Exhibit A in how not to target women voters

Just moments ago, John McCain kicked off a campaign event in Wisconsin, the focus of which “will be women in business and the economic challenges they face.”

It makes sense that McCain would target women voters, who, if polls are any indication, prefer Barack Obama by a fairly strong margin. But I don’t think McCain appreciates just how awkward his outreach to women is going to be.

This week, Carly Fiorina, a leading McCain advisor/surrogate and the Republican National Committee’s “Victory Chairman,” was discussing consumer-driven health insurance when she proposed “a real, live example which I’ve been hearing a lot about from women: There are many health insurance plans that will cover Viagra but won’t cover birth-control medication. Those women would like a choice.”

On Wednesday afternoon, a reporter asked McCain if he agrees with his top advisor, and the senator was hopelessly, embarrassingly lost. On MSNBC last night, Rachael Maddow and The Nation’s Chris Hayes highlighted just how big a headache this is becoming for McCain.

Of all the embarrassments McCain has had this week — and there have been many (more on this later) — I thought calling Social Security a “disgrace” would be the one that stuck. But there’s just something hilarious about watching McCain squirm.

More importantly, though, Fiorina actually raised an important point — a lot of women do care about this; they are bothered by the insurance plans’ policies; and they do want a choice.

Which makes McCain’s opposition to Fiorina’s position all the more salient in a campaign context.

Nico Pitney had this important item last night:

How damaging is this video, now spreading around the web, showing John McCain squirming, stumbling, and then claiming ignorance about his position on providing women with birth control?

Apparently, very damaging. A Democratic Party strategist familiar with internal polling said McCain’s two votes against requiring insurance companies to cover prescription birth control have been polled in battleground states and had tremendous resonance with women, including independents and Republicans.

(Polling conducted last month for NARAL Pro-Choice America showed similar data: 79 percent of pro-choice independent women and 61 percent of pro-choice Republican women said that McCain’s votes against birth control access raised “serious doubts” in their minds about McCain.)

More troubling for the presumptive GOP nominee is that the video of his awkward exchange aboard the Straight Talk Express is getting wider attention from major media outlets (which apparently can’t resist the Viagra angle).

Note to self: stories about sex sell; stories about Social Security don’t.

And to reiterate a point from yesterday, let’s not lose the forest for the trees here. Sure, it’s embarrassing that McCain can’t answer a fairly easy question on an issue of concern to millions of women. And sure, it’s amusing that McCain and one of his top advisors don’t agree on the issue.

But the key thing to remember here is that McCain’s record on reproductive rights and sexual health is utterly miserable. His rhetoric is awful, but his record is worse.

I watched this last night and it was the Best Television Moment Ever. My husband looked at McCain and pronounced him a “badly calibrated animatronic that would be promptly pulled off the line at Disney.”

  • Whoa, this is getting attention on TV?

    I’m not sure how to put this, but sometimes I think that our media has strange priorities, and isn’t even particularly good at reporting the news.

  • So now McCain has two senior advisors with whom he publicly disagrees? Who vetted his campaign staff, Alfred E Neuman?

  • It’s been quite a run for the double talk express. With this coming right on the heels of Dr Phil’s blunder, you have to wonder if McSame has any advisers he… you know…actually takes advice from. Since he routinely rejects their advice, why are they there in the first place? It’s beyond odd that the guy who claims to want to eliminate waste in government staffs his campaign with people he has no use for.

  • McCain is a misogynist. But I’d say there is good portion of trailer tramps out there that like a good strong man to keep them in line, call them cunts, etc.

  • CB,

    You (and Rachel Maddow) have apparently missed something in this report. Near the beginning of Maddow’s report she shows the clip of Fiorina’s statement that McCain was aksed about and squirmed all over the place because he didn’t have an answer. About 4:10 into the clip you have posted there is another shot of Fiorina at the event where she made the statement. In this shot you can see who is sitting next to her on the dais. Why it is John McCain!!! So McCain was actually sitting right there while Fiorina made her statements on an issue which he now has not thought about and doesn’t want to talk about!

  • Isn’t this going to be a sweet election. For years we Dems have watched as our presidential candidates have run incompetent, slow reaction, imploding campaigns. Now we get to watch McCain as he drags the Repubs even further into the trash.

  • I’ll take what we can get in terms of adverse McCain coverage, but I still think – as bad as the substance of McCain’s position here is, and as badly as he showed his discomfort with the whole topic is – that the most telling part of his comments on this issue was the “I don’t know how I voted.”

    By itself, that may not be a big deal. He has, after all, cast thousands of votes back when he bothered showing up for votes. But combined with a similar comment in the same day where he attacked Obama on Iran by claiming he (McCain) had voted to name the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization and Obama had skipped the vote — when in fact McCain had also skipped the vote starts to look like a pattern of simply having no idea where he was, how he voted, what he stood for then and what he stands for now. Nothing will raise the age questions and the integrity questions as fast as these continuing gaffes about whether and how he voted on a particular issue.

  • The first Tuesday this next November is the day we will exercise Jefferson’s “collective wisdom” unless we get hoodwinked again!

    I like Hayes’ take on this, as I too see a hustle going on. -Kevo

  • Notice the use of the phrase “want a choice” used to refer to birth control. Women don’t want a choice about birth control, they want their insurance to pay for birth control because it is related to reproductive health.

    Bringing the word “choice” into the issue of contraception reinforces an equivalency between that and abortion, something anti-abortion activists have been trying to accomplish. The extension of a prohibition on abortion to a prohibition on contraception is a goal. So, this simple use of language, echoed by CB in his post, shouldn’t be overlooked. What is being “chosen” when you ask your insurance company to pay for something it doesn’t now cover? Nothing.

    I see McCain’s befuddlement as equivalent to a candidate’s floundering over the price of milk. Ask him about Viagra and he’ll be right on top of the issue. I think it is also possible that he is signaling to his conservative constituents that a God-fearing person who is married and not playing around shouldn’t know anything about contraception. Sort of like when “nice” girls pretend not to know what certain words mean.

  • For once I agree totally with Mary. Women like to have choices, but birth control is not “pro-choice” the way it has been redefined by the “pro-life” RW groups. Somehow we have to de-link contraceptives from the abortion issue. There are two reasons that McCain couldn’t answer the question: a) the “pro-life” crowd considers the pill an abortafacient (sp?) and b) they forsee the “pro-choice” forces whittling away at their gains by declaring birth control an equal rights issue and when tackled from that viewpoint, you cannot deny another form of “birth control” which abortion CAN be…

    Besides, those polls are of women who are “pro-choice”. The numbers would be more meaningful if they included ALL women, including those who have fallen under the spell of RW propaganda.

  • Gee, I was sure that Mary, who is Janie on the Spot when she thinks male candidates might be showing some insensitivity to women, would be outraged at McCain’s stunning ignorance about this major women’s issue and the unmistakable message it sends that he never thinks about this stuff. I was certain she wouldn’t make excuses for him and try to redirect the criticism McCain deserves to other Democrats. I just can’t understand how I could have been so wrong.

  • Devastating video.

    McGramps for President?
    This guy isn’t competent enough to call a Bingo game at a senior home…

  • By November, he won’t even remember he’s running for office.

    “Uh, Cindy? What’s my name?”
    “John McCain”
    “John McWho??”
    “McCain”
    “Then what’s your name, young lady?”
    “Dumbass”
    “Dumbass? I had a wife named that. Are you my wife?”

  • Mary…It had nothing to do with knowledge of contraception…but with what ins. companies covered. This is not something where “knowledge of contraception” is even pertinent. McCain and anyone else would instantly understand what is meant for Viagra to be covered and not BC.

    I also don’t see how the word choice has anything to do with ins. coverage of BC unless it was to imply that women like to have the choice of whether they want to get pregnant or not and ins, should cover BC if they choose not to become pregnant.

    McCain wasn’t signaling anything other than “how can I play this without making women more angry” when his brain turned into Homer Simpson as it often does.(Doh…Don’t think).

    As much of a woman chaser reputation McCain had while still married to his first wife I fail to see how anyone but the most naive would think he didn’t know about these pills and why they are used.

  • Has Carly Fiorina ever bragged about the insurance plans offered under her at Hewlett Packard? I’m sure they were just as backwards as the plans she’s questioning now.

  • The best part is the announcer telling us that MCCain is effed as she laughed. That was priceless. I would use that as the intro for an ad

  • Wow….Mary…everyday I’m amazed at your ability to spin, double talk, obfuscate, and rationalize every minute detail of the candidates and always negatively for Obama and positively for McCain.

    I only see McCain trying to stall and wiggle out of the question. Like he knows he can’t anger the women voters he knows he’ll need to be president, but also can’t anger the right-wingers whom he’ll also need. I saw no deliberate coyness about the topic from him…just deer in the headlight discomfort, not wanting to answer either way. If he was going to send coded signals to the right, he would have said something to the effect “I’ve always been pro-family, just look at my record.”.

  • Hey, give McCain a break. He can’t even remember what he’s supposed to be for or against without Joe Lieberman whispering in his ear. How’s he supposed to remember what he voted for?

  • This also explodes the CV that McCain’s experience makes him somehow better at unscripted on the fly straight talk. I’ve see pundits suggest that Obama is ducking debates and town hall meetings with McCain because there is no teleprompter. Ridiculous.

  • Loath though I am to step back into this one.

    I loved how Rachel handled this last night. She (well, Countdown’s producers) ran the whole tape of JSMcC*nt squirming away. It was priceless.

    If we had a real market for health insurance in this country women could shop around for policies that did cover birth control (and a lot more). Since instead we have a system that was an unintended consquence of WWII wage controls (employers offered to pay for health insurance because they couldn’t pay more in wages) Americans find themselves dependent on their employers to choose insurance plans to meet their needs. Unfortunately, too many women probably work for employers who don’t think women have a right to recreational sex, and oppose on ‘moral grounds’ birth control.

    I hope that women won’t vote for JSMcC*nt. But who knows.

  • Based on this post’s observation that the MSM loves sex and the prior post’s layout of McCain’s colorful marital past, the perfect question to now ask McCain is “were you ever married to two women at the same time? Like, say, early 1980 for example?”

  • The best part for me is when he goes “Crazy Eye Killer” in his thought process.

    Stop the tape at 1:31 to enjoy. This might be my new computer wallpaper.

    Mr McCain, Do you have an opinion on that?

  • 11. On July 11th, 2008 at 11:44 am, Mary said:

    Notice the use of the phrase “want a choice” used to refer to birth control. Women don’t want a choice about birth control, they want their insurance to pay for birth control because it is related to reproductive health.

    Bringing the word “choice” into the issue of contraception reinforces an equivalency between that and abortion, something anti-abortion activists have been trying to accomplish. The extension of a prohibition on abortion to a prohibition on contraception is a goal. So, this simple use of language, echoed by CB in his post, shouldn’t be overlooked. What is being “chosen” when you ask your insurance company to pay for something it doesn’t now cover? Nothing.

    I see McCain’s befuddlement as equivalent to a candidate’s floundering over the price of milk. Ask him about Viagra and he’ll be right on top of the issue. I think it is also possible that he is signaling to his conservative constituents that a God-fearing person who is married and not playing around shouldn’t know anything about contraception. Sort of like when “nice” girls pretend not to know what certain words mean.

    Notice the use of the phrase “anti-abortion activist” used to refer to people who want to let women decide for themselves when or if they want to have a child. Women don’t want a sanctimonious lecture about a particular flavor of religiousd insanity, they want insurance to pay for both birth control and male sexual perfomance enhancement drugs, or neither, because it is related to equal treatment of both sexes as regards medical reproductive health issues.

    Bringing the words “anti-abortion activist” into the issue of contraception reinforces an equivalency between that and anti-choice religiously insane prudes, something anti-choice theofascists have been trying to accomplish. The extension of a prohibition on abortion to a prohibition on contraception is a goal of the pagan occult superstitionist theofscists. So, this simple use of language, parroted by Mary Mary Quite Religiously Insane in her comments to this post, shouldn’t be overlooked. What is being “allowed” when your insurance company pays for viagra but not birth control? Nothing if you’re female.

    I see Mary’s deliberate misinterpretation of the facts as equivalent to the current sadministration’s disinformation strategery. Ask her about the non-statements in the BuyBull about this sort of thing and she’ll be lying her a$$ off. I think it is also possible that she is signaling to her fellow religiously insane conservative Putsch fellators that females who choose to engage in intercourse should be forced to become pregnant. Sort of like when William Donohue wants to press kidnapping charges on a kid for taking the Eucharist off church property and encourages his followers to make death threats to the kid, and then falls on the fainting couch when anyone points out how offensive his behavior is.

  • Even as a dyed-in-the-the-wool (European) liberal, I can figure out what the correct response from an American conservative should be to the question:

    “It’s not the job of legislators to compel private insurers to offer a particular product. In a free market, if an insurance company offers birth control within its product offering, then women who want that option will avail of it. Those who don’t want it choose another option. The market decides.”

    How difficult is that to figure out? McCain’s embarrassment isn’t based primarily on not remembering how he voted, but more on the fact that he hasn’t a clue as to what the issues, concerns and hot topic buttons are with female voters. He didn’t want to say something that would prove controversial and unpopular, but he had no instinct as to what the right thing was to say.

    He just wants to be loved.

  • I think I have deja vu

    Q: “What about grants for sex education in the United States? Should they include instructions about using contraceptives? Or should it be Bush’s policy, which is just abstinence?”
    Mr. McCain: (Long pause) “Ahhh. I think I support the president’s policy.”
    Q: “So no contraception, no counseling on contraception. Just abstinence. Do you think contraceptives help stop the spread of HIV?”
    Mr. McCain: (Long pause) “You’ve stumped me.”
    Q: “I mean, I think you’d probably agree it probably does help stop it?”
    Mr. McCain: (Laughs) “Are we on the Straight Talk express? I’m not informed enough on it. Let me find out. You know, I’m sure I’ve taken a position on it on the past. I have to find out what my position was. Brian, would you find out what my position is on contraception – I’m sure I’m opposed to government spending on it, I’m sure I support the president’s policies on it.”
    Q: “But you would agree that condoms do stop the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. Would you say: ‘No, we’re not going to distribute them,’ knowing that?”
    Mr. McCain: (Twelve-second pause) “Get me Coburn’s thing, ask Weaver to get me Coburn’s paper that he just gave me in the last couple of days. I’ve never gotten into these issues before.”

  • when I heard that John Mccain voted NO to insurance companies covering birth control for women I was definately taken aback!!! His reason? Because birth control is a personal choice “quote unquote” WOW, is he kidding? Thats just exactly what we need is another baby boom that will spike insurance costs for us all!!! If a woman is responsible enough to get birth control and actually take it to prevent yet another unwanted/unplanned pregnancy then why on earth would we not encourage her to do so buy allowing the brunt of the cost for said birth control to be included in her insurance plan that im sure she already pays plenty for? ( I know my plan isnt cheap!!) Not to mention the rising costs of groceries and gas that we are all scooping deeper into our pockets to pay for! I wonder when she is standing in line applying for food stamps if he will still be saying its a personal decision for her and her children to be a drain on the economy because she cant afford to feed them? Maybe he will just give all us women a prescription for one aspirin to hold between our knees then we wont even have to worry about getting all those COVERED viagra prescriptions filled either saving everyone money…..THERE YA GO, PROBLEM SOLVED!!!!
    And mind you these are the same insurance companies that DO cover prescriptions for VIAGRA…. yep thats right folks……a hard on is evidentally a medically nessesary, life sustaining function and is unquestionably covered by most insurance companies??? JOHN MCCAIN IS AN IDIOT AND HAS DEFINATELY LOST MY RESPECT AND MY VOTE!!!!

  • Hillary doesn’t use birth control OR viagra, which proves Obama is bad.

  • O said:
    Medicare doesn’t cover birth control either but I can get a penis pump.

    That’s swell.

  • The last time I worked a voter registration table with a sign saying “Sign our pro-choice petition” I was harrassed by several people who are against abortion. They were all men, for some reason. A few women walked quickly by the table without giving it a glance, then came back later saying “I couldn’t sign it before because I was with my husband (or mother).” That experience reinforced the power and control issues involved here.

    It is no coincidence that the strong statements above quarreling with my comments about abortion are from people posting under male names. Men hold very different opinions on this issue. That’s why it is a damned crying shame that both of our presidential candidates are once again men.

    Of course McCain is clueless. His constituents don’t care about birth control, condoms or insurance for reproductive care. They care about preventing sex in teenagers. If you’d asked him about that, he would have been all over it. But does Obama really care? When he talks about getting his knowledge about what women want from Michelle, I cringe inside. Isn’t this issue important enough for him to research and have regular opinions on — does he delegate his policies about education to his kids. No offense to Michelle, who is an intelligent and competent person, but she is not a policy analyst, not a health care expert, not even a women’s rights activist. Being a mommy may qualify you to have an opinion, but it doesn’t quality you to make policy. I want Obama to take this seriously because you can be sure the single-issue conservatives are, every man jack of them.

  • “Birth control”—for all the ninnyhammers who lack the intestinal fortitude to aggressively attack the issue, is defined by the religious whackos, thus:

    It aborts a man’s ability to control a woman’s destiny by aborting his ability to get her pregnant.

    Have you ever heard the phrase, “keep ’em barefoot and pregnant?” Have you ever noticed Old Order Amish households, where the men wear thew boots, and the women are always barefoot? Or how about the “QuiverFull” issue—where women are relegated to being little more than baby-making machines, because God is the ultimate birth control provider?

    Ri-iiight.

    Tip-toeing around the fact that we live in a patriarchal society doesn’t change that society; it merely caters to the knuckledraggers. To fight this particular fire, you need a bigger fire.

    If a judge can issue a permit to a group of activists to picket a women’s health center, then that same judge can issue a permit to another group of activists to picket a church—on a Sunday morning, during their worship services, or during a weekly church-school schedule, or a weekend potluck, or a Friday evening fish-dry or spaghetti dinner—or a wedding, or a funeral, or a baptism, or a seasonal program. The churches don’t own the city sidewalks, and a judge who takes sides on the issue by denying the second group their right to gather in protest does so at his or her own peril.

    So quit your whining and boo-hooing about “how you don’t understand this-or-that.” It’s a cop-out. If you don’t like the way that the Religious Right is “pushing the envelope,” then the only solution is to “take their envelope away from them, throw it on the ground, and crush it beneath the heel of your shoe.” Start playing offense on this thing—and go on the attack….

  • Comments are closed.