Why The Movies Have Gone Bad

Guest Post by Thomas McKelvey Cleaver

Okay, okay, I admit right up front that any list of ten “dark clouds” we face as a nation should very likely not include the question of whether or not we can survive an onslaught of bad entertainment. However, I have been reading a lot of posts of late in the blogosphere on this subject, all written by people whose closest association with the problem is as a consumer.

Since I am the only liberal blogger I know who is also one of those who has actually been part of the creation of the product being complained about, and have been around it long enough to have some perspective on the situation – having written 15 movies that got made including one unexpected hit that proves well-known screenwriter William Goldman was right when he said the three rules of Hollywood are “Nobody. Knows. Anything.” as well as having worked in the production of a few cable TV series – I think I have more of an informed opinion about this problem than does my friend Garance Franke-Ruta over at Tapped despite her piece being as erudite and insightful as all her writing is.

As a 25-year resident of Hollyweird, aka Okefenokee West, allow me to present some thoughts about why the movies now suck:

To me, the primary reason the movies have declined is that the studios are no longer independent entities. Their mission is no longer to create movies, but rather to produce “product” as part of the overall bottom line for the mega corporations of which they are now less-and-less-significant parts. The mega-corporatization of Hollywood has resulted in a lot of things changing over the past decade. As is usual with any Hollywood production that fails, the answer to the question why this happened is “the script sucked.”

Up until the Great Writer’s Strike of 1988, Hollywood ran a “farm system” in which writers were able to work regularly. One could pitch an idea and get hired to write a “development draft” of it, working in what many called “development hell” until it was decided that a “new voice” was needed and another writer would be called in to rewrite the first one. Creatively, it was something of a demeaning system, but it was entirely possible for a member of the Writer’s Guild to be able to buy a house “south of the boulevard” in Sherman Oaks and send their children to a private school, having worked in the business ten or fifteen years, all without ever having seen a script they’d written or rewritten turned into a movie.

That was life in “The Show,” the Majors, where one had finally managed to scale the castle walls in the midst of the blinding storm without being washed away and been annointed into the Guild where they could practice their craft.

For those in the Minors, otherwise known as the low-budget world, it was possible for a writer to also survive while they learned their craft. They might not live “south of the boulevard,” but it was certainly possible to afford a one-bedroom apartment in a neighborhood that didn’t require one to wear body armor when going out to get the car.

The king of all that was Roger Corman. One didn’t make a lot of money working for Roger, but if you did that assignment right, there would be another, and it was possible to live on all that. Those who worked in the company weren’t well-paid either, but they too got “enough.” It used to be a standing joke to drive into the parking lot beneath the building and look at the collection of junkers there. But people were learning their business, and anyone with the talent and drive to get through the door had a chance. One gained experience, got their work seen, and was able to “move on up” to The Show. The list of A-List Greats in Hollywood who are graduates of “The Roger Corman Film School” is long and quite prestigious.

Then the Writer’s Guild “won” the Great Strike of 1988, after staying out for six months. Within a year, that system no longer existed. People far, far away from the business began to hear of writers getting paid a million dollars for a “spec” script, and the Great Spec Script Boom began. Soon no one in Hollywood was hiring a writer to work on a project, not when they could wait for the writer to finish it on his own (screenwriters are still mostly “he” than “she”). Today, just about no one who was a member of the WGA in 1988 is still active. A very telling bit of information about how things are now is the fact that in 1989, 80 percent of WGA members qualified for health insurance at any given time, meaning they had been paid the equivalent of “scale minimum” for a 30-minute sitcom script in a 12-month period. Today, that percentage is just about reversed, and the marvelous Guild health plan is a shadow of its former self in terms of services provided.

Allow me to tell you something about screenwriting. It’s like playing the piano – the more you practice, the better you get. Being able to pay the bills with writing allows a writer to take the time to actually get good at it. As the amount of pay got less, the number of writers who could afford to play the game got smaller. If one didn’t have some other source of income, it was unlikely they would stick around long enough to get established. About that time – the early 1990s – the Ivy League discovered Hollywood. (As my friend David Freeman once put it, “Hollywood is the last respectable outlaw profession for upper-class white boys.”)

The result of this discovery is that almost all the young people coming into the business in the past 10-12 years as would-be writers, directors, studio executives, etc., are those from the upper-middle and upper classes who have access to either a trust fund or parental financial support, thus allowing them to “intern” in their chosen field (i.e., work for free). Those whose economic situation requires them to earn a paycheck are thus priced out of the marketplace. I remember seeing the result of this very clearly 10 years ago when I had reason to go over to Corman’s company to take care of some business for my then-employer. I drove into the parking lot, and there were no junkers to be seen. The cars were all mini-Mercedes and Beamers and such.

The money that used to be paid to writers didn’t disappear. 20 years ago a mid-level studio executive could nail down about $50,000 a year for their job. Today, kids a few years out of college expect a 6-figure income. Before, executives all knew that somewhere along the line they would go “indie-prod” and become a Producer. Today, “going indie-prod” is seen as a failure for the upwardly-mobile young corporatists of Hollywood. Actually making movies on their own is no longer seen as an opportunity.

Today, I have yet to meet a young writer who comes from an “educated working class” background, as I did. That means there is a much different worldview in the business, and that has everything to do with what gets made. On the one hand you have corporate-minded executives whose idea of a “good story” is to remember back 25 years when they were in kindergarten, how much they liked “The Dukes of Hazzard”, “Bewitched,” etc., etc. “Hey! Let’s make a movie out of them!! They were gooooood!”

When you couple that with would-be writers who don’t necessarily come from a background where they are going to have had much “life experience” that fits them for telling interesting stories and there is no one to say “that stinks” to the idea of remaking a bad TV show, you get what we’ve now got.

Not only that, but if the writers haven’t made a lot of money for the corporations by the time they are 35 (roughly when they have been in the business for around 10 years), they can expect to be out. It’s a little-known fact, but it takes till one is somewhere in their early 40s for an “observer of life” (as Real Writers are) to have observed enough life for things to start making real sense. Suddenly, it becomes easier to write Characters than Caricatures. Thus, just at the time they finally have the necessary experience to actually become good, they’re gone.

My screenwriting mentor, the late Wendell Mayes, who got started writing movies in 1956 (after 8 years writing live television) when he wrote “The Spirit of St. Louis” for Billy Wilder, finished the last script he ever wrote six weeks before he died in 1995 – nearly a 40-year writing career that saw him write “Anatomy of a Murder” and “Go Tell the Spartans” in addition to many others. No writer in Hollywood today will ever experience such a career.

The thing everyone likes to forget is that the only people in Hollywood who start with nothing and actually create something are the writers. The director and the actors really don’t just make it up as they go along. Everyone else is merely doing a version of “et cetera” to the existing script. While many bad movies have been made from good scripts, the reverse has never happened. Today, the wherewithal to get good, original scripts that aren’t hackneyed re-dos of what’s gone before is just not there, not when the only people not being paid for their work are the ones who create the work for everyone else.

Like I said, the problem is the old one that’s always plagued Hollywood: the script sucks. Just my two cents on the real reasons why you haven’t been going to the movies of late. With that and $3, you can get yourself a cup of coffee at Starbucks.

I have found it truly bizarre that over the past few years the movies have all been remakes of (bad) old tv shows and movies. Dukes of Hazzard, Charlie’s Angels, Starksy & Hutch, Lovebug…the list goes on. It makes a little more sense to me now. I’m hoping we’re seeing the end of that trend, or at the very least they’re running out of material.

  • Stevie Ray Vaughn died at Alpine Valley, not Stone Mountain.

    PLOT DESCRIPTION
    Raiders of the Sun is a Filipino variation of Mad Max. In a post-apocalyptic world, warrior Richard Norton does what he can to survive. Since society was laid low by a biological mishap, provisions are at a premium, and the villains will do anything to grab up all they can for profit. Norton is a bit more altrustic: he wants to restore world order, even if he has to rearrange a few faces to do so. The all-purpose leading lady in Raiders of the Sun is Brigitta Steinberg, dressed in as close to nothing as possible

    Running Time: 80 minutes

  • Even re-makes of films that were considered to be quite good in their original release (The Longest Yard, Bad News Bears, Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory) are being re-made. Anything to make a buck and just sell recycled content. It seems like the lazy way to make a buck. But it sounds like that’s what Hollywood has become.

    It really doesn’t seem to be about creating interesting characters and plotlines anymore. It’s about creating a brand franchise that sells tickets, DVDs, music CDs, merchandise, sequels, you name it. It’s more about the drawing power of the actors’ names than about the content of the film.

    It’s sad, really.

  • I have heard Ted Turner complain that the same phenomenon of mega-corporations taking over all Media would prevent anyone like himself from building another CNN. I expect that some variation of that story would apply to a number of once great industries, laid low by the building of mega-corporations.

    A lot of people, who decry GWB, fail to recognize the extent to which our Harvard B School President is a creature of a huge social movement, which has created a feckless elite. Corporate executives, paid vastly more than they were in the 1960’s, drawn from a closed class, ignorant, lazy and irresponsible, run all of America. They run all business; fund our politics, and control the political discourse. The Daily Howler is one long cry in the wilderness against a millionaire Press Corps, which has driven Democrats from power.

    Only a revolution will save this country, and the revolution will only come out of a catastrophic collapse. The storm clouds may be gathering; but it is going to have to be one hell of a storm to wash this mess away.

  • I have found a whole new bunch of thoroughly engrossing movies since I started taking Italian. The class (actually a relaxed summer version of it) has been watching wonderful Italian movies, in Italian (plus subtitles), and discussing them (mostly in Italian).

    Some of those I’ve really enjoyed: Cinema Paradiso, Caro Diario, La Stanza del Figlio, La Vita è Bella, Johnny Stecchino, Mediterraneo, Pane e tulipani, L’Albero degli zoccoli.

    I rarely go out to movies anymore, and I can’t stand commercial breaks on TV (never watch anything live except baseball games). Netflix has been a wonderful discovery, especially for milking all the terrific classics of Hollywood (and others)

  • I work in the games industry and it has become just like the movie industry: totally risk averse. Shareholders demand huge profits which means we have to make video games which are even more visually appealing than anything currently out there which means more time has to be spent by more people which means the project is going to cost a whole lot more money.
    And we then have to make that money back plus more. Company execs are scared shitless to take a risk on something unproven or something which doesn’t already have a huge following.
    That, I think, is also the main problem with Hollywood – I’m sure there are plenty of talented script writers out there but if they can’t bust out a script for “Spiderman vs Jaws IV”, they’re not going to get anywhere…

  • Just to follow on to Pratik’s comment, my hubby teaches computer graphics (including game design) and he agrees that the whole field is like that – they’re not only not going to take a risk on some,thing “unproven” – they also aren’t willing to take a risk on someone unproven. He tells his students that their first job will come from someone they know, and likely from a company they’ve done freelance work for (again, through somebody they know) in the past. Companies aren’t interested in developing a “farm team” – they want you to grow on your own, and they’ll “pluck” you when you’re ripe. And they don’t hire you in on an entry level position because they HAVE no entry level positions. They outsource to somebody who already HAS the skills and training to do the job. That outsourcing contact is the person who might – MIGHT, mind you – throw you a freelance job to handle some of their “overflow.” Then when it comes time to hire somebody full time as their business expands (hopefully), they’re going to go to the people who did GOOD freelance work for them in the past, and offer the job to them. They don’t post jobs, and your only “interview” is doing well on a project they gave you a year ago (if not more).

    OTOH, his college provides students with many, many opportunities to network with professionals – free of charge – chances for students to meet – and sometimes even show their portfolios to – the people who might give them that “first job,” and most of the students don’t bother to take advantage of them. “What, you mean you want me to give up my Saturday (or an evening) to talk to these people who don’t even have a job available *right now*? No way, dude.”

    Too much short term thinking going on all around. IMHO, of course.

  • Pratik hit the nail on the head. There is so much money involved in entertainment anymore, that risk is unacceptable. Even when they are not out an out remakes (or the pompous ‘re-imaginings) it’s the same tired formula. Without risk, there is nothing new. Without anything new, there’s not much that’s interesting, or for that matter, entertaining.

  • Can we just summarize it as the complete dumbing
    down of America? Car chases, sex and violence,
    no dialogue and non stop action. And ear splitting
    sound effects. Might as well turn on the tube instead
    and watch a nice info-mercial. Or some right wing
    ranting on cable.

    And let’s not forget how bad popular novels are
    getting to be.

    What a shame. Talented writers who can’t sell
    their work, but instead must prostitute themselves
    delivering drivel to the masses.

  • the movies aren’t dumbed down for americans. they are reduced to non-verbal slapstick and chase scenes for the world-wide audience which wouldn’t understand anything with a cultural or linguistic context. it’s helpful to think of most movies as being made for poor farmers in thailand, which explains why they are mindless-cgi fests. i can’t imagine the thai are all that happy with it either.

  • Thanks, Mr. Cleaver for your explanation. I’ve been waiting several years now for this deplorable trend of making movies for 13 year old boys to end, and now I see that it probably won’t.

    The sad thing is that one can find better shows on television than on the big screen. Shows that offer well-developed and rich characters, placed into layered and nuanced stories, and surrounded by production values that rival anything seen on the big screen (i.e. Deadwood or Farscape). To be sure, the curse of the reality shows continue, but tucked away in the nooks and crannies of basic and premium cable, one can find a few gems. While such shows aren’t all that frequent, they at least appear more often than a good movie appears at my local cinema.

    I suppose that in the end, even the few interesting and riveting pieces of entertainment on the small screen will be crushed out of existence. Really, these large media conglomerates are a curse. They’ve destroyed radio, music, and are bent on destroying movies. Where will it end?

  • What a shame. Talented writers who can’t sell
    their work, but instead must prostitute themselves
    delivering drivel to the masses.

    hark, I hear you. Not to put myself presumptuously into the category of “talented writers,” but I wrote a novel which got raves from lots of folks and some very decent endorsements. It’s a political novel which deals with real issues of our day but with a look at how our most intractable problems could be addressed if only our leadership was different.
    I found a publisher and was literally a week away from printing the galleys when the publisher had a change of heart. They suggested somewhat paternalistically that if I wanted to write about “so much real stuff” that I should write nonfiction, and told me that if I wanted them to publish the book I should take out the “real stuff” and add some sex, and then they’d publish it. I kid you not. Turn a political vision into a harlequin romance, essentially. Needless to say I bade them goodbye. But it was a rude awakening, I can assure you.

  • Comments are closed.