McCain touts Dems’ praise, but also gives Dems an opening

In recent weeks, the McCain campaign has unveiled a series of web videos that are created for the sole purpose of generating news. These videos aren’t “ads,” in any traditional sense, and won’t even be considered for television broadcast. They are, in effect, video press releases with provocative messages, made to generate media attention and a sense of “buzz.”

And, invariably, it works. The more outrageous the web video, the more the news networks will run it, repeat it, and talk about it. The videos about “The One” and reporters’ alleged affection for Barack Obama were, as planned, everywhere.

That said, the latest effort, unveiled yesterday, may have been a miscalculation.

When John McCain railed against the Bush administration or bucked his party on campaign finance reform, he was his Democratic colleagues’ favorite Republican.

But their praise is coming back to haunt them.

On Thursday, McCain’s campaign released a one-minute Web ad seeking to burnish his maverick image — with testimonials from prominent Democrats.

You’ll notice that a few of these Democratic leaders look a few years younger than they do today.

My first thought was, “Let this be a lesson to all of us — if you say something nice about a Republican, the Republican will use it against you later.”

But as it turns out, the DNC’s response was both fast and pitch-perfect.

It’s called, “Maverick No More,” and it features the exact same Democrats who appeared in McCain’s clip.

If you can’t watch clips online, Seth Colter Walls has the transcript.

The point’s pretty obvious — excluding the attack Hillary Clinton made during the presidential primaries, Dems used to appreciate McCain’s willingness to cooperate and occasional independent streak. Indeed, before his metamorphosis, McCain had probably earned some of this praise from his Democratic colleagues.

But that’s precisely the point: McCain changed. The people who used to respect him don’t anymore. Those who’ve worked with him in the Senate have seen, up close, the transition from independent thinker to Republican hack.

Indeed, thanks to the McCain campaign’s new web video, we could — if the media has any interest at all — have a debate about the Old McCain vs. the New McCain, exploring the ways in which the previous incarnation would find the revised model offensive.

As Howard Dean says in the DNC’s response, “You know, the John McCain of 2000 wouldn’t vote for this John McCain.”

This probably isn’t the kind of response the McCain gang wanted from its video. Good.

Thanks, Hillary. Thanks a lot.

  • The destructive nature of Hillary’s primary campaign will no doubt become more and more apparent as the general election wears on. With pundits are so fixated on why Obama isn’t farther ahead in the polls, they need not look beyond Mrs. Clinton, her acolytes, and her husband for the answer.

    The Clintons have been, on balance, harmful to the Democratic Party and progressive causes. I understand why Obama is being gracious and deferential towards them but, for my part, I’d like to see them both relegated to a well-deserved oblivion.

  • I don’t get it. This ad seems risky for McCain. Doesn’t running an ad with prominent Dems risk praising him risk hurting McCain among his right-wing base? Doesn’t it make it appear that he takes pride in their kind words? If they like(d) him doesn’t that mean that McCain is an untrustworthy RINO?

  • Once again Hillary I want to thank your husband for de-regulating the banking industry and causing the mortgage crisis and assorted banking fiascos. Also for de-regulating the MSM so Americans never get the truth about the problems we face because the entire industry is now controlled by Republicans. And you claim to be a Democrat? Maybe it is because you are too sleazy to even be a Republican.

  • Actally, i think Hillary can now unequivocally repudiate her Obama comments with the “Old McCain vs. New McCain” line. For example.

    “the McCain I was talking about is not the McCain that is running for President and now I see what McCain’s republican collegaues disliked. People such as Thad Cochran, who served along side McCain in teh Senate. I suspect that what Cochran saw in the private republican caususes is what we are all seeing now. It is not a pretty sight”

    Done and done.

  • I’m with Zoe (#3). This certainly won’t help solidify McCain’s credentials with the Republican base.

    But then, maybe it’s aimed at his base. You know, the Media.

  • Please give it a rest on Hillary. She’s currently out campaigning for Obama as he takes a week’s vacation, and both she and her husband are supporting his candidacy. McCain is the winner if we focus on rehashing the primaries.

    I think playing up imaginary Hillary-Barack differences is the new concern trollery.

  • JimBOB, in this particular instance, it is not concern trolling, it is neutering something that many people saw as problematic when it happened and now there is a chance.

    This would be like taking a pawn in a chess game: not game determinative, but generally better than losing one as it usually strengthens your position. (bear in mind that there are moments where better strategy dictates sacrificing a piece, but that is a move from a subtle and deliberate adversary. Right now, the Travelling McCains are anything but subtle.)

    eric

  • Just as with each new release from the McCain campaign, it’s hard to fathom how this ad could garner more votes than it will lose by inspiring Republicans to stay home. The base 23% spend incessant time and energy hating and despising each of the politicians shown praising McCain. I see an “endorsement” of McCain by Howard Dean as something that might get one Democrat to think about voting for McCain while nine Republicans become more disgusted with McCain.

    But evidently it is difficult to generate advertising for McCain’s tired rhetoric, lack of substance and incessant reframing of his Obama’s views and policy. As for the “maverick”, sorry, the maverick is busy licking the boots of the big oil companies and getting strategy lessons from the people who trashed him in 2000. In other words, behold the magnificent Maverick Sellout Sale on display now.

  • I’m with jimBOB. We gotta let it go about what Hillary did in the primaries. It will do us no good to go over it again, and it will piss off the hard-core Hillary folks who now (ironically) refuse to listen to Hillary and work against McCain. They were really just anti-Obama more than they were pro-Hillary, IMO, but we may need their votes nonetheless.

    And what zoe said is true too. This ad will be very useful in pissing off the right wing morons who have been deluded into thinking that McCain might just be like they are (when he’s really just a shameless flipflopper). They already have trust issues with McCain, and this ad will make them think he’s going back to his old Liberal-Hugging ways. Everyone knows that the Liberals are the biggest threat to the USA that there ever was, so this is like an ad where McCain is being endorsed by Joseph Stalin and Ho Chi Minh.

  • This ad will be very useful in pissing off the right wing morons who have been deluded into thinking that McCain might just be like they are

    I will admit that this does set two major goals of the right wing movement at odds with each other. However, given the makeup of most right-wingers these days, I’m fairly positive that McCain is correct in this gamble and the goal of “do whatever it takes to win” edges out the goal of “do whatever it takes to piss off liberals” just ever so slightly.

    In the end, I don’t think McCain really has to worry much about his base. He needs to cost Obama votes among the squishy middle. If Obama can win with just Democrats, McCain is screwed this election cycle anyway. He has to play the odds that Obama needs a majority of Independents as well as Dems to take the prize. And that means playing the odds that his base hates to lose more than they hate having a candidate get some praise from the other side of the aisle.

  • JIMBOB I hope you are right that Hillary is OK and is backing Obama but I have a suspicion that between now and the convention, big money is going to see Mcsame as not viable and push Hillary back into the race.

  • Lousy Actor/Fictional Character Tobias Funke generated more buzz at Tatamount Studios than the McCain Mutiny.

  • “The more outrageous the web video, the more the news networks will run it, repeat it, and talk about it. The videos about “The One” and reporters’ alleged affection for Barack Obama were, as planned, everywhere.”

    Much as I don’t favor over-regulation of every facet of our lives, I miss the Fairness Doctrine.

  • How much is that maverick in the window? -Racer X

    A cool $2 mil will net you maverick lovin’.

  • I needed a good laugh yesterday, so I went to RedState to see what sort of bizarro news they were covering, and they had a post on this video of McCain’s which they insisted was utterly brilliant and would surely destroy Obama. No, I didn’t really get it either. Particularly odd is that RedState HATES Democrats and thinks we’re all diseased traitors, yet they were so pleased with themselves that they could have a video of Dems having once praised McCain. These people truly are clueless.

    And I don’t know if it was a fluke, but I did notice that their comments section seem pretty empty on every post, as compared with previous times I’ve been there. Enthusiasm gap, anyone?

  • I wish this whole thing was over.. The McCain Hillary quote reminded me again of politics in its least enviable form. The McSame campaign had best implode for the sake of the country. I don’t know if it’s spot on for the democrats to respond in like manner or not. It’s seems that Senator InSane already lampooned himself with the first one. I wish I could hibernate for 3 months till all this insipid ugliness has passed. Enthusiasm gap indeed.

  • What is strange is that the McCain campaign didn’t learn the lesson that if you use real live people, you give them a voice and an opportunity to respond. Look at the Paris Hilton response. That should have been a warning not to pull other people into the arugument, but they didn’t learn

    Is this how the McCain administration would govern? By not learning from their previous mistakes? By being arrogant? It reminds me of another administration…

    John McCain: just the same old Bush.

  • IS Hillary not just supporting Obama, but attacking McCain? (Maybe she is, it is an honest question.) And again, is she telling the PUMAs that they should NOT use her name against Obama. Those — and an apology for the ‘just a speech — ready on Day One’ comments are all I am waiting for to forgive her (and to stop worrying about what she might be up to.) Please tell me she is, and give quotes.

  • John McCain: just the same old Bush.

    It’s the mantle of power passed from W to McCain, the power to create reality, the power to swirl brains into a soup of confusion, and of course, the power to use anyone to your ends especially if they are attractive, blond, and female. Paris Hilton is McCain’s starter Valerie Plame as he practices up to assume the role of Destroyer in Chief.

    And how’s the rest of that song go? “how much is that maverick in the window, the one with oil wagging his tail…”

  • SteveA said: “JIMBOB I hope you are right that Hillary is OK and is backing Obama but I have a suspicion that between now and the convention, big money is going to see Mcsame as not viable and push Hillary back into the race.”

    How, by paying back her $11 MIL debt?

    Hillary is running to be the Vice President nominee, nothing more. Boy you people are suspicious.

    This JSMcC*nt’s ad isn’t effectively shooting himself in the foot it just goes to prove that all Republican’ts are hypocrits, hating liberals and Democrats only rhetorically to win over their wingnut base.

  • I guess this gives the Obama campaign an excuse to start using the very effective ad again from the Illinois state legislator who praised Obama effusively. I mean, now that McCain is using this ad …

  • The only way this will be truly effective is if the MSM shows the snippets — featuring the same person — side by side. Kerry from McCain’s ad, immediately followed by Kerry Now, etc If they show (entire) McCain’s ad today and DNC (entire) response tomorrow, the effect is diluted in peoples’ imperfect memory.

  • Comments are closed.