This Week in God

First up from The God Machine this week is an item about George W. Bush’s renewed interest in his so-called “faith-based” initiative, one of the few policy priorities the president wanted but couldn’t get through a Republican Congress in his first term.

A few days ago, perhaps with an eye towards “legacy building,” Bush decided to re-emphasize the failed project.

An old friend made a surprise appearance at President Bush’s speech to a conference of faith-based groups this afternoon. Perhaps you remember him. He goes by “compassionate conservatism.”

The phrase was a staple of the then-Texas governor’s winning presidential campaign in 2000 before terrorism, war and a slumping American economy pushed it aside. Bush dusted it off today before an adoring crowd that celebrated his two-term effort to open the gates of government funding to religious groups working to combat homelessness, AIDS and other societal ailments.

In the process, he fondly recalled the early days of that first White House run, which, he noted, “seems like a long time ago.”

“You’ve helped revolutionize the way government addresses the greatest challenges facing our society,” Bush told the crowd. “I truly believe the Faith-Based Initiative is one of the most important initiatives of this administration.”

That his legislation never passed seemed largely irrelevant.

What’s especially curious, though, is the timing of Bush’s renewed interest. The president’s faith-based scheme, which was largely implemented through executive orders and administration agencies, has actually been the subject of multiple scandals recently, including reports that grants were directed to undeserving, but politically connected, groups. And these scandals come a few years after former White House staffer David Kuo explained that the White House faith-based office was used in 2002 primarily to help elect Republican candidates in tight races.

So what it is, exactly, the president is so proud of?

There were plenty of other great items from The God Machine this week.

* This is a pretty big hire: “Shaun Casey, who teaches religion and politics at Wesley Theological Seminary in Washington, D.C., has been hired by the Obama campaign to focus on outreach to evangelical voters. Casey, who has been informally advising the Obama campaign on faith issues for a year, next month will become a formal part of the faith outreach staff, Casey said today. His title will be senior adviser for religious affairs.”

* On a related note, Beliefnet.com president Steven Waldman points to the latest Pew Forum report to suggest the “God gap” between the parties is shrinking: “In past elections, voters who were the most religious clearly broke for the Republicans, and Democrats were increasingly seen as hostile to religion. Even now, 43% of those who attend church weekly or more identify themselves as Republicans compared with 40% who call themselves Democrats, and it’s still the case that the more religious you are, the more likely you are to prefer Republicans.”

* South Carolina’s new license plates — which feature the phrase “I Believe” alongside a Christian cross — have already sparked a federal lawsuit. This week, State Rep. Bill Sandifer (R), who helped pass the measure, defended the plate policy, saying, “I think this bill simply allows people the opportunity to give a visible indication of their religious beliefs.” Asked if he would support allowing minority faiths, including Islam, to also have an opportunity to give a visible indication of their religious beliefs, Sandifer said, “Absolutely and positively no.” It proves, once again, that when right-wing Republicans talk about more religion in the public square, they’re only referring to their faith.

* Incremental progress: “Leaders of the Presbyterian Church (USA) overturned a long-standing ban on the ordination of gays and lesbians Friday, providing yet the latest example of a religious denomination struggling with how, and whether, to incorporate homosexuality into church life. At the same time, the church’s national governing body, meeting in San Jose, refused to alter its definition of marriage, calling it a ‘covenant between a woman and a man.'”

* A federal court ruled yesterday that an anti-gay religious group cannot be excluded from handing out fliers at a gay-pride festival in St. Louis. At issue was a provision in the city code that says “no person shall parade, exhibit or distribute any advertisement, circular or handbill in or adjoining any public park, place or square.” The AP explained, “U.S. District Judge Henry Autrey ruled June 24 that the group has the right to distribute literature and discuss its religious viewpoint at PrideFest.”

* And finally, if you’re injured during an involuntary exorcism in Texas, you won’t be able to sue for damages, at least according to the conservative court majority on the Texas Supreme Court.

I hope Casey doesn’t prove as dumb a choice of religious advisors for Obama that Wright and his Catholic Priest friend were.

  • Maybe Bush will try to embarass Obama by trying to push the religion/government envelope because of Obama’s religiosity.

  • I always found it funny that the term, “compassionate conservatism,” was ever used by anyone on the right. By adopting the modifier, weren’t they acknowledging that conservatism was by nature cold and unfeeling?

    I mean, the only reason to buy an odor-free diaper, is because diapers are inherently stinky.

  • So what it is, exactly, the president is so proud of?

    Actually, you gave teh answer before you asked the question.

    Bush dusted it off today before an adoring crowd that celebrated his two-term effort to open the gates of government funding to religious groups working to combat homelessness, AIDS and other societal ailments.

    He can’t find too many of those adoring crowds anymore – so he’s proud this bit of bullshit and baloney still plays to the morons with the sawdust behind their ears.

  • it’s still the case that the more religious you are, the more likely you are to prefer Republicans.”

    Further proof that religion is for the mentally-challenged.

  • A federal court ruled yesterday that an anti-gay religious group cannot be excluded from handing out fliers at a gay-pride festival in St. Louis

    This brings to mind (don’t ask me why) an event which was supposed to take place in Skokie, IL many years back. A group of neo Nazi’s were trying to (or got) a permit to have a parade through a pretty Jewish suburb of Chicago. My friend’s brother (both she and he are Orthodox), along with a group of his friends, were going to hand out his own “fliers” to those in the parade – at the end of baseball bats. Thankfully, the parade was canceled.

  • Tom @5, did you catch Countdown (I don’t know when, I am out of the country and caught it on MSNBC’s website) where Bush went to either KY or TN and he was waving at the TWO people who showed up? Bush was literally jumping and waving at them. They virtually yawned. F’ing hysterical.

    And Mary continues her McCain trolling. Oh, MMOD…where are you…?

  • It could be worse:
    The [Hindu] pilgrims come to see a large icicle in a cave that devout Hindus revere as an incarnation of the Lord Shiva, the Hindu god of destruction and regeneration.

    And millions of Muslims gather each year to march around, a…rock. And trample each other in the bargain.

    And Christians seem to be constantly on the search for the face of Jesus or Mary’s face in a taco.

    Fetishism lives.

  • “In the process, he fondly recalled the early days of that first White House run, which, he noted, ‘seems like a long time ago.'”

    even longer for us, george. even longer for us.

  • Can we get North Carolina and South Carolina together on license plates? Then we could get an I believe license plate that begins with WTF. Or maybe they could do I believe with OMG.

  • That story about the Texas exorcism is scary. The Texas courts have sanctioned child abuse in the name of religion.

    Off topic, but when I was at the hardware store yesterday the guy who loaded my truck complimented my bumper sticker:

    Mission Nothing Accomplished – defeat Bush in ’04.”

    I gave him a fist-bump. First compliment I’ve had in four years, but quite a few snide remarks.

  • Tom, yet again you delight us all with your tolerance and patience. “Religion is for the mentaly challenged.” Like Martin Luther King, Jesse Jackson, Father Drinan, the Berrigans, or, on the conservative side, people like G.K. Chesterton or even a William Lane Craig. I would agree, as an atheist, that non-believers have the smarter premises, and that overall their intelligence level is higher, but there are some bone-dumb atheists and brilliant Christians. Look into the work of someone like Morton Scott Enslin — who, I was fascinated to find out, had MLK as a student in one class, and he got a B in it. Or read some of the intelligent Christian blogs, like Chris Tilling’s and Jim West’s, or like BIBLE AND THEOLOGY. You might find your eyes opening.

    For that matter, both Fred Clarkson — of Talk2Action — Rabbi Haim Beliak — of JewsOnFirst, and all the heads of Americans United have been believers, and I doubt if even you consider them ‘mentally challenged.’

  • The AP explained, “U.S. District Judge Henry Autrey ruled June 24 that the group has the right to distribute literature and discuss its religious viewpoint at PrideFest.”

    Great, this brings the cockroaches into the light and supports the 1st Am. I hope some of those asshats offend their employers. Or someone recognizes an ex among the Xtians. D’oh!

  • On the other hand, the Texas story is not just scary, but a good reminder of how the Texas Republican Party has, for years, been taken over by the true theocrats, at least as far as their platform goes. There is an excellent story on this at Talk2Action — http://www.talk2action.org/story/2008/6/20/15922/7012 — this week. focussing on the Texas Freedom Network’s report on this year’s version. I’ll just give a few quotes:

    The Texas GOP declares that “America is a nation under God founded on Judeo-Christian principles” and that the party is pledged “toward dispelling the myth of separation of church and state.”

    We oppose any governmental action to restrict, prohibit, or remove public display of the Decalogue (Ten Commandments) or other religious symbols.”

    The Texas GOP supports congressional passage of the so-called “Constitution Restoration Act,” which would among other provisions bar the U.S. Supreme Court from hearing and ruling in cases regarding governmental entities or officials who acknowledge “God as the sovereign source of law, liberty, or government.” The law would also permit the impeachment and removal of judges who listen to such cases.

    The party would forbid judges from determining the constitutionality of laws and end Supreme Court jurisdiction in cases involving abortion, religious freedom and the Bill of Rights. It calls for the impeachment of judges who, through the subjective judgment of others, “abuse their authority.”

    Despite problems such as abuse of clients and financial mismanagement that have plagued some programs in the past, Texas Republicans call for less oversight and regulation of faith-based providers of social services.

    The Texas GOP would undermine the teaching of evolution in science classes by promoting “intelligent design”/creationism and the so-called “weaknesses” of theories such as evolution. The platform does not acknowledge that evolution is the foundation of all the biological sciences and that scientists have repeatedly debunked arguments about so-called “weaknesses” of the theory.

    Texas Republicans “oppose any sex education other than abstinence until heterosexual marriage.” That position would prohibit teaching students age-appropriate, medically accurate information about birth control and the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases and HIV.

    Fortunately for the sane Texans — yes there are some who still remain — this platform and its predecessors remain mostly words. Even Bush and Rick perry haven’t actually tried to implement the provisions.

  • I suggest Mary devote all recent and future posts to be published next year in the Sour Grapes Cookbook. It’s sure to be popular with voters who cannot admit they are racists, but can convince themselves that Hillary is more like McCain, even as Hillary herself asks them to vote for Obama.

    It’s just amazing how much Hillary supporters are loyal to the wishes of their candidate.

  • I see that David Kuo, a former W operator, is still active. His acts while he worked for W are mentioned in a chapter of THE FAMILY by Jeff Sharlet. Mr Kuo’s feelings about W’s faith based acts are interesting. No, I don’t suggest that anyone read or buy THE FAMILY. It’s a tedious exposure of the group behind National Prayer Breakfasts. While Mr Coe, who promotes the Prayer Breakfasts, cultivates an air of mystery, Mr Coe’s mystery isn’t interesting or exciting. Coe runs an organization which pretends not to have a structure. The book is as dull as a scholarly analysis of a Communist bureaucracy. Coe’s non-organization is obsessed with secrecy. They bring Jesus to the powerful, influential, sometimes un-churched. While Hillary Clinton has some ties to a prayer group related to Mr Coe’s non-organization, Hillary can’t join Coe’s whatever because she’s a woman. Coe’s group is aimed at men only. It’s hard to take Coe or his group seriously because its as dull as Christian Rock.
    Maybe Coe’s story could be interesting if a writer for ROLLING STONE like the later Hunter Thompson reviewed or rewrote the family. These Jesus Freaks of any stripe have a terminal case of sincerity. Maybe we can laugh again when W leaves office & these oh so sincere bores follow W into obscurity.

  • There is nothing that prevents anyone, anywhere in this country, from putting a religious bumper sticker or window sticker on their vehicle if they so choose.. And there certainly are enough of them around already to gag a dinosaur. It’s bad enough that the rest of us have to be confronted by this self-righteous display. Not to mention also the billboards that shout in two-foot high letters “Jesus is Lord!”. In a pluralistic society relgion has no place in the public sphere, and certainly not on license plates and billboards. Personally, I prefer to be as anonymous as possible when driving my car, and announcing my religion on my license plate is, as far as I’m concerned, an invasion of privacy.

    But much of the South doesn’t want to live in a pluralistic society, and wants to exclude all those who don’t conform to their narrow worldview. That such lawsuits have to be brought over and over again is more eleoquent testimony to how badly our educational system has failed.

  • Prup, no matter how “smart” a religionist might be, they elect to turn off their intelligence, reject reason and become irrational when it comes to their faith and Iron Age superstition. Such belief without evidence, and despite evidence to the contrary is a form of mental illness.

  • Dear Mexico,

    You were right, we were wrong. As a token of our sincerest apologies, please find enclosed the entire landmass formerly known as the state of Texas.

    Regards,

    The United States of America

  • “Personally, I prefer to be as anonymous as possible when driving my car, and announcing my religion on my license plate is, as far as I’m concerned, an invasion of privacy.” -Rich

    Over the last eight years I have come to regard those “icthus fish” symbols and those weird “mansym + womansym = restrooms, er I mean marriage” bumper stickers to be warnings for possible road rage incidents, especially on SUVs. It’s always uplifting to get flipped off by someone with a “jesus is lord” bumper sticker and you have to hand it to the “faith based Bushies” to make astonishing hypocrisy a common occurrence.

    New bumper sticker suggestion: “DRILL ANWR! Jesus loves cheap gas!”

  • “…if you’re injured during an involuntary exorcism in Texas, you won’t be able to sue for damages, at least according to the conservative court majority on the Texas Supreme Court.”

    “Look Bob, there’s your brother-n-law, the asshole who wouldn’t let you have that loan. He’s got the devil in him. You can see it ’cause he drinks and swears too much. An exorcism is what he needs. Bring the prayer book and let’s kick the devil out of him till he screams for Jesus.”

    Only Tx two stomp allowed.

  • btw…is it me or have others observed that all the miracles and the places of Pilgrimages all come from the era of superstition, before science. That since the progression of science the big miracles have all disappeared and the sacred places decayed as if abandoned by the gods.

    Since the introduction of science all the miracles seem to be internalized and a huge desire to return to the age before science…the age of superstition. We have faith through fear of punishment and belief devoid of reason, based on books edited more times than the sears catalog and older than the hills filled with all the miracles anyone could ask for.

    Or is it we are the miracles we’ve been looking for. Just us. No..couldn’t be.

  • Justice David Medina wrote that finding the church liable “would have an unconstitutional ‘chilling effect’ by compelling the church to abandon core principles of its religious beliefs.”

    These guys would have upheld Jim Jones’ right to mix Kool-Aid and force his followers to drink it. How far gone are they?!

    The party would forbid judges from determining the constitutionality of laws…

    I see the Texas GOP has a deep understanding of the role of the judiciary. Oh wait a minute, that’s the same Texas judiciary that ruled on the right to injure people during exorcisms. Hmm. Not sure I’d like them determining anything. Can we just force that state to secede from the union? Just disown them?

    As for religious people being smart, I second ipu4m3 @ 20. Religious belief among “smart” people entails a willful rejection of logic and rationality in that major portion of their lives having to do with religion. They have to be willing to live with an unsynthesized belief system, actually two mutually contradictory belief systems, and in that too they have rejected rationality. Whether such a person can be categorized as “smart” is debatable, no matter their degree of intellectual prowess in other areas. It shouldn’t be surprising that religious belief is inversely proportional to educational level. The more one is trained in logic and deduction, the less likely one will be willing to abandon it and embrace religion.

    Dawkins had a quite thought-provoking piece about a geologist, Kurt Wise, who struggled with this very quandary. He knew perfectly well because of his depth of training in science that his fundamentalist religious beliefs simply didn’t make sense, but he was so anchored to his religion that he ultimately rejected his scientific world view. It was actually quite a sad story. You can read the whole thing here.

    As Mencken said: “We must respect the other fellow’s religion, but only in the sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart.”

  • The other day my kids were asking me what residents of various states were called, i.e., New Yorkers, Ohioans, etc. When it came to Texas, and what residents there are called, I responded with “Retards”.

    I can see by the story of the exorcism coming out of Texas, I wasn’t too far off base.

  • Asked if he would support allowing minority faiths, including Islam, to also have an opportunity to give a visible indication of their religious beliefs, Sandifer said, “Absolutely and positively no.”

    Will he prefer to abolish the Christian plates if the Supreme court forces the issue?
    I’m VERY confident this “problem” will arise.

    Who do you suppose benefits more from such plates? Ubiquitous Christianity or unusual faiths these zealot’s children can join to cheese them off?

    These people clearly do NOT play chess.

    Exorcism in Texas…
    Just curious, can this church do an exorcism on non-members? Is human sacrifice okay too? Which crimes are religious people NOT allowed to do if they proclaim it part of their dogma. Just want to know so I can warn my future fellow Canadians. about the backward theocratic banana republic of the United States. (Just kidding, Texas will secede long before this fundamentalist disease can reach me.)

  • Comments are closed.