The ‘Freedom’ Walk is anything but

It was offensive from the outset when Rumsfeld’s Defense Department created the “America Supports You Freedom Walk” to exploit 9/11. It added insult to injury when those who wished to participate in the government-sponsored “Freedom Walk” on public property were told they had to endure Pentagon “screening.”

On a fundamental level, it doesn’t make sense that in order to participate in a government-sponsored “Freedom Walk” on public streets past public monuments, from one outdoor public landmark to another, you have to give your name address, phone number, and email address to the Pentagon. I mean, what could they do to stop you from just walking on public property along with those who did register?

Apparently, quite a bit.

Organizers of the Pentagon’s 9/11 memorial Freedom Walk on Sunday are taking extraordinary measures to control participation in the march and concert, with the route fenced off and lined with police and the event closed to anyone who does not register online by 4:30 p.m. today.

The march, sponsored by the Department of Defense, will wend its way from the Pentagon to the Mall along a route that has not been specified but will be lined with four-foot-high snow fencing to keep it closed and “sterile,” said Allison Barber, deputy assistant secretary of defense.

The U.S. Park Police will have its entire Washington force of several hundred on duty and along the route, on foot, horseback and motorcycles and monitoring from above by helicopter. Officers are prepared to arrest anyone who joins the march or concert without a credential and refuses to leave, said Park Police Chief Dwight E. Pettiford.

This is a national embarrassment. Those who wish to honor 9/11 on the anniversary of the attacks will walk along public streets, lined with fences, with those outside the fences facing arrest. Oh, and there’s this:

One restricted group will be the media, whose members will not be allowed to walk along the march route. Reporters and cameras are restricted to three enclosed areas along the route but are not permitted to walk alongside participants walking from the Pentagon, across the Memorial Bridge to the Mall.

To borrow a phrase, these are the marks of repressive government, which mixes inefficiency with authoritarianism.

Hopefully, the press will seize on the amount of security at this “parade” and compare it to the lack of same in the devastated Gulf Coast area.

I’m wondering…will the participants be required to wear brown shirts and carry large vertical banners with the GOP elephant emblazened on it?

Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Bush.

  • How in the world is this legal? I could comprehend if it was a private group that had applied for a permit to march and prohibit others to join – example of Boston’s veteran St Pats march excluding, well, ME! But since (last I checked), the defense department is part of fed’l govt, wouldn’t that be inherently public, thus the same legal restrictions could not apply?

    Are there any legal challenges going on with this by the media or better yet, hopefully no media will show and broadcast.

    Too much! Too much going on with this (faux) govt – what to complain about next!

  • I sent this post to the Bushites in my family. One of the more virulent responded, “So much for peacemaking. Doesn’t work when only one side tries.”

    Orwell, anyone?

  • The reporters might find out that the participants were all Republican operatives, which is what it might come down to if nobody else shows up. Wouldn’t that be fun?

  • I’ll say this for the Dept of Def, though. I registered for the walk just to see if I got any interesting email. Nothing, but more importantly no spam either, meaning they didn’t sell my info to WorldNetDaily or some other crackpot operation.

    Then again, I did sign up as Haywood Jablome, so maybe I got culled.

  • Going slightly off topic; Angry young man – I HAVE to remember that name. I didn’t get the play at first (but that’s nothing new anyways!) Excellent. Quite excellent.

  • Comments are closed.