“Up is down” and “down is up” in Bush’s Iraq

Guest post by Ed Stephan.

The White House seems to be happy with what’s going on in Iraq during recent weeks. Bush, augmenting his remarks with a Pat-Robertson’s semi-giggle, tells us he’s “pleased”.

Speaking in the White House Rose Garden, Bush said he was pleased with progress in Iraq more than two years after he declared the end of major combat operations.

In his own garden at the U.S. Naval Observatory, Cheney purred to hard-hitting interviewer Larry King that we’ve made “major progress” in Iraq.

“The level of activity that we see today from a military standpoint, I think, will clearly decline. I think they’re in the last throes, if you will, of the insurgency.”

It’s actually hard to tell what’s been going on over the last few weeks. There’s been very little coverage of Iraq in the news media, considering we’re still “at war” there. Apparently “no news is good news” for this Administration. Even Mark Fiore begins his wonderful Democracy Lite animated cartoon with a soothing “Now that Iraq is all Okay … the world is being transformed, just like the neocons promised” followed by a satiric review of conditions elsewhere: Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan.

But is everything Okay in Iraq? What kind of progress are we making with the Occupation? And at what cost? U.S. military deaths keep going up and up there. No matter what happens, no matter how those events are spun, no matter how little coverage there is, the steady increase in U.S. military deaths in Iraq continues with a regularity which looks, graphically, more like a mechanical than a human process. I should mention that even that graph doesn’t tell the whole story. Some U.S. military deaths are not counted as such, e.g., those which occur after evacuation from the campaign area.

Unmentioned anywhere is the fact that, reported or not, the trend in the monthly death rates is going up, not down. It’s easy enough to demonstrate by entering the monthly totals on a spread sheet and having it display the “trend line” (aka, “least-squares regression line”):
Monthly trend line for US deaths in Iraq

The monthly U.S. death toll, which was averaging less than 50 toward the beginning of the occupation is, after more than two years, now nearing 80 and still climbing. And Bush and Cheney, reporting from their respective garden parties with a docile press, both tell us that they are “pleased”.

According to Fox News, the last casualty in Iraq was on May 13. I dunno bout you, but I believe what they have to say, not you Mr. Ed Stephan, or shall we call you Mr. Suspicious Two First Names.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,144344,00.html

check it, all’s rosey.

  • Alex,
    You have to be joking. You use an article that says right on it (as of May 17″ to say that the last casualty was May 13??? You not to bright. You stupid.

  • Ted, shush, be nice. Alex can’t help if he doesn’t know how to search the web and relies on FauxNews.com. Alex – if you can, navigate to this link.

    http://www.fallenheroesmemorial.com/oif/chronlist.php

    Wait – navigate: too techese for you. Take the mouse, position the “blinking line/pointer” just before the “http…” above. Click/and keep the left-mouse button depresesd. Drag the mouse over until you reach the end..
    ….oh,never mind.

  • Nice Steven. 59 dead since May 13th, not to mention the “casualties” that were only injured. Alex, how rosey is that?

  • Alex, take some time. Read newspapers, surf the net, don’t belive the Fox. You are being led astray by the BUSH news media.
    Do your research. I can’t tell you it will make you happy though when you find out BUSH is LIEING TO YOU!!!!!!

  • Yeah guys, I know how to work the internetamaphone and I know that Fox is wrong.

    How weird do you think it is that Fox stopped their “Fallen Heroes” listing on May 17?

  • Ahhh…doi! I retract if I caused offense. 🙂 Irony detector has been increased. Previous to this web page, I was browsing a ultra-right web site and my bull-s!#!$# sensitivity was warped.

    Alex, you’re right. Nowhere on Fox’s site (at least from what I can tell) can you search and find anything later than May 17th.

  • Too bad that Alex had to explain his snark in Comment #1 above; it seemed pretty damn obvious to me. OF COURSE Faux News will not have accurate data let alone accurate opinion — that does not serve their meme. It’s a tactic taken from the Bush White House, where its website is constantly being scrubbed of embarrassing items, or things that do not support their world view. It’s business as usual for the Rethugs. 50 lashes with a wet noodle for those who couldn’t detect the snark but instead jumped to the “oh no, it’s a troll” reaction. Lighten up, guys, it’s Friday!

  • It’s obvious that Fox thinks every soldier killed after May 13 is not a “Fallen Hero” but a “Fallen Traitor” because their deaths make Bush look bad. How’s that for adjusting to the right’s warped thinking?

  • Comments are closed.