The Bush administration’s routine corruption — redux

In 2002, the Bush administration announced that it would buy oil and gas rights on a large section of land in the Florida Everglades. At the time, this seemed like a good move. Environmental groups such as the World Wildlife Fund, which is not always fond of the administration’s policies, endorsed the proposal and Interior Department Secretary Gale Norton as “a win for all sides.”

We didn’t realize, though, just how big a win it would be for one particular side.

The U.S. Interior Department inspector general concluded that the Bush administration offered in 2002 to overpay a prominent Florida family for oil and gas rights on Everglades land, according to people familiar with the matter.

In a report to the Senate Finance Committee to be made public today, Inspector General Earl Devaney says the department nearly tripled earlier estimates of the value of the mineral rights, the three people said. The agreement wasn’t completed and the people familiar with the situation said Devaney’s findings would scuttle it.

President George W. Bush announced in May 2002 that the federal government would pay $120 million in cash plus an undetermined amount in tax deductions to prevent the Collier family’s privately held Collier Resources Co. from drilling for oil and gas on 400,000 acres of land it owns in what he called “critical parts of the Everglades.” Two previous government assessments valued the rights between $5 million and $68 million.

A career Interior Department official said there’s no way we should pay the Colliers so much, but the advice was ignored. The Geological Survey said the rights were worth between $5 million and $20 million, but that too was ignored. In fact, a Bush administration political appointee solicited several appraisals, all of which were lower than $120 million, but the ridiculously high bid moved forward anyway.

What’s more the report on this deal showed the government may have already owned the mineral rights because the Colliers sold the government surface rights for the same land in 1988. The administration would be paying triple for land the government may already own.

And who are the Colliers?

Members of the Collier family contributed more than $121,000 to Republican candidates in the last election cycle, including at least $5,000 to Jeb Bush, according to the Washington-based Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks campaign donations.


The Interior Department had no comment; the White House had no comment; Collier had no comment. Critics did.

“This is a sweetheart deal for one of the richest landowners in America” that would have been financed by taxpayers, said Keith Ashdown, who has tracked the case for three years as vice president of tax policy at Taxpayers for Common Sense, a Washington-based advocacy group that opposes government waste.

We wouldn’t even know about this controversy were it not for Montana Senator Max Baucus, the senior Democrat on the Finance Committee, asking the Interior Department’s inspector general to investigate the agreement in late-December 2003. (Conceivably there could have been some kind of congressional hearing on this, but Republican lawmakers don’t believe in administration oversight for Republican presidents.)

This could be an interesting situation. It’s pretty straightforward as scandals go: rich GOP donor has land, Bush administration makes donor even richer by overpaying for land.

Where’s Ken Starr when we need him?

CROOK’S LIARS CHEATS………CROOK’S LIARS CHEATS……CROOK’S LIARS CHEATS

  • There’s something desperately wrong with our systems when the best investment a person can make is a large contribution to a political party. Some rough math suggests that the Colliers’ $120,000 investment in the Republican cause netted them somewhere between $60-100 million in return. Tremendous.

  • Hmm. This does have an odor about it that I don’t like. However, real estate appraisals, particularly oil and mineral rights appraisals can vary a great deal- it is very commonplace. To this day no one can agree as to how much oil is beneith the Saudi sands, and they have been drilling that place for over eighty years and have the best experts money can buy on this matter. Nonetheless, more investigation is needed, and should not be stiff-armed or mothballed.

  • What Michael said. The thing about investing in republican politicians is how cheap it is. For a few $1000 or $100,000 you can get a staggering return on investment. Not 10% or 50% or 100% but 1000% or more.

  • However, real estate appraisals, particularly oil and mineral rights appraisals can vary a great deal- it is very commonplace.

    OK, fair enough, but when every appraisal comes in far far under the price to be paid, and there’s no evidence that the price to be paid is based on any professional valuation, it doesn’t just smell funny, it is positively redolent of the stench of corruption.

  • 6. Paperwight- actually, I read carpetbagger’s link; there was a professional appraisal done by a company that is no slouch in the field of such apraisals, and the price was basically in the middle of the field. Nonetheless, somebody still needs to get to the bottom of this.

  • The Toledo Blade is doing great work digging into corrupt Republican practices in Ohio involving investments in the state’s Workers Comp Fund. The similarities are disturbing. For small campaign contributions to Republicans, a huge amount of public money is squandered.

    The following headline says it all: Democrats cite GOP ‘culture of corruption’ – link http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050608/NEWS24/506080357.

    In a funny irony, one of those being investigated has the name Mark D. Lay. Corruption seems to follow the name Lay (Kenneth of Enron fame). Add the initial (D. Lay) and it really begins to look bad.

  • Where’s Ken Starr when we need him?

    Where’s the scandal-loving major media when we need him? The MSM should be all over this “like stink on a pig.”

  • Since when is $120M halfway between $31M and $140M? Let’s see (counts fingers) the midway point would be $85.5M. And when the other (recent) assessments done top out at $68M, that looks like a pretty big premium to me. Or we could split the very lowest and very highest estimates ($5M and $154M) to get $79.5M. Come on.

    Maybe there’s some bell curve in the private industry guy’s estimate that puts the highest probability at $120M, but that seems far far out of whack with the rest of the estimates.

  • Like you said, paperwight. And let’s not forget the kicker in the deal: “plus an undetermined amount in tax deductions.” Just how much do you think that undetermined amount would turn out to be? Yes, it’s called corruption. No lipstick on this pig, please. This is about as clear as it gets, especially considering that it looks like the government owned the rights already. But what’s $120 million (plus an undetermined amount in tax deductions) between friends?

  • If they end up forcing Social Security privatization down our throats can I invest mine into Republican party contributions? I don’t think that I can get a return on my investments like this in the markets.

  • The fact that so many Americans see this sort of thing as O.K. is what should be worrying. Reagan made greed acceptable, and things have been escalating in the corportate/business world ever since. Ethics are not what they used to be, and it is going to take a social revolution to restore “right” in our country.

  • Comments are closed.