Dobson reconsiders the ‘circumstances,’ warms up to McCain

In January, Focus on the Family’s James Dobson ruled out voting for John McCain, if he won the Republican nomination. “Speaking as a private individual, I would not vote for John McCain under any circumstances,” Dobson said in a statement. In February, just as McCain was wrapping up the GOP nod, Dobson reiterated that McCain was unacceptable.

As recently as April, Dobson told the WSJ, “I have seen no evidence that Sen. McCain is successfully unifying the Republican Party or drawing conservatives into his fold. To the contrary, he seems intent on driving them away.” Dobson added that McCain has “written off” social conservatives.

And yet, Dobson has suddenly discovered that his hatred of McCain is not as intense as his hatred of Barack Obama.

Conservative Christian leader James Dobson has softened his stance against Republican presidential hopeful John McCain, saying he could reverse his position and endorse the Arizona senator despite serious misgivings.

“I never thought I would hear myself saying this,” Dobson said in a radio broadcast to air Monday. “… While I am not endorsing Senator John McCain, the possibility is there that I might.” … In an advance copy provided to The Associated Press, Dobson said that while neither candidate is consistent with his views, McCain’s positions are closer by a wide margin.

“There’s nothing dishonorable in a person rethinking his or her positions, especially in a constantly changing political context,” Dobson said in a statement to the AP. “Barack Obama contradicts and threatens everything I believe about the institution of the family and what is best for the nation. His radical positions on life, marriage and national security force me to reevaluate the candidacy of our only other choice, John McCain.”

Dobson recognizes that he’s done a 180-degree turn here, and told the AP, “If that is a flip-flop, then so be it.”

Now, it’s tempting to just dismiss this as yet another unprincipled religious-right leader, doing what these clowns always do — shill for the Republican Party.

But I have to admit, Dobson’s reversal actually surprises me. In fact, from a political perspective, Dobson isn’t doing himself any favors here.

As a matter of course, we see ideological heavyweights, from both sides of the aisle, denounce a presidential candidate in the primaries, only to see everyone close ranks once there’s an official nominee. Grudges are put aside for the sake of political expediency — partisans invariably hate the other party’s candidate more than their own.

But as a rule, that’s now how Dobson has operated.

In general, there are two types of religious right leaders: partisans and ideologues. Dobson, who’s far more interested in issues than party, is definitely part of the latter.

TV preachers like Pat Robertson are just as extreme in their beliefs as Dobson, but at their core, they’re just Republicans who think it’s fun to get invited to sit at the big kids’ table. Robertson has always gone out of his way to help Republican candidates, even those he disagrees with on important issues, to help advance the party’s broader agenda. In the Christian Coalition’s infamous voter guides, for example, Robertson would promote GOP moderates by skipping over issues that might anger the religious right’s rank and file. It’s always been more important to Robertson to elect Republicans than it was to achieve ideological purity.

Dobson’s different, or at least, he was. In 1996, for example, the Bob Dole/Jack Kemp ticket wasn’t doing much to electrify the far-right GOP base. Robertson was touting the ticket on his 700 Club program and Ralph Reed was hobnobbing on the floor at the Republican National Convention. What about Dobson? He not only steered clear of Dole/Kemp, he publicly announced that he didn’t even vote for the Republican ticket, opting instead for the radical Constitution Party.

Robertson sees his GOP allies as his buddies at the country club who invite him to cool parties; Dobson sees his GOP allies as a means to a right-wing end. Robertson wants a seat at the table; Dobson wants to own the table and will let Republicans sit at it if it suits his interests.

Given this, Dobson is acting out of character here. He hates McCain, and always has. In 2000, Dobson even went after McCain’s history of adultery, publicly accusing McCain of having a moral character “reminiscent” of Bill Clinton’s — possibly the ultimate insult in conservative circles.

And yet, here we are, just 106 days until the election, and Dobson is not only giving up on his commitment, he’s doing so for nothing. In fact, Dobson is proving himself to be a surprisingly cheap date — McCain can ignore Dobson, Dobson’s issues, and Dobson’s movement, but when push comes to shove, even after Dobson vowed never to support McCain “under any circumstances,” Dobson is still prepared to hold his nose and support the Republican nominee.

For the religious right, this should be a fairly depressing development, and a sign that the movement’s influence is seriously on the wane. In this election cycle, the religious right has been completely irrelevant, and the movement hasn’t been able to call any of the shots. They couldn’t stop the candidate they hate from getting the nomination, and without him so much as lifting a finger, they rallied behind him anyway.

Dobson maintains clout based on fear — it’s his supporters who provide the GOP with foot-soldiers. If Dobson is prepared to back McCain now, without McCain doing anything to earn his support, the fear factor is gone, and the religious right movement starts to look like a paper tiger.

Who cares who Dobson endorses? Anyone listening to this (what is his credential again?) isn’t going to be swayed into voting for Obama no matter what.

  • All these guys are hearing the old guy in “Blazing Saddles,” running into town yelling “the sheriff is a nii-iii-gggg….!!!!!!!”

    Someone is suprised that the fascist scum are circling the wagons? If Obama wins they get to slide back under the rocks for the rest of their worthless lives.

  • Why do religious wacko leaders even get face time- what is this country’s infatuation with TV evangelists vetting candidates? Especially a-holes like Dobson, Hagee and Palfrey…

  • Given this, Dobson is acting out of character here. He hates McCain, and always has. In 2000, Dobson even went after McCain’s history of adultery, publicly accusing McCain of having a moral character “reminiscent” of Bill Clinton’s — possibly the ultimate insult in conservative circles.

    Would love to see video of that…

  • Democrats should worry. This move could mobilize the evangelicals which is a great organizing machine. Especially since Obama isn’t doing too hot.

  • I’m sure Halperin will find a significant win for McSame in this. But it really creates an even tighter bind. When Dobson says there’s a possibility he might endorse McCain, what he’s really doing is telling McCain to dance. If he’s adequately entertained, he’ll throw him a bone. If not, McCain is toast with the religious fringe, and his shot at winning is all but dead.
    But if McCain dances to Dobson’s whim, his ‘Straight Talk Maverick’ brand will be reduced to such rubble that even his MSM won’t be able conceal it.
    Like I said, I’m sure Halperin will see this a major victory for McSame this week.

  • I think at this point its like being endorsed by a brontosaurus.

    He’s certainly influencial to some, but that is a movement in decline, not on the rise or at the peak of its power. This election really is about change, and alot of people are sick of the toxic christian right. Dobson will appeal to his sheep, but even that crowd is beginning to show cracks.

    Odd though, isn’t it? Dobson’s craven and meaningless endorsement of McCain gets headline treatment while Maliki’s “endorsement” of Obama’s Iraq strategy gets somewhat less fanfare.

  • CB, I think this Dobson quote,

    “There’s nothing dishonorable in a person rethinking his or her positions, especially in a constantly changing political context,” Dobson said in a statement to the AP,

    should read,

    As John McCain has shown us, there’s nothing dishonorable in a person rethinking his or her positions, especially in a constantly changing political context,” Dobson said in a statement to the AP.

  • joew, they’re both dancing:

    “dance for me & MAYBE I’ll endorse you.”

    “Publicly declare that MAYBE you’ll endorse me, and MAYBE I’ll dance for you.”

    “OK, you hang up first.”

    “No, YOU hang up first.”

    And so it goes, hakuna mutata, whatever & ever, amen.

  • What’s worse than endorsing McCain for Dobson? Sitting at home by the phone when no one is calling and nobody cares.

  • …Dobson is acting out of character here. He hates McCain, and always has. In 2000, Dobson even went after McCain’s history of adultery, publicly accusing McCain of having a moral character “reminiscent” of Bill Clinton’s — possibly the ultimate insult in conservative circles.

    And yet, here we are, just 106 days until the election, and Dobson is not only giving up on his commitment, he’s doing so for nothing. In fact, Dobson is proving himself to be a surprisingly cheap date — McCain can ignore Dobson, Dobson’s issues, and Dobson’s movement, but when push comes to shove, even after Dobson vowed never to support McCain “under any circumstances,” Dobson is still prepared to hold his nose and support the Republican nominee.

    Now that ought to be something for to “swift-boat” The Terrible-Tempered Mr. Bang of Indecision 2008 with, and then some–especially considering his trying to win support from obvious pseudoreligious whose core audience consists mostly of the socioeconomically marginalised and vulnerable.

    Otherwise known as poor, undereducated or homeschooled and easily-influenced “white trash” with few or no realistic socioeconomic prospects in the changing socioeconomic paradigm beyond a declining labour-intensive Ludditery heavy with “patriotic” hubris.

  • Yes, good post. Dobson conceding his own powerlessness and getting behind McCain now–not a move he had to make since McCain is almost certain to lose–means Dobson has traded away any hope of calling shots in future elections, and for zero return in this one.

    Most interesting will be the response from other evangelicals on this–some, at least, are likely to challenge him on this concession as a way of establishing themselves as standard bearers for the sectors of the religious right who believe that preserving their own bargaining chips for future elections is more important than coalescing behind McCain now. If they let themselves be made irrelevant in this election, they will never again be a force in the GOP–and they know it.

  • To be a leader requires one thing and one thing only: followers. James Dobson is about to learn how many followers he really has. My guess is that the institutional religious right will continue to rally around McCain, but that the rank and file will either sit this one out, or reluctantly vote McCain. Some may even vote for Obama based on economic issues or social issues not called “abortion” or “gay rights.” I’m pretty certain that the religious right rank and file will NOT fire up the GOP GOTV operation as they have for George Bush in 2000 or 2004.

    The religious right leadership is about to learn the virtue of humility. Their house of cards is about to collapse. Hopefully, they will learn their lesson and keep issues of personal morality out of the political arena.

  • Maria touches on what struck me whan I read this one: as a purely political matter, Dobson is making a foolish move. He is betting his movement’s credibility on McCain winning. If Dobson endorses now and McCain wins, he will of course take credit. But if he ultimately does endorse and McCain still loses, Dobson looks (a) like a sell-out and (b) like he was impotent to impact the election.

    Given that the odds still appear to favor an Obama victory, Dobson’s sitting out (while it apparently was gnawing away at his ego) was actually smart for the movement. When McCain lost without the movement’s help, after the movement had been credited with Bush’s wins, Dobson could claim (whether it was true or not) that the movement made the difference and in the future Republican candidates had better learn to dance with the devil Dobsonites.

  • I had all my money on Dobson sitting out a McLame nomination. Maria & zeitgeist sum up my surprise that he would back a clear loser this late in the race. I guess he’s not as smart as I thought he was (sic)

  • Dobson is proving himself to be a surprisingly cheap date

    WTF? Dobson’s proving himself to be the high-priced whore who offers to pay the “client” for a roll in the hay. Talk about a desperate, depraved individual—and his candidate even has the right name for it.

    John….

  • What an opportunity for Obama — and for the rest of us who wish that Dobson would stfu! Dobson has made such a career about being against things that nobody ever looks at what he is in favor of. Everybody who attacks him goes after his homophobia, etc. Now is the time to challenge McCain on what Dobson supports, including Bible-based baby beating — see my
    http://saltosobrius.blogspot.com/2006/10/jim-benton-on-bible-based-baby-beating.html for details — submissive wives, paternalism, etc. (And, of course, there is still Tony Perkins’ support of “Phineas priests” out there to be used against both of them.)

    The fact is that someone could spend a day on the FotF and FRC sites and get enough quotes to make McCain reject the support of yet another ‘crazy preacher.’

  • In 2000, Dobson even went after McCain’s history of adultery, publicly accusing McCain of having a moral character “reminiscent” of Bill Clinton’s — possibly the ultimate insult in conservative circles.

    Please, CB, post links to this so peopl can use it to demoralize the RR!

  • “…“There’s nothing dishonorable in a person rethinking his or her positions,…”

    Yes, there is Dobson. When the person doing it is totally dishonorable to begin with.

    Dobson will find he speaks for fewer and fewer people as time goes on and his power tantrums reveal a small threat from a small man.

  • CB, I think this Dobson quote,

    “There’s nothing dishonorable in a person rethinking his or her positions, especially in a constantly changing political context,” Dobson said in a statement to the AP should be used every time someone accuses Obama of flip-flopping on any issue. Is this not relevant to ALL political speech? How does one distance oneself from this statement?

    I am committed to Oneness through Justice and Transformation
    peace,
    st john

  • I located the complete Dobson quote on McCain from 2000:

    “The senator [John McCain] is being touted by the media as a man of principle, yet he was involved with other women while married to his first wife and was implicated in the so-called Keating scandal with four other senators. The senator reportedly has a violent temper and can be extremely confrontational and profane when angry. These red flags about Senator McCain’s character are reminiscent of the man [Bill Clinton] who now occupies the White House”

    http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0002/18/cf.00.html

    Print that out and post it everywhere “conservatives” hang out. I’m thinking of handing some out at the local Baptist churches.

  • There’s interesting contrast between Dobson’s come-kneel-for-my-blessing-and-i-will-tell-my-flock-about-you brand of politics and the new model of leaders giving candidates a forum in which to talk directly to the people in the pews:

  • Dobson, conniving little maggot that he is, sees his relevance quickly evaporating, and is hoping that McCain will somehow pull out a victory, so that he and his cult of thickwitted fanatics can claim credit for it in the name of ‘family values’ or some such nonsense. But what do you expect from a douchebag who wrote a an entire book about how to beat your kids?

  • Democrats should worry. This move could mobilize the evangelicals blah, blah, blah…

    Thanks for your concern, troll.

  • You’re not reading this closely enough, Steve. Dobson is not committing himself to anything. This _is_ an ideologically oriented move.

    Dobson is angling for McCain to pick a Christianist VP (cough Huckabee cough), or to get lots of agents of intolerance into his cabinet. If Huckabee is VP, doesn’t Dobson win the game, especially if McCain keels over sooner rather than later?

    On the other hand, if Obama is in the White House, will there ever be a Christianist president? Not likely. After Obama, the US will be free from the 50-year stranglehold of conservative governance. Further, Obama is giving young evangelicals a seat at the table, and they aren’t as doctrinaire as their ossified parents. Christianism won’t last in its current virulent form, and Dobson will be long dead of old age before the fringe right again has a chance to take the White House.

    Dobson can see the writing on the wall. If he doesn’t manage to gain leverage over McCain, he’s lost the big prize — forever.

  • Oh, and it’s probably a loss for Dobson in any case: McCain is simply too old to successfully run against Obama. But it’s Dobson’s _only_ chance.

  • Shaz said: “Dobson is angling for McCain to pick a Christianist VP (cough Huckabee cough), or to get lots of agents of intolerance into his cabinet. If Huckabee is VP, doesn’t Dobson win the game, especially if McCain keels over sooner rather than later?”

    Maybe all the talk going around about Mitt Romney the Mormon (read, not really a Christian in Dobson’s opinion) getting on the ticket is inspiring a late conversion. That’d be cool. I think Huckabee is better than Romney but the Club for Growth/Greed doesn’t. JSMcC*nt’s money will dry up and his volunteers might not jump enough to make up the difference.

  • I don’t think there’s any chance for Romney to be the VP candidate. Recently, some reporter asked McCain the hardball question of who would play him in a movie (he said Tim Conway.) When asked who would play Romney, he said “any TV weatherman.”

    Ow.

  • Dr. Dobson has called abortion “murder” (Jan. 20, 2003 press release). He has said he would never vote for any politician who supports the killing of even one baby. John McCain is for exceptions, believing it’s OK, it should remain “legal,” to murder babies in the womb that are there because of rape/incest. Thus, there is no way Dr. Dobson can support/vote for McCain without shredding his own credibility and leaving himself open to the charge that he is a double-minded man (James 1:8) which, alas, he will be if he endorses McCain.

    John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com

    Recovering Republican

    JLof@aol.com

    “Accursed is that peace of which revolt from God is the bond, and blessed are those contentions by which it is necessary to maintain the kingdom of Christ.” — John Calvin.

  • Shaz looks like you called it as I see it. We are about to go through a shift in American politics unrivalled since FDR took office. Reagan had a minor revolution but had to deal with a Democratic controlled congress. So he had to make some major compromises. And look how he shifted the landscape for 25 years. 1980-2005.

    Barack will have a friendly Dem congress, gaining Dem ground everyday (with all the GOP retirements that are sure to come). And a huge mandate to do whatever he proposes. I would say a 50 year liberal ascendency is calling it about right.

  • Well, folks, McCain did throw Dobson a bone with the amusing video where he refused to answer the question about birth control parity. Dobson just signaled that maybe he would play if given a little more room at the table. I think Huckabee as VP would do it.

  • Comments are closed.