StemPAC pushes progress in stem-cell debate

There are plenty of voices struggling to be heard as part of the ongoing debate over stem-cell research, but there’s a great group of people have put together a new 527 organization, with the intention of making this issue a central one in the next couple of campaign cycles.

There’s a new kid on the block in the battle over embryonic stem-cell research, and it’s threatening to make the debate less about the science of the issue and more about the political ramifications for lawmakers who oppose broad federal funding of the controversial studies.

StemPAC, a group formed in May of this year but officially launched in July, is headed by John Hlinko, a Democratic political activist and founder of the “Draft Wesley Clark” presidential effort, along with a team of like-minded strategists, including media consultant Bud Jackson of the Jackson Group. Liberal Web logger Markos Moulitsas Zuniga of dailykos.com sits on its advisory board.

The group aims to be more aggressive than groups already on the landscape, officials said.

“We want to sort of be the bulldog in the yard,” said Jackson in an interview. “We want to apply political pressure. … We thought there was a vacuum out there and that there was a way to do this smarter.”

Indeed, there is. Having Nancy Reagan call Republican lawmakers is behind the scenes is helpful in pressuring those who are inclined to do the right thing, but StemPAC is poised to pack a bigger punch.

As Bill Frist’s evolving position on the issue became front-page news recently, StemPAC’s efforts good off to a surprisingly good start.

Just two weeks ago, StemPAC raised some eyebrows in DC by announcing that it would run a series of TV ads criticizing Frist for his position and his reluctance to let the Castle-DeGette legislation pass the Senate. Cognizant of Frist’s future career plans, StemPAC said the first ads were slated to run in New Hampshire.

Whether it was a coincidence of timing or not, Frist almost immediately changed course and announced, on the last day before the August recess, that he was abandoning his opposition to federally-funded stem-cell research and will oppose the president’s policy.

StemPAC’s plans, of course, go beyond just Frist.

Hlinko said the group will push to create a national grass-roots movement dedicated to pressuring wavering lawmakers to support stem-cell research on embryos from fertility clinics that would be destroyed or discarded anyway. Most anti-abortion conservatives oppose such research because they consider it the destruction of a nascent human life.

Hlinko said StemPAC will use both carrot and stick, spending most of its energy working to defeat lawmakers in the 2006 midterm elections rather than just supporting lawmakers who have voted for or back stem-cell research.

“Whoever the biggest roadblocks are, we will target them,” said Hlinko, adding that Democrats and Republicans alike could be targets.

The Republican Main Street Partnership and the Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research, among others, have been lobbying on the Hill on this issue, but StemPAC is adding a hardball, financial edge. The Main Street Partnership and CAMR don’t want to upset GOP leaders; StemPAC doesn’t care.

The group has already shown some fundraising prowess — StemPAC raised about $200,000 shortly after announcing their intention to air the Frist ads — and it’s not hard to imagine a series of key races where StemPAC’s efforts could make a difference. (Bud Jackson said Rick Santorum would “definitely be a target.”)

The latest Newsweek poll showed that only 31% of the country approves of the White House policy on stem-cell research. If StemPAC starts making Bush allies nervous, a veto-proof majority for Castle-DeGette doesn’t seem out of the question.

This might add something new to the stem cell silliness. Scientists now claim to have found stem cells in the placenta. If they turn out to be true stem cells, these could be easily obtained from the over 4 million annual births in the US.

I wonder how the Fundamentalists will twist this bit of good news into another reason for condemning Democrats.

  • Cognizant of Frist’s future career plans, StemPAC said the first ads were slated to run in New Hampshire.

    Whether it was a coincidence of timing or not, Frist almost immediately changed course and announced, on the last day before the August recess, that he was abandoning his opposition to federally-funded stem-cell research and will oppose the president’s policy.

    Wow. Let me say that again: wow.

    Ed, are you doing any campaign/political work (anymore)?

  • Eadie,

    I’m not doing any campaign/political word full-time or for pay. In fact, I’ve found very little I want to do even on a short-term volunteer basis. That is, I haven’t seen anyone I’d be willing to sacrifice much for. Not in years and years. Both parties seem to care about nothing except fund-raising anymore … getting money and managing it was almost never of itnerest to me, perhaps because we didn’t need so much of it back then.

    In San Francisco I used to enjoy opening a campaign office, finding out which organizations were in the district (political clubs, garden groups, Russian veterans of WWI, you name it) and arranging candidate appearances, making block-by-block maps of the district based on Census Bureau and other publications (race, age, gender, home owner / rental, party affiliation, etc. (all done by hand in those days) and organizing canvassers to visit everywhere in those blocks, thinking up stuff to get the candidate in the paper or on the radio, etc. Now it’s all money. Money, money and still more money. Not interested (or maybe just not talented – my wife handles all our finances and gives me an allowance); certainly don’t have any of my own to spare.

    I think I also discovered, when I was in grad school in Oregon, that I was losing my touch. I used to be able call elections pretty well, all over California, with very little study. In 1966 the earlier Governor Brown (Pat, father of Moonbeam) was challenged by Bedtime-for-Bonzo Reagan. I figured Brown would be a shoo-in. He had just completed the CA Aquaduct project (biggest construction project in the history of the world) and creation of one of the best university systems in the world (still free in those days). Reagan slaughtered him (he later wrecked the universities).

    I was devastated by the MLK and RFK assassinations of 1968, amazed that was taking so terribly long for anyone to raise signifcant hell about Vietnam (which I had been actively opposing since before the Tonkin Gulf lie/build-up, angry at the mis-directed, superficial “liberalism” of the early ’70s PC “liberals”, amazed at the fact that the only presidential candidates we could put up (after standing courageously for the Civil Rights and Voting Rights acts of the mid ’60s) were Southern governors of very “centrist” leanings. “Don’t ask don’t tell” made me wonder where the Dems were headed. They’re still there. Losing. And begging for nothing but money, money, and still more money. There are ideas and ideals and … no: just money, money.

    I continue to be amazed at my inability to see things the way the American electorate seems to. Maybe it’s because I don’t watch as much television as they do. Whatever it is, I don’t feel “connected”, nor do I feel that as a loss in any way. I wish I could get the names and phone numbers of the 38% who still support Bush to sell to a telemartker; those people are so gullible they’d buy anything.

    Almost everyone I knew from my parents’ generation could write a decent paragraph and often checked books out of our little public library. Very few of those I know from my own (baby boom and later) can write anything coheret (this CB group is truly exceptional) and virtually none of them ever reads a book. My grammar school teachers knew more about independent, courageous thought than many of today’s university “professors” do (certainly more than any politician does).

    I’m not bitter, just not interested (beyond thinking groups like this one, which satisfy my old intrigue with politics in general).

  • Comments are closed.