A sharp right

I’ve mentioned that Bill Frist is one of the big losers as a result of the deal struck by the Group of 14, but there’s another name that might challenge the Majority Leader at the top of that list: James Dobson. The man who believes he’s helping guide the Republican domestic agenda made a series of unequivocal demands that weren’t open to negotiation. He came up completely empty handed.

Dobson insisted — in fact, he commanded — Senate Republicans to ensure confirmation votes on every Bush nominee, eliminate judicial filibusters permanently, and sidestep any attempt at compromise. Dobson invested heavily to rally millions of evangelicals to the cause, bombarding the hill with messages, and making this vote the top priority for the religious movement in Congress this year. For his efforts, he was rewarded with absolutely nothing from his wish list.

About two hours after the deal was announced, Dobson sent out an alert to Focus on the Family members, blasting the compromise as a “complete betrayal,” and making veiled political threats against those who undermined his initiative.

“This Senate agreement represents a complete bailout and betrayal by a cabal of Republicans and a great victory for united Democrats,” Dobson said. “Only three of President Bush’s nominees will be given the courtesy of an up-or-down vote, and it’s business as usual for all the rest. The rules that blocked conservative nominees remain in effect, and nothing of significance has changed. […]

“We share the disappointment, outrage and sense of abandonment felt by millions of conservative Americans who helped put Republicans in power last November. I am certain that these voters will remember both Democrats and Republicans who betrayed their trust.”

Indeed, Dobson is but one of the far-right’s pharisaical leaders who were outraged, but because Dobson has led the effort and been the most outspoken about his concerns, his failure is the most dramatic.

It may be something of a trend.

Note, for example, what Trent Lott said recently about the head of the Focus empire.

“Who does [Dobsobn] think he is, questioning my conservative credentials?” Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., said in an interview. Dobson, head of the conservative group Focus on the Family, criticized Lott for his efforts to forge a compromise in the fight over the judges. Lott is still angry. “Some of his language and conduct is quite un-Christian, and I don’t appreciate it,” the senator said.

This takes some chutzpah on Lott’s part. Dobson is under the impression that he can call whatever shots he likes on the Hill. For a leading conservative Republican senator to call Dobson’s conduct “quite un-Christian” may suggest that an important shift is underway.

In fact, the seven Republicans in the Group of 14 knew that Dobson would go after them with everything he has — and yet it didn’t stop them from striking a deal. The message seems clear: “Thanks for your input, Jim, but we have work to do.”

Now, what’s Dobson prepared to do about it? He’s threatened in the past to bolt the GOP and take his evangelicals with him if he believes the Republicans aren’t responsive enough to his demands. Wouldn’t this qualify?

Note to Dobson: The Republicans are playing you for a chump. I say you teach them a lesson and form the radical party you’ve always wanted, one in which no one will question your commands and there will never be any betrayal of your agenda. The GOP had its chance but it took you for granted; it’s time to walk away.

  • This speaks to how McCain is emerging as less of a mad bomber and more of a canny politico out of this deal. First, he delivers serious body blows to Frist, who is Rove’s obvious man for 2008 and who sold himself body and soul to the vast mailing lists and religious networks emanating from Colorado Springs. Second, this sticks big knives in the back of Dobson, who Rove went to for those extra votes relative to 2000 and not only helps neuter his power but get revenge for what was done to him (Mccain) in the 2000 primaries (remember his ballsy attacks on the religious wingnuts after South Carolina?). Third, put it together with his inquisition against Norquist, and you can see that McCain is doing his best to clear out space for a serious effort to reclaim the party for the moderates, and to clear a big swath out for his 2008 presidential run. I am still skeptical of his chances as a 72 year old cancer survivor, but the man still has a lot of of broad appeal and positioning himself as the man who brokered the deal that saved the republic from the evil senator can only help.

  • I agree. Dobson expended a huge amount of political capital in this fight. How willing will Republicans be to go back into the trenches if Dobson sounds the trumpet again? How willing will his followers be to go through the whole gruelling cycle of donations and phone calls?

    Republicans were handed a defeat. How much do they want to risk another one?

    Democrats have had a taste of victory. I bet they wouldn’t mind going back for seconds.

  • If history holds true and the Crusaders on the Christian Right keep plowing forward with their claim that they are doing God’s will and will not be dissuaded this may be the beginning of the end for the unified Right. dcspeculator is right on with his assessment of McCain. He represents the Republican Party led by business execs and economists. They will only tolerate this looking over their shoulders (to make sure Dobson et al are not about to smack them on the knuckles with a ruler) for so long. I think either way we win. A) Dobson will march off and form the “C.H.U.R.C.H.” (Citizens Having Unbelievable Right-wing “Christian” Hissy-fits) and the conservatives will loose their plurality. B) Dobson et al will keep his people in the party but when he demands action from the Republican leadership he will get the same kind of treatment that the Democrats give to groups like ELF. Republicans may still be united but under a more reasonable banner.

  • I absolutely *love* the C.H.U.R.C.H thing. I laughed so hard I almost spilled my latte.

    But how, exactly, does one pronounce “pharisaical”? The best I could do was something like ‘ferry-cycle’, but is there a better way?

    Maybe we could have a contest.

  • “But how, exactly, does one pronounce “pharisaicalâ€?? The best I could do was something like ‘ferry-cycle’, but is there a better way?”

    I would say it’s pronounced ‘farah-SEE-ical’

  • Comments are closed.