The K Street Project — going strong and getting worse

When the typical American thinks about corruption in Washington, they probably imagine movie-like scenarios in which an obese man with a cigar summons a congressman, hands him a briefcase full of cash in a darkened room, and the congressman in turn does the donor’s bidding. Real-life corruption doesn’t look like this at all. It looks like the K Street Project.

I’ve noted this initiative in the past, but feel like it’s important enough to repeat until the embarrassment is better known. Fortunately, Elizabeth Drew has a terrific piece on the Project in the current issue of The New York Review of Books that everyone needs to go read.

If you’re not familiar with the K Street Project, it is a scheme launched 10 years ago after the GOP takeover of Congress. Newt Gingrich and Grover Norquist looked at DC’s infamous K Street, home to the city’s powerful lobbying industry, and noticed a problem: some of the lobbyists weren’t Republicans. It was a calamity that demanded a remedy — and the K Street Project was born.

The idea was simple enough: seize control of Washington’s lobbying apparatus through intimidation, hardball political tactics, and even private threats when necessary, until K Street had been purged of Democrats altogether and Republicans (who could fill GOP campaign coffers indefinitely) dominated. Any lobbying firm or trade association that expected to have any access, influence, or success with the federal government would have to acquiesce — or face the consequences.

As Drew noted, it’s been effective in more ways than one.

[Washington lobbyist Jack] Abramoff’s behavior is symptomatic of the unprecedented corruption — the intensified buying and selling of influence over legislation and federal policy — that has become endemic in Washington under a Republican Congress and White House. Corruption has always been present in Washington, but in recent years it has become more sophisticated, pervasive, and blatant than ever. A friend of mine who works closely with lobbyists says, “There are no restraints now; business groups and lobbyists are going crazy — they’re in every room on Capitol Hill writing the legislation. You can’t move on the Hill without giving money.”

This remark is only slightly exaggerated. For over ten years, but particularly since George W. Bush took office, powerful Republicans, among them Tom DeLay and Senator Rick Santorum, of Pennsylvania, have been carrying out what they call the “K Street Project,” an effort to place more Republicans and get rid of Democrats in the trade associations and major national lobbying organizations that have offices on K Street in downtown Washington (although, of course, some have offices elsewhere).

The Republican purge of K Street is a more thorough, ruthless, vindictive, and effective attack on Democratic lobbyists and other Democrats who represent businesses and other organizations than anything Washington has seen before.


At one point, in discussing the Project with Grover Norquist, Drew noted that there were any number of Democratic lobbyists who were not particularly ideological and were happy to serve corporate interests. In other words, these Dems don’t need to be purged; the Republicans’ corporate agenda would thrive even if they were employed. Norquist wouldn’t hear of it: “We don’t want nonideological people on K Street, we want conservative activist Republicans on K Street.”

It’s frightening to consider how effective this has been. Seasoned and capable lobbyists have been fired because DeLay, Santorum, and other Republicans behind the K Street Project have demanded it. Business associations who are considering applicants for job openings are told, in no uncertain terms, that they will face retribution unless they hire a Republican. The politics of fear drives the process.

At times, the GOP has used all the subtlety of a sledgehammer. In one infamous example, Gingrich and DeLay intentionally blocked a vote on an intellectual property bill in the House because the Electronics Industry Association announced it intended to hire a new director — who happened to be a Democrat. Gingrich and DeLay told the group, hire a Republican or we won’t pass your bill.

In another one of my favorite examples, Services Committee Chairman Michael Oxley (R-Ohio) pressured the Investment Company Institute (ICI), a consortium of mutual fund companies, to fire their chief lobbyist because she was a Democrat. Oxley’s staff suggested to industry officials that a congressional probe of the mutual fund industry might ease up if ICI complied. As Drew noted, a Republican now holds the top job at the Investment Company Institute.

The Motion Picture Association of America hired as its new head Dan Glickman, a former Democratic representative from Kansas and secretary of agriculture in the Clinton administration, and the Republicans punished the MPAA accordingly.

Republicans had warned the MPAA not to hire a Democrat for the job. After Glickman was hired, House Republicans removed from a pending bill some $1.5 billion in tax relief for the motion picture industry. Norquist told me, “No other industry is interested in taking a $1.5 billion hit to hire a Clinton friend.” After Glickman was selected, the Capitol Hill newspaper Roll Call reported last year, “Santorum has begun discussing what the consequences are for the movie industry.” Norquist said publicly that the appointment of Glickman was “a studied insult” and the motion picture industry’s “ability to work with the House and the Senate is greatly reduced.” Glickman responded by hiring prominent Republicans, including House Speaker Dennis Hastert’s former spokesman, for major MPAA jobs.

It’s going to get worse.

Despite its effectiveness, “the K Street Project is far from complete,” according to Norquist, who says, “There should be as many Democrats working on K Street representing corporate America as there are Republicans working in organized labor — and that number is close to zero.” He wants the project to include not just the top jobs in K Street firms, but “all of them — including secretaries.”

It’s times like these that the Republican machine in Washington more closely resembles an organized crime family than a governing political party. This gang isn’t just corrupt; it’s taken legal corruption to a masterful level.

Am I missing something here? The Project’s effectiveness is clear given the current situation where GOPs are the majority. But it all seems less dramatic when boiled down to simply: lobbying is arguably more effective when the lobbyist is the same political pursuasion as the politician. So what happens when the tide inevitably turns Democrat? Won’t it be more difficult for any of these groups to accomplish anything when they are the minority party? They will be left preaching to the choir.

  • That’s the part I love. Payback is an ampersand, like they say… OTOH, I still don’t understand why lobbying isn’t illegal. Maybe just because I am from a small state (Vermont), and I can call up my Senators or Congressman and give my input to a staffer (And, if it’s important enough, I actually do have a couple of written responses personally signed by one of my Senators), but I don’t see why money should give any greater access to a politician.
    Call me a purist, or whatever, but public service is exactly that- service. We don’t enter public service to get rich, we enter it to help out other people, while making a decent enough living to support ourselves. Unfortunately, that attitude is long forgotten- on BOTH sides of the aisle.

  • Am I missing something here? The Project’s effectiveness is clear given the current situation where GOPs are the majority.

    That’s true, but I think the problem here is broader than that. When lawmakers tell lobbyists, firms, and trade associations that GOP leaders must maintain some control over who they hire and fire, or federal law will suddenly work against them, that’s textbook corruption. It borders of racketeering. (“It’s nice a trade association you have here; it’d be a shame if something happened to it…”)

    As the Drew article notes, there are even blacklists to see which groups “play ball” with the K Street Project and which don’t. Those that cooperate find benefits (improved access, influence in the law-writing process), while those that don’t lose.

    Lobbyists are literally getting fired, not just because GOP is in power right now, but because they’re facing fear of government retribution. It’s like Tammany Hall all over again, except at the federal level and with less subtlety.

  • Dzuban and Castor Troy,

    Go read the transcript from Bill Moyers lastest speech over at Common Dreams and then come back and consider this post by the Carpetbagger.
    We all need to be asking ourselves what are we going to do about this.

  • A related subtle but important distortion caused by the K St. project is its insistence that to get anything done on the Hill you have to support whatever the Republican priority is. For example, even if your industry doesn’t care about capital gains tax cuts you might be told that you have to lobby for them if you ever expect to be listened to when it comes to things you do care about. So even if you think there’s some merit to lobbying (i.e., making lawmakers more aware of how their actions affect specific industries), this is another example of how Norquist has corrupted the process.

  • Well, there are several things we need to do to steal the conversation from the other side. First off, business should be thoroughly in Democratic hands. For cryin’ out loud, GM is going under because of its healthcare plan… By paying poverty wages, Wal-Mart is keeping its healthcare costs to bare minimums, forcing people onto the public… Businesses are (have to be) open to Nationalized Healthcare. No other 1st world nation has its businesses paying (directly) for healthcare. We should be chalking this up as argument number 1!

    The argument runs very simply, “American Businesses are struggling to compete on a world-market where none of their competitors have to pay for employee healthcare. A nationalized healthcare system in the U.S. would save corporations billions of dollars, and allow them to compete fairly in the world markets!”

    How very Republican, and how very Democratic. We get the result we want, national healthcare, and the GMs and Wal-Marts of America get an extra boost in the ass. Can someone please explain to me why (especially with GM in the headlines these days) we haven’t taken this stance on the issue?????

    It is only through centrist arguments, ones which benefit both sides, that we can take the constituencies. We have to make clear, short arguments which, as Howard Dean said, are heard and understood by the white southern guy with a confederate flag in his pick-up. Arguments like the example, I think they might listen to.

  • You remember the old saw, “capitalism carries the seeds of its own destruction”?

    If Democrats never find an alternative source of campaign funds, the Democratic Party will, barring, some catastrophe to the country (remember Hoover), will remain in the minority indefinitely.

    In the meantime, the effect of the K Street Project, is to accelerate the Democratic Party’s shift toward a more “pure” ideological composition. If the Democrats do find an alternative source of funds, that alternative source may well tend to solidify Democrat’s ideological committments, including skepticism or even hostility concerning the interests and intentions of Business.

    Among current pols, conservative Democrats will be the main victims. What does a “K” street, Republican lobbyist do with his “democrat” political funds, when it comes to a Blue Dog/New Democrat, who, for ideological reasons and because of the composition of his district, can counted on to support business interests? (see Bankruptcy Bill “yes” vote roster for a list of specific names) Does our business lobbyist give money to a Democrat’s campaign, because this Democrat is pro business? Or, does he stiff our Blue Dog, because the district is an easy Republican pick-up?

  • Castor Troy,

    OTOH, I still don’t understand why lobbying isn’t illegal.

    Because its part of the first ammendment.

    “…or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”

    right to petition the government. Personally, I wish the framers had somehow insisted that that petitioning (as well as other rights ennumerated in our constitution) be done by the specific person with the “grievance”, i.e. that they couldn’t subcontract that work out. That small change would destory the vast majority of first ammendment arguments against campaign finance reform, FWIW.

  • I see that the next fine post addresses the subject of republican uncertainty regarding the ’06 elections.

    It will be a great thing if dem’s can retake a majority in congress but the “K” Street model has created built in corruption no matter who’s running the show.

    Having seen how effective an exercise the “K” Street project has been, whoever’s in power will want to keep the money flowing. I can’t imagine that there will be any dismantling of the apparatus.

    The priorities will skew progressive I suppose but the process of governing in this country has been corrupted to it’s core by $$$$.

  • What makes any of you think that God’s Own Party doesn’t already have plans to make certain that they are never again the minority party no matter what the voters want? That’s one of the goals behind things like the K Street Project after all.

  • Agreed. Remember after 2000 we were going to fix the electoral system? Rush Holt and other Dems proposed bills to do so which got nowhere because of Republican domination of the committees. Then in 2002 it was pretty bad and for sure we were going to fix it by 2004. Again, nothing but another highly suspect and arguably stolen election. But don’t worry America, we’ll get it fixed by 2006. Anybody hear anything about how well it’s being fixed? Yes, it is being fixed, but not in the sense of the word that we can appreciate. Tell me, why aren’t Dem Congressmen shouting this from the rooftops? Is it politically incorrect to point out that your opponents have rigged the electoral system? And does anyone actually believe that if you can rig presidential elections that you won’t also rig some Congressional ones? What kind of fools are we that we pretend our votes count. Joseph Stalin infamously said that it’s not who gets the votes that matters, it’s who counts the votes. Stalin and Goebbels would have felt right at home in the modern day Republican party.
    All the Democratic strategy in the world won’t make an iota of difference as long as the vote counting is rigged. First things first.

  • Comments are closed.