The media crackdown

That’s what I get for giving the administration the benefit of the doubt. When I first heard about a FEMA request that journalists not photograph dead bodies found in Louisiana, I actually understood the basic reasoning. There are a lot of families with missing loved ones and no one wants to learn of a friend or family member’s death by seeing a body on CNN. Besides, I thought, this “preference” lacks teeth — short of confiscating cameras, there’s not much the American government can do to stop American journalists from covering a story on American soil anyway.

I guess I “mis-underestimated” them again.

As Josh, Kevin, and others have noted, the administration has cracked down on the media’s coverage of the Katrina devastation in a big way.

First, it was the ban on photographs. This was followed by the National Guard receiving orders to turn away all media trying to get access to New Orleans; FEMA warning firefighters not to talk to reporters; and NBC’s Brian Williams being shuffled away from his location because he was attempting to take pictures of a National Guard unit taking up positions outside a Brooks Brothers on the edge of the French Quarter.

As Josh put it, it’s now “pretty clear that a key aim of the Bush administration’s takeover of the NOLA situation is to cut off press access to report the story.”

“Take a moment to note what’s happening here: these are the marks of repressive government, which mixes inefficiency with authoritarianism. The crew that couldn’t get key aid on the scene in time last week is coming in force now. And one of the key missions appears to be cutting off public information about what’s happening in the city.”

Given everything that’s happened since the storm struck the Gulf Coast, I’d say this all makes a lot of sense.

As near as I can tell, Bush has two Katrina-related problems: the failure to respond appropriately to the hurricane and the public’s awareness of his failure. By cracking down on a free press, the administration is addressing at least one of its ongoing dilemmas.

Why is this happening now, as opposed to immediately after Katrina hit? Because, early on, the media wasn’t being terribly aggressive — in fact, it seemed ready to give Bush a pass.

CNN’s Wolf Blitzer interviewed former Louisiana Sen. John Breaux and pressed him about the issue of the levee funding. Blitzer wanted to know specifically who was responsible for not getting the job done: “Who resisted? Was it the Clinton administration?” (Emphasis added.) Blitzer never bothered to ask about the Bush administration’s role in neglecting the levees.

Last week, while the federal relief efforts unraveled, MSNBC’s Chris Matthews cheered, “Last night, we showed you the full force of a superpower government going to the rescue.” His report would have been more impressive (not to mention more accurate) if a superpower government had actually gone to the rescue at the time.

And here’s how the Washington Post, in a Sept. 1 editorial that should live in infamy, described the administration’s disaster relief: “So far, the federal government’s immediate response to the destruction of one of the nation’s most historic cities does seem commensurate with the scale of the disaster.”

Three days later David Broder, the dean of the D.C. press corps, also came to Bush’s aid, suggesting that the turmoil in New Orleans represented “an advantageous setting” for the president and that his handling of the situation would open “new opportunities for him to regain his standing with the public.”

The administration didn’t crack down, in other words, until they thought it was necessary. And it became necessary as soon as journalists started reporting from the scene itself and saw, first hand, the disastrous federal response to this nightmare.

In this sense, as Michael Froomkin noted, the assault on the free press follows a certain twisted logic: “If the thing that is most responsible for Bush’s bad week is the bad TV images, and the reporters who saw with their own eyes that he and his underlings were lying — then surely the answer is to remove the reporters from the picture so we can all get back to spinning as usual.”

It figures. The one time the media starts doing its job, Bush stops them.

  • John at Americablog suggests everyone call the White House and demand that the press be allowed back in. I doubt it will change their execrable behavior but I did call. The number is 202-456-1111

  • I wonder what these people would do if Governor Blanco went to New Orleans with a gaggle of reporters and photographers. Would they turn her away at gun point? Now, that would be a great photo-op.

  • Over at TPM, Josh Marshall is asking readers to contribute to a timeline of events related to hurricane Katrina, including documentation of the devastation.

    What we need is for a video recording made by an ordinary citizen with a camcorder that has the same visual impact as the filming of the Rodney King beating and which conveys the depth of the devastation in New Orleans.

  • Actually, I think Bush has a lot more than just two problems related to Katrina. His biggest problem, IMHO, is the massive reduction of funds to the Army Corps of Engineers before the storm hit. By trying to save a few million here and there for his adverture in Iraq, there’s a good chance that the massive flooding wouldn’t have occurred. Can you imagine how well things would have been going if the levees actually held? There wouldn’t be any calls for investigations on the response because the electricity would be back on and the residents of New Orleans would be cleaning up some relatively minor damage. Instead, they’re boating around in a toxic soup that isn’t going anywhere anytime soon and will have to completely demolish a good percentage of the city’s structures.

  • Everything that’s happening fits the Republican Party’s general modus operandi: spread fear (WMD) and loathing (gays) as a distraction from the leaders’ greed and grand theft (tax cuts).

    In this case fear is “eek, the blame game” and “you’ll lose your press privileges”; loathing is “black looters” and “holdouts” and “disease vectors”; greed is CheneyCorp/Halliburton lusting after all that forcefully evacuated delta land, now ripe for eminent domain development, uh, oil drilling.

  • What’s the difference between Dan Froomkin and Michael Froomkim–besides the obvious?

  • Has it occurred to anyone that the government might be keeping the press and independent authorities out so that we don’t learn the number of actual dead? It’s been a week and a half and we still have no hard figures. Now the authorities are claiming the numbers are much lower than expected. Without the press, or independent authorities there, how are weto know?

  • Now is the time for all reporters and camera crews to stand up for the rights of the free press and the rights of a free society. They need to assemble in mass and go into New Orleans together. If one shot is fired, they should retreat and reassemble in Washington DC, at the white house. Chances are that it won’t get that far because the last thing the Bush Administration needs right now, is more bad press. The media in this country has been way too easy on Bush since 9/11. It took much too long for the failures in Iraq to come out. Now, if they get away with this, Bush and the neo-cons will have total control of the press, anytime they feel it is necessary to cover something up.

  • How can there be a media “crackdown” unless the “Media” allows it to happen. What has happened to FREE SPEECH. Why are MEDIA PEOPLE taking this kind of abuse and allowing this to happen? Are they all cowards? I agree with the person who said all media people should gather together to get the stories and the truth out if that’s what has to be done. Why is the media so afraid of the Bush Administration. Stand UP for your and OUR rights!!!

  • MSM is corporate owned. They may growl a little every now & then (when mistreated), but who seriously thinks they’ll actually bite the hand(s) that feed them. Otherwise GW wouldnt’ve gotten away with the Bush v. Gore in the first place.

  • Comments are closed.