The man can’t help himself

After all that Tom DeLay has done to bring unwanted attention to himself, one might assume the House Majority Leader would go out of his way to steer clear of improprieties. But when there’s a scenario involving billions of dollars, the oil industry, Halliburton, and his home town, DeLay just can’t help himself.

The Republicans’ energy bill, which is an embarrassment unto itself, went to a conference committee between House and Senate negotiators. The end result is a “closed” bill that cannot be altered before receiving a vote in both chambers. As Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) discovered, DeLay, once again, decided to play by his own rules. Here’s Waxman explaining the problem to House Speaker Dennis Hastert:

I am writing to draw to your attention a provision in the Energy Conference Report that raises serious procedural and substantive concerns. At its essence, this provision is a $1.5 billion giveaway to the oil industry, Halliburton, and Sugar Land, Texas. The provision was inserted into the energy legislation after the conference was closed, so members of the conference committee had no opportunity to consider or reject this measure. Before the final energy legislation is brought to the House floor, this provision should be deleted.

The provision at issue is a 30-page subtitle called “Ultra-Deepwater and Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Petroleum Resources.” This subtitle, which was taken from the House-passed energy bill, was mysteriously inserted in the final energy legislation after the legislation was closed to further amendment. The conferees were told that they would have the opportunity to consider and vote on the provisions in the conference report. But the subtitle was not included in the base text circulated to conferees, and it was never offered as an amendment.

Instead, the new subtitle first appeared in the text of the energy legislation only after Chairman Barton had gaveled the conference over. Obviously, it would be a serious abuse to secretly slip such a costly and controversial provision into the energy legislation.

Indeed, it would. Adding insult to injury, DeLay not only flouted the process for his own corruption, the provision he inserted is nothing more than an “indefensible giveaway to one of the most profitable industries in America.”

The provision establishes a $1.5 billion fund, up to $550 million of which would be dedicated direct spending, which is not subject to the normal congressional appropriations process. Although the name of the subtitle refers to “ultra-deepwater and unconventional natural gas,” it appears that the $1.5 billion fund created by the subtitle can in fact be used for many oil and gas projects. According to the language of the subtitle, oil and gas companies can apply for funds for a wide variety of activities, including activities involving “innovative exploration and production techniques” or “enhanced recovery techniques.” While oil and gas companies could be required to contribute to the costs of their projects, the subtitle expressly provides that the Department has discretion to reduce or eliminate any such contribution.

The subtitle appears to steer the administration of 75% of the $1.5 billion fund to a private consortium located in the district of Majority Leader Tom DeLay. Ordinarily, a large fund like this would be administered directly by the government.

As Think Progress put it, “Tom DeLay thinks the federal treasury is his personal piggy bank.”

Waxman wants the provision pulled before the House takes up final passage of the bill. DeLay’s office is insisting it stay in. No word yet from Hastert.

Now that’s corruption, people. I’m sure Duke Cunningham is green with envy.

  • Why is it that whenever I think of Congress I imagine those Capital One commercials with Huns and Vandals pillaging through the city streets?

    This, I suppose, is part of the quid pro quo between the legislative and executive branches. In return for the congressional right to plunder without any interference by a presidential veto, the legislative branch must in return refuse any opportunity to exercise oversight over anything the executive branch does.

  • Is it any wonder that people consider DeLay to be both a pig and a thief?

    I find it impossible to believe that Waxman would level this charge without first ckecking with Bingaman and Dingell first; Waxman is such an ethical fanatic that it would be a shocking development if he was off the mark here.

    The spinning by DeLay’s spokesman about this, as reported in the Boston Globe, explains the lie by saying that the Dems “weren’t paying enough attention” to what was going on — at 4 f**king am!!

    Lying bastards — so much for the rules, as even when they just get caught breaking them, the Rethugs simply rewrite history on the spot!!

  • Mr. Flibble – Before I quit watching TV I had that same thought whenever I would see that commercial. Now the question is, what’s in our wallet that will stop the advance of these Republican Vikings?

    Seriously I’m just about to the point that if the ever growing list of scandals doesn’t stop the Republicans then I think that I am just going to sit back quietly and let it all happen. When things get bad enough maybe the people will be wise enough to ask what happened.

  • Waxman should have mentioned that even if DeLay didn’t sneak this in, it involves actors in DeLay’s ethical troubles. That by itself raises at least the appearance of a quid pro quo.

    I was going to email my congresswoman (Myrick) and my senators (Dole and Burr), but I just might call them since they’re on their way home.

  • There was a Simpsons on recently where the family heads to Washington DC. They need to get a bill passed (I can’t now remember why). They try the honest way and get nowhere. The janitor agrees to help them. They get their bill/amendment to pass by distracting the Senate/House and then paper clipping they’re amendment to the bill that was about to be voted on. The speaker picks up the bill, “What’s this? I don’t remember this being a part of the bill. Oh well, it IS paper clipped. All for…” I never knew that the Simpsons so accurately portrayed how our government works.

  • Since W said he “earned political capital and intends to spend it,” it’s become increasingly clear he wasn’t talking about political influence but instead the U.S. Treasury and all of the economic assets of this nation. While folks remarked capital is something you invest and not spend, the Republicans have been investing it — in their own political futures and at the expense of this nation. I wish the religious right would have the balls to invoke the commanments at this time and take a hot branding iron the foreheads of Republican leadere everywhere that is inscribed “Thou shalt not steal.”

  • Comments are closed.