‘Brownie’ has an interesting background

On Friday, the president thanked FEMA director Michael Brown — whom he affectionately calls “Brownie” — and told the world that Brown is “doing a heck of a job.” The president, of course, seems to be the only one who thinks so.

So, who is the man responsible for running FEMA during the worst natural disaster in American history? Knight Ridder had a very helpful profile over the weekend. Alas, it was not encouraging.

From failed Republican congressional candidate to ousted “czar” of an Arabian horse association, there was little in Michael D. Brown’s background to prepare him for the fury of Hurricane Katrina.

But as the head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Brown now faces furious criticism of the federal response to the disaster that wiped out New Orleans and much of the Gulf Coast. He provoked some of it himself when he conceded that FEMA didn’t know that thousands of refugees were trapped at New Orleans’ convention center without food or water until officials heard it on the news.

“He’s done a hell of a job, because I’m not aware of any Arabian horses being killed in this storm,” said Kate Hale, former Miami-Dade emergency management chief. “The world that this man operated in and the focus of this work does not in any way translate to this. He does not have the experience.”

Brown, whom Maureen Down described over the weekend as “the blithering idiot in charge of FEMA,” has a resume that includes absolutely no training or background in managing much of anything, worst of all an emergency. The highlight of his professional career was serving as the judges and stewards commissioner of the International Arabian Horse Association, which required him to make sure horse-show judges followed horse-show rules.

So, how’d he get the FEMA gig?

Brown’s ticket to FEMA was Joe Allbaugh, President Bush’s 2000 campaign manager and an old friend of Brown’s in Oklahoma. When Bush ran for president in 2000, Brown was ending a rocky tenure at the horse association.

Brown told several association officials that if Bush were elected, he’d be in line for a good job. When Allbaugh, who managed Bush’s campaign, took over FEMA in 2001, he took Brown with him as general counsel.

Allbaugh eventually moved on, prompting Bush to promote Brown. Now, the Gulf Coast is paying the price for the decision.

I’d be remiss if I didn’t include this gem from Josh Marshall, who noted the parallel between Brown’s career and that of his boss.

So let me see if I understand this. Brown’s a Republican from the southwest. He ran unsuccessfully for Congress when he was thirty-three. Then he bounced from job to job, finally getting into the sports business in mid-life, before getting canned. And then he used connections to land himself a high-powered position in the federal government for which he had no apparent experience at all.

We should probably start preparing ourselves for “Brownie’s” presidential campaign in 2008.

CB wrote: “We should probably start preparing ourselves for “Brownie’s” presidential campaign in 2008.”

Maybe. I think the real criterion is whether he can’t say ‘no’ to his friends (which tends to manifest in those who are incapable of appreciating the consequences of one’s actions). That’s why Bush is the ideal president for the GOP. As to whether Brown is that way, I can’t guess from everything I’ve read. To be sure, at the very least he’s a garden-variety failure boosted to a position through cronyism. One of many in this administration. Even one of the profs where I got my Ph.D. at played soccer with Bush & was made ambassador to a Carribean country.

  • How’d he get the FEMA gig? Probably the way Spencer Abraham got Energy – by advocated its elimination.

    This is what happens when we have people in government who dont believe in government — anarchy.

    As far as I am concerned the conservative movement, which has morphed into a vicious and heartless cannibalism, now lies belly-up and invites a stake into its chest.

    When libertarianism is the dominant philosophy of government, all that remains is cronyism.

    Into its chest with the stake, right now, before it’s really too late.

  • Don’t Give Your Hurricane Donations to the Red Cross! Establishment charities have history of withholding disaster funds As the aftermath of hurricane Katrina continues to wreak mayhem and havoc amid reports of mass looting, shooting at rescue helicopters, rapes and murders, establishment media organs are promoting the Red Cross as a worthy organization to give donations to. The biggest website in the world, Yahoo.com, displays a Red Cross donation link prominently on its front page. Every time there is a major catastrophe the Red Cross and similar organizations like United Way are given all the media attention while other charities are left in the shadows. This is not to say that the vast majority of Red Cross workers are not decent people who simply want to help those in need. But what the media fails consistently to remember in their promotion of the organization is that the Red Cross has been caught time and time again withholding money in the wake of horrible disasters that require immediate release of funds. The Red Cross, under the Liberty Fund, collected $564 million in donations after 9/11. Months after the event, the Red Cross had distributed only $154 million. The Red Cross’ explanation for keeping the majority of the money was that it would be used to help ‘fight the war on terror’. To the victims, this meant that the money was going towards bombing broken backed third world countries like Afghanistan and setting up surveillance cameras and expanding the police state in US cities, and not towards helping them rebuild their lives. Then Red Cross President Dr. Bernadine Healy arrogantly responded when questioned about the withholding of funds by stating, “The Liberty Fund is a war fund. It has evolved into a war fund.” Despite the family members of victims of 9/11 complaining bitterly to a House Energy and Commerce Committee’s oversight panel, the issue seemed to be brushed under the carpet and the mud didn’t stick. The Red Cross’ scandalous activities reach back far before 9/11. After the devastating San Francisco earthquake in 1989, the Red Cross passed on only $10 million of the $50 million that had been raised, and banked the rest. Similar donations after the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995 and the Red River flooding in 1997 were also greedily withheld. Smaller charities that were involved with the 2004 Tsunami relief project went public to say that large charities like Red Cross and United Way were engaged in secret backroom negotiations with each other that meant a large portion of the donation money was purposefully restricted from reaching the most needy areas affected by the disaster. The history is clear, the Red Cross and other large so-called charities are in actual fact front group collection agencies for the military industrial complex. Do not give any money to the Red Cross unless you support the expansion of empire abroad and police state at home.
    Find a smaller trustworthy organization in the local area of New Orleans and make your donation to them.
    One large nightclub in Pioneer Square in Seattle, the Last Supper Club, has agreed to donate 100% of door proceeds and 20% of bar tab to Second Harvest an organization with an excellent reputation for directing funds to the victims rather than to the bank accounts of overpaid directors of ARC and other questionable ‘charity’ groups. Mercy Corps is also a reputable organization to send donations to.
    BTW, FEMA is directing Katrina donations to none other than the Rev. Pat Robertson. FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, is the lead federal agency in the rescue & recovery operation at work in New Orleans and the Mississippi gulf coast. FEMA has released to the media and on its website a list of suggested charities to help the storm’s hundreds of thousands of victims. The Red Cross is first on the list. The Rev. Pat Robertson’s “Operation Blessing” is next on the list.

  • I agree with the post above advising against donating to the Red Cross, for all the reasons mentioned, as well as several more:

    My Dad and his friends were in WWII. When the Salvation Army came around, they gave the soldiers food, personal care items and other things they needed. But when the Red Cross came around… they would not give the soldiers anything! They SOLD things to the soldiers. My Dad recalls that apples were 25 cents each, which was a heck of a lot of money for an apple 60 years ago.

    Also, the Red Cross did not make accomodations for evacuee’s pets. I am not here to argue that animals lives are more important than people’s lives, that is not the point. The point is that companion animals are all the “family” that some people have, and TO THEM, being forced to abandon a pet is no dfferent than being forced to abandon a child. Furthermore, it has been well documented and widely accepted by the scientific and medical communities that owning a pet adds year to a person’s life. Therefore, a pet may be as essential to a person’s survival as any medication, and the Red Cross certainly would not deny a person’s medication.

    It is not just the fact that the Red Cross makes no accomodations for pets, but that they also do not coordinate their efforts with animal welfare groups, who would be happy to partner with them and keep evacuee’s pets onsite, nearby, and/or take evacuee’s names to keep with the pets if the pets need to go to a distant shelter, so at least the owner has the peace of mind that the pet is in good hands, and s/he can be reunited with the pet later on.

    If you agree that the Red Cross should implement a plan to accommodate the companion animals of the persons they assist, please take a moment to let them know. You may reach them at:

    American Red Cross National Headquarters
    2025 E Street, NW
    Washington, DC 20006
    Phone: (202) 303-4498

  • Comments are closed.