voters. Probably the most enthusiastic I’ve been since AuH20. But unlike Sandra #5, I’m enthusiastic about Obama. Another reason to mistrust statistics.

  • Just a guess, but as Obama runs to the right with dumb moves like supporting the telecom immunity bill, he might see his enthusiasm advantage disappear. It’s an important issue for me and it’s had me depressed well beyond the news cycle coverage of it. And it’s an important enough move that it could easily have a permanent, long-lasting effect.

  • * Organizers of the Democratic National Convention have more volunteers than they know what to do with. Organizers of the Republican National Convention are still hoping to find folks willing to sign up. — CB

    According to the Democratic Convention Watch (thanks, Maria, for steering me there), they’re so desperate, they’re asking *Dems* to volunteer for them, in the spirit of bipartisanship… I nearly fell off my chair laughing, when I read that last night.

  • Thanks, Chopin! Glad you see it that way. And hey, maybe you and others like you can rescue the Republican party from the crazies currently running it. A two-party system works best when one of the parties is not a cynical criminal conspiracy, and though I’m not likely to ever become a Republican, I’m ready to vote for thoughtful prudent and open-minded ones, especially when facing corrupt machine Democrats.

    But the other comments about the sudden flood of counter-commenters are right on: the McCain campaign and the RNC have clearly decided that the web is important, and they’re evidently mobilizing all sorts of operatives, or even just their easily persuaded supporters, to come visit progressive blogs and comment — but their comments are SO lame. Pseudo-Hillarist moaning, while others are still trying to ‘turn’ “change you can believe in” (worked so well during McCain’s speech a few weeks ago, after all!). The latest meme, coming from the trolls in the usual lockstep synchrony, is “Obama the Chicago machine politician”, which falls apart under superficial examination. Of course Obama did politics in Chicago — but he came from outside, and very little suggests he ever took his orders from City Hall or its back rooms. This is another pretty tired stereotype, and it’s hard to see it getting much traction, though I’m sure that Rove and the Rovistas are already planning the buildup.

  • Tom Cleaver
    it is nice to see an obamaer going to such great lenghts to try and get others to follow
    the messiah. not even close, that one page resume, in the hallow suit
    is NOTHING but politcal theater with followers like lemmings can’t wait until the
    battle realy begins and the BO and his nasty wife go back to the corrupted Chicago

  • It is no surprise that more enthusiasm is generated by the Obama camp. McCain is very dry. His oratory is weak, his appearance is unattractive, his charisma is lacking. You can’t watch more than 5 minutes of a McCain speech without changing the channel.

    http://www.palapolitical.com

    When it comes to policy and initiatives, McCain has a lot more to offer than Obama. And his campaign has been more proactive – initiating trips to Iraq, town hall debates, energy initiatives, etc. Only, there is no strength behind his persona, and unfortunately for McCain voters are affected by this.

  • Comments are closed.