The Dark Cloud of the Dominionists

Guest Post by Thomas McKelvey Cleaver

Yesterday, one of those intelligent souls who commented on my post about “dark clouds” said that the darkest cloud was that created by fundamentalism. I have to say I could not agree more. As a friend of mine once pointed out, the words Christian, Jew, Moslem and Hindu are all nouns. When you put the word “Fundamentalist” in front of them, they become pronouns – descriptive only of the variety of fundamentalism, which is in its world view very similar regardless of the religion it claims. When I look at Fundamentalism around the world, whatever its source, I see hubris: people declaring definitively that they “know” The Word of God, and they’re willing to strike you down if you disagree.

I wrote on this topic several months ago in the midst of the Schiavo Circus for That’s Another Fine Mess, back when we were happy to have 200 readers on a good day. What I said then is still highly relevant:

The Theocratic Right loves to claim that there is nothing in the Constitution about any “separation of church and state.” I think it’s relevant to quote the architect of the separation of church and state, President Thomas Jefferson, in his famous 1802 Letter to the Danbury Baptists:

“I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between Church and State.”

Lately, Tony Perkins – director of The Family Research Council and a “leading light” of the far Theocratic Right – has advocated the death penalty for women who are “unchaste before marriage,” as well as for doctors who perform abortions and the women who undergo one.

This isn’t really surprising. Perkins’ boss is James Dobson of Focus on the Family – the largest and most important Theocratic Right organization in the country – recently stated that “Five black-robed justices on the Supreme Court can tell us how it’s gonna be. They’re not gods. They don’t do everything right. For 43 years, the court has been on a campaign to limit religious liberty.”

What Dobson is so specific about is the 1962 Supreme Court decision Engel v. Vitale, in which local New York families – some Christian, some Jewish – had objected to a prayer written by a New York education board and recited daily in public schools, claiming that mandatory state-sponsored prayer conflicted with their rights as parents to teach their children religion as they saw fit. In its decision finding the state-drafted prayer unconstitutional, the court stated:

“It is no part of the business of government to compose official prayers for any group of the American people to recite as a part of a religious program carried on by the government.”

Dobson, Perkins, and the rest of the Theocratic Right want government to write prayers your children will recite in school and you will recite at public gatherings. This is the biggest of all possible governments: the state as religious instructor. To them, to do otherwise is “to limit religious liberty.”

These people are Dominionists, a branch of fundamentalist Christianity you likely haven’t heard of that has grown and spread across American fundamentalism for the past 45 years, to the point it has taken control of the Southern Baptist Conference in the person of Richard S. Land. They are biblical literalists who believe God has called them to take over the U.S. government.

Dominionism was founded in 1959 by D. James Kennedy, a former Arthur Murray dance instructor, who built Coral Ridge Ministries in Florida into a $37-million-a-year empire, with a TV-and-radio audience of 3 million, by preaching it was time to save America – not by saving souls but by winning elections. A founder of the Moral Majority in 1979, Kennedy is so influential that George W. Bush sought his blessing before running for president, and he continues – with other top Dominionists – to be consulted by Bush on matters of federal policy.

In case you have any doubts what Kennedy and the Dominionists are about, here is what he says about saving America:

“Our job is to reclaim America for Christ, whatever the cost. As the vice regents of God, we are to exercise godly dominion and influence over our neighborhoods, our schools, our government, our literature and arts, our sports arenas, our entertainment media, our news media, our scientific endeavors – in short, over every aspect and institution of human society.”

They want schoolbooks to reflect a “Christian” version of American history. They want to make it a felony punishable by death for gay men or women to have sex and for women to have abortions.

Dominionists were in the lead during the Schiavo Circus last spring. When the courts ordered Terri Schiavo’s feeding tube removed, it was Dominionists who organized the 24-hour protests and called on Governor Jeb Bush to defy the law and take Schiavo into state custody.

Unlike the End-Timers of American fundamentalism who believe the Second Coming is just around the corner, the Dominionists believe they must establish a “bible-believing” government in America that will endure for a thousand years until Christ returns. Does anyone remember who was the last one to declare a “thousand year” government?

Reverend Mel White – ghostwriter of Jerry Falwell’s autobiography before he broke with the evangelical movement and announced his sexual orientation was gay – says of the movement:

“Most people hear them talk about a ‘Christian nation’ and think, ‘Well, that sounds like a good, moral thing.’ What they don’t know – what even most conservative Christians who voted for Bush don’t know – is that ‘Christian nation’ means something else entirely to these Dominionist leaders. This movement is no more about following the example of Christ than Bush’s Clean Water Act is about clean water.”

Alan Sears, president and CEO of the Alliance Defense Fund, a team of 750 attorneys trained by the Dominionists to fight abortion and gay marriage, says “The First Amendment does not say there should be a separation of church and state.” Sears believes that the constitutional guarantee against state-sponsored religion is actually designed to “shield” the church from federal interference, allowing Christians to take their rightful place at the head of the government.

David Limbaugh, brother of Rush and author of “Persecution: How Liberals Are Waging War Against Christianity,” claims “We have a right, indeed an obligation, to govern.”

Rick Scarborough, author of “Mixing Church and State,” says that “Activist judges have systematically deconstructed the Constitution. A God-free society is their goal!”

The Dominionists’ idea of the kind of “non-activist” judge they want to see appointed to the Supreme Court is Roy Moore, the former Alabama Chief Justice who installed a 5,300-pound granite memorial to the Ten Commandments – complete with an open Bible carved in its top – in the state judicial building, and once penned an opinion calling for the state to execute “practicing homosexuals.”

Before every meeting, the Dominionists recite an oath they dream of hearing in every classroom:

“I pledge allegiance to the Christian flag, and to the Savior for whose kingdom it stands. One Savior, crucified, risen and coming again, with life and liberty for all who believe.”

While Dominionists rely on grass-roots activists to fight political battles, they are backed by some of America’s richest entrepreneurs: Amway founder Rich DeVos has donated more than $5 million to Kennedy. Jean Case, wife of AOL founder Steve Case (whose fortune was made largely on sex-chat rooms) donated $8 million. Tom Monaghan, founder of Domino’s Pizza, is a major financial supporter of Dobson’s Focus on the Family. (A good reason not to buy his crappy pizzas, if you didn’t have one already.)

Unsurprisingly – back when he was House Majority Whip – Tom DeLay was a winner of Kennedy’s Distinguished Christian Statesman Award. Is it any surprise Dominionists are the major backers of DeLay in the current fight over his corrupt practices as House Majority Leader?

Sinclair Lewis once wrote in “It Can’t Happen Here,” a novel about the coming of a fascist government to America in 1935, that “When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross.”

We worry about the danger of a nuclear-armed fundamentalist government in Iran. Thinking about a nuclear-armed fundamentalist United States is truly a scary dark cloud.

Just to remind ourselves that there are Republicans who do not buy this totalitarian fascism masquerading as religion, former Senator and UN Ambassador John C. Danforth, an Episcopal minister who the president recently described as “a man of strong convictions, unquestioned integrity, and great decency… a man of calm and judicious temperament…” wrote this past March in the New York Times:

For moderate Christians, the only absolute standard of behavior is the commandment to love our neighbors as ourselves. Repeatedly in the Gospels, we find that the Love Commandment takes precedence when it conflicts with laws. We struggle to follow that commandment as we face the realities of everyday living, and we do not agree that our responsibility to live as Christians can be codified by legislators.

For us, living the Love Commandment may be at odds with efforts to encapsulate Christianity in a political agenda. We strongly support the separation of church and state, both because that principle is essential to holding together a diverse country, and because the policies of the state always fall short of the demands of faith. Aware that even our most passionate ventures into politics are efforts to carry the treasure of religion in the earthen vessel of government, we proceed in a spirit of humility lacking in our conservative colleagues.

Danforth concluded:

The problem is not with people or churches that are politically active. It is with a party that has gone so far in adopting a sectarian agenda that it has become the political extension of a religious movement.

As an addendum to what was written this past Spring, a recent article in the Los Angeles Times reports that, through his Leadership Training Institute in Washington, Dominionist-founder Kennedy is working to establish a future generation of political leaders who will “follow God’s Law, not the will of the people.”

“Thinking about a nuclear-armed fundamentalist United States is truly a scary dark cloud.”

Dude, we already got a nuclear-armed fundamentalist United States.

This issue is just like the war in Iraq. The morons who “don’t see any problem” with school prayer will NOT see any problem until it hits them PERSONALLY. I’m beginning to think the problem is the “me generation”. Someone forgot to teach these people “the golden rule” (or its Buddhist predecessor) or maybe they taught them, but forgot to make sure they understood it.

As an atheist, I am often struck by how little of “Christ” I see in the hordes of “Christians” who infest America. My Muslim friends put them to shame. (Note that I’m not saying Islam doesn’t have some serious issues)

  • Light and whimsical you are today.

    Monaghan does not own Domino’s anymore (not that I now advocate partaking in their overpriced slop). He sold all of his ownership in Domino’s and has given away much of it (to his children’s dismay) to charities and used another large portion to open a Catholic law school called Ave Maria around Ann Arbor. It seems that this group is branching into many different directions to “reclaim America for Christ” or at least train those that will.

  • Can you link to a statement made by Tony Perkins expressing support for the death penalty for “unchaste” women? I don’t doubt these guys would go there if they could, but still, this is pretty dramatic stuff.

  • I couldn’t agree more on the threat christian fundamenatalists post to this country. Here’s more of what Jefferson had to say:

    … our fellow citizens, after half a century of experience and prosperity, continue to approve the choice we made. May it be to the world, what I believe it will be, (to some parts sooner, to others later, but finally to all,) the signal of arousing men to burst the chains under which monkish ignorance and superstition had persuaded them to bind themselves, and to assume the blessings and security of self-government. That form which we have substituted, restores the free right to the unbounded exercise of reason and freedom of opinion. All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately, by the grace of God. These are grounds of hope for others. For ourselves, let the annual return of this day [Fourth of July] forever refresh our recollections of these rights, and an undiminished devotion to them…. (Thomas Jefferson, letter to Roger C. Weightman, June 24, 1826 [Jefferson’s last letter, dated ten days before he died]; from Adrienne Koch, ed., The American Enlightenment: The Shaping of the American Experiment and a Free Society, New York: George Braziller, 1965, p. 372.)

    Jefferson certainly understood the threat. To learn more about separation of church and state, check out infidels.org, particularly http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/ed_buckner/quotations.html

  • Pronoun: A part of speech which stands for a noun: ‘he’, ‘she’, ‘him’, ‘her’, ‘them’. Possessive pronouns express ownership (‘his’, ‘hers’). Reflexive pronouns are ‘herself’, ‘himself’, ‘myself’ and are used either for emphasis (he did it all himself’), or when an action reflects back on the agent who performs it (‘he shot himself in the foot’). Relative pronouns include ‘who’, ‘which’, ‘that’ and are usually used in the form ‘he rebuked the reader who had sung in the library’. Interrogative pronouns ask questions (‘Who stole the pie?’; ‘Which pie?’). Indefinite pronouns do not specify a particular person or thing: ‘Anyone who studies grammar must be mad.’ ‘Somebody has to know about this stuff.’

  • Very interesting, creepy stuff, but could you provide links or at least citations for the various claims you make about Dominionist doctrines, particularly the quotes?

  • Thanks. What about the judicial opinion in which Roy Moore called for the execution of homosexuals? Anyone have a citation to that?

  • These people are so scary! It seem’s the US is headed back to the dark ages.
    I am not a religous person but neither are any of these people who claim they are speaking for GOD

  • Shortly after 9/11, I visited the Ayotollah of Iran’s website where there was a video of the Ayotollah giving his comments on 9/11. What I remember is that the Ayotollah agreed with Pat Roberston, the “former presidential candidate”, about why the attacks happened. I’m still curious enough about the rest of the Ayotollah’s comments that yesterday, I asked Google Answers to track down the video or a transcript.

    At the time, I found it hilarious that the Ayotollah and Pat Robertson were on the same wave length. Now I’m not so sure.

  • Here is a link to the case decision and Roy Moore’s comments. When you go there, simply search for the word “sword” and it will lead you to the two sentences in question,
    “The State carries the power of the sword, that is, the power to prohibit conduct with physical penalties, such as confinement and even execution. It must use that power to prevent the subversion of children toward this lifestyle, to not encourage a criminal lifestyle.” :

    http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=al&vol=1002045&invol=2

  • Gridlock,

    Wow! I didn’t realize what a truly raving lunatic Roy Moore is until reading that opinion. I shudder to think that his name was seriously mentioned, even by right-wing fringe groups, as a possible Supreme Court nominee.

  • Theocracy Watch is a good site. I viewed this video months ago, and it was both disturbing in its content, and informative as to the scope of this belief amongst our current bunch of congressional leaders.

  • As a liberal who believes that “the best response to offensive free speech is more free speech,” I always wonder why our progressive leaders don’t try to expose the whole Dominionist agenda for what it is: an anti-democratic power grab that would subjugate all our Enlightenment principles to one limited vision of “Higher Truth.”

    What frightens me, though, is that particularly in unstable times, a majority of the American people might actually choose theocracy over true self-determination. I don’t really believe this at the moment, but in the face of an economic collapse I see as nearly inevitable and the steady rise of an “us-against-the-world” sensibility, I could see it becoming the case.

  • Carrie, I just watched the video. That is one of the scariest things I have ever seen.
    These people must be stopped somehow.

  • Separation of church and state also is in the Bible. “Render unto Caeser those things that are Caeser’s and unto the Lord those things that are the Lord’s.”

  • jeffstoned,

    You mention two things:

    1. This is a power grab.
    2. The odds of people falling for this crap go up as the Nation’s favors go down (i.e., economic prosperity, etc.).

    I think the fact that the current president is spending faster than ever, embroiling us in an unwinnable war, and speaking in terms of “good” and “evil” is not a coincidence. The Dominionists understand the connection between their success and the declining fortunes of this Nation, and are actively working, it would seem, to ensure a favorable climate for their assertions.

  • Not to be contrary, but I think we’ve forgotten
    the darkest cloud of all. Condi told us
    about it, remember? That “mushroom
    cloud” that they saved us from by
    fighting the terrorists over there.

  • Comments are closed.