Congress wants less information — Part III

It seemed like a reasonable request. At least two senior White House officials leaked the name of an undercover CIA agent in order to cover up their lies about a war, leading to an ongoing criminal investigation in which every one in the West Wing, including the president, has spoken to prosecutors.

Congressional Dems see these circumstances and would like the White House to provide some information about the controversy to Congress, which, not incidentally, has oversight responsibilities for the administration. Congressional Republicans? Not so much.

Two congressional committees rejected Democratic-backed resolutions that would have compelled the Bush administration to turn over records relating to the outing of CIA operative Valerie Plame.

Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee and International Relations Committee, who opposed the resolution, said Congress should await the outcome of a federal investigation by special counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald.

Democrats countered that Republicans were trying to protect President Bush and his top political adviser, Karl Rove. “We know that this is a political decision because there is potential embarrassment to the administration,” said Rep. William D. Delahunt (D-Mass.).

The resolutions, rejected in committee votes along party lines, sought to force the departments of Justice and State to turn over all documents related to Plame.

It’s quite a change of heart for congressional Republicans. Not too long ago, when there was a Dem president, it never occurred to them to hold off on hearings and congressional investigations until Ken Starr had completed his work.

I can’t imagine what changed their mind.

The hypocrisy is amazing. Even if Fitzgerald indicts the lot of them, the GOP will say they don’t need hearings because it’s in the courts.

  • That’s what happens when you have both houses of Congress and the Presidency controlled by the same party. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

    The only way to ensure that the politicians in this country don’t run roughshod over the people is to have checks and balances. That usually means a divided Congress and especially means having a President whose party affiliation is in opposition to those who control Congress.

    Bring back GRIDLOCK!!

  • Of course, if the tables were turned and it was a DEMOCRATIC administration involved in the outing of a covert CIA agent, can you imagine the outcry we’d be hearing from the right?! They would make Watergate look like a mere afternoon picnic. They would be calling for indictments and special prosecutors and impeachments and….you name it.

    The hypocrisy boggles the mind.

  • Comments are closed.