Frist’s leadership problem

The Dem filibuster that blocked John Bolton’s nomination to be U.N. ambassador on the Senate floor yesterday offers some interesting subtexts. The media seems particularly interested in the fight upsetting the comity that resulted from the Gang of 14’s compromise earlier this week.

But let’s not lose sight of the fact that Bill Frist took on another important Republican challenge — and failed again.

When it came to judicial nominees, Frist’s nuclear option scheme and obstinate negotiating tactics led seven of his GOP colleagues to go around him and strike a deal with Dems. Frist had two specific goals in mind: up-or-down votes on all Bush judicial nominees and the elimination of judicial filibusters forevermore. He got neither and his leadership suffered a blow.

Yesterday, Dems made it clear they didn’t want to block Bolton’s confirmation permanently; they simply wanted the Bush administration to provide the Senate Foreign Relations Committee with information requested by Dems and Republicans on the panel. Harry Reid said, “We are not here to filibuster Bolton — we are here to get information.” Joe Biden, who’s led the opposition to Bolton, said, “I have absolutely no intention of preventing an up-or-down vote on Mr. Bolton.”

Indeed, according to the LA Times, Frist agreed that the Dems have a point.

According to a Frist aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity, the majority leader lobbied the administration to give Biden and Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.) access to the records sought by Bolton.

Previously, partial transcripts of the intercepted communications — with the names of U.S. officials edited out — had been shown to Roberts, the Senate Intelligence Committee chairman, and to Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), the panel’s senior Democrat.

Democrats wanted to see the intercepts as well as the names of U.S. officials contained in them to judge whether Bolton had sought the information to bolster his position in bureaucratic struggles.

Predictably, the Bush gang wouldn’t show lawmakers unedited files and pushed Frist to ignore Dem demands and hold the confirmation vote anyway.

And once again, Frist couldn’t get the job done.

Keep in mind, Dems told Frist the filibuster was coming and explained he wouldn’t have the votes to stop it.

…Reid spokesman Jim Manley said the Democratic leader “told Senator Frist this afternoon he did not have the 60 votes needed, and urged him to consider holding off on the vote” while Biden and others pressed the administration for the requested documents.

So, what did Frist do? He held the vote anyway, failed to overcome the filibuster, handed the administration another setback, and kept the controversy surrounding Bolton in the news.

When Republicans threw Trent Lott overboard two years ago, Bush and other GOP leaders tapped Frist because he had a reputation for being smart and would be a friendlier face for the party on TV. When the GOP caucus grew to 55, Frist probably assumed his troubles were over and he’d get everything he asked for, all the while gearing up for a presidential campaign.

But this week reminds us of an inconvenient detail: Frist just isn’t a very good at being the Senate Majority Leader.

I wonder how long it will be before we start hearing grumblings and rumors in conservative circles about the need for a change….

Only a whacko theocrat could keep from laughing at the fact that this jumped-up fart thinks he’s presidential material.

  • Excellent post. I would advise the Dems to be LOUD AND PROUD here instead of deferential (Biden saying `we could vote in 10 minutes if we just get those docs’). THe Dems need to trumpet Voinovich’s letter and speeches–George V is hardly an out of the mainstream guy–and say that not only is this administration brazenly trying to force the vote on what is possibly the WORST choice for this position imaginable, but they are also wantonly continuing their executive branch power grab by stonewalling on documents that even Lugar and Frist agree are reasonable. Come on guys, be LOUD AND PROUD and let the people know you are doing their work and acting in the best interests of the United States by holding this nomination up!

    McCain is quoted in the same article as saying `Elections have consequences’. Sure, but the elected representatives have the responsibility to serve, and for McCain and his ilk to roll on this atrocious nomination confirms that they are not interested in the good of the US but only in furthering their own political ambitions by giving this favor to W, a narrowly elected second termer well on his way to lame duck status.

  • Here’s a thought about why Frist might not be jettisoned so hastily. When Frist was selected the President had unquestioned control over the entire Republican caucus and a decent number of Democrats to boot. Whatever Bush wanted Bush got.

    Can you confidently say today that the Republican caucus will unanimously support whomever Rove might think will do a better job of advancing the Dobson agenda? The Social Security, Schiavo, nuclear setbacks have taken a huge toll on popular support for Republican leadership. If these stupid fringe-pleasing initiatives continue unabated into 2006 the House majority at least may well be sunk.

    Who’s to say that if Frist gets jettisonned his replacement won’t be, say, John McCain?

  • If Santorum gets the “man on dog” in his name every time, can’t Frist get the “cat killer” in his name from time to time?

    Carpetbagger, as always, you’re great. Can someone keep a watch to see if Frist makes a “trip” to the Whitehouse? Might not make the news, but we know he’s getting a spanking when he goes there.

  • “Cat Killer” Frist (that’s for you, Alex) is being duped by the lame duck administration over and over. Don’t know if I should feel sorry for him or hope that he’ll grow a spine and start actually leading the Senate, which is supposed to be an independent body, not a subset of the executive branch (duh!).

  • The difference between Bolton and the judicial fight is that the filibuster is not just a way to kill the nomination with 41 votes, but a legitimate delay to get documents from the White House. By the way, when is Bush going to finally be sued or held in contempt of Congress? Voinovich is clearly against Bolton, Chafee will almost certainly vote against him, and JOHN THUNE said this week he will vote against Bolton because the DOD is closing SD’s largest military base. Take that. Bolton may not win in an up-down vote, though I think the WH will whip Thune in line (ala Hagel in the Judicial filibuster). I can’t wait to see this vote even if he does pass.

  • Senator Sad Sack (R-Dobson’sButt) vs. Harry Reid (D-Veryshrewd). Flashing ahead to January 2008, when Dr. Frist is watching President Clinton being sworn into office, after she handily beat George Allen back in November, wondering if he’d jumped the shark when he went on that fundy bender with James Dobson. Everything just seemed to go to hell after that, and when he didn’t even get 10% of the votes in New Hampshire….Oh yeah, got Cheney’s funeral tomorrow, too….

  • Comments are closed.