There’s gold in that there Darwinism: How business might finally crush creationism

Guest Post by Morbo

I’m fascinated over how the two wings of the Republican Party — business-oriented, free market conservatives vs. fundamentalist Christian social conservatives — continue to exist alongside one another.

On some issues, they just don’t get along. Fundamentalists are appalled by pornography and want the Justice Department to shut it down. Free-market conservatives look at the porn industry and see $10 billion a year (at least) being pumped into the U.S. economy.

In these cases, business tends to come out on top. After all, they have the money. Thus, the Justice Department prosecutes a few porn producers every year who are putting out stuff that pushes the envelope and looks the other way at more conventional porn.

Now there’s evidence that the GOP’s two wings may be headed for another big dust-up, this one over an unlikely subject: evolution.

Writer Michael Ennis lays it out in the April issue of Texas Monthly. Ennis points out that bio-technology is rapidly becoming a very lucrative field. Those who understand modern biology will reap the benefits. Those who think the planet is 6,000 years old and that dinosaurs and humans lived at the same time will be left behind working at Wal-Mart and watching “The Flintstones.”

Ennis points out that states like California, New Jersey, North Carolina, Wisconsin and others are itching to enter the “biotech ‘gold rush.'” One thing they’re offering employers is an educated workforce that understands modern science.

The Lone Star State wants a slice of that — but there’s a problem.

“Texans don’t know much biology,” Ennis writes. “Our students test below national averages in science achievement, our science curriculum isn’t competitive, and we have a shortage of science teachers….[T]he real problem isn’t that Texas’s science teachers can’t teach, it’s that Texas’s teachers can’t adequately teach evolution, thanks to our long legacy of Darwin-bashing.” (Unfortunately, you can’t read the article at Texas Monthly’s site unless you’re a subscriber.)

Most Texas public schools don’t teach creationism outright, but they fail to emphasize evolution or teach it in such a half-hearted way that the treatment is useless. Evolution is the unifying principle of the biological sciences. It should underpin biology instruction and be a constant companion as students study high-school biology. Instead, it is relegated to a single unit or an afternoon of study — if that.

Texas has a long tradition of encouraging fundamentalist interlopers who create all manner of havoc over textbooks. For years, the late Mel Gabler and his wife Norma ran an outfit from their kitchen table that struck fear into the heart of state legislators. The Gablers didn’t believe in evolution and managed to make their ignorance the standard for the entire state; they dumbed down the science curriculum for years.

But as Ennis explains, modern science progresses no matter what biblical literalists think. I’ve always found it supremely ironic that the same fundamentalist who denies evolution benefits from advances in modern medicine brought to you by researchers who understand its reality. Science marches on, and other states know this. California is only too happy to pick up the bio-tech business Texas can’t get.

Ennis understands this. Thus, he calls attacks on Darwinism “a childish indulgence that can only discourage bio-tech venture capital already skittish about doing business in Texas.”

The separation of church and state is a great legal weapon to use against biblical literalists who seek to get their theology taught in public schools. It’s a less effective public-relations argument, as most people’s eyes glaze over when you mention the “Establishment Clause.” We can only hope their eyes won’t glaze over when you tell them that a substandard science education is going to cause their children to miss out on the high-paying, exciting jobs that are just around the bend.

A certain percentage of the population can remain scientifically illiterate without lasting damage to the larger culture. It probably does not matter whether the guy who paints your house believes in evolution or not. But at a certain point, if the problem becomes widespread or systemic, the culture does take a hit and so does the economy. Many businesspeople understand this.

By the way, if you’re interested in this subject — and you need to be — visit the friendly folks at the National Center for Science Education, who track this issue full time. They are outmanned and out financed by the fundamentalists, but still do great work. Drop in on them and send them a few bucks if you can spare it. They’ll put it to good use.

I’ve always found it supremely ironic that the same fundamentalist who denies evolution benefits from advances in modern medicine brought to you by researchers who understand its reality

Considering the pharmacists who refuse to fill prescriptions based on their religious fervor, I wonder if this might someday soon result in a pharmacist refusing a prescription for a bio-tech drug because it encourages belief in evolution.

  • The NCSE does great work no doubt. Ignorance and superstition is almost always an easierr sell than truth, and being HQ’d in CO Springs is a bold move. On the downside it irritates me immensely that their textbooks contribute to the MTV-ification of schoolbooks in America. It’s a major pet peeve of mine that textbook makers have caught themselves in this inane arms race over who can stuff the most glossy color, sidebar digressions and other distracting doodads into a single text. It’s gotten to the point where it’s almost impossible to read a string of paragraphs without having one’s attention drawn of by one gimmick or another. Sadly the draft NCSE texts that I saw when I visited in ’98 were easily as bad as I’ve seen.

    Textbook makers probably claim that they’re just reacting to the short attention spans of the Internet Generation (and of course the MTV generation before that). Piddle. They’re as responsible as anybody. A great textbook can have two colors and scarce few llustrations as long as it’s well and clearly written.

  • Thanks for the post, Morbo!

    Tim F. is mistaking the NCSE for some other organiztion, I think. The National Center for Science Education
    1. does not produce any textbooks
    2. is based in Oakland, California and not Colorado Springs.

    Also: more anti-creationism blogging is available at the Pandas Thumb (www.pandasthumb.org).

  • Thanks Tom for your correction to Tim F. re NCSE. You beat me to it.

    I have supported NCSE for several years and think they do a great job given the limited resources they have. Eugenie Scott of NCSE was on Hardball this past week. This is the first time I have seen her on national TV. Too bad this organization is not given more exposure because I think they are doing important work in countering the creationists and intelligent design people.

    Thanks Morbo for the post. I have always known that science would win out in the end. It always does, sooner or later. Just wasn’t sure how.

  • Thank you for correcting me. I was sure that it was NCSE, but those being my college years it’s entirely possible that my memory is not 100% reliable. Now I wonder who it was that I did visit.

  • Gotta say, I’ve always found it exceedingly odd that these guys can worship at the altar of a (simplistically) Darwninian survival-of-the-fittest philosophy when it comes to economics and social welfare, but reject the idea of evolution. Goes beyond mere irony into some twilight realm only accessible to the right wing mind. If any. Speaking of which, it seemed strangely appropriate to watch these same know-nothing Kulture of Lifers over-identify, to the point of some kind of mass psychosis, with a person utterly lacking a cerebral cortex. Clutching her desperately to their bosom and elevating her to iconic status, as if her state represented some kind of subconscious ideal. Weird.

  • If I was a vengeful person, I’d wish that things in Texas stay exactly as they are. The rest of the country, except those parts where similar attitudes exist, can do the heavy lifting science-wise and reap the benefits therefrom.

    So that the Children of the Uber-Faithful did wax thin, and their lamentations were heard across the land. And they shall live in the houses of their parents unto the end of days, and the parents will despair of ever being rid of them.

    Nah, I wouldn’t wish that on those poor suffering parents whose offspring will never be able to support them in their old age, not on the salary of a Wal-Mart associate.

    Not more than five or six times a day, anyhow.

  • The textbook producers in Colorado Springs would be Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS). They date back to the post-Sputnik push to bring science curricula into the modern age. Evolution coverage in schools was an issue then, too. The BSCS texts were controversial for their unabashed approach of telling students the way things were: evolution is the unifying principle of biology. Evolutionary concepts ran throughout the text, and were not relegated to a lonely, oft-ignored chapter late in the volume.

    Besides NCSE (disclaimer: they write my paychecks), some other resources of note on the pro-science side of the issue are

    The TalkOrigins Archive, featuring rebuttals for pretty much every antievolution argument in existence.
    TalkDesign.org, a sister site of the TalkOrigins Archive specializing in materials critical of “intelligent design”.
    The Panda’s Thumb, a group weblog discussing evolutionary biology news and critiques of “intelligent design” and other anti-science claims.
    Antievolution.org, the critic’s resource on antievolution topics, featuring the McLean v. Arkansas Documentation Project and a summary of the interaction of antievolution and the law.
    Understanding Evolution, a joint UC Berkeley UCMP/NCSE web site putting evolutionary biology concepts into plain talk.

  • Thank you again Wesley. It was refreshing to meet the BSCS folks but I’m concerned about their philosophy re textbook layout.

    Don’t forget to mention The Loom. Carl Zimmer writes for a mainstream audience but he’s definitely a frontline warrior for scientific thought.

  • Relationship of business to Christian conservatives?

    There’s a pretty tight alliance between the fundies and the business community. The latest Harper’s has the story — stories. It’s really worth laying out a couple of bucks for the May issue. Seriously. If you can’t, I’ve just posted some excerpts at my site — Harper’s doesn’t allow access to their articles online in a timely fashion!…

  • Deep in the heart of Texas, if one can fill a pick-up truck with gas and then drive it away, that person may then be considered evolved enough to make it through the world. The more gas consumed confers a more elevated position of blessedness within the greater community. I am a Texan, born and raised, but realized that achieving a level of scientific awareness beyond that of filling the pick-up with gas, I would have to go elsewhere, so I left. I don’t know how Jim Hightower and Molly Ivins remain other than that they have plenty of material to study on the social pathology of arrested development which afflicts so many of the states population. (See POTUS #43 and #41).

    Fine post Morbo, Thanks.

  • Jay – they stay for the same reason Carl Hiaasen would never think of leaving Miami. For a writer specializing in human dysfunction the stories practically write themselves.

  • Tim F., (LOL), of course, how silly of me. When James Michener, (sp?), after all his world travels, decided to wind down his final years in Austin, he said it was because Texas “was where the stories were”. True enough but it’s disheartening to hear how many of the stories start from a base of murder, mayhem, abuse and general knuckleheadedness. Intelligent Design….well, sort of. Fill ‘er up.

  • Sorry, but I have to take on that Texas stuff. I’m an elitist, Ivy, northeastern liberal who lived mostly in Europe and, ohmigod, the best place I’ve found to live in the US so far is Texas. Yes sir, right in the middle. In a rural area. Lots of intelligent, interesting people here. Mavericks, intellectuals, but above all a huge sense of humor which I find irresistible and not to be found elsewhere. Stereotyping will let you down every time!

    Not just Jim and Molly, but Bill Moyers and Kinky Friedman and one of the best Dems in Congress, Lloyd Doggett. At least half of the most interesting actors we have (movies and B’way) are Texans. There are some appalling Texans and of course you won’t find appalling people in Maryland or Oregon or Maine. Or maybe… Oh, and we complain plenty about what gas costs, even at HEB discount. You should see the Scions and Priuses in the parking lots now…

  • Great post Morbo. You get to a very important fact about the rise of fundamentalism we’re witnessing: that it is ushering-in a new age of unenlightenment. Dogma rules the day and free exchange of ideas, dialectic and challenging assumptions are frowned upon. Not only is it acceptable to refuse to think, it earns you a merit badge as a devout right-winger. Even Tom Friedman is saying in his latest book that the Chinese and Indians are beginning to out-compete us in innovation and creativity.

    This is also connected to the current fillibuster battle. Why is retaining the fillibuster so important? Because Republican fealty is preventing open debate on some pretty poor choices for the judiciary. Instead of questioning the fitness of a judicial appointment on behalf of their constituents, the Repubs don’t demonstrate any intellectual curiosity (modeled after W) and put a premium on loyalty. This nation needs to think and question more instead of resigning ourselves to being robotic believers.

  • Comments are closed.