The DNC and the Obama campaign, confirming a week of rumors, announced yesterday that Barack Obama will accept the party’s presidential nomination at Denver’s Invesco Field at Mile High. The stadium, home to the Denver Broncos, can accommodate more than 75,000 people, more than triple the number in the arena where the rest of the convention will be held.
The idea strikes me as a pretty good one. It will be the first convention acceptance speech in a stadium since JFK in 1960, and it will take advantage of Obama’s unique ability to generate extraordinary crowds. I have no idea what they’ll do if the weather fails to cooperate, but barring that, it seems like a winning move.
It’s curious, though, to see how the far-right has responded to the announcement. I noticed that there were some right-wing blogs that compared the notion of an Obama speech at Invesco Field to a Hitler rally in Nazi Germany. The National Review picked up on this, too.
“So, the recent news out of the Obama camp is that they’re planning a huge rally with thousands of people in a stadium, want to create a mandatory youth corps for national service, and are thinking about a big dramatic speech in Berlin.
It’s like they’re trying to sell copies of Jonah’s book [about ‘liberal fascism’] or something.”
Like many far-right arguments, I find all of this a little odd.
For one thing, since when do stadium rallies necessarily lead to comparisons to Hitler, fascism, and Nazis? Across the country and around the world, stadiums are routinely used for sporting events, concerts, religious rallies (the Pope routinely hosts events in stadiums), protests, and in the JFK example, convention speeches. How, exactly did the right decide to make the leap to Hitler?
And for another, four years ago, the Republican National Committee and the Bush campaign considered a plan to have George W. Bush deliver his convention speech at Yankee Stadium. At the time, I don’t recall any Dems comparing the plan to fascism.
Conservatives sure do pick strange things to complain about.