Al Gore, global warming, and Hurricane Katrina

If I might take a moment to add to the Al Gore adulation from July, I’d like to encourage readers to take a look at an excellent speech the former Vice President delivered on Friday, addressing the challenges and moral imperatives posed by Hurricane Katrina and global warming.

Oddly enough, Gore’s speech, delivered in San Francisco, wasn’t supposed to happen because he had a scheduling conflict — he was supposed to be in New Orleans last week, speaking to insurance commissioners about global warming and hurricanes.

“There are scientific warnings now of another onrushing catastrophe. We were warned of an imminent attack by Al Qaeda; we didn’t respond. We were warned the levees would break in New Orleans; we didn’t respond. Now, the scientific community is warning us that the average hurricane will continue to get stronger because of global warming. A scientist at MIT has published a study well before this tragedy showing that since the 1970s, hurricanes in both the Atlantic and the Pacific have increased in duration, and in intensity, by about 50 %. The newscasters told us after Hurricane Katrina went over the southern tip of Florida that there was a particular danger for the Gulf Coast of the hurricanes becoming much stronger because it was passing over unusually warm waters in the gulf. The waters in the gulf have been unusually warm. The oceans generally have been getting warmer. And the pattern is exactly consistent with what scientists have predicted for twenty years. Two thousand scientists, in a hundred countries, engaged in the most elaborate, well organized scientific collaboration in the history of humankind, have produced long-since a consensus that we will face a string of terrible catastrophes unless we act to prepare ourselves and deal with the underlying causes of global warming. [applause] It is important to learn the lessons of what happens when scientific evidence and clear authoritative warnings are ignored in order to induce our leaders not to do it again and not to ignore the scientists again and not to leave us unprotected in the face of those threats that are facing us right now. [applause]

“The president says that he is not sure that global warming is a real threat. He says that he is not ready to do anything meaningful to prepare us for a threat that he’s not certain is real. He tells us that he believes the science of global warming is in dispute. This is the same president who said last week, “Nobody could have predicted that the levees would break.” It’s important to establish accountability in order to make our democracy work. And the uncertainty and lack of resolution, the willful misunderstanding of what the scientific community is saying, the preference for what a few supporters in the coal and oil industry – far from all, but a few – want him to do: ignore the science. That is a serious problem. […]

“Ladies and gentlemen, the warnings about global warming have been extremely clear for a long time. We are facing a global climate crisis. It is deepening. We are entering a period of consequences. Churchill also said this, and he directed it at the people of his country who were looking for any way to avoid having to really confront the threat that he was warning of and asking them to prepare for. He said that he understood why there was a natural desire to deny the reality of the situation and to search for vain hope that it wasn’t really as serious as some claimed it was. He said they should know the truth. And after the appeasement by Neville Chamberlain, he sad, “This is only the beginning of the reckoning. This only the first sip, the first foretaste, of a bitter cup which will be proffered to us year by year – unless by a supreme recovery of moral health and martial vigor, we rise again and take our stand for freedom.”

“It is time now for us to recover our moral health in America and stand again to rise for freedom, demand accountability for poor decisions, missed judgments, lack of planning, lack of preparation, and willful denial of the obvious truth about serious and imminent threats that are facing the American people.”

It’s a great speech. Take a look.

I hate to say it, but couldn’t he have given more speeches like this in 2000?

  • Gary,

    You forget. Back in 2000, Americans didn’t have a corrupt government that didn’t take “accountability for poor decisions, missed judgments, lack of planning, lack of preparation, and willful denial of…truth”, (unless you count Ms. Lewinsky).

    Americans were living high on the hog and didn’t want to be bothered with global warming. W is America’s wake-up call. Too bad it has taken 5 years for the country to start to stir. Let’s hope Lady Liberty doesn’t hit the snooze button.

  • Uh, weren’t there just a bunch of critical posts on this blog about using the hurricane to advance one’s own agenda?

  • Science? You want Americans to grasp SCIENCE?

    Huge percentages of Americans can’t even understand basic facts like who the hell attacked us on 9/11. They will NEVER be able to tell science from horseshit.

    http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=544

    (Data from February of 2005)

    47 percent believe that Saddam Hussein helped plan and support the hijackers who attacked the U.S. on September 11, 2001 (up six percentage points from November).
    44 percent actually believe that several of the hijackers who attacked the U.S. on September 11 were Iraqis (up significantly from 37% in November).
    36 percent believe that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction when the U.S. invaded (down slightly from 38% in November).
    64 percent believe that Saddam Hussein had strong links to Al Qaeda (up slightly from 62% in November).
    61 percent believe that Iraq, under Saddam Hussein, was a serious threat to U.S. security (down slightly from 63% in November).

  • Uh, weren’t there just a bunch of critical posts on this blog about using the hurricane to advance one’s own agenda?

    I think the difference is Katrina is related to global warming and school vouchers aren’t. Gore wants to start a real national dialog on an environmental crisis and Tom DeLay just wants school vouchers because he likes them.

  • Gary,

    In addition to what Gridlock said, the Sage of Tennessee DID make these speeches in 2000. Our CCCP (Compliant Complicit Corporate Press) was too busy gleefully — literally, with glee — hammering Gore as a “liar” when he misspoke about which FEMA rep he accompanied to hurricane zones, all the while letting Bush get away with whoppers that were barely deciperable because of his mangled syntax. Gore fucking did make these speeches, but the CCCP wanted to focus on his “sighs” at the debate rather than on Bush’s incoherence.

    Gore made his political bones in great part because of his early and passionate embrace of emvironmental issues, forseeing the coming crisis long before anyone else in government had it on their radar screens. Now that the crisis is here, fucking Bush wants to study it some more…as if he had any desire let alone a brain to engage in any rigorous intellectual analysis or similar endeavor. To borrow a phrase from Barbara Mandrell, “Gore was enviromental, before being environmental was cool.”

    So Gary, I appreciate that you admire Gore and his command of these issues, but he has been ringing this alarm bell for a LONG time, long before he became the Vice-President in 1992. Gore’s not piling on, or taking political advantage of the Katrina disaster; instead, he is saying that Katrina will be the new standard unless BushCo wakes up and starts seeing reality. We all know how likely that will be…

  • Racerx, if you want to illustrate the stupidity of Americans you can go a bit further than their ridiculous beliefs about 9/11 and Iraq. Like:

    • A Gallup poll shows that 48 percent of Americans believe in creationism, and only 28 percent in evolution (most of the rest aren’t sure or lean toward creationism).

    • According to recent Gallup Tuesday briefings, Americans are more than twice as likely to believe in the devil (68 percent) as in evolution.

    Think about that a minute—the friggin’ devil?!? It’s the goddamn Dark Ages all over again. And we want these morons to understand science? We’ve got college-educated nutjobs who think cavemen rode around on dinosaurs. We’ve got millions of Americans who believe that George Bush was chosen by an omnipotent cloud being to be our leader. Try explaining beta decay to a two year old, I think you’d be more successful than expecting those millions (of voters! Omigod!!!) to understand the first thing about science. Or logic. Or reason. They willingly gave that all up a long time ago in favor of “faith” in unsubstantiated and wholly unsynthesized beliefs which puts them at the mercy of religious hucksters who are now all of a piece with the political hucksters.

    I don’t have a lot of hope, frankly. Or did you deduce that already?

  • Even if Gore had given such speeches in 2000, the press and most Americans would not have paid attention. The press was out to humiliate Gore and most Americans have too short an attention span. They’d rather believe Rove’s lying soundbites.

    Al Gore, true 43rd president of the US and rescuer of 270 people in New Orleans!!! Love the guy!!!

  • #7 “We’ve got college-educated nutjobs who think cavemen rode around on dinosaurs.”

    But, but, but… the Flintstones had Dino the dinosaur as a pet, didn’t they???

    ::sarcasm off::

  • Analytic Liberal #6: of course, thank you for the Gore refresher. Gore is nothing if not a man of principle.

    (Sorry for the multiple posts)

  • I get so made every time I think of the 2000 campaign I get ill. Yes, Gore did make some good speeches and, absolutely, he was way ahead of the curve of envrionmental issues. I liked him for that back in 1988.

    But that campaign! He just didn’t seem to have he “fire in the belly” that he now does, and that it takes to win. He had that lazy campaign crew sitting around changing his clothing colors and mildly whining about press coverage instead of doing something about it. All those damned focus groups and fingers-in-the-wind.

    And the final catastrophe: that weasely little partial recount instead demanding the entire state recount. It was a cave job from the start I’m very sorry to say. I don’t know when (if ever) we’re going to find a bright, imaginative, gutsy candidate with the courage to tell his campaign staff to get out of his way, tell at least somebody in the press that the rest of the press is screwing him over (if they are), and call candidates like Bush out every time there’s a chance. So far, I think Hillary’s the only one with balls enough; the others are off polishing their image or something.

  • Welcome back, A.L. We missed you.

    I also remember Gore making speeches like this, but as most everyone has pointed out, few were listening, especially those in the media. I can remember reading “Earth in the Balance” several years before 2000, and thinking, “Wow, a politician who actually understands this stuff.” It’s a crying shame that the media whores worship the Cult of Personality and would rather spend 10 seconds on some meaningless slip of the tongue than cover in depth the real issues that are going to effect real people.

    I have never been able to understand the mindset of a person who would vote for a candidate because they were “down-to-earth, more like me, not some snotty know-it-all.” For God’s sake, don’t we want our president to be smarter than we are? (I know I do, and I consider myself to be at least smarter than the average bear.) I mean, really, this guy’s job is not going to be to sit around and shoot the shit at a bar-be-que; he’s going to be the leader of the most powerful nation on earth. I WANT a know-it-all. Or at the very least someone with the intellectual curiosity of a half-smart second grader. Bush’s lack of knowledge about the rest of the world is an embarrassment. I’d love to see how many third world countries he could pick out on a map. What’s worse, he’s arrogant and unashamed of his ignorance; perhaps he’s so stupid he thinks he’s smart.

    Sometimes, just to torture myself, I daydream about what life would be like had Gore actually been able to assume the office to which he was elected. I’m not saying it would have changed everything, but I’m sure we wouldn’t be in Iraq, I’m sure we wouldn’t have granted tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans over and over and over again, I’m sure we wouldn’t have passed this travesty of an energy bill, I’m sure we wouldn’t have exploding deficits as far as the eye can see, and because of all that we wouldn’t have been in the position to even have to contemplate gutting important programs like levee repair and flood control for the gulf coast.

    But it doesn’t do any good to indulge in that fantasy; at the end of the day we still have to face the fact that we’re stuck with this lazy, stupid, greedy sonofabitch, his evil minions, and the mess they’ve made. We need to stay focused on the awful truth of BushWorld and figure out how to protect enough of what’s good about this country from being destroyed before we can run this gang out of office.

  • I miss Clinton.

    Makes me so sad.

    I was so relieved when that young saxophone-playing guy was elected and Bush the First booted out of DC. I breathed a sigh of relief and ignored politics for 8 years.

    Even though I wasn’t paying that much attention, I didn’t like Big Dog much when he was pres– he seemed like a wannabe Republican and he and his wife were getting pimp-slapped by Gingrich and the Limbaugh brigade every time I looked up. Gore neither– as bright and environmenally-conscious as he is, I will never forgive him or his Puritan wife for the PMRC or the Tipper Sticker. I held my nose and voted his way in 1992 and 1996 but I certainly wasn’t going to vote for him in 2000 just on principle. How petty that concern seems now.

    But I miss the 90’s so much now it’s heartbreaking. Everything was so good. People were making money. Government actually worked. Our country was sowing peace throughout the world. Technology was actually advancing in a way that was supposed to help people. The overnight super-rich who were cropping up on every block in Silicon Valley, were actually paying their taxes. FEMA did its job.

    Alas, all that’s gone now. It may never come back. It’ll take a tremendous amount of work just to keep our kids from inheriting an utter clusterfuck.

  • U.S. Hurricane Strikes by Decade

    Number of hurricanes by Saffir-Simpson Category to strike the mainland U.S. each decade.
    Decade Saffir-Simpson Category1 All
    1,2,3,4,5 Major
    3,4,5
    1 2 3 4 5
    1851-1860 8 5 5 1 0 19 6
    1861-1870 8 6 1 0 0 15 1
    1871-1880 7 6 7 0 0 20 7
    1881-1890 8 9 4 1 0 22 5
    1891-1900 8 5 5 3 0 21 8
    1901-1910 10 4 4 0 0 18 4
    1911-1920 10 4 4 3 0 21 7
    1921-1930 5 3 3 2 0 13 5
    1931-1940 4 7 6 1 1 19 8
    1941-1950 8 6 9 1 0 24 10
    1951-1960 8 1 5 3 0 17 8
    1961-1970 3 5 4 1 1 14 6
    1971-1980 6 2 4 0 0 12 4
    1981-1990 9 1 4 1 0 15 5
    1991-2000 3 6 4 0 1 14 5
    2001-2004 4 2 2 1 0 9 3

    1851-2004 109 72 71 18 3 273 92
    Average Per Decade 7.1 4.7 4.6 1.2 0.2 17.7 6.0

    1 Only the highest Saffir-Simpson Category to affect the U.S. has been used.

    This is taken from
    THE DEADLIEST, COSTLIEST, AND MOST INTENSE
    UNITED STATES HURRICANES FROM 1900 TO 2000
    (AND OTHER FREQUENTLY REQUESTED HURRICANE FACTS)
    by
    Jerry D. Jarrell(retired), Max Mayfield, and Edward N. Rappaport
    NOAA/NWS/ Tropical Prediction Center
    Miami, Florida

    Christopher W. Landsea
    NOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division
    Miami, Florida

    Tropical Cyclone, Tropical Weather, & TPC Information Topics:
    Storm Information, Hurricane Awareness, Historical Information,
    Tropical Analysis and Forecasting Branch, About Us, Contact Us
    NOAA/ National Weather Service
    National Centers for Environmental Prediction
    National Hurricane Center
    Tropical Prediction Center
    11691 SW 17th Street
    Miami, Florida, 33165-2149 USA
    Disclaimer Privacy Policy
    Comments/Feedback
    Page last modified: Monday, 25-Jul-2005 12:00:09 EDT

  • there is not science or history to support the more and worst lie about hurricanes you idiots- algore is an idiot- you are scientific proof you can’t fix stupid people

  • What’s so sad is that there is no way George Bush could write, much less present, such a ringing speech. But the mainstream media has allowed him to get by with his “workin hard” and “you gotta understand” comments over and over again without question while giving scant attention to leaders like Gore who truly to foresee what problems await this country and has the vision and heart and intelligence to do something about it. Gore was villified for sighing, while Bush is credited with being able to stand up straight. It sometimes make me wonder just how many members of the media have, like Armstrong Williams, been bought. Where there’s smoke there’s fire.

  • Comments are closed.